31 Mayıs 2015 Pazar

Google Wants To Be Your Everything

Google wants to be everywhere you — and your data — are.

Google

Ninety minutes into today’s Google I/O keynote, at the precise moment my right buttcheek began to notify me that it was about to fall into a most uncomfortable, tingling sleep, a Google executive booted up Spotify on her Android phone and started playing a Skrillex song from the stage. I rolled my eyes. Then, as the interminable pulsing beat wormed its way to the inevitable drop, the executive tapped the phone’s screen and posed a question to the device’s black mirror: What’s his real name? Without hesitation, the phone redirected to a familiar white Google page proudly displaying the answer — Sonny John Moore — along with a picture of the undercut-having, beat-dropping DJ looking angsty. The feature was part of Google’s Now on Tap mobile search, which reads the context of whatever app you have open and delivers answers to queries based on what you’re doing in the moment. The demo was simple, elegant, and enough to make me forget, at least for a moment, about my right buttcheek.

If you’re looking to understand what Google hopes to accomplish with its wildly popular Android operating system in the coming years, Now on Tap is a good place to start. It’s a sleek, impressive, and ambitious demonstration of machine learning that sits always at attention, ready to sift through the pile of data your smartphone is constantly producing in order to make your life easier. Now on Tap is the connective tissue between you and your apps and the internet at large — your very own search butler. And if it works as seamlessly on a street corner as it does from the comfy confines of a keynote stage, it’s also a triumph that suggests Google is poised to surpass Apple when it comes to mobile design.

Late Apple chief Steve Jobs rather famously noted that "design is not just what it looks like and feels like. Design is how it works." By that definition, the company Jobs founded has reason to be more than a little spooked by today’s Android keynote. Taken together, the rather small Android product features that Google announced — gesture-controlled smartwatches, context-based mobile search, facial-recognition-powered photo searching and storage, offline maps with turn-by-turn directions, and lightweight mobile processing for the internet’s "next billion" users in the developing world — come together as a comprehensive suite of technology that appears to be without peer. Whether it’s a $100 smartphone designed as gateway to the internet in a place with historically low smartphone penetration or a $500 high-end gadget squarely targeted toward early adopters, the vast and comprehensive mobile ecosystem revealed in today's keynote is deeply in control of your data and nearly always in your life. It also, for lack of a better word, works.

On Tap in action.

Google

And that’s really all that matters when we’re talking about Android or iOS or any of the digital networks that surround every facet of our lives, both on- and offline. At its most extreme, a good suite of mobile products will not only hold its user hostage but also help them cultivate a healthy case of Stockholm syndrome. To do this it has to work. It has to be able to look at your photos and recognize faces and the places those faces were in when the shutter clicked. It has to be able to remind you that you’re going to Chicago next month and Hey, why don’t you give your lovely Aunt Mildred a ring since you guys haven’t seen each other in a bit and — well, would you look at that! Looks like it’s time for you to get in the car if you’re going to make that appointment in Menlo Park by 2:00 P.M. Today, Google proved Android is a powerful captor.

Of course, there’s a price for all of this. The price is your data — and, by proxy, your privacy. Want to be able to find that picture of your second cousin you took six years ago? Let us look at and analyze the faces in every single one of your photos to figure it out. Want to know Skrillex’s full name? Let us see what's in your headphones right now. Need that reminder to call your college roommate? Let us know where you are now and where you’re going to be next week and yeah, we should probably have your address book handy, too. You haven’t booked the trip yet? Don’t worry, we’ve got your search history right here so we figured you’d be booking the trip soon.

Let us know everything about you. We promise it’ll be worth your while.

Google's mission statement.

Charlie Warzel / BuzzFeed

This information and privacy tradeoff is nothing new, but today’s keynote showed perhaps the fullest realization of the power of buying into an ecosystem whole hog. And in contrast to Apple’s beautifully designed — and, in many cases, prohibitively expensive — hardware, Google touted and demonstrated Android’s ability to provide an immersive digital ecosystem at staggering scale. Google’s feel-good portion of the keynote, which focused on bringing the mobile web to the developing world, was as much about indoctrinating the next billion inside the Google ecosystem as it was about delivering universal access to information. And with dirt-cheap and powerful Chromebooks and Android One smartphones, Google is arguably the only company even capable of this kind of market grab.

If Google is successful with all this, it will prove to be an unprecedented level of control for a company that arguably has more access to individual information than any entity on the planet. During the vanity stats portion of the keynote, Google exec Sundar Pichai revealed that six separate Google services (search, YouTube, Maps, Gmail, Android, and Chrome) all have roughly 1 billion users or more. Even third-party apps, arguably the only escape hatch out of Google’s walled garden of software and hardware, operate within and must defer to Android’s connective tissue features if they want to take advantage of things like On Tap. Google I/O is billed as a conference for developers, and today Google courted them and made them hoot and holler and clap at a number of features that promise to make their programs better, faster, and more efficient. But almost every single feature on display today was about Google’s play for more control.

Mat Honan / BuzzFeed

In this sense, the keynote, which prominently featured female executives and employees of color, was strangely Jobsian. Sure, it lacked sexiness — at one point a Google executive asked the crowd if there were any Star Wars fans in the crowd, and was met with a deafening chorus of woos and applause — but it was a prominent display of ambition, control, and design. Rather than simply build into the Internet of Things, Google built and unveiled an operating system for it. Why be the one to physically manufacture the smart locks that will secure your home of the future when Google can build the infrastructure that the locks run on? That’s control.

Skrillex demonstration aside, very little about today’s keynote was flashy, exciting, or engineered to echo through the culture. It was a series of rather incremental updates; perfectly subdued glimpses of a digital ecosystem that is becoming more fully realized. Set against Apple’s flash and aesthetic, it was almost boring. But it’s this insidious power that makes Google not only a transformative tech company but an almost elemental force of nature. Sure, it wasn’t all that pretty, but everything fit together seamlessly. And, most importantly, it worked.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1BBqPLq
via IFTTT

30 Mayıs 2015 Cumartesi

Here's Everything We Learned At Google I/O

Google I/O, the biggest Google conference of the year, kicked off Thursday morning with a keynote address from Senior Vice President of Products Sundar Pichai. Past I/O conferences have included updates to the mobile Android OS, Cardboard — Google’s stab at virtual reality — wearables, and more. Here’s a running list of what we’ve learned so far today:


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1d6mnOL
via IFTTT

29 Mayıs 2015 Cuma

The Three Coolest New Things From Google’s Experimental Lab

Touchscreens in midair, touchscreens on clothes, and a build-a-phone.

Advanced Technologies & Projects, a division within Google, is a lab that traditionally works on really cool, futuristic projects. Today's presentation was a look at what the company is developing.

It didn't disappoint.

First up: Sensors.

First up: Sensors.

Brendan Klinkenberg / BuzzFeed

The product of Google's Project Soli, they detect movement from a hand that's above the watch, and can interpret incredibly detailed gestures.

Basically, Google is creating an alternative to the touchscreen.

Basically, Google is creating an alternative to the touchscreen.

Brendan Klinkenberg / BuzzFeed


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1AzxpXT
via IFTTT

24 GIFs For Every Possible Facebook Moment

Now that Facebook just started allowing GIFs, you’ll need the right one to use at the right time.

When someone announces their engagement:

When someone announces their engagement:

shit4chanposts.tumblr.com

When your ex comments on your status:

When your ex comments on your status:

apanelofanalysts.tumblr.com


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1FkHoNl
via IFTTT

Silk Road Mastermind Sentenced To Life In Prison

Ross Ulbricht

Facebook / Via Facebook: Free-Ross

Ross Ulbricht, 31, the mastermind behind the darknet marketplace Silk Road, was sentenced in federal court Friday to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Before delivering her sentencing decision, Judge Katherine Forrest addressed Ulbricht for close to an hour, telling him he was a “complicated person” who didn’t fit the “typical criminal profile.”

Forrest said however that it was clear Ulbricht “wanted [Silk Road] to be your legacy...And it is.”

Forrest said she spent over 100 hours contemplating her decision. She told Ulbricht, “you are no better a person than any other drug dealer.”

The judge called the messages that he wrote online that were presented as evidence in court “arrogance” and quoted his response to a friend’s request that he devote his time to a more upstanding, legal pursuit: “Because I’m running a goddamn multimillion dollar criminal enterprise.”

“What you did in connection with Silk Road was terribly destructive to our social fabric,” Forrest said.

Ulbricht stood and appeared stoic as he received two life sentences for the harshest charges — narcotics trafficking over the internet and continued criminal conspiracy.

Ulbricht’s mother sat in the second row of the court and pressed the fingers from her left head into her forehead.


When court was adjourned Ulbricht looked back as his mother, father and several family members in attendance as he was led away by two court officers. Ulbricht’s mother sat for a moment and cried.

Silk Road

What is the Silk Road?

In 2011, Ulbricht created the website as an online marketplace where people could buy whatever they wanted anonymously. He managed the website under a number of anonymous handles, the most well known being “Dread Pirate Roberts” after the popular character from the movie The Princess Bride.

The site operated on the anonymous internet, or “darknet,” accessible only by using the encryption software TOR — an acronym for the program standing for “The Onion Router” to reflect the layers of security. All transactions on the Silk Road were completed using Bitcoin, the well known crypto-currency.

In a journal entry introduced in court, Ulbricht wrote, “In 2011, I am creating a year of prosperity and power beyond what I have ever experienced before. Silk Road is going to become a phenomenon and at least one person is going to tell me about it, unknowing that I was its creator.”

How Silk Road Blew Up

The online bazaar became an Amazon-like retailer for dealing drugs and other illicit goods. Several thousand vendors sold LSD, heroin, cocaine, marijuana, and other drugs anonymously.

In a June 2011 profile of the site, Gawker’s Adrian Chen wrote: “Making small talk with your pot dealer sucks. Buying cocaine can get you shot. What if you could buy and sell drugs online like books or light bulbs? Now you can: Welcome to the Silk Road.”

Federal investigators said there were more than 1.5 million transactions on the site. Evidence presented by the government at trial showed that Silk Road generated more than $213 million in revenue between January 2011 and October 2013.

Vocativ reported marijuana sales accounted for more than $46 million on Silk Road, while heroin sales were worth about $8.9 million.

Ulbricht took a commission on every deal, amassing a fortune of more than $18 million in Bitcoins before the feds started to close in.

Ross Ulbricht

Facebook / Via Facebook: Free-Ross

The Bust of Dread Pirate Roberts

In October 2013, Ulbricht was arrested by FBI agents in a San Francisco library, his laptop seized while still logged in to the Silk Road as Dread Pirate Roberts.

He was charged with seven federal counts, including narcotics trafficking, computer hacking, and money laundering.

He was also accused of soliciting the killings of six people he believed were threats to the site’s business. At trial, the prosecution said there is no evidence that the killings actually took place or that anyone was harmed.

Lyn and Kirk Ulbricht (back R), parents of Ross Ulbricht, speak to journalists after his conviction in Lower Manhattan, New York February 4, 2015.

Reuters Staff / Reuters

The Trial of Ross Ulbricht

At trial, Ulbricht pleaded not guilty to all the charges.

His lawyer argued that Ulbricht created the Silk Road as an “economic experiment,” but then turned the site over to others when it became too popular for him to manage.

“He created it as a completely freewheeling, free-market site that could sell anything except a couple items were harmful,” Dratel told the jury.

Dratel said that after giving up the site, Ulbricht was eventually lured back as a “fall guy” when the investigation heated up.

The prosecution said the Silk Road was Ulbricht’s “baby” and promised to show the jury “a mountain of evidence” that proved he was the owner and operator of the site.

“His idea was to make illegal drug deals as quick and easy as ordinary online shopping,” prosecutors told the jury.

After Ulbricht was busted, the office of Preet Bharara, U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, said private messages from Dread Pirate Roberts matched evidence recovered from Ulbricht’s laptop, connecting the two.

In court, the prosecution cited journal entries that Ulbricht kept while building and running the site, and a college friend, Richard Bates, testified that Ulbricht told him about the project after seeking his help with programming.

“He shared with me that he created and ran the Silk Road website,” Bates said.

The prosecution illustrated the alleged murder-for-hire plots during the trial. They argued Ulbricht solicited the killings “to retaliate against a former staff member who he believed had stolen Bitcoins from the site and who he feared would provide information about the site to law enforcement, and to eliminate the threats posed by others who were threatening to publicly leak the names and addresses of Silk Road users and vendors.”

In one example, prosecutors said that in 2013, Ulbricht paid Silk Road user Redandwhite to kill user FriendlyChemist, who had threatened to publicize real names and addresses of site vendors and customers unless Ulbricht gave him $500,000.

In his closing argument, prosecutor Serrin Turner told the jury that Ulbricht used his “dark corner of the internet” and “made it easier for drug dealers to get users hooked, users from all over the world.”

In February 2015, Ulbricht was found guilty on all seven counts after the jury deliberated for three-and-a-half hours. The charges against him demanded a sentence of at least 20 years, but he was ultimately sentenced Friday to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Ulbricht didn’t testify at his trial, but prior to sentencing, he broke his silence in a letter to the judge.

“I’ve had my youth, and I know you must take away my middle years, but please leave me my old age,” Ulbricht wrote in his plea for leniency. “Please leave a small light at the end of the tunnel, an excuse to stay healthy, and excuse to dream of better days ahead, and a chance to redeem myself in the free world before I meet my maker.”

Max Dickstein stands with other supporters of Ross Ulbricht, the alleged creator and operator of the Silk Road underground market, in front of a Manhattan federal court house on the first day of jury selection for his trial on January 13, 2015 in New York City.

Spencer Platt / Getty Images

What Happens Now

Bharara said the verdict “should send a clear message to anyone attempting to operate an online criminal enterprise.”

“The supposed anonymity of the dark web is not a protective shield from arrest and prosecution," he added.

In a bizarre twist in the story, two government agents involved in the investigation of Silk Road were also indicted on federal charges in connection to the bust of Ulbricht.

Carl Mark Force and Shaun Bridges, Drug Enforcement Administration agents who were assigned to the Secret Service, are accused of money laundering and wire fraud in connection with actions during the investigation.

Both men were part of a Baltimore-based task force that investigated Ulbricht separately from the Manhattan group. Following their indictments, Bharara said that their operation was separate from his office. Defense attorneys were unable to introduce details of the Force investigation at Ulbricht’s trial.

During the Baltimore group’s investigation, Force allegedly made contact with Dread Pirate Roberts under several fictitious user names not sanctioned by the government, communicated with him using encrypted messaging, and attempted to extort $250,000 from Ulbricht in exchange for withholding secret information from the government.

According to the complaint, during the investigation, Force deposited $776,000 in misappropriated Bitcoins into his personal accounts and Bridges diverted $800,000 to his.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1LOH1z8
via IFTTT

Facebook Now Supports GIFs And Life Will Never Be The Same

WHAT A GIF(T).

Guess what?

Guess what?

90scartoons.tumblr.com

See???

View Video ›

Facebook: nguyen.m.nicole


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1SHaeAI
via IFTTT

Inside Formation 8's Secret Strategy To Invest In Hardware

The venture capital firm Formation 8 wants to raise $100 million to invest in hardware makers. BuzzFeed News obtained a confidential slide presentation about the new fund.

Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

Drones. Robots. Wearable devices. Internet-connected household appliances.

These technologies are making the partners of venture capital firm Formation 8 — including Joe Lonsdale, a co-founder of data mining giant Palantir — see dollar signs.

Formation 8 disclosed last week that it is seeking to raise up to $100 million for a fund focused exclusively on hardware. It has expanded on this new strategy in a confidential slide presentation for investors that was obtained by BuzzFeed News and is published in full below.

The fund, which Formation 8 calls the "world's first" dedicated to backing hardware makers, plans to make early-stage investments in startups in the United States, Israel and Asia, according to the presentation. Its focus will be the "connected world and the Internet of Things," including 3D printing, semiconductors, autos and domestic gadgets.

The fund is seeking a minimum of $75 million in capital, according to the presentation, which is dated March 2015. It initially plans to invest between $1.5 million and $3 million in seed or Series A deals.

Formation 8 is banking on its connections in Silicon Valley and Asia. Its founders include Lonsdale, a Silicon Valley billionaire, and Brian Koo, a member of the powerful Korean family behind the LG conglomerate.

The firm's Asian connections are particularly important in helping manufacture and distribute hardware, the slide presentation argues, listing Asian companies like Huawei, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba among its "mission-critical partners."

Formation 8 wants investors to think its hardware strategy is a contrarian play. The presentation claims that there are more than 300 startup incubators focused on software, but only 5 focused on hardware.

While the venture capital firm was founded only in 2011, it is hoping investors will view it as a seasoned expert in hardware. It hit a prominent home run with early investments in Oculus, the virtual reality headset maker that was bought by Facebook for $2 billion last year.

"Hardware companies are traditionally very hard to build and startups, especially, face unique challenges," the presentation says. "We believe the time is ripe to focus in depth on the intersection of hardware, software and services."

The hardware fund will be led by Lior Susan, who joined Formation 8 this year. He was previously the general partner of LabIX, a hardware investment program at the Singapore-based manufacturing services company Flextronics, and is a reservist of an Israeli military special forces unit, according to his bio.

Flextronics itself is an investor in the Formation 8 hardware fund, according to a person briefed on the matter.

A Formation 8 spokesman declined to comment on the confidential presentation.

Check out the slides below.

Formation 8

Formation 8


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1LRJf03
via IFTTT

How Your Tweets Could Crash The Global Economy

A new study outlines the frightening ways financial algorithms harvest social media data — including yours.

Andrew Burton / Getty Images

Two years ago, a hacker took control of the Associated Press Twitter account and tweeted, "Breaking: Two Explosions in the White House and Barack Obama is injured." Within two minutes, the Dow Jones dropped nearly 150 points and the S&P 500 had lost nearly $150 billion in value. Within five minutes, the market had recovered.

The whiplash caused by the tweet was held up by many in the press as an example of the power — and ultimately the correctness — of the proprietary, lightning-fast algorithms that automatically execute financial trades based on reams of incoming data. Though these algorithms are closely held secrets, it is widely understood that they take into account social media data, including tweets. That a tweet from the AP could cause this kind of market fluctuation was seen as a kind of double proof of the sophistication of these formulas, which recognized and heavily weighted a tweet from a world-renowned news organization, then recognized it as a fake and course-corrected.

For Tero Karppi, a professor of media theory at the University at Buffalo, the drama raised much more fundamental questions about the way online speech affects the global financial market.

In a new case study, "Social Media, Financial Algorithms and the Hack Crash," Karppi, along with co-author Kate Crawford of Microsoft Research, mapped the ways that social media data intersects with financial algorithms, and the potential consequences of that integration.

"The biggest surprise was just how interconnected the systems are," Karppi told BuzzFeed News. "There are systems that buy access to social media and mine that data. Social media plays a significant role in financial markets."

Indeed, much of the study focuses on services like Dataminr (which played a role in the 2013 crash and recovery) that harvest data from social networks and turn it into "actionable signals" for financial companies. As the study puts it, these companies "assess emotion, importance and social meaning in order to 'predict the present' and thus transform social media signals into economic information and value." (Through a spokesperson, Dataminr declined to comment for this article.)

The problem with converting social media speech to algorithmic data, according to Karppi, is that this speech is not necessarily accurate or truthful. Indeed, the 2013 crash was precipitated by a trusted Twitter account being amplified by thousands of people at once who had no idea they were spreading a lie. "People don't necessarily represent their actual being while they are on social media," Karppi said. "There seems to be this neo-positivistic epistemology where we believe the data we gather from social media actually represents reality in some way. I think we need to be critical towards that."

Software like Dataminr performs so-called "sentiment analysis": measuring how people feel from their online speech. It's not hard to imagine a series of performatively negative tweets about a marketing campaign, or a global news event, snowballing into a speech trend that sentiment analysis converts into data points for trading algorithms. And that's where the trouble could begin.

The algorithms into which firms funnel social media content perform so-called high-frequency trading, and they value speed above all, a fact that can lead to "weird and scary consequences," said Karppi. As he and Crawford write in the study, "algorithms and other actors respond to sudden changes in financial markets which are then imitated and repeated; when someone or something begins to sell in earnest, other entities follow." In other words, our online speech can indirectly lead to to huge self-fulfilling prophecies that shake financial markets, as algorithms follow other algorithms that are following faulty social media data.

It's a bracing idea, that our stray thoughts — and more importantly, the digital speech of influential people, brands, and organizations, many of which hardly pay a pittance to security — are imperfectly integrated into a vast layering of formulas that play a dominant role in determining the economic health of the world. Even more frightening is the fact that we have no idea how our speech is being weighted, because the math is all kept secret.

And because all of these processes happen faster than human cognition, the only solution, according to Karppi, is building better automated systems to govern them — another layer of abstraction.

"No one has the time to check if its true or not," Karppi said.

In the shadow of a global economic collapse that was characterized by the massive abstraction of financial products, it's yet another example of the sheer complexity of global financial system, and our complicity in it, whether we like it or not.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1JZ98fP
via IFTTT

28 Mayıs 2015 Perşembe

Google Wants To Give You What You Need, Right On Your Wrist

In a post–Apple Watch world, Google wants to make Android Wear devices even easier to use.

Drawing an emoji on the LG Watch Urbane, an Android Wear device.

Nicole Nguyen

The war to put wearable technology on your wrist will likely be won by the device that gives you useful information quickly, effortlessly, and without driving you crazy. Changes coming to Android Wear make a case for why Google's smartwatch operating system platform does the job best — perhaps even better than the Apple Watch.

There are now some 1,500 custom watch faces and 4,000 Android Wear apps, Google revealed during its annual I/O developers conference today. And the company claims some of those apps are getting better at using device motion sensors, location, and other data points to guide you through life. Imagine, upon entering a new restaurant, that your watch suggests what to order. Soon you may be able to see a real-time countdown of your train's arrival, or order an Uber by saying, "OK Google, call a car," into your wrist.

Those app capabilities, announced last month, will roll out in the next few weeks to all seven Android Wear watches in an attempt to enhance their appeal, especially their ease of use, in a post–Apple Watch world. "Checking the time is pretty cool," David Singleton, director of Android Wear, told the audience at Google's developers conference. "You can just look at your wrist, get the information you need, and make decisions in fractions of a second. It's glanceable, actionable, and effortless. And that's the cornerstone for what we think of all interactions with Android Wear."

Compared to the Apple Watch, features can be accessed with fewer gestures: Flick your wrist to scroll through notifications, for example, and tap the screen once to start apps and send messages.

Perhaps more importantly, almost all the Android Wear watches have since last year included an "always-on" screen — which means that, unlike the Apple Watch, you don't have to swipe or shake your wrist to see the time. Soon, Android Wear apps will also have the option to be "always on" rather than disappear. To save battery life, the screen will appear in full color when you look at it, but revert to black-and-white the rest of the time. (A Google spokesperson declined to provide hard numbers on how such changes affect battery life, saying it varies depending on the device and usage.)

Another obstacle that Google is trying to overcome: getting rid of the smartphone that traditionally provides the internet connection for smartwatches. One criticism of the Apple Watch has been that the device must be within 30 feet of an associated iPhone for all its features to operate. Android Wear devices aren't quite as restricted; they can operate on Wi-Fi as long as the accompanying phone, wherever it is, has a data connection.

That's not to say that Android Wear watches are 100% convenient — but they are taking steps to get there. Sketch something, for example, and the watch will convert it into an emoji.

And newly announced Google Fit updates for Android Wear, which are expected to launch over the next few weeks, will enable the device sensors to automatically count sit-ups, push-ups, and squats — in much the same way that Google Fit on Android captures your runs, walks, and bike rides on smartphones. It will also offer daily exercise goals calibrated to experience level, Allyson Gale, a product manager for Google Fit apps, told BuzzFeed News.

Allyson Gale, product manager for Google Fit apps, demonstrates how the latest Google Fit updates for Android Wear can track squats.

Stephanie M. Lee

No matter how powerful a watch is, it becomes even more so when it taps into a larger universe of wirelessly connected objects. Google is working on just such an ecosystem. Possibilities, Singleton told the audience, include using Android Wear devices to check the battery in a Ford car, control music on Spotify, or adjust living room temperature via a Nest thermostat.

Control the world by checking your watch? Google wants to make it happen.


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1EBHvCx
via IFTTT

Apple Isn't Going To Get Rid Of Its Antitrust Monitor Anytime Soon

A federal appeals court rejects the company’s latest bid to oust a court-appointed antitrust compliance monitor.

Apple

Apple has lost another bid to jettison the court-appointed monitor tasked with evaluating its antitrust policies.

On Thursday, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan rejected Apple's appeal to oust Michael Bromwich, the monitor appointed to oversee the company's compliance with antitrust law in 2013 after it was found liable for conspiring with major publishers to raise e-book prices and squeeze out competition from companies like Amazon.

The ruling is a clear disappointment for Apple, which has lambasted Bromwich for everything from trying to "set up shop in Apple's boardroom and executive offices" to his fee of $1,000 an hour.

In handing down his decision, Circuit Judge Dennis Jacobs did find fault with some of Bromwich's behavior — notably "the appearance of impropriety" when he submitted an affidavit for plaintiffs involved in a separate Apple case. "Bromwich's submission in conjunction with a litigant's brief was the opposite of best practice for a court-appointed monitor," Jacobs wrote. Sadly for Apple, that's no reason for disqualification. The company's stuck with Bromwich until October.

Apple declined comment.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1cmbnMD
via IFTTT

17 Apps That Will Change The Way You Use Gmail

Inbox hero.

Alice Mongkongllite / BuzzFeed


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1RruCEu
via IFTTT

Digital Single Market Isn’t Anti-American, Says EU Commissioner

The European Commission’s vice president defends plans to unite the fragmented internet economy of European states.

European Commission Vice President Andrus Ansip, Head of the Digital Single Market. Francois Lenoir / Reuters

European Commission Vice President Andrus Ansip praised the European Union's plans for the creation of a unified digital economy at an event hosted by the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C., on Thursday. He also addressed criticism that such an initiative would harm American businesses and serve as a protectionist ploy.

"With a digital single market, we have been accused of unfairly targeting U.S. tech companies. This is not true," Ansip said. He went on to cite the number of recent antitrust and merger cases pursued by the EU, noting that U.S.-based companies were involved in only a minority of them.

The proposed "digital single market," a pan-European economy to bolster the international trade of IT and web services, is estimated by EU officials to contribute 415 billion euros to the EU. With a 16-point road map scheduled to be completed by the end of next year, commissioners hope to offer improved access to digital goods and services. The DSM has been framed as an extension of the EU's project to unite a patchwork of national economies, consolidating the regulatory maze of 28 member states into a simplified market.

Vice President Ansip's remarks come at a time when European authorities are closely scrutinizing some big American tech firms. Facebook's privacy settings are being proved by regulators in Germany, France, Spain, the Netherlands, and Belgium. In a case brought by EU Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager, Google has been charged with favoring its own products over those of rivals, . And Amazon recently changed its European tax practices amid a commission investigation into the company's tax-avoidance strategy in Luxembourg.

Ansip, who insists the EU harbors no bias toward U.S. tech companies, said Europe should not be viewed as a data fortress preventing trans-Atlantic trade.

Indeed, Ansip argued that an EU inquiry into the market power of online platforms run by Google and others mirrors the Federal Trade Commission's interest in studying the business practices and policy challenges posed by sharing economy firms like Uber and Airbnb. "We have the same problems, the same concerns about platforms in the United States and also in the European Union," he said.

While the commission's economic proposal aims to inspire a Silicon Valley across the Atlantic, Ansip believes the benefits won't be exclusive to the EU. The digital single market "will provide opportunities for trade, investment, innovation not only for Europe, but globally — also, for the United States" he said.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1AwQCcT
via IFTTT

In Virtual Reality, Google Is The A's And Facebook Is The Yankees

The search giant builds cheap from within, and the social giant builds expensive from without. Sports fans know which one usually works.

Google

In professional sports, it is a truism that building a team via the minor leagues, the draft, and cheap, undervalued free agents is better than building a team by hiring superstars. The former method is inexpensive, sustainable, and leads to a coherent organizational culture. The latter, by contrast, is expensive, often unsustainable, and can lead to a mercenary and incoherent organizational culture. Though win/loss columns do contain examples to the contrary, any sports fan will tell you building cheap and from within is the way to go. It's Moneyball versus the Yankees.

That seems to be the approach to virtual reality Google outlined today at its annual I/O developer's conference, which clarified several things about the tech world's never-ending sprint towards "immersive experiences." Most prominently, Google's initiative stands in sharp relief to the swaggering and slightly mercenary VR strategy of their greatest rival in the nascent space, Facebook.

Cardboard, Google's low-cost VR headset, was conceived in-house by employees taking advantage of the company's fabled "20 percent time". It's cheap. You can make it yourself. And it takes advantage of existing players we carry around with us daily — smartphones. Google's new Expeditions program, also announced today, is going to put Cardboard in the hands of thousands of school-kids -- seeding a next-generation audience for the company's VR efforts. And with Jump, a technology for creating virtual reality footage, Google is crowd-sourcing VR content development. There's a partnership with GoPro, sure, but it's limited; anyone can make the camera rig if they want to.

Then, there's Facebook's Oculus. That VR effort was conceived out-of-house. It cost Facebook $2 billion dollars to acquire. Rift, the VR headset developed by Oculus, can't be put together at home. And it's going to cost $1500 -- an exorbitant price that will surely be too high for the kids who will most want to use it. And despite Facebook's best efforts to spin Rift as a device that will further the company's mission of social connectivity, it still seems like a gaming luxury device, at best. And the content, well, who knows what the content is going to look like? We're assured some of the entertainment industry's finest minds are involved.

None of this is to say that Cardboard and Jump are destined to succeed and Oculus is doomed to fail. One or two transcendent acquisitions have lifted certain teams to titles, and a similarly transformative piece of software could do the same for Oculus. But Google's approach is building a structure for a culture of virtual reality — the kids who use Expedition this fall will someday be adults who know what a VR experience should feel like. Facebook simply bought superlative technology from without and is hoping for the best.

And as any Lakers can tell you, when your big buys don't work out, you're screwed.

Of course, Facebook has the money to hold onto Oculus for years, and technology owned by companies with billions never has to retire. Down the road, Oculus founder Palmer Luckey and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg may look back on the day Google decided to put VR in classrooms with fondness; what many VR enthusiasts still don't understand is that the creation of a virtual reality culture is as important a prerequisite to its sustainable popularity as good technology. That's an area where Oculus has done little -- and where Google just announced two major strides. So don't be surprised if the killer Oculus app is built by an artist or a designer inspired by seeing Jump footage for the first time.

Because, come to think of it, before you focus on building a good team, you should make sure people care about the sport.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1GHDUZQ
via IFTTT

Google Unveils Android Pay, A Revamped Google Wallet

Announced on the heels of Apple Pay at Google’s annual developers’ conference, the tap-to-pay service will be available at 700,000 stores.

At today's I/O conference, Google Vice President of Engineering Dave Burke unveiled Android Pay, Google's new in-app and tap-to-pay mobile payments service. Payments will employ "near-field communication," or NFC, to allow users to pay for goods and services with a preloaded credit card by simply placing their phones near a merchant terminal.

Burke said that Android Pay will be available in over 700,000 stores, including Macy's, Bloomingdale's, and McDonald's locations, in addition working within apps such as GrubHub, Uber, and Groupon. Payments can also be authorized with a user's fingerprint. At I/O, Burke said Payments would be available "soon."

Burke said Pay "builds on work we did in previous Android releases," and indeed, Google first rolled out a payments service, then called Google Wallet, in 2011. But it never took off, as it wasn't available in many stores and a number of users didn't even realize they could make payments with their phone. Google recently acquired technology assets from SoftCard, formerly known as Isis, a mobile payments company founded by a consortium of wireless carriers. At the same time, Google made a deal with carriers to have Google Wallet pre-installed on phones. Google also has deals with the major credit card networks — American Express, Discover, MasterCard, and Visa — to support Android Pay.

Right now, Apple Pay is the clear leader in mobile payments from consumers to merchants. Apple Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook said in January that Apple Pay does $2 out of every $3 of contactless payments for MasterCard, American Express, and Visa. It has also successfully signed up major banks and merchants like Best Buy, Whole Foods, McDonald's and is available at nearly 700,000 merchant locations, Tim Cook said in March.

But it's still a relatively small market. Forrester Research estimated that there were $52 billion of mobile payments in 2014, which includes in-person payments, payments done through mobile apps remotely, and peer to payments like Venmo). 22 percent of cell phone owners made at least one mobile payment in 2014, and a third of cell phone users between aged 18 and 29 did, according to a Federal Reserve survey.

The main reason people don't use mobile payments, according to the Federal Reserve, is that they're not noticeably more convenient than credit or debit cards. 75 percent of the respondents in the Fed survey said that it was easier to pay with credit or debit cards, and 59 percent said they were concerned about the security of mobile payments. Like with Apple Pay, Android Pay will not convey a credit card number to the merchant, and will instead receive what's known as a unique token for each transaction.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1BrPZw7
via IFTTT

Google Inbox Adds Trip Bundles, Undo Send

And the email app no longer requires an invitation.

Google

Google announced a host of augmentations to the seven-month-old Inbox app today at I/O, its annual developer conference. Among them: Making the product available to everyone and adding new trip-related bundles.

To its Bundle feature, which groups together related emails, Inbox adds Trip Bundles, which gather all of the email related to a trip. According to Google, all of the particulars about a trip—think flight times—will pop up the moment a user opens Inbox. That's potentially bad news for TripIt, a mobile app that organizes trip information.

It will look like this:

Inbox is also adding an email retraction function called Undo Send, which allows users to "take back" an email in the moments immediately after sending it. In addition, Inbox users will now have the ability to swipe to delete email.

Finally, Inbox, which had been invitation-only, is now available for everyone.


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1HUtfJO
via IFTTT

Read This Post If You're Bored At Google I/O But Need To Look Like You're Working

A list of cute and funny pics that will make it look like you’re actually reading about a tech conference. You’re welcome.

Look. We understand you're supposed to be paying attention to the big Google I/O event, but it's boring there and you'd much rather be looking at a BuzzFeed list of animals or funny pics or something. But your boss is right next to you and you don't want anyone to see you're secretly looking at BuzzFeed lists.

Don't worry. We got you.

Click quickly to reveal each photo of a cute animal or funny photo, and scroll fast to the next one before anyone catches you. We'll make it LOOK like you're doing work.

The 2015 Google I/O should be one of the most exciting events of the year.

The 2015 Google I/O should be one of the most exciting events of the year.

Definitely more exciting than a kitten dressed up as Battlecat.

reddit.com

The keynote presentation will probably be about Android.

The keynote presentation will probably be about Android.

This guy is thinking his keynote is about slamming some cold brews and chilling because he's a dog in sunglasses and that's literally all dogs in sunglasses do.

Facebook: Shiba.Zero.Mika

Developers and industry experts will be in attendance.

Developers and industry experts will be in attendance.

Much like this gathering of shina ibus at dinner.

Facebook: Shiba.Zero.Mika


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1Qd0xpx
via IFTTT

27 Mayıs 2015 Çarşamba

Jawbone Sues Fitbit For Stealing Employees And Trade Secrets

As the wearable activity tracker market becomes increasingly crowded, Jawbone says Fitbit is out to “decimate” it.

The Flex by Fitbit is presented at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona on Feb. 24, 2014.

Josep Lago / Getty Images

In a lawsuit filed today, Jawbone has accused Fitbit — its main rival and the world's leading activity tracker company — of plundering its employees and trade secrets as Fitbit prepares to go public.

The suit, filed in California Superior Court in San Francisco, alleges that this year alone, Fitbit recruiters tried to poach about 30% of Jawbone's employees and hired at least five of them. According to the suit, these workers deliberately gathered confidential information about Jawbone and brought it to Fitbit, violating Jawbone's policies. An unnamed Fitbit recruiter is quoted in the lawsuit as saying, "Fitbit's objective is to decimate Jawbone."

The "stolen files," the lawsuit alleges, "are the informational equivalent of a gold mine for Fitbit, as they provide an intricate roadmap into the core of Jawbone's business." Jawbone is accusing Fitbit of stealing information about product updates and new technologies rather than investing in building new features itself.

Jawbone is seeking unspecified compensatory, punitive, exemplary, and other damages from Fitbit and the five employees, as well as injunctive relief to prevent the employees from disclosing any additional Jawbone trade secrets and Fitbit from using them.

One accused employee is Ana Rosario, who started in Jawbone's design and user researcher/customer experience department in May 2014. She interviewed for a position as a senior user experience researcher at Fitbit on April 16, 2015, the lawsuit alleges, and four days later, before announcing that she planned to leave, met with co-workers to discuss Jawbone's direction and product designs and prototypes. Rosario then downloaded onto her personal computer a confidential presentation about Jawbone's current and future products — the company's so-called "Playbook for the Future" — in violation of company policy, the lawsuit alleges, before giving notice April 22.

Rosario is said to have been poached by Katherine Mogal, who began at Jawbone in August 2013 as director of marketing and customer experience insights before joining Fitbit in March 2015 as head of user experience research. She is also named in the suit, as are Patrick Narron, Patricio Romano, and Rong Zhang.

Narron, a staff audio engineer, allegedly sent confidential company information to his personal email less than a week before he left Jawbone for Fitbit. Romano, a product design engineer, allegedly saved Jawbone files onto a USB drive, sent them to a personal email, and wiped the footprints of his activity from his computer, all before he gave notice at Jawbone to take a job at Fitbit. Zhang, a cost accounting manager and supply chain manager, allegedly saved information onto a USB drive, resigned from Jawbone the next day, and joined Fitbit in April.

The lawsuit comes just weeks after Fitbit filed for an initial public offering, and it is unclear how it will affect those plans. The company is the dominant player in the wireless activity tracker market, with $745 million in revenue and nearly 11 million devices sold last year. But it acknowledged in its IPO filing that it shares the market with a growing number of competitors, including Jawbone and Apple.

On the other hand, Jawbone, which has raised about $700 million and is reportedly valued at about $3 billion, has struggled with profitability, paying off its debts, and raising funding. Its newly released Up3, a wristband health tracker, has received mixed reviews. The global contract manufacturer Flextronics sued it last year for breach of contract, alleging that "Jawbone's financial condition is perilous and currently insufficient to pay its debts." (Fortune reported that the suit was quickly settled.) It took out a $300 million loan in February from BlackRock, a move that observers told Bloomberg View is a bit of a lifeline since the company has struggled to sell venture shares.

A Fitbit spokesperson did not return requests for comment. Jawbone referred media inquiries to its attorneys.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1HxesCm
via IFTTT

Hackers Got Tax Information For Over 100,000 People From The IRS

The hack, which took place over two months, revealed sensitive information included in tax returns.

Jim Watson / AFP / Getty Images

The tax returns and tax information of over 100,000 U.S. citizens have been hacked through an online service provided by the IRS, according to the Associated Press.

The hackers behind the attack spent more than two months in the IRS system between February and mid-May, according to a statement issued by the IRS on Tuesday. The IRS did not immediately respond to a request for more information from BuzzFeed News, but said in its statement that hackers were able to bypass the login screen in the "Get Transcript" system and access the files in question. At the time of this report, the "Get Transcript" system appeared to be offline.

According to the IRS's website, several types of transcripts of tax returns are available for download from the "Get Transcript" system.

According to the IRS's website, several types of transcripts of tax returns are available for download from the "Get Transcript" system.

irs.gov

"The IRS notes this issue does not involve its main computer system that handles tax filing submission; that system remains secure," the agency said in its statement, adding that it was notifying individuals whose information had been compromised.

While the IRS did not give details about the types of files hacked, tax returns include personal information ranging from social security numbers to names of spouses, children, and birth dates — all information which could easily be used to steal a person's identity.


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1GBGP6f
via IFTTT

Ford's GoDrive Car-Sharing Service Debuts In London

GoDrive is the first of 25 Ford social mobility experiments to be launched publicly.

media.ford.com

When Ford Motor Company announced its Smart Mobility Plan at CES this past year, company executives emphasized that its 25 experiments were just that. Not all of them were intended to reach commercial viability. "Each experiment is different and luckily [Ford CEO] Mark [Fields] is giving us the ability to experiment and fail fast," Erica Klampfl, Ford's global future mobility manager, said at a press event in April.

But one of those experiments, City Driving On-Demand, has birthed a real social mobility service. Called GoDrive, it's an on-demand, app-based car-sharing service. Ford launched it in London on Tuesday with a fleet of 50 vehicles that can be booked on demand, picked up, and then dropped off at one of a number of hubs across central London. Booking a car through the app also effectively books a parking space at the chosen drop-off location.

"One of the things that we really wanted to ensure with our service was flexibility of use," Alicia Agius, product innovation manager of Ford Europe, told BuzzFeed News. "If you use our services it's fully on demand. You bring the car back when you're ready and you don't say exactly when you're going to return it."

GoDrive, like many of the company's other experiments, is Ford's answer to industry disruptors like ride-hail giants Uber and Lyft — which are both gunning to replace personal car ownership.

"I think it's helping us understand the model and what our place is in this model going forward and in the future," Agius said. "We're not saying that we want to be a global car-sharing operator. But we do see it as a growing market and [feel] there's a place for it going forward. We also view it as a huge opportunity in terms of accessing new customers — both non-car and non-Ford-owning customers — which is another huge benefit to operating in the space."

One key goal of GoDrive is to spur adoption of Ford's electric vehicles, yet the program's fleet includes gas-powered cars as well. Agius said there's good reason for that. "We obviously thought early on about having a 100% electric fleet," she said. "As this is an experiment and it's really about learning, by having the choice between electric and petrol it helps us understand why people are choosing electric cars and what sorts of people choose electric. We're already gaining lots of information about that."

youtube.com

As part of this effort, consumers who use the GoDrive service are asked to complete a survey asking which vehicle they chose and why. While it's too early to draw any definitive conclusions, Agius said Ford has already learned a bit more about why people aren't choosing electric cars. "Sometimes it's lack of knowledge, misunderstanding, or even a fear that it's going to be very different to drive," she said. "There's also the other type of customer that couldn't wait to get into the electric car and that was one of the main reasons for wanting to join."

The service does require membership in order to validate each driver's license — but it comes at no additional cost. Drivers only have to pay for each minute they use the car at a rate of 17 pence per minute — about 10 euros per hour.

Though Ford has experimented with other car-sharing and swapping services in markets like Germany, Michigan, and India, GoDrive was the only one mature enough to launch publicly. Agius said London was an obvious first choice of market.

"From an experimental perspective London is a perfect storm in terms of different variables affecting a car-sharing program," she said. "There's extremely constrained parking in central London, congestion and air quality concerns, and also the multiple boroughs in central London that make it quite a difficult city to operate in. Because it's an experiment it is about learning and we wanted to make sure we were operating in a geography that would maximize learning.

"And London is obviously quite densely populated — there is huge untapped potential in London for a really designed car-sharing model that suits London and Londoners to flourish on."


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1cjoMoH
via IFTTT

There's A Crazy Text Message Going Around That Shuts Off iPhones

WTF.

At around 9 this Tuesday night, I opened my iPhone to see a bizarre text message from my sister. Like, it looks like it makes NO sense.

At around 9 this Tuesday night, I opened my iPhone to see a bizarre text message from my sister. Like, it looks like it makes NO sense.

Sam Stryker / BuzzFeed

I thought it was just my sister being a ~teen~ and I thought it was funny, so I sent it to my coworker Alex. Then, the UNTHINKABLE happened.

I thought it was just my sister being a ~teen~ and I thought it was funny, so I sent it to my coworker Alex. Then, the UNTHINKABLE happened.

Sam Stryker / BuzzFeed

Yes, I shut his phone off! I immediately tried it on my friend who was standing next to me...and the same thing happened. His phone shut off and restarted when I sent him the text.

Yes, I shut his phone off! I immediately tried it on my friend who was standing next to me...and the same thing happened. His phone shut off and restarted when I sent him the text.

Disney

It appears the text is a bug that crashes iMessage and reboots the iPhone. And this isn't the first time something like this has happened before!

It appears the text is a bug that crashes iMessage and reboots the iPhone. And this isn't the first time something like this has happened before!

CW


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1Ex19zG
via IFTTT

26 Mayıs 2015 Salı

Elizabeth Warren On Rise Of The 1099 Economy: "A Real Problem"

The Democratic senator avoided directly answering whether Uber and Lyft drivers should be classified as employees, but did weigh in on the changing nature of contract workers.

ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS / Getty Images

Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren on Tuesday dodged addressing whether contract workers for on-demand services such as Uber and Lyft should be classified as employees, but did note that the "1099" IRS designation is being used in ways for which it was not intended.

Speaking at Re/Code's Code conference in Rancho Palos Verdes, California, Warren addressed a host of issues related to the changing economy and workforce in a wide-ranging interview with ReCode's Kara Swisher and Walt Mossberg. But in a followup question-and-answer session, the Democratic senator declined to directly address a BuzzFeed News reporter's question on how 1099 workers for on-demand services should be classified.

"I think there is evidence that increasingly employers use independent contractors not in ways that were originally intended, but in ways that let them treat employment laws differently than they otherwise would be responsible for," Warren said to BuzzFeed News. "I think that's a real problem and I think the Department of Labor is looking into this and I think they're right to do that."

The "1099 workers" are so named because of the IRS tax form they fill out for contract work at places like Uber and Lyft, as opposed to the traditional W-2 form for full-time employment.

Last week, a Florida agency ruled that an Uber driver should be classified as an employee and therefore be eligible for unemployment and other benefits. Meanwhile, Uber and Lyft are facing class action lawsuits in California from drivers seeking classification as employees.

Given both the current lawsuits, and the rapid rise of the so-called 1099 economy to power on-demand services, the question promises to be a hot issue in an election year.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1Kmygv1
via IFTTT

The Surveillance Debate Shifts As Patriot Act Nears Expiration

With the NSA’s dragnet call program already winding down, the Senate will reconvene in a rare Sunday vote to get surveillance powers back online.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) Alex Wong / Getty Images

Following an unusual Friday-night session of Congress ahead of the Memorial Day weekend, Senators will reconvene in another rare holiday-recess vote on May 31 in the hopes of salvaging legislation that would end the NSA's bulk call data collection program and rein in its powers of surveillance.

The USA Freedom Act, passed in the House earlier this month by a 338–88 vote, and backed by the Obama administration, would reauthorize surveillance powers under the Patriot Act while ending a National Security Agency phone data collection program recently ruled illegal by a federal appeals court. While the bill enjoyed wide, bipartisan support in the House, two Senate factions opposed the legislation. It failed to proceed in a 57–42 vote. When the White House declined to submit a reauthorization request for the controversial program, the NSA began winding it down.

The question for lawmakers now: What happens next?

Without the 60 votes needed to advance in the Senate, failure to pass USA Freedom will cause crucial parts of the Patriot Act to expire after May 31. One of these provisions, Section 215, served as the secret legal justification by the NSA to eavesdrop on American citizens. While libertarian-minded senators like Rand Paul view the sunset of the Patriot Act as a great victory for privacy rights and a necessary blow against the surveillance state, security hawks like Majority Leader Mitch McConnell see an unacceptable weakening of vital law enforcement tools.

Between these two perspectives lies the coalition backing USA Freedom. Rep. Adam Schiff, ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, told BuzzFeed News that USA Freedom was the product of a hard, negotiated compromise, drawing on a broad sector of support. He believes that any legislation proposed by the Senate that would undermine the privacy protections of USA Freedom will likely be rejected by the House.

Some lawmakers, like Sen. Ron Wyden, would like to see a more comprehensive review of the government's surveillance power but still support passage of USA Freedom. "If we were to end mass surveillance under the Patriot Act, that would be a worthwhile step even if it doesn't go nearly far enough," Keith Chu, a spokesperson for Sen. Wyden, told BuzzFeed News.

Rep. Ted Lieu, one of the 88 representatives in the House who voted against USA Freedom, takes a more skeptical position. "The bottom line is that Section 215 has been used by the NSA and other federal agencies for years as the basis for open-ended programs that have violated the constitutional rights of Americans and jeopardized the public's trust in our government," he told BuzzFeed News.

Rep. Lieu acknowledged the merits of USA Freedom, but he cited overly broad data collection and concerns of information being retained that isn't relevant to criminal investigations as issues with the bill. "We can't truly curtail the government's expansive surveillance programs without comprehensive reform that addresses a number of statues, but that may first require opposing inadequate proposals and allowing the Patriot Act provisions to expire completely," he told BuzzFeed News.

Privacy advocates have argued that USA Freedom's attempts to limit government abuse are too modest, pointing to a Justice Department report released last week that "did not identify any major case developments that resulted from use of the records obtained in response to Section 215 orders." Bolstered too by the appeals court opinion, critics maintain that the dragnet surveillance apparatus spawned by the Patriot Act is both ineffective and illegal.

In addition to USA Freedom being reconsidered by the Senate on Sunday, Majority Leader McConnell is expected to introduce short-term extensions of the Patriot Act. But just as these proposals were blocked last week, last-minute efforts for a clean reauthorization of surveillance powers are expected to be stonewalled come Sunday.

Complicating matters further, even if a Senate extension or some altered version of USA Freedom is allowed to proceed, the House doesn't return from Memorial Day recess until June 1, meaning the provisions would necessarily expire. The only workable solution to prevent the expiration of these measures would be for the Senate to pass USA Freedom.

"Because the Senate failed to complete its work last Saturday, passage of the USA Freedom Act remains the only viable legislative option that will bring real reform and ensure no lapse in intelligence authorities." wrote House Judiciary Committee Chair Bob Goodlatte and Senate Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Patrick Leahy in a statement on Tuesday.

In a bipartisan joint statement released Saturday by House leaders, representatives blamed the Senate for the possibility of a coming security lapse. "The Senate has failed to make the important reforms necessary, jeopardizing Americans' civil liberties and our national security," wrote Reps. Bob Goodlatte, John Conyers, Jim Sensenbrenner, and Jerrold Nadler.

Harley Geiger, senior counsel for the Center for Democracy and Technology, told BuzzFeed News, "the question is how long Section 215 sunsets." The Senate and then the House may renew Section 215 after only a few hours, he said. But in the absence of "major reform that ends NSA bulk collection and provides strong transparency requirements," the CDT prefers the Patriot Act to sunset.

If Sunday's last-ditch attempt fails, it's unclear which political faction and surveillance policy will ultimately prevail. In a new status quo where surveillance powers are narrow and limited, the Patriot Act may lack the support to be re-enacted as opposed to merely extended. But the counterterror war drum might grow louder still. On Sunday, it may come down to three senators changing their minds.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1AsAUiS
via IFTTT

AOL Chief To Get $59 Million Bonus For Selling The Company

Tim Armstrong stands to receive “Founders’ Incentive Reward” for orchestrating the Verizon deal. He also gets access to the Verizon corporate jet.

Brian Ach / Getty Images

AOL's deal to sell itself to Verizon for $4.4 billion will enrich CEO Tim Armstrong even more than previously thought.

Armstrong is set to receive a "Founders' Incentive Reward" when the merger closes, the company said in an SEC filing today, a package that includes restricted stock worth 1.5% of AOL's market capitalization. At today's stock price, the award would be worth about $59 million.

In addition, the filing said, Armstrong will be able to use the Verizon corporate jet for business travel.

Armstrong stands to get half of the bonus package three years after the merger is completed, followed by the other half a year later. Starting in 2016, he will be eligible for awards of up to $3 million worth of Verizon stock.

That's on top of the windfall Armstrong is getting through his personal ownership of AOL stock and options. At the time of the deal, Armstrong owned or controlled 6.7% of AOL's shares, with a market value of $280 million.

Much of that was in the form of options and other awards he was given for his service as CEO. His direct ownership of stock, worth about $60 million at the price of the deal, came from his investing over $20 million of his own money to buy shares over the years.

The filing also shed light on the path leading up to the acquisition deal.

Before deciding to sell itself to Verizon, AOL considered striking a joint venture with the telecom giant. Those talks, starting late last year, continued until April, when Verizon CEO Lowell McAdam suggested that Verizon instead buy AOL outright.

AOL also considered spinning off certain of its "brand assets," a portfolio that includes TechCrunch, Engadget, and The Huffington Post, but ultimately decided against that idea.

Verizon wasn't the only suitor to approach AOL about a possible deal. AOL also fielded interest from two other companies and a private equity firm, according to the filing, which did not identify the rival suitors.

The seeds of the Verizon-AOL deal were sown at the annual conference in Sun Valley, Idaho, hosted by the investment bank Allen & Company. At the conference, which draws power players from media and technology, Armstrong and McAdam "met and discussed ongoing and emerging trends in their respective industries," the filing says.

At the Sun Valley confab, reporters staked out a meeting between Armstrong and Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer, who is also a former Google colleague of the AOL chief. Some speculated that the two could be planting the seeds of a merger between their companies, one that has been rumored or called for at least eight times since 2008.

LINK: AOL Chief’s Stake In Company Now Worth $280 Million

LINK: Verizon Likely To Retain TechCrunch And Engadget


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1FevPr2
via IFTTT

Replace "Millennials" With "Snake People" Using This Perfect Chrome Extension

“For Snake People, A Generational Divide.” h/t to creator @ericwbailey

You know that wrathful feeling you get when you see yet another article making broad, sweeping generalizations about so-called "millennials"?

You know that wrathful feeling you get when you see yet another article making broad, sweeping generalizations about so-called "millennials"?

Time Inc. / Via wordpress.com

Curb your angry, eye-rolling urges with this delightful Chrome extension that replaces the m-word with... "Snake People."

Curb your angry, eye-rolling urges with this delightful Chrome extension that replaces the m-word with... "Snake People."

Via chrome.google.com

Revisit Google results:

Revisit Google results:

Via google.com

What does Snapchat's CEO think about this generation?

What does Snapchat's CEO think about this generation?

Via bloomberg.com


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1PKAn2q
via IFTTT

The Most Redacted Men In America

The Declassification Engine searched nearly a million pages of once-secret documents to find the men the Eisenhower administration wanted the world to know the least about.

"America's Most Redacted" is the first article in a BuzzFeed series written with help from Columbia University's History Lab. This team of historians and data scientists is developing a "Declassification Engine" that turns documents into data and mines it for insights about the history and future of official secrecy. The stories draw from the lab's searchable database of over 2 million declassified government documents.

opensource.com CC BY-SA / Via Flickr: opensourceway

Last week, the U.S. government released a tranche of documents related to the 2011 raid on the Abbottabad, Pakistan, compound where Osama bin Laden spent the last years of his life. The declassification of the papers, which included bin Laden's correspondence and his reading materials, was incredibly public — advanced to the press and immediately scrutinized, not just for their content but for their timing, shortly after Seymour Hersh's expose in the London Review of Books called into question many of the basic facts that support the government's story about the operation.

Such commotion hardly greets the declassification of most American government secrets, which pass into the public record years after the information they contain would have caused a stir. And yet beyond their specifics, the patterns of information contained in these declassifications can yield enormous insight into the priorities of government and the nature of official secrecy.

Analyzing the data behind these patterns can answer a fascinating question: Who are the people the American government was most likely to conceal in its official documentation? Politicians? Diplomats? Spies?

With an archival platform that combines visual and textual analysis, the History Lab queried over 117,000 documents — more than 765,000 pages from the CIA, the Pentagon, and the State Department — declassified at presidential libraries over the past 40 years. What they were looking for: names that were proportionally more likely to be blacked out — redacted — during the Eisenhower administration, to start. (Go here for a closer look at the Lab's methods.)

The resulting list of 10 men contains major world leaders and fairly obscure officials alike, and reflects the dominant foreign policy concern of the time, Soviet influence. And they are all linked by a single factor: The American government thought they were involved with things that should not be released to the public.

"There are diplomats as well as spies, and not all are enemies of the state," Matthew Connelly, a Columbia University history professor and the principal investigator at History Lab, told BuzzFeed News. "U.S. officials often erase names simply to save embarrassment. Now we are beginning to have the technology to measure this problem."

Here in order, are America's 10 most (proportionally) redacted names from 1953 to 1961:

Ismet Inonu

Ismet Inonu

U.S. Army Signal Corps/Library Of Congress


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1F8fp2v
via IFTTT