30 Eylül 2016 Cuma

Evan Rachel Wood And Thandie Newton Defend Sexual Violence In "Westworld"

From left: Evan Rachel Wood, James Marsden, and Thandie Newton.

Frederick M. Brown / Getty Images

Westworld, HBO’s much-anticipated sci-fi series about a futuristic theme park where humans pay $40,000 to interact with lifelike robots, finally airs this Sunday. In the months leading up to the premiere, the show’s creators, producers, and even one top HBO executive have defended its fixation on sexual violence. Last night at a press event, actors Evan Rachel Wood and Thandie Newton, who both play artificially intelligent “hosts” who are repeatedly assaulted, also stepped in to defend the show, arguing that Westworld is both responsible and sensitive in its depiction of rape.

"You have an obligation as a storyteller to raise awareness and to show the horrors of that so that people aren’t desensitized to it. I don’t think there’s anything titillating about what we’re doing — it’s all horrific, as it should be," said Wood.

"We get to see the consequence and ramifications of this violence, the cost of this violence,” added Newton.

There’s only one rule in Westworld: Hosts can’t harm humans. Humans, on the other hand, can do whatever they want to the hosts, which can mean shooting them, stabbing them, and raping them. At the end of each day, the bots are patched up and their memories are mercifully wiped; the same Western-themed adventure starts anew the next morning.

In the first four episodes, the show does not depict rape onscreen. "We don’t actually show sexual violence towards women," Wood said. "You never see a scene of like rape or anything, but you know it’s going to happen." But the inanimate hosts emote and bleed just like humans, so it’s harrowing to watch them get treated like bystanders in a first-person shooter game.

Wood and Newton spoke at a roundtable discussion yesterday evening held at the Four Seasons hotel in Silicon Valley to promote Westworld, along with actor Jeffrey Wright, who plays the theme park’s head programmer, as well as the married couple behind the production, showrunners Jonathan Nolan (the brother of director Christopher Nolan) and Lisa Joy. Nolan’s previous works — he co-wrote the movie Interstellar and created the TV series Person of Interest — have also circled around artificial intelligence. With Westworld, he and Joy wanted to tell the story from the robot’s perspective and see what humans look like through their eyes.

“Morality isn’t a problem with video games because the simulation is poor enough that you don’t conflate the experience,” said Nolan. But, he added, “when the intelligence of the nonplayer characters that you’re interacting with eclipses a certain level, then it’s much more problematic than driving around in Grand Theft Auto and running over a bunch of pedestrians.”

Westworld is adapted from Michael Crichton's 1973 movie of the same name. But unlike Crichton's Jurassic Park, the threat here is more existential than physical. In the first episode, a line of code in a software update causes the hosts to remember brief flashes of the horrors that they have lived through, leaving the resort essentially “populated by 2,000 abuse victims and survivors, finally waking up,” Willa Paskin wrote in Slate.

Both executive producer J.J. Abrams and HBO president Casey Bloys have called the criticism about excessive sexual violence accurate and valid, but defended Westworld. “You can’t tell a story about oppression without depicting the oppressed," Abrams told reporters at the show’s premiere in Los Angeles earlier this week.

At the roundtable, Newton and Wood also acknowledged the horror of those scenes, but emphasized that the intent is to force the audience to contend with sexual violence.

“We’re also looking at it from so many different points of view, the perpetrator, the person who has been affected by it, the people who are complicit by being around it. I mean, when do you ever really get a narrative where you get to see it from those different points of view? I think that’s incredibly valuable, but the only way we can really look at it is by showing it," said Newton.

Newton also stressed there was nothing gratuitous about the sexual violence on the show. "It’s not like we’ll show you this then we’ll distract you and show you something else so you forgot that you’ve seen something so fucking disgusting, and that you don’t even have time to really sit with it and process it, and challenge it in your own mind,” she said. “I think it’s hugely responsible and sensitive filmmaking to first of all be brave enough to put this stuff out there, frankly. Because it’s the opposite of what we want to promote as a team."

youtube.com




from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2dM3u8v
via IFTTT

This Guy Was Arrested After He Smashed Up All The iPhones In An Apple Store

Apparently, he was protesting “consumer rights”.

Wearing sunglasses, dangling iPhone headphones, and a thick glove, the man went phone by phone crushing them with the large iron ball.

Wearing sunglasses, dangling iPhone headphones, and a thick glove, the man went phone by phone crushing them with the large iron ball.

Twitter: @Quentin_IOS

In a video filmed by a bystander, the man yells about his rights as a consumer had been violated by Apple.

In a video filmed by a bystander, the man yells about his rights as a consumer had been violated by Apple.

Twitter: @Quentin_IOS

“[Apple] violated my rights and refused to refund me in accordance to the European consumer protection law,” the man shouts.

“[Apple] violated my rights and refused to refund me in accordance to the European consumer protection law,” the man shouts.

Twitter: @Quentin_IOS


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2dxc7Vz
via IFTTT

29 Eylül 2016 Perşembe

Twitter Says This Isis Beheading Photo Doesn't Qualify As Abuse

"Kathleen" is an outspoken Hillary Clinton supporter. Last Tuesday she took to Twitter to criticize the Trump campaign's Skittles refugee poster, calling it a "disgusting ad." Shortly after, @leslymill — who goes by the name Adorable Deplorable — replied, "i LOVE THE AD. Describes the complexity of the "PROBLEM perfectly."

The political disagreement — very common on Twitter — came to a head when @leslymill replied to Kathleen's tweet with an unsolicited photo of a child holding a knife and a newly severed head with the caption, "your heading for a deep hole." The photo, according to the website tangentcode.org, is from a video titled “Information Office of the State of Homs offers families (and ) the liquidation of a Captain in the Army Alnasiri” and shows a child soldier, believed to be associated with ISIS, beheading a man and posing with his head.

After seeing the photo, Kathleen reported the tweet to Twitter using its report forms. Soon after, Twitter replied that its investigation found the alleged violent and threatening tweet did not violate Twitter’s rules, which prohibit tweets involving violent threats, harassment, and hateful conduct. Twitter’s rules explicitly state that one may not “threaten other people on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliation, age, disability, or disease.”

This is not uncommon. In a recent BuzzFeed News survey, which asked over 2,700 Twitter users about abuse, 90% of respondents alleged that Twitter didn’t do anything when they reported abuse.

For Kathleen — who asked to remain anonymous (and use a pseudonym) so as not to receive more targeted abuse — the harassment is unsurprising, but unnerving. "I've worked online since 1985, so I've seen it all," she told BuzzFeed News. "But that doesn't mean I think it is ok."

Kathleen's case also raises questions about Twitter's ability to help protect its users from unwanted graphic imagery — the kind frequently used by abusers and trolls to threaten. Reached for comment, Twitter directed BuzzFeed News to a passage from an August blog post on countering violent extremism. The passage notes that "there is no one 'magic algorithm' for identifying terrorist content on the Internet." It also cites "proprietary spam-fighting tools, to supplement reports from our users and help identify repeat account abuse." These tools, according to the post, identified "more than one third of the accounts we ultimately suspended for promoting terrorism."

The post, however, doesn’t address terroristic or graphic imagery that has been co-opted by Twitter accounts that do not explicitly promote terrorism or violence against others. In @leslymill's case, horrific images of death are often used in rebuttal to opposing views, or to express sentiments like "This Is the Real Face of Islam."

When asked to clarify if the company evaluates graphic images such as beheadings on an individual basis, granting exceptions for newsworthiness, Twitter directed BuzzFeed News to a past statement noting that when evaluating media removal requests, "Twitter considers public interest factors such as the newsworthiness of the content and may not be able to honor every request." The company declined to provide further details about its handling of Kathleen's abuse report.

But roughly three hours after BuzzFeed News contacted Twitter about Kathleen's report, the tweet she'd flagged as abusive disappeared from @leslymills’ timeline. Twitter did not respond to queries about its deletion.

Reached for comment, @leslymill did not directly answer questions about being contacted by Twitter for possible terms of use violations. The account subsequently tweeted that it had been asked by Twitter to remove a picture, though it is not clear whether that picture was the one Kathleen reported. "I was asked to remove it...," @leslymill explained. "So I guess I shouldn't share those photoes...wonder why they don't tell me."




from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2dunw8M
via IFTTT

28 Eylül 2016 Çarşamba

Trump Claims Google Suppressed Bad News About Hillary Clinton

Jonathan Ernst / Reuters

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump on Wednesday claimed Google's search engine was biased in burying bad news about his rival Hillary Clinton.

Trump made the comment at a rally in Council Bluffs, Iowa, after mentioning a Google poll, which he said he was leading "despite the fact that Google's search engine was suppressing the bad news about Hillary Clinton. How about that."

Trump did not elaborate on what "bad news" he believed was being suppressed, though he typically appends "crooked" to Clinton's first name and has made her private email server a central talking point of his campaign.

Google did not immediately respond to a BuzzFeed News request for comment on the Republican nominee's latest allegation.

Though his claim that Google stacked the deck against him appears to be new, Trump has also repeatedly complained that the electoral system is, or could be, "rigged" against him. This summer he repeatedly warned of voter fraud, and put out a call for "observers" to watch polling places and safeguard against cheating.

After Monday's debate, Trump also claimed that his microphone was faulty and speculated that the alleged problem could have been intentional.

LINK: Trump Seeks Volunteer “Observers” To Stop Clinton From “Rigging” The Election

LINK: Trump Defends His “Rigged” Election Claim: “I Just Hear Things, And I Just Feel It”




from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2duUXb0
via IFTTT

Amid Fears Of Russian Hacks, Officials Say The US Election Is Secure

Afp / AFP / Getty Images

Less than a week after high-ranking lawmakers accused Russian intelligence agencies of trying to interfere with the presidential election, US officials have tried to offer a reassuring response: a cyberattack, they say, couldn’t change the outcome of the presidential election.

“I’m here to communicate one message — that message is that our elections are secure,” said Thomas Hicks, the chairman of the Election Assistance Commission (EAC), during a Congressional hearing Wednesday on election cybersecurity. Hicks said that our locally run election process, with each state managing its own systems, and comprising over 9,000 jurisdictions, presents an overwhelming obstacle to any would-be hacker.

Although hackers breached online election databases in Arizona and Illinois recently, Hicks stressed the difference between websites and voting systems. No voting machines in use are connected to the internet, he said. Hicks added that the attack on state systems served as a wake up call. “Instead of causing a national crisis, the breaches notified election officials across the country that they should be on high alert,” he said.

The EAC and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) have been tasked with providing cybersecurity resources and guidance to state governments after the hacks in Arizona and Illinois, and the Democratic National Committee’s email hack in July.

"We have confidence in the overall integrity of our electoral system because our voting infrastructure is fundamentally resilient."

Andy Ozment, a top DHS cybersecurity official, agreed that our decentralized election system protects against outside interference. “We have confidence in the overall integrity of our electoral system because our voting infrastructure is fundamentally resilient,” he said during the same hearing.

Ozment acknowledged that parts of the US electoral system, just like any digital technology, are vulnerable to tampering. But “we have no indication that adversaries are planning cyber operations against US election infrastructure that would change the outcome of the election in November,” he said.

Several lawmakers referenced how Sen. Dianne Feinstein and Rep. Adam Schiff had publicly accused Russia of engaging in sustained efforts to influence the US election, but Ozment declined to comment. No member of the executive branch has confirmed that Russian agents perpetrated the hacks, nor have they pinned the attacks on any other entity.

"Attacks against voting machines are unlikely to have widespread impact... However, attacks or malfunctions that could undermine public confidence are much easier."

Despite Ozment and Hicks’ reassurances, experts during the hearing pointed to the glaring security flaws tied to dangerously outdated voting equipment that’s still used across the country, as well as paperless voting machines.

Andrew Appel, a computer science professor at Princeton University, urged election officials to abandon touchscreen machines that produce no paper record. This protects not only against deliberate and malicious interference, but also miscalibration and software bugs, he said during the hearing. Appel has demonstrated how it's possible to install a vote-stealing program onto a voting machine in 7 minutes using just a screwdriver.

“As the equipment gets older, we are more likely to see failures,” said Lawrence Norden, the deputy director of the democracy program for the Brennan Center for Justice and co-author of a recent study that catalogued the alarming state of US voting machines.

Norden doubts that a Kremlin-hatched election scheme could determine who ends up in the White House. But he expressed a different concern, echoing lawmakers like Feinstein and Schiff: Rather than manipulating vote tallies, tampering with voting machines could sow distrust in the electoral process.

“Attempted attacks against voting machines are highly unlikely to have widespread impact on vote totals this November,” he said. “However, attacks or malfunctions that could undermine public confidence are much easier.”



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2d89WIA
via IFTTT

New Hampshire "Ballot Selfie" Ban Is Unconstitutional, Appeals Court Rules

Mike Blake / Reuters

WASHINGTON — A New Hampshire law that forbids people from taking so-called "ballot selfies" is unconstitutional, a federal appeals court ruled on Wednesday.

"New Hampshire may not impose such a broad restriction on speech by banning ballot selfies in order to combat an unsubstantiated and hypothetical danger" of vote buying or voter intimidation, Judge Sandra Lynch wrote for the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals.

"We repeat the old adage: 'a picture is worth a thousand words.'"

The ACLU had brought a lawsuit challenging the law on behalf of three people investigated for alleged violations of the law during the 2014 election. At the appeals court, they were backed by the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and Snapchat, among others.

In the key part of the ruling, Lynch wrote:

Read the opinion:



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2dlZI1x
via IFTTT

Here’s What We Actually Know About What Gadgets Do To Our Bodies

For Cassandra Smolcic, the trouble began at her dream internship. Handpicked to spend a summer working on movies at Pixar, the 26-year-old logged marathon hours, and more than a few all-nighters, at her computer and tablet. At first, she managed to ignore the mysterious pinching sensations in her hands and forearms. But by the time her internship ended and a full-time job offer rolled in, she could barely move her fingers.

For Skylar, a 12-year-old in South Florida who loves her laptop, phone, and tablet, the breaking point came at the start of sixth grade last fall. Suddenly her neck, shoulders, and back felt strained whenever she rolled her head, as if invisible hands were yanking muscles apart from the inside. All her neck-rolling, she worried, made her look like she was trying to cheat off someone’s test.

To be a perpetually plugged-in, emailing, texting, sexting, swiping, Snapchatting, selfie-taking human being in 2016, a little thumb twinge is the price of admission. There are the media-anointed outliers: the Candy Crusher with a ruptured thumb tendon, the woman who over-texted her way to “WhatsAppitis.” And then there are people like the 18-year-old woman who said, “If I’m scrolling down Tumblr for more than half an hour, my fingers will get sore.” “When I hold my phone,” a 22-year-old complained, cradling her iPhone in her palm, “my bottom finger really hurts.” A 30-year-old software engineer said his fingers “naturally curl inwards,” claw-like: “I remember my hand did not quite use to be like that.” Amy Luo, 27, suspects her iPhone 6s is partly to blame for the numbness in her right thumb and wrist. Compared with her old iPhone, she said, “you have to stretch a lot more, and it’s heavier.” Dr. Patrick Lang, a San Francisco hand surgeon, sees more and more twenty- and thirtysomething tech employees with inexplicable debilitating pain in their upper limbs. “I consider it like an epidemic,” he said, “particularly in this city.”

“I consider it like an epidemic, particularly in San Francisco.”

To be clear, no one knows just how bad this “epidemic” is. At best, we learn to endure our stiff necks and throbbing thumbs. At worst, a generation of people damage their bodies without realizing it. In all likelihood, we are somewhere in the middle, between perturbance and public health crisis, but for the time being we simply don’t — can’t — know what all these machines will do to our bodies in the long term, especially in the absence of definitive research. What we do know is that now more people are using multiple electronics — cell phones, smartphones, tablets, laptops, desktops — for more hours a day, starting at ever earlier ages. But we weren’t built for them.

Source for computer injury prevention tips: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons / Via orthoinfo.aaos.org

Growing up in the Rust Belt city of Greensburg, Pennsylvania, Smolcic was the kid who was always sketching characters from movies and cartoons. And in her adolescent years in the ’90s, computers became an important tool for honing her artistic talents: She made clip-art greeting cards and banners, and high school newspaper layouts, on desktop computers. At Susquehanna University, she went all in on graphic design as a career after she took a computer arts course on a whim. That meant long hours on various iMacs, and even more screen time when she went on to earn a master’s in graphic design at the Savannah College of Art and Design. Over the years, she’s also carried a flip phone, a Motorola Razr, a Dell laptop, and, at the moment, a MacBook Pro and an iPhone 6s.

Smolcic in Hong Kong

Courtesy Cassandra Smolcic

Machines were crucial to Smolcic’s burgeoning artistic career, as they are to so many of our lives. But it’d be hard to call them human-friendly.

Consider the minimum biomechanics needed to work a smartphone. Put aside all the other risks — of getting depressed and lonely; of sacrificing sleep, hearing, eyesight, and focus; of dying while snapping selfies on cliffs, or texting while walking or driving. The act of just using the thing is precarious.

Our heads sit atop our necks and line up with our shoulders and arms, just as a two-footed species’ should. But a forward-leaning head shakes up this graceful arrangement: The upper body drifts back, the hips tilt forward, and pretty much everything else — the spine, the nerves below the neck, the upper limb muscles — tightens up. Slouching is all too easy when we hold a phone in our outstretched hand or reach for a mouse. When we type on our laptops cross-legged or sprawled on our stomachs, our necks and shoulders strain from leaning into the low screens. (Yes, as counterintuitive as it sounds, you probably shouldn’t put a laptop on your lap.)

Our hands are uniquely capable of grasping objects, a useful trait for our branch–swinging primate ancestors. Especially remarkable are our opposable thumbs, free to flex, extend, curl, and press in all sorts of directions. But their inherently unstable joints didn’t evolve to be constantly pushed beyond their range of motion. Yet they are when we flick through our phones or, worse, tablets.

Dr. Markison in his San Francisco office

Stephanie Lee / BuzzFeed News

To Dr. Robert Markison, it’s clear: Virtually none of Silicon Valley’s inventions, from the clunky Macintosh 128K of 1984 to the sleek iPhone 7, have been designed with respect for the human form. Markison is a San Francisco surgeon who depends on his hands to operate on other people’s hands. He so believes in technology’s potential to harm — and treats so many young startup workers who confirm that suspicion — that he almost exclusively uses voice recognition software. He also has his own line of smartphone styluses that double as pens, with colorful barrels made of manually mixed pigments, pressure-cast resin, and hand-dyed silk.

On a recent afternoon in his office, Markison asked me to make a fist around a grip strength measurement tool, with my thumb facing the ceiling. It felt powerful, easy. Then he had me turn my palm to the floor, the keyboarding stance of a white-collar worker, and do the same thing; my grip immediately lost a noticeable amount of strength. “There’s no reason to think a mouse is a good idea,” Markison said.

Of course, many people with office jobs probably suspect that already. During the ’80s and ’90s, when computers — then also known as “video display terminals” — invaded workplaces around the world, employees felt their arms and fingers go numb, and headlines warned of the harm these newfangled devices appeared to be inflicting. In the early ’90s, telephone operators, journalists, clerical workers, and employees from other fields filed hundreds of lawsuits against the manufacturers of equipment such as computer keyboards, which they blamed for severe arm, wrist, and hand injuries.

All that worry woke a generation up to the physical (and psychological) toll of automated, ultra-efficient work. Then came furniture and appliances to align technology with our bodies. Ergonomic mice are gripped vertically, and foot mice save clicks. Slanted and split keyboards let hands relax. Desks convert to a standing position or have adjustable split levels for monitors and keyboards. Some software transcribes speech, other software alerts your boss when you type too fast.

But these inventions have been largely for desktops. The dizzying rise of cell phones, tablets, and laptops, fueled by the rush to make screens ever more portable and ubiquitous, have all but left human-centered design principles in the dust.

Chances are good you’re reading this on your phone. In fact, chances are good your phone was the first thing you looked at this morning and the last thing you looked at last night. Wake up to a phone alarm. Scroll, bleary-eyed, through email, texts, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram. Field more news and email on your phone on public transit (or, er, in the car). Sit behind a computer of some kind at work or school. All day your buzzing phone demands to be held, whether you’re out to lunch or, admit it, on the toilet. Come reverse commute, you’re once again head down on your phone, or an e-reader, until you finally take a break at home — by watching Game of Thrones on your laptop or tablet. Bonus points if you play Words With Friends while you do it.

Mark Davis / BuzzFeed News. Sources: New York Spine Surgery & Rehabilitation Medicine, Mayo Clinic, American Society for Surgery of the Hand

Last year alone, an estimated 164 million laptops and 207 million tablets were sold worldwide. Sixty-three percent of the world’s population had a mobile subscription; by 2020, more than 2.5 billion new smartphone connections are predicted to come online. We are surrounded by gadgets. Luo’s hand may hurt from holding her iPhone, yet her lifestyle leaves her little choice but to swipe and soldier on. “I have considered being on the phone less,” said the Twitter product designer, “but it’s kind of hard because it’s how I keep in touch with my friends and everything.” Her doctor told her to “absolutely stop” laptop work. Luo admits she doesn’t listen.

Eighteen hours, from waking up at 7 a.m. to going to bed at 1 — that’s how long Owen Savir, 35, says he’s on his Nexus 6P every day. (He keeps busy as the president of Beepi, an online car marketplace.) Savir’s pinkie sometimes goes numb under his phone, and the cover cuts his skin so much it needs a Band-Aid.

How would he feel, I asked, if his phone got taken away?

He paused. “I would use my other phone.”

“I have considered being on the phone less, but it’s kind of hard because it’s how I keep in touch with my friends and everything.”

Scientists don’t definitively know how all this activity affects our bodies. While some studies link hand ailments to heavy computer and video game use, far fewer have examined new devices like smartphones. “The phones have only been out 10 to 15 years at best,” said Jack Dennerlein, who directs the Occupational Biomechanics and Ergonomics Laboratory at Harvard University. “We haven’t had the long-term exposures to start seeing some of the more chronic issues that come up later in life.”

No reliable measurement of technology-related ailments exists. The closest thing is an annual survey of workplace injuries by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, whose data suggests that cases of musculoskeletal disorders, including carpal tunnel syndrome, have dropped over the last two decades. But these figures are at best “a very crude measure” of problems, said Dr. Kurt Hegmann, who directs the University of Utah’s Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health. As Dennerlein put it: “They’re better than nothing.”

Hegmann offers some theories for why the numbers are shrinking: High-risk jobs like manufacturing are decreasing. Panicked workers in the ’90s likely reported nonexistent ailments before the hysteria subsided. Some offices may have became more ergonomic. And there are other reasons the numbers are probably off: Non-work-related factors like obesity can contribute to carpal tunnel, and if you’re constantly sending work emails but also Instagramming for fun, it’s hard to blame your sore hand on work alone.

BuzzFeed News; Getty. Source: Surgical Technology International

However widespread phone-linked injuries may or may not be, a small cluster of studies suggests that they are real. A 2011 study of nearly 140 mobile device users linked internet time to right thumb pain, as well as overall screen time to right shoulder and neck discomfort. Another found that smartphone overuse enlarges the nerve involved in carpal tunnel, causes thumb pain, and hinders the hand’s ability to do things like pinch.

Upright, an adult’s head puts about a dozen pounds of force on the spine, according to a 2014 paper. But tilted 15 degrees, as if over a phone, the force surges to 27 pounds, and to 60 pounds at 60 degrees. (That’s the weight of four Thanksgiving turkeys.)

“It’s harmful when you’re younger, because the bones are still malleable and pliable and they may be disformed permanently,” said New York spinal surgeon Dr. Kenneth Hansraj, who wrote the paper after treating a patient “head down in his iPad, playing Angry Birds four hours a day.” Older people can suffer too, he said, because their spines are prone to narrowing, making them susceptible to injury.

But the doctor insists he’s no “cell phone basher.” “I love the ability to have a cup of coffee and contact 10 of my friends in 10 countries with one text and say, ‘I love this coffee,’” he said. “I’m just saying, my message is to keep your head up and be cognizant of where your head is in space.”



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2d9Lt34
via IFTTT

What Killed The Blackberry?

Today, Blackberry announced it will no longer make hardware. Here’s the definitive history of the once-dominant smartphone’s downfall.

This is the original iPhone, a leading smartphone.

Apple

This is the iPhone 3G, which added 3G capabilities to the original iPhone smartphone.

Apple

Here is the iPhone 3GS, which added more speed to the iPhone 3G.

Apple

This is an image of the iPhone 4, the next in the series of the iPhone smartphone line. It had a new, better screen and was faster than its predecessor, the iPhone 3GS.

Apple


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2dffs8p
via IFTTT

Oculus Diversity Program Members "Shocked And Dismayed" By Founder's Alt-Right Ties

Palmer Luckey

Kevork Djansezian / Getty Images

This May, 100 virtual reality developers from around the country gathered at Facebook’s Menlo Park campus for a bootcamp in making software for the Oculus Rift. They were there as a part of the Launch Pad program, a fellowship designed “for diverse creators to build for VR.” After a long day of meetings, the final speaker was Oculus founder Palmer Luckey, wearing his trademark Hawaiian shirt. By keynoting the event, some attendees felt, Luckey was sending a message: The future of VR looked like them.

Now, four short months later, many of the Launch Pad fellows are reconsidering their involvement with the program after revelations that Luckey donated money to a pro-Trump nonprofit associated with the alt-right, the online political movement of trolls that sees offensive speech as a patriotic duty and views cultural diversity with disdain.

"I'm doing a Day of the Dead project. ... How can I promote that when the head of Oculus is giving money [to support] Trump?"

"The mood is surprise, shock, dismay, and disappointment," one Launch Pad fellow, a California-based producer, told BuzzFeed News. "A number of people are creating documentaries to address social issues, and they are questioning whether Oculus is the right platform."

Announced in March, the Launch Pad program comprises the May bootcamp as well as the possibility of tens of thousands of dollars in funding for Oculus projects. In the announcement, the company encouraged "women, people of color, members of the LGBTQ community and anyone who is willing to share how their perspective adds to the 'diversity of thought' in our community" to apply.

The program also includes a community: a closed Facebook group set up for the fellows by in-house coordinators, where dozens of fellows are now sharing their anger and disappointment.

"Let me get this straight, the founder of Oculus thinks my sister should be banned from visiting me in the US because she's Muslim? And hates my husband because he's Jewish?" wrote one fellow.

Alejandro Quan-Madrid, a Launch Pad fellow based in Los Angeles, said Luckey's political donations make him feel like a hypocrite. "I'm doing a Day of the Dead project and showing it at Day of the Dead festivals," he told BuzzFeed News. "How can I promote that when the head of Oculus is giving money [to support] Trump — and Trump wants people in my community to be deported?"

On Friday, Luckey wrote a Facebook post apologizing for "my actions ... negatively impacting the perception of Oculus and its partners." But he did apologize not for the activity of Nimble America itself, which was formed to turn "shitposting and meme magic" into a "real life" political operation. As the Daily Beast reported, Nimble America gestated on r/The_Donald, the Trump subreddit whose community members say that liberals are "cucks" and "left wing SJWs," Syrian immigrants are "animals" who should be "put in a cage," and that black people would "still be living in mud huts" if not for colonialism.

Palmer's apology didn't move many of the Launch Pad fellows. "It didn’t say anything of real substance," said the California producer. "At some point, I’m not sure if there is anything to be said. It feels like he probably really believes this stuff."

Several of the fellows asked the Launch Pad coordinator, Oculus Diversity Lead Amy Thole, for clarification on Luckey's apology. Thole, who declined to speak to BuzzFeed News, sent an email to the fellows yesterday announcing that because of a planned move to Oregon, Monday was her last day at the company. There would be an "Oculus Diversity Transition" to new leadership, she wrote. She did not mention Luckey or Nimble America. (According to the email, Thole's replacement is Ebony Peay, who previously worked as an executive assistant at Oculus.)

Peay will be thrust into a difficult situation — now many of the fellows are hesitant about Oculus publicly using their work. At the bootcamp, Oculus employees talked about the importance of “making VR inclusive” from the very beginning of the new industry, one of the fellows told BuzzFeed News. But now, fellows say, people are going to view Project Launch skeptically. "I feel bad for the organizers," said Quan-Madrid. "Any time they come out and talk about Launch Pad, it will look like a PR cover-up."

Launch Pad fellows will have until October to decide whether or not they will accept funding from Oculus; that's when the company plans to announce the winning projects. If they don't, they'll join a handful of developers who have already decided to withdraw support from the platform in the wake of last week's report about Luckey. Among other things, that's not good news for Facebook, which faces major competition in the burgeoning VR market from Sony, HTC, and Google.

"The days of separation between a founder's values and his company’s values are waning," the California producer and Launch Pad fellow said. "And there’s a bigger question: Are the values he embodies good for Facebook?"



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2d6p5K7
via IFTTT

27 Eylül 2016 Salı

Those Online Polls Showing Trump Winning The Debate Were Probably Not Rigged By Russia

Timothy A. Clary / AFP / Getty Images

SAN FRANCISCO — Many of the online polls following the first presidential debate were manipulated to make it appear as though Trump had won, but those trying to skew the polls appeared to be be pranksters and Trump supporters rather than organized Russian hackers.

As it emerged Tuesday that dozens of online polls showed landslide victories for Trump following the first debate, rumors swirled that Russian hackers had been behind a campaign to hack the polls and hand Trump a victory.

A tweet by Twitter user @DustinGiebel purported to show a map of Twitter activity in the Russian city of St Petersburg as evidence that the #TrumpWon hashtag had originated there. The tweet has since been deleted but a screengrab is below.

The tweet has since been deleted and the account has not answered numerous requests for comment on which program was used to reach the conclusion that Russians were behind the #Trumpwon hashtag. A blog post from the Washington Post also pointed out that the map used in the tweet is not typical of mapping programs used to plot Twitter trends, including TrendsMap which was originally identified as the source of the graphic.

"This is certainly not from any of our tools and do not know of any tools that look this way," TrendsMap spokesperson Kathy Mellett said in an email to the Post. "Based upon our analysis, #TrumpWon primarily came from the US. There was an initial spike just after the debate followed by a much larger one a few hours later. In particular, around 97% of the initial spike of approximately 6,000 tweets came from the US."

An analysis by BuzzFeed News showed that while there was one St. Petersburg-based Twitter account repeatedly using that hashtag, it was also widely used across the United States at the same time.

Meanwhile, a look at the poll results, however, showed that the polls themselves were so poorly designed and secured that simple tricks suggested by Trump supporters on the 4chan messaging board were enough to manipulate the results at dozens of media outlets, including Time, CNBC, and BuzzFeed News.

The idea to manipulate the polls was suggested on 4chan in the week leading up to the debate. In one dedicated chat room Monday night, Trump supporters shared tips on how to manipulate the polls using easy methods such as opening an incognito browser window, or turning a phone's airplane mode off and on.

4chan / Via boards.4chan.org

4chan / Via boards.4chan.org

A developer at BuzzFeed confirmed that in-house this poll, run in the wake of the debate, had indeed been manipulated to give Trump a hardy victory over Clinton. The developer said that someone had executed a JavaScript script to register votes repeatedly, basically running a program that let them vote repeatedly in the same poll.

BuzzFeed News reached out to Time and CNBC for comment, both of whom ran polls created by the same Playbuzz platform, which gave Trump a huge victory in the debate. A spokeswoman from Time said the company had seen more unique viewers than votes on the page where they ran the poll. CNBC did not respond to a request for comment, though it appears it was heavily targeted by 4Chan users. A spokesperson from Playbuzz did not answer a request for comment on how it ensures that its polls are conducted securely, but a Playbuzz employee, who answered a call from BuzzFeed and agreed to speak on condition of anonymity, said their polls were "not scientific, they aren't meant to be taken as scientific evidence."

That media companies continue to run online polls, especially around important news events such as the first debate in right race for the presidency is a "failing of journalism," said one editor at a news organization who ran one of the polls conducted Monday night.

"I spent all morning asking and no one knows if our poll was secure, how it was conducted, or if someone scammed it. Now people are pointing to our poll saying that it shows Trump won," said the editor, who asked to remain anonymous as he was not authorized to speak about his company's polling system. "That's not good journalism."

CNN is currently the only news outlet to have run a poll in which verified people were asked how Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump fared in the debate Monday night. The CNN/ORC poll conducted immediately following the debate found that Clinton topped Trump 62 to 27.





from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2cA1gUL
via IFTTT

Ready To Die On Mars? Elon Musk Wants To Send You There

This is what SpaceX's Interplanetary Transport System, which Elon Musk hopes will take people to Mars one day, would look like.

SpaceX / Via Flickr

Elon Musk has said he wants to die on Mars — “just not on impact.” In a speech on Tuesday, Musk outlined how his company Space Exploration Technologies (SpaceX), which has yet to even send a human into orbit, hopes to shuttle people to Mars to forge a self-sustaining civilization within 40 to 100 years.

What the billionaire did not explain, however, is how the people he plans to shuttle there would survive on a planet no human has ever set foot on. In 2002, Musk founded SpaceX with the goal of “making life multi-planetary.” When Musk teased his intent to discuss a plan to colonize Mars in April, he warned, “it’s going to sound pretty crazy.” It does.

"Are you prepared to die? If that’s ok, then you’re a candidate for going.”

“Are you prepared to die? If that’s ok, then you’re a candidate for going,” Musk said. Would he become the first man on Mars himself? Probably not. “I’d definitely need to have a good succession plan because the probability of death is really high on the first mission. And I’d like to see my kids grow up.”

But for those who are willing to risk death – Musk would not advise sending your children – he pulled up a presentation slide that showed SpaceX’s timeline to begin flights to Mars in 2023. The cost of bringing a person to Mars right now is about $10 billion, he said. And his goal is to bring that figure down to $200,000, the median price of a home in the US, and hopefully even lower, to $140,000. Who’s going to pay for it? “Ultimately, this is going to be a huge public-private partnership,” Musk said. He also said he will fund the project with his own money. (Forbes estimates his net worth at $11.7 billion.)

The speech marks a big moment for Musk, and casts aside his troubles on Earth: Tesla, his electric car company, is under federal investigation after a driver's fatal crash while operating one of its cars with its Autopilot system engaged. Several shareholders are suing Tesla as well, after the company made an offer to purchase SolarCity, the solar energy company Musk is chairman of. Not to mention the fact that a SpaceX rocket carrying a satellite for Facebook’s Internet.org initiative exploded at its launch site, Cape Canaveral Air Force station, earlier this month.

"There’s a tremendous opportunity for anyone who wants to go to Mars to create something new...Everything from iron refineries to the first pizza joint."

“If you’re an explorer and you want to be on the frontier and push the envelope and be where things are super exciting, even if it’s dangerous, that’s really who we’re appealing to here,” Musk said. He compared SpaceX’s plans to shuttle people to Mars in spaceships that could fit 100 (and eventually 200) people to the construction of the Union Pacific Railroad, which was built in the late 1800s to connect about two dozen western states. “There’s a tremendous opportunity for anyone who wants to go to Mars to create something new and bold, the foundations of a new planet. Everything from iron refineries to the first pizza joint, things on Mars that people can’t even imagine today that might be unique to Mars,” he said.

People might not be able to imagine them because humans have yet to set foot on Mars. For 40 years, NASA has been sending out rovers, orbiters and landers to learn more about the planet. Scientists and researchers have spent lengthy periods of time in cold, dangerous environments like Antarctica, and inside barren volcano slopes in Hawaii, to simulate life on the Red Planet. But dreaming big is perfectly in character for Musk, who started SpaceX in 2002. In 2012, the company’s Dragon rocket became the first commercial spacecraft to deliver cargo safely to the International Space Station for NASA and return to Earth. Since then, it’s been landing (and failing to land) reusable rockets on barges in the middle of the ocean.

youtube.com

The company released a video of its new rocket, which would be the biggest rocket ever, as part of the presentation. It’s called BFR – short for “big fucking rocket.” For scale, Musk pulled up an image of it on the screen behind him. This is what it looked like:

That small man to the right, just a blip, is Elon Musk. He projected the BFR on the screen behind him.

Scott Hubbard, formerly the director of NASA Ames Research Center and its "Mars czar," told BuzzFeed News that building such a rocket would be an engineering feat. "That's way beyond anything anyone's ever built before," he said. The individual components of Musk's engineering goals are very optimistic, but not technologically impossible, Hubbard said – it's not like Musk said he's trying to build a transporter beam.

"The scale of it, though, is so much larger than anything NASA's ever done, and I am skeptical about the timeline. The specifics require engineering development that has yet to be done," Hubbard said. "The history of launch vehicles is littered with failures...rocket science is called rocket science for a reason."

In a statement after Musk’s presentation finished, NASA said it “applauds all those who want to take the next giant leap – and advance the journey to Mars. We are very pleased that the global community is working to meet the challenges of a sustainable human presence on Mars.”

"Rocket science is called rocket science for a reason."

Still, NASA’s timeline for putting humans on Mars is several years out from Musk’s, and its plans are much less grandiose.

Ellen Stofan, chief scientist at NASA, told BuzzFeed News prior to Musk’s announcement that the agency sees value in its partnership with SpaceX and that the company can help accelerate the dream of getting humans to Mars. But the biggest hindrance is figuring out how to keep humans healthy and sustain life there. Humans lose bone density in space, and radiation levels on Mars are so high that “for humans to stay on Mars for any duration, you’d have to be living underground.”

“When you think about large-scale movement of humans to Mars, it’s just not practical or desirable,” Stofan said. “I think our timeline of aiming to get humans to mars in the early 2030s, say 2032, is the one that gets people there on a path where we can feel comfortable that we can get them there safely, and get them home safely.”

Then there are other human issues, like one that an audience member asked Musk in the Q&A after his presentation. He said he came up with the question while at Burning Man, with no plumbing, in a hot, dusty Nevada desert that got chilly in the evenings. Will Mars have toilets?

"Is this what Mars is going to be like? Just a dusty, waterless shit storm?"

“There was a lot of shit, and there was no water to take it into the rivers,” he told Musk. “Is this what Mars is going to be like? Just a dusty, waterless shit storm?”

Musk clearly wasn’t prepared for the question.

After all, his presentation touched only lightly on how people would live upon getting to Mars. He presented a simple solution as to how people would be fed: “We can grow plants on Mars just by compressing the atmosphere.”

John Logsdon, the founder and former director of the Space Policy Institute at the George Washington University in DC, said Musk’s presentation lacked details on how any of his goals would be funded, and that it left “lots of open technical issues.”

“This is very much a vision rather than a detailed plan,” Logsdon said. “We need bold visions for anything to happen.”



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2dpQWon
via IFTTT

Facebook's Suspensions Of Political Speech Are Now A Pattern

Facebook, a vital forum for online speech, can’t seem to stop removing significant political content from its platform.

Last week, the company disabled several prominent Palestinian journalists’ accounts, following user reports that they were violating Facebook standards. These weren't small time reporters — they're people who manage pages followed by millions. Facebook later reinstated their accounts, blaming their removal on an error: “The pages were removed in error and restored as soon as we were able to investigate,” a Facebook spokesperson said, using an excuse that didn’t need dusting off, since Facebook has offered variations of it at least four times in past six months.

In April, Facebook removed six pro-Bernie Sanders groups before reinstating them and blaming a technical error. In July, Facebook pulled a video showing Philando Castile dying after being shot by police at a traffic stop, only to subsequently reinstate it and again blame its original removal on a glitch. In August, Facebook suspended two big libertarian Facebook pages for days before reinstating them, saying: “The pages were taken down in error.” Last week, it was an “error” again.

"We sometimes get things wrong"

After four such errors in six months, Facebook's takedowns seem less like occasional missteps and more like symptoms of a flawed policy that needs to be addressed. Asked if there are fundamental issues within Facebook’s systems that need to change, a Facebook spokesperson pointed BuzzFeed News to a public statement, stating: “Our team processes millions of reports each week, and we sometimes get things wrong.”

The company did not respond to a follow-up question about whether Facebook plans to review its tendency to erroneously silence politically significant speech.

Facebook depends on a system of user reports to police content on its platform. When someone sees content they think violates Facebook’s community standards, they can flag it and send it into review. While this system might work well for content that's broadly recognized as objectionable and in clear violation of Facebook policies, it doesn't work quite as well in situations with more nuance. In some of those situations, it seems people with one political perspective are gaming Facebook's system to silence people with other perspectives.

User reports are used as weapons in other scenarios on Facebook, such as the company's "real names," policy, which has been exploited to suspend transgender Facebook users.

This probably won't be the last time a Facebook review team member makes a curation decision that the company will reverse after complaints and further consideration. If the company doesn't change its review system, there’s little preventing errors like this from occurring again, and again.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2dp7YD3
via IFTTT

Two Unicorns Go To War In Business Software

Hulton Archive / Getty Images

Josh Reeves, the 33-year-old CEO of the payroll and benefits startup Gusto, is an Eagle Scout with a sweet smile and a sensible haircut. He speaks softly, blushes easily, and gently reminds guests to remove their shoes before entering the office.

But last week, at a press briefing in a private dining room of an upscale San Francisco lunch spot, Reeves slung mud at Zenefits, his most prominent — and most prominently troubled — rival. He had just been telling the reporters about Gusto's new product, a Zenefits-like human resources software system. With Zenefits expected to unveil its own product upgrade next month — dubbed Z2 — Reeves seemed keen to ensure his rival's past missteps wouldn't be forgotten.

"Z2 sounds like a sequel," Reeves said. "Ideally the first movie is good enough on its own."

"There are no shortcuts. There's always a poster child for that," he added, in a not-so-subtle dig at Zenefits' past failures to comply with insurance broker licensing rules. "Things like compliance have to be there from the beginning."

"We've been thrilled by the customers moving to us from Zenefits," Reeves continued. The burger he had ordered remained untouched.

The beef between Gusto and Zenefits — which fired its founding CEO and lost hundreds of employees earlier this year in the wake of its broker licensing scandal — stretches back about a year. That's when BuzzFeed News reported that Zenefits, known for making human resources software and selling health insurance, was secretly developing a payroll processing system, stepping directly onto the turf of its onetime partner Gusto, then known as Zenpayroll.

Zenefits' effort had the tongue-in-cheek nickname "Project Nutshot."

Sergei Supinsky / AFP / Getty Images

Gusto — which at that time was itself quietly moving onto Zenefits' turf by preparing to sell health insurance — has now fired back in force. On Tuesday it announced it has created an "all-in-one" human resources software system, including features to help small companies onboard new employees and manage 401(k)s. The effort is a direct challenge to Zenefits, which has long offered similar features but has lately been busy patching things up with regulators and customers.

Told of Reeves's comments, Zenefits spokesperson Jessica Hoffman picked up the gauntlet.

"It's great to hear that our competitors are already in a panic about Z2," Hoffman said in an email to BuzzFeed News. "They're still trying to copy version one of our product while we are about to launch version two, which will redefine this industry."

"The fact that they're talking so much about Zenefits indicates who the market leader is," Hoffman added.

Silicon Valley startups aren't often willing to spar like this in public (they're usually more comfortable criticizing giant incumbents in their industry, as Zenefits did last year in a legal fight with ADP). That Gusto and Zenefits would publicly trade blows underscores their yearning to capture potential riches in the business of HR and payroll management. Both startups are trying to bring technology to an antiquated, paperwork-heavy industry that can cause real headaches for small businesses. Zenefits moved early in offering a software-powered HR system, but it moved too quickly, and now Gusto is trying to seize an advantage.

At the media briefing last week — held at celebrity chef Tyler Florence's Wayfare Tavern, where spiced deviled eggs seem as plentiful as tap water — Gusto staff handed out embargoed press releases with details on the startup's progress and plans. Over 40,000 small businesses use Gusto's payroll software, according to the release and an email from a spokesperson. (Zenefits, by comparison, says it has more than 20,000 customers using its HR software.) The new Gusto HR product will include a "welcome wall" where coworkers can warmly greet a new employee, according to the release. An executive at a healthcare company was quoted saying he was "confident that everything is done right with Gusto."

Many details seemed intended to highlight how Gusto was different than Zenefits, though the release never mentioned its rival by name. Reeves, however, was less coy. After introducing the subject of Zenefits by saying he wanted to discuss the "ecosystem," Reeves said he had heard "horror stories" from companies that had used Zenefits and switched to Gusto.

Borrowing a line that Zenefits once used, Reeves said he was "excited to be the fastest-growing company in this space, as far as I can tell," by number of customers. (Still, Gusto has been in payroll processing for most its existence, while Zenefits has been in the slightly different business of insurance and HR management.)

Reeves also said he was "excited to be doubling our valuation in our last financing round, while others are halving their valuation."

Gusto, which launched in 2012, was valued by investors at $1 billion in a financing round in December, doubling its valuation in under a year. Zenefits, launched in 2013, agreed in June to cut its valuation in half — to $2 billion from $4.5 billion — in a deal with its investors.

Zenefits' new CEO, David Sacks, has undertaken a sweeping effort to remake the company, including by taking a contrite tone and forging a string of settlements with state regulators. In May Sacks announced he had changed the company's stated values: “Everyone’s shit stinks,” for example, became “Put the customer first.”

Reeves, as his burger got cold, had something to say about company values, too.

"You don't really change them," he said. "You have to know them from the beginning."

Sacks, as it happens, invested in Gusto in its seed round several years ago. Reeves said at the briefing that Sacks — an experienced entrepreneur who sold his software startup Yammer to Microsoft for just over $1 billion — currently has no access to Gusto's confidential information. The two spoke in 2012, when Reeves got advice from Sacks on building a business, and haven't spoken since, Reeves said.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2dpd2mO
via IFTTT

These Ex-Googlers Want To Test You (And Your Family) For Cancer

Katarzynabialasiewicz / Getty Images

DNA-testing startup Color Genomics, which launched in spring 2015, is notable in the biotech world because of its emphasis on the "tech" side: Two of its cofounders are former Google and Twitter engineers. Another way it's setting itself apart from the competition: Its costs. Color prices its cancer gene tests at a fraction of the cost of many tests on the market in an attempt to make them accessible and affordable — and in turn to broaden its data pool.

San Francisco Bay Area–based Color now has plans to make its tests even more widely available. Currently, its $249 saliva-based test scans 30 genes to detect an individual's risk of common hereditary cancers, including breast, ovarian, colon, pancreatic, prostate, uterine, colorectal, and stomach cancer; in contrast, other tests range from $1,500 to $4,500. Color's test is cheap enough that many people could pay for it out of pocket, instead of going through insurers, who traditionally shoulder the bulk of the cost for genetic tests.

Now, the startup is teaming up with the BRCA Foundation and private donors to offer the tests at an even steeper discount — $50 — to first-degree relatives of people who have already tested positive for one of the 30 mutations on Color's test. Parents, siblings, and adult children are then eligible to also take a Color test. A relative of someone with a BRCA mutation, for example, has a 50% chance of having the mutation, too, which can lead to breast or ovarian cancer. Color has partnered with private donors and the BRCA Foundation to subsidize the screening program.

Unlike DNA-testing startup 23andMe, whose tests can be bought without the approval of a medical professional, doctors and genetic counselors are involved in interpreting and reviewing the results of Color's "spit kits." Already, the tests are being used in a $14 million study in which the University of California is aiming to put 100,000 women through personalized breast cancer screening. Color customers can choose to contribute their anonymized data to research, or not.

To support its growth more broadly, Color also said it's raised $45 million from General Catalyst, U2 frontman Bono, Khosla Ventures, 8VC, Laurene Powell Jobs' Emerson Collective, and Susan Wagner, a BlackRock cofounder. Wagner is also joining its board of directors, along with General Catalyst managing director Hermant Taneja. To date, the startup has raised $60 million in total.

Color is up against several other hereditary cancer-testing companies, including both startups and established heavyweights, such as Myriad Genetics, Invitae, and Counsyl. The company says it keeps costs low by employing advanced software and machine learning technologies to be more efficient — from highly automating the analysis of DNA samples, to automatically creating family trees for the Color genetic counselors who explain results to customers.

"We’re viewing what we’re doing as biology 2.0," CEO and cofounder Elad Gil told BuzzFeed News. That tech mindset comes from Gil's years as a former vice president for corporate strategy at Twitter, as well as a product manager at Google. Another cofounder, Othman Laraki, also worked at Google and was vice president of product at Twitter. (The two came to Twitter after founding Mixer Labs, which made geolocational software, and selling it to the social networking company in 2009.) But Gil also has a PhD in biology from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and chief scientific officer Taylor Sittler trained in clinical pathology at UC San Francisco.

Referring to the idea of tailoring therapies to individuals' unique backgrounds and risk factors, Gil said, "The thing we ask ourselves every day is, 'How can we help facilitate things so precision medicine will be available to everybody next year or in two years?'"



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2dgN8k0
via IFTTT

26 Eylül 2016 Pazartesi

Palantir Discriminated Against Asians, Labor Department Alleges

Palantir CEO Alex Karp

Sean Gallup / Getty Images

The Department of Labor is suing Palantir, accusing the data analysis company of systematic discrimination against Asian job applicants.

The government agency said that it filed the suit after being "unable to resolve the findings" in negotiations with the Silicon Valley company, which works with government clients including the the FBI, the U.S. Special Operations Command, and the U.S. Army.

The suit alleges that, beginning in 2010, Asian applicants were "routinely eliminated during the resume screen and telephone interview phases despite being as qualified as white applicants with respect to the QA Engineer, Software Engineer, and QA Engineer Intern positions," and that the company's employee referral program also unfairly discriminated against Asian applicants.

Palantir denies the allegations and intends to contest the lawsuit. "Despite repeated efforts to highlight the results of our hiring practices, the Department of Labor relies on a narrow and flawed statistical analysis relating to three job descriptions from 2010 to 2011," the company said in a statement.

When comparing the number of qualified Asian applicants for a position with the number eventually hired, the Labor Department's Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs found evidence of discrimination.

In one case where Asian applicants made up 85% of the the qualified candidates for a job but only 11 of the 25 people eventually hired, Labor Department calculated that the the odds of such a hiring pattern happening by chance were "approximately one in 3.4 million." In another case, it said the odds were more like one in a billion.

Department of Labor / Via dol.gov

As a government contractor, Palantir “has agreed not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin,” the complaint notes.

The Labor Department is seeking compensation for those affected by the company's hiring practices, including for "lost wages, interest, retroactive seniority and all other lost benefits of employment." If the company is ordered to provide such relief, and fails to do so, it could lose its current government contracts and be barred from bidding on future ones.

The full complaint is available to read here.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2dbPuCS
via IFTTT

Inside Apple Music's Second Act

Justin Sullivan / Getty Images

Music streaming is a buyer’s market, and over the course of its first 14 months, Apple Music has pitched itself to customers in a few marquee ways. There’s the army of in-house music experts, working to craft note-perfect playlists for your commute and workout; the radio station Beats 1, which seeks to reinvent real-time, communal music discovery; and the exclusive releases from big-name artists — including Drake and Taylor Swift — before fans can get them anywhere else.

But for music streaming services, which rely on a delicate web of relationships with the artists, publishers, and record labels that supply them, keeping customers satisfied is only half of the equation. Viewed from up close, it’s the benefits Apple Music has promised its industry partners — still reeling from decades of digital disruption — that have arguably defined the service’s short life more than anything else.

“I don't know how to do this any other way, except to help make really good music, get it exposed, and get it handled and treated the way it deserves to be treated,” Jimmy Iovine, who runs Apple Music after a long tenure as the founder and chief executive of Interscope Records, told BuzzFeed News in a recent interview. “That's the only thing that we know how to do coming from where we're coming from. You use all the tools you have to do that.“

Iovine was striking a rare note of contrition, one month after a controversy over the implications of Apple Music’s exclusives caused the world’s largest label group, Universal Music Group, to distance itself from his company. UMG decided it would end most exclusives in late August after it was embarrassed by a lucrative deal between Apple Music and Frank Ocean, which enabled the superstar to go independent. The ban upended one of Apple Music’s main selling points, and it left Iovine — a former record producer who sees bridging the worlds of music and technology as a personal calling — caught between the existential demands of his old business and his new one.

Apple’s streaming service has tried to position itself as a kind of sixth man for the established music industry.

The clash over exclusives, which came to a head just weeks before Apple Music underwent a much-anticipated relaunch designed to make it more appealing to users, served as a reminder that the music service faces a war on two fronts: It’s vying to lure subscribers from a field of strong competitors on the one hand, while defending its aggressive plans to skittish content owners on the other.

“We put a lot into this, we’ve had some real successes, and we always hold up our end of the relationship,” Iovine said, insisting that he has no intention of encroaching on record labels’ territory. “We’re feeling our way around and seeing what works ... Every time we do [an exclusive], we learn something new.” He added that Apple Music would move forward with its pursuit of exclusives from other partners, such as Sony Music Entertainment and the Warner Music Group, noting, “It’s Apple’s show. As long as Apple’s asking me to do what I’m doing, I’m gonna keep doing it.”

Kanye West criticized Apple Music and Tidal's rivalry over exclusives.

Twitter.com

If exclusives have drawn the ire of some record labels, they haven’t always endeared Apple Music to consumers, either. Fragmentation in music streaming — requiring fans to either pivot between services to access exclusive albums, wait days or weeks until they are released widely, or download them illegally — has accelerated in the past year, as artists are increasingly pledged to one service or another. Responding to whether fragmentation would hurt the business in the long term (as Kanye West and others have argued), Iovine was unfazed.

“I don’t think we know yet, I don’t think anyone knows yet,” he said, musing that people could end up paying for multiple music streaming services, as they do with Netflix and Hulu. “A year from today could look extremely different from what it looks like right now.”

More concerning to Iovine is something that directly impacts his company’s bottom line: the proliferation of free, ad-supported music on competing services like Spotify and YouTube. Both have been accused by artists and labels of using a business model that takes money out of their pockets, and both boast user bases that dwarf Apple Music's (it has 17 million subscribers compared to Spotify’s 40 million; YouTube says it has over a billion users). “The rights holders, whoever they are, have to do something, because there's a lot of free [music] out there, and it's a problem,” Iovine said. “There's enough out there to make people say, ‘Why should I subscribe to something?'"

The tension over exclusives highlights a central challenge for Apple Music, which believes its future relies on forging ever-closer ties with artists and record labels. More so than any of its competitors, whom have had to contend with the deep suspicion of rights holders, Apple’s streaming service has tried to position itself as a kind of sixth man for the established music industry, a white knight riding in to restore the commercial and cultural value of music after decades of decline.

The feasibility of such a commitment was tested even before Apple Music launched. In June 2015, Taylor Swift, an industry unto herself, joined critics who protested that the service wasn’t planning to pay royalties for music streamed during its free three-month trial period. Apple responded by quickly reversing the policy, eating the costs of the trials and earning a distinction as the only on-demand streamer to carry Swift’s music in the process.

Justin Sullivan / Getty Images

“I think Apple Music is the place that helps artists tell their stories,” said Zane Lowe, who presides over Apple Music’s radio station Beats 1. Lady Gaga, in an interview with Lowe, recently used the station to announce the title of her forthcoming comeback album, Joanne. And Drake, who is among a growing roster of paid contributors to Apple Music and has his own Beats 1 show, used it to premiere “Hotline Bling.” “It’s where artists can come and feel comfortable," Lowe said. "And that’s not just on Beats 1, it's through the releasing of their records, it's through our editorial, through content, all sorts of ways.”

For the moment, Apple Music executives trying to make their case to music owners have the numbers on their side. Revenues for recorded music in the US — driven by the growth of services like Apple’s and Spotify’s — are up by 8.1% in the first half of 2016, which puts them on track for the second full year of growth in a row. The music industry hasn’t seen back-to-back revenue increases since 1998–1999, and the money, as always, talks. Work with us and the happy days will come again.

"We were too ambitious in the beginning — we put too much into it."

Looking at the new version of Apple Music offers some clues as to where subscription music is going. At this point, the most coveted new audience for the service, which comes preloaded on every iPhone and iOS device, consists of older and international users who have no prior experience with streaming music. The redesign answers criticism that the first iteration was overly complicated, introducing a cleaner interface with larger images and text care of Apple design guru Jonny Ive. Additionally, the tabs at the bottom of the screen have been re-ordered, with the one that gets the most use — the music library — moved to the first, far-left position.

An Apple Music ad with James Corden.

Apple.

“The question we ask is: In the normal course of your day, how are you actually interacting with music?” Bozoma Saint John, head of global consumer marketing for Apple Music and iTunes, told BuzzFeed News. She co-stars in a new ad for the service with Iovine and “Carpool Karaoke” star James Corden. “What are you going to it for? And how can we better serve that up?”

The other big change is the addition of two new personalized playlists: My Favorites Mix and My New Music Mix. The playlists are generated by algorithms, a first for the service, which has largely relied on human curation for its playlists up to this point. Revealing how the mixes operate for the first time to BuzzFeed News, Apple claimed a potential advantage over similar algorithmically personalized playlists, including Spotify’s Discover Weekly and Pandora’s Thumbprint Radio: deep historical knowledge of individual users’ tastes and habits, based on years of data carried over from iTunes.

If you gave high ratings to a song or album in your old iTunes library, or just played it a lot more than others, you’ll find that behavior reflected in your My Favorites Mix. Meanwhile, the My New Music Mix algorithm serves recently released songs — as well as songs that Apple Music knows you haven’t played before — that the service’s music experts have flagged as similar to others in your taste profile. Apple Music executives suggested even more personalized playlists will follow in the series; but only after prototypes have been vetted, with all possible outcomes — intentional and otherwise — given careful consideration.

“We were too ambitious in the beginning — we probably put too much into it,” said Iovine. “But we’re getting there now, one foot in front of the other, and the stuff we’re creating I don’t think anyone is gonna see coming."



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2deOCvl
via IFTTT

Square Says Its New Credit Card Chip Reader Is Faster Than What You're Used To

Square, the mobile payments processing company led by Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, is introducing a chip card reader it says will process the payments in 4.2 seconds, compared to the industry average of between eight and 13 seconds. That’s big news for a couple reasons.

Giphy / Via giphy.com

Chip cards started rolling out in the US about a year ago, and, as we know by now, they’re glacially slow.

Giphy / Via giphy.com

They are, however, more secure, according to Square's head of hardware product development, Jesse Dorogusker. That’s why they exist in the first place. Or, rather, why the government mandated that US stores have chip-card-accepting technology by October 2015, which still hasn’t really happened, yet. As much as we want the speed of the old magnetic stripe, our money is safer with the chips, for the most part.

Here’s what a faster credit card chip reader could mean for your life:

1. Maybe you won't lose your card

Chip cards are so slow that people have been leaving them at cash registers in droves. Maybe a faster reader will keep people’s attention.

2. A path to the future

Square’s new readers can also process payment methods like Apple Pay and Android Pay — which means you don’t even have to touch your card to the reader. According to Square’s Dorogusker, these are “far superior technology” because these methods typically require a second piece of authentication like a fingerprint.

The US desperately needs more secure credit cards. We have 25 percent of the world’s credit cards but 50 percent of all credit card fraud.

Dorogusker blames the risk of fraud squarely on the magnetic stripe technology. “They’re like cassette tapes,” he told BuzzFeed News.

Giphy / Via giphy.com

3. Shorter lines

During a lunch rush or the holidays at a retail store, every second counts. You might be quick to abandon a line if it’s not moving. Retail workers of the world, rejoice: much less awkward small talk with frustrated customers.

Giphy / Via giphy.com

Don’t expect to see Square’s readers at H&M or Whole Foods any time soon, though. Sellers who make over $500,000 per year only account for 14 percent of the company’s business, according to its Q2 2016 investor letter. However, the company hopes to bring the transaction speed down to three seconds in the near future — maybe that’ll attract more big clients.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2dwC7zn
via IFTTT

I Went To My Own Digital Funeral

BuzzFeed News

A few weeks ago, I went to my own funeral. Or at least a simulation of my own funeral. I was sitting in an auditorium, alone except for a trim young man in a black suit, who walked up to a lectern and began speaking. “Good evening,” he said. “We are here to honor the memory of Doree Shafrir. Doree was a beloved friend, daughter, and wife. Our thoughts go out to her loved ones on this day.”

It was more than a little jarring, sitting there listening to this guy talk about me. Doree, he said, was “committed to her work, to social justice and to literature. She showed support to women she’d never even met, and gave platforms to voices of color.” He went on like this for another minute or so, talking about how I’d passed away and “left an empty place” in the hearts of my loved ones. Next, there was a video — all my tweets, scrolling on a huge screen in front of me — and it was only then that I truly started recoiling. My legacy was going to be my tweets about Justin Bieber’s fling with Bronte Blampied, my neighbors' love of Project Runway, my excitement about wearing a dress with pockets to a wedding.

I was at LACMA, the LA County Museum of Art, for an interactive exhibit put on by an organization called the Hereafter Institute, which was started by the 34-year-old artist Gabriel Barcia-Colombo. The pitch was vague: The Hereafter Institute, I was told, “evaluates a person's digital afterlife using new technologies.” The “funeral” was the culmination of a half-hour personal tour through a series of exhibits meant to inspire reflection and conversation on our digital afterlives.

What would someone who doesn't know me infer about who I was based solely on my online presence?

For centuries, people have been trying to figure out how to achieve immortality — or at least extend their lifespans. Today, billionaires like Larry Ellison, Peter Thiel, and Sergey Brin are spending part of their fortunes on research that they hope will allow them to extend their lifespans. Perhaps the most radical ideas are coming out of Dmitry Itskov's 2045 Initiative, an organization that hopes to eventually be able to meld human heads with robot bodies. For the non-billionaires among us, digital immortality will have to do.

I've long been fascinated by the posthumous digital lives of others, but I'd never really thought about what would happen to my own self-created online presence after I'm dead — and more important, how it could be manipulated, even by people with the best of intentions. As someone who likes to maintain a modicum of control over her online presence (don't we all?), this notion started to feel more than a little bit scary. What would someone who doesn't know me infer about who I was based solely on my online presence? At least when I'm alive, my social media is a constantly updated, organically changing thing; once I'm dead, it's all frozen in amber. Would that same online presence serve as a comfort to people who knew me, a kind of poignant memorial? Or, most terrifyingly of all, would no one care?

A "funeral" at the Hereafter Institute, an installation at LACMA.

Courtesy Gabriel Barcia-Colombo

I'm not proud of the fact that when I hear about a celebrity dying, I check to see what their last tweet was. I obsessively read the Last Message Received Tumblr, which posts the last communication (usually texts) that people got from exes, or family and friends who died; the ones that are the most painful to read are the mundane ones from friends who were then killed by drunk drivers.

In 2016, the human condition is marked by existential despair in thinking about being remembered for a few lackluster, dashed-off tweets and silly photos.

These transmissions can appear cruelly unremarkable, but after death, even the most ordinary dribs and drabs of communication feel poignant to their loved ones. Like the Hereafter Institute's project, the Last Message Received is saying: You matter. You matter, and the world you lived in matters, and the people you loved — they matter too.

Still, I can’t help but think I'll want to keep everything away from the prying eyes of people like me when someone I’m close to dies.

Aren't we really just expressing anxieties about our own mortality when we voraciously consume the digital afterlives of others? When I think about it in this light, I'm more forgiving of my morbid, voyeuristic habit. If there is an upside to my obsession with these inadvertent social media memorials, it's that they have made me more aware of the permanence of my online presence, which, in the moment, can seem deceptively ephemeral. In 2016, the human condition is marked by existential despair in thinking about being remembered for a few lackluster, dashed-off tweets and silly photos. What if the last thing I ever tweet is a complaint about how much Time Warner Cable sucks? And so, whether we like it or not, life now requires no small degree of constant self-examination about our own legacies, online and off.

Courtesy Gabriel Barcia-Colombo

When I arrived at the entrance of the Hereafter Institute's exhibit, I was greeted by a young blonde woman (an actor, I later learned) in a lab coat, who began by asking me a series of questions about my online presence, including which social networks I had accounts on and which dating apps I’d used. I was left, by that simple exercise, with the uncomfortable knowledge that my digital legacy goes far beyond a bunch of photos on Instagram. It’s a LinkedIn profile where I’ll always be working at BuzzFeed, a Clue profile where my next period is always just a few weeks away, my Discover Weekly playlist on Spotify updating until the end of time. I sat there wondering if my Apple ID would exist forever and if new episodes of Who? Weekly would keep downloading well after I was gone.

Then I stood on a platform while another Hereafter Institute guide took a 3D scan of my body — a scan I would later see animated at my "funeral" — and led me to another building at the museum, where there exhibit continued. There, I saw a record player on a stand where tweets by a man named Fernando Rafael Heria Jr. scrolled on a black screen. (I later found out he had been hit by a car and killed in 2010 while riding his bike in Miami; he was 25.) "Ever wanted to kick someone in the throat?" said one tweet, from March 20, 2010. "Fernando Rafael Heria Jr. shared a link: Brian Piccolo: Thursday Night Criterium Series," said another from March 25 of that year.

Next, I was led over to a different part of the same room, where I put on a virtual reality headset and found myself engulfed in the separate worlds of three people who had died. It was like a video game, with voiceovers by friends and family (and in one case, a reading by one of the deceased). Barcia-Colombo explained that his intention was to create a memorial to the dead that would allow people a small window into their lived experiences.

A few days after I went through the exhibit, I spoke with Barcia-Colombo by phone. “I was really interested in this sort of bizarre thing that’s happening now, where people pass away on the internet and there’s no real virtual practice put in place for what we do with this data,” he said. “I've had friends that have passed away, and yet people don't really know, and they still wish them happy birthday. Or people tweet after they've died because they've set up auto-tweeting. I thought it was a really sort of interesting time in our culture, and our conversation about death is really changing.”

“At some point there's going to be more people who've passed away on Facebook than there are alive people on Facebook.”

Last year, Facebook instituted a policy that allows you to designate a person to maintain your Facebook page after you die; your page lives on, but is changed to a “memorial” page. But what happens when that person dies? And so on? “At some point there's going to be more people who've passed away on Facebook than there are alive people on Facebook,” Barcia-Colombo said. “What is that going to mean?”

We don’t know the answer to that question yet. But what does it mean when even the most off-the-cuff content that we produced when we were alive has the potential to become a posthumous representation of ourselves? It’s exhausting enough to maintain a digital presence while we’re alive. Now are we expected to also be mindful of how our digital selves will be perceived after death?

Today's teenagers are enamored with pointedly ephemeral social media like Snapchat, where posts disappear quickly and (seemingly) forever, and maybe they're onto something. Maybe the next generation is so conscious of digital legacies that they've decided not to create one at all. But I'm too far gone, I think, to make my social media presence disappear; I am a self-archivist by nature, and erasing everything is scarier to me than the idea that someone might piece together a contextless version of me after I die.

All of this awareness adds another complicated layer to the notion of the digital self — one that a quick perusal of my Twitter feed tells me I am definitely not ready for. We may not be sentient beings in death, but whether we like it or not, we will continue to exist long after our bodies are dead and gone.

BuzzFeed News




from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2cwovit
via IFTTT

24 Eylül 2016 Cumartesi

Here's Who Facebook Thinks You Really Are

I stumbled into Facebook’s secret brain and learned how it really sees me.

I was poking around Facebook's privacy settings – when I accidentally discovered the site's ad preferences page.

I was poking around Facebook's privacy settings – when I accidentally discovered the site's ad preferences page.

nbc.com / Via gfycat.com

In my case, that includes blankets and carbohydrates which is *pretty* accurate, tbh.

In my case, that includes blankets and carbohydrates which is *pretty* accurate, tbh.

Nicole Nguyen / BuzzFeed News


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2di7sXw
via IFTTT