29 Nisan 2016 Cuma

How Sex Toy Makers Sneak Around Digital Filters

Liz Klinger first started selling sex toys four years ago, as a host of Passion Parties, in-home sales events modeled on Tupperware parties — only instead of Tupperware, vibrators and lubricant were for sale.

The experience made Klinger, whose background is in design and marketing, interested in manufacturing sex toys herself. So she rounded up some friends from companies like Google and Amazon and started building a "smart vibrator" that uses sensors to intelligently analyze what’s happening during sex. Today she is the CEO of a startup called Lioness.

But if the Passion Parties made it easy to talk to women directly, selling online made it harder. Klinger, like other sex toy manufacturers, couldn't get the word out on Facebook and Instagram. They also can't raise money on Kickstarter, and struggle to sell their product on Amazon, thanks to those sites' rules about sexually explicit material.

“Vibrators — even vibrators that are positioned as a sexual health discovery product, as opposed to something that’s pornographic — have a really hard time” selling online, Klinger told BuzzFeed News. Which is why she, along with a handful of other savvy sex toy slingers, decided the best way to deal with these rules is to break them.

Like many people, I first heard about Lioness via an Instagram ad — which is weird, because Facebook, which owns Instagram, doesn’t allow adult companies to advertise on any of its platforms. ("Our ad policies don't allow companies to advertise adult products or services, which includes sex toys," a Facebook spokesperson told BuzzFeed News in an email.) But Klinger found a workaround.

Lioness shot a video of a woman reading positive customer feedback the company had received. The video doesn’t have any sexual images, which makes it less likely to get flagged. But the real trick was having Lioness’s Facebook page, which sponsored the ad, link not to the Lioness website, but to a Lioness YouTube account. The only way potential customers would even find the company’s website was by clicking on an annotation inside the YouTube video.

Another sex toy startup, Comingle, used a similar workaround (before shutting down in February due to lack of funds). Comingle itself didn't buy promoted posts — but Indiegogo, where the company raised the money to build its product, is a crowdfunding platform, not a sex toy sales platform, so it can promote whatever it wants. Comingle never gave Facebook a dime, but Indiegogo was able to circulate a post that promoted the Mod, Comingle’s vibrator.

Hiding behind another company with a slightly different mission is another way to make it onto Facebook. Diamond Products, the parent company of Jimmyjane — one of the biggest and best known brands in the alternative sex toy market — recently bought Sir Richard's Condoms, an all-natural contraceptives company so popular that it’s sold at grocers like Whole Foods.

“The reason I acquired the company is, it’s my Trojan horse,” Jimmyjane President Robert Rheaume said, laughing. “I can use condoms to advertise on Facebook and other social media feeds that don’t allow sexual toys.”

Both Facebook's and Twitter’s advertising policies have loopholes that allow contraceptives to be advertised, regardless of sexual content. Customers who click through a Sir Richard’s ad to the website can easily add Jimmyjane products to their cart before checkout, he said.

For most of these companies, finding the backdoor to Facebook was effective, even if it wasn’t preferable. According to Klinger, during the time the ads were up, Lioness saw a tenfold increase in sales though Indiegogo, without any press or other significant events. But, she said, “if you talk to someone in e-commerce, this is a really, really inefficient way of selling product.”

Facebook's and Instagram’s weren’t the the only algorithms Lioness and others like it had to beat. Getting the word out on social media is important, but if you want to sell goods to a mass audience, the obvious place to turn is Amazon.com. And that option is full of obstacles for sex toy makers.

Amazon does have a “sexual wellness” category, but sellers need to get “pre-approval,” which means selling 50 units of something else before they can start selling adult products. A representative from Amazon told BuzzFeed News that this policy is meant to ensure quality and customer satisfaction.

But that can be a tricky hurdle if all your company makes is vibrators. Alex Fine, CEO of Dame Products, cleared it by having 200 bumper stickers made that said, “My other car is a vibrator.” They sold well — but more important, they won Dame the Amazon page it wanted.

Via Flickr: tgidenver

Even so, getting onto Amazon was just the start. The company also controls how sex toys show up in search results, to ensure that sex toys don't show up when that's not what the searcher is seeking. So, if you search "dildo" or "vibrator," sex toys are what you'll find. But if you search "Dame Eva" — the name of one of Dame's vibrators — you'll find cell phone cases emblazoned with Eva Longoria's face and albums by Dame Eva Turner.

"The reason I acquired the company is, it's my Trojan horse."

James Wang / Lioness

And there's a good reason for that — if you're shopping for a lemon squeezer, or a biography of Eva Perón, you probably don't want to be bombarded with a bunch of lemon-shaped vibrators.

But if you're a seller of sex toys, you don't want your potential customers to have to know where to look in order to find your products. Many of the search results when you just type "sex toy" into main search are from accounts selling brand-name sex toys, usually purchased wholesale, on the cheap. If they move enough product and get high enough ratings, they’ll ultimately get top placement in Amazon search results, outranking the companies that actually make the toys.

To get around the rule that keeps them out of main search, some of the sex toy companies try framing their product postings in a way that makes them appear unlike sex toys — Revel Body's Robert Elenga said he would label the vibrators as sports massagers, muscle massagers, or yoga massagers, and sell them along with a water bottle. But many end up getting flagged as adult products in the end anyway.

“It's almost a full-time job just to manage your listing,” Elenga told BuzzFeed News. And in fact, recently, Elenga got out of the sex toy game — sort of. Instead of selling vibrators to consumers, his new plan is to license RevelBody’s vibrating motor technology to smartphone and smartwatch manufacturers, as well as other sex toy companies.

Between Facebook’s terms of service, SafeSearch in browsers, and various other algorithm-driven impediments, it was just too much work to get the word out about Revel, Elenga said. “There's layers and layers of filters that block getting your content out,” he said.

Soumyadip Rakshit / MysteryVibe

Minna Life is best known for the Limon, a couples vibrator, but about a year ago, it came out with kGoal, a device that’s supposed to help women strengthen pelvic floor muscles. (There’s a version for men that will hit markets soon.) Minna CEO Brian Krieger said the kGoal is decidedly not a sex toy, which is helping Minna grow brand recognition on platforms where it wouldn’t normally be seen.

“We were definitely aware that if we broadened our purview a little bit it would strengthen our ability to argue with somebody like a Facebook,” Krieger said. Indeed, kGoal launched on Kickstarter, which doesn’t normally allow sex toys or other “pornographic materials.” Minna Life was also able to run an advertising campaign for kGoal on Facebook for a few months before getting flagged by the site and, ultimately, deactivated — but not before scoring a distribution deal with Target.com.

Krieger isn’t the only sex toy entrepreneur strengthening his brand with kegels. OhMiBod CEO Brian Dunham said his company has actually been selling kegel-exercising devices for years. But only the newest model, the “Krush,” vibrates and pairs with an app. This year, it won best in show in health and wellness at the Consumer Electronics Show.

Dunham said he was denied when he first applied for entrance to CES six years ago. Now, he plans to use his company’s victory there to continue pushing vibrators in spaces where they’re technically not allowed. When the Krush launches in May, it will launch under a new LoveLifeToys brand, which Durham plans to promote on Facebook and other channels. “It will be a great litmus test if Facebook shuts us down,” he said.

There are plenty of other ways to advertise sex toys online. Lelo uses blog posts that get shared on social media. Mysteryvibe syndicates content through a British media company called Unruly. But at the end of the day, the best way to get around content filters and terms of service might be satisfied customers, said Michael Topolovac, CEO of a sex toy company called Crave.

"If a customer says a product is great, they don't filter that out,” he said, “because that's free speech."



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/23ensr2
via IFTTT

Do You Know What Happened In Tech News The Week Of April 25?

iPhone sales slowed, Beyoncé picked her streaming service of choice, and Facebook started broadcasting sports. Take the tech news quiz for the week of April



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/26BMmp3
via IFTTT

The New MacBook Is A Sexy, Slim, Cable-Guzzling Monster

Probably the best-looking laptop you’ve laid your eyes on.

Jenny Chang / BuzzFeed / Via Apple

Apple recently introduced its second-generation MacBook.

Apple recently introduced its second-generation MacBook.

No, it's not an update to the powerful-yet-portable MacBook Pro, or the highly-competent, compact MacBook Air. The latest Apple lappy, fitting to its ~minimalist aesthetic~, is just called “MacBook."

For the uninitiated, the MacBook is probably the most attractive laptop ever. But it's for a very specific kind of computer-er (and a very particular kind of budget).

Aside from a new rose gold model (which is really just PINK), the updated 2016 MacBook is superficially the same as last year’s, but there are a few key improvements to its speed and battery life. Apple loaned me a review unit to take its new suped-up MacBook to the limit.

So, should you buy this laptop? Should you buy a laptop at all?? Read on.

Will M. / Nicole Nguyen / BuzzFeed


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1NGe1Pb
via IFTTT

28 Nisan 2016 Perşembe

Amazon Is Reporting Profits For A Change, And Investors Love It

Jens Meyer / AP

Amazon sold a lot of stuff in the first three months of this year, more than analysts expected. But Amazon always sells a lot of stuff. What's changing is how much profit it chooses to make while doing so.

The company reported a $513 million profit for the quarter, up from a $57 million loss in the same period last year. It was almost double what analysts had expected, and was close to the $596 million the company earned in all of 2015. In 2014 it made a $241 million loss.

The unexpectedly large profit came from revenues of $29.1 billion, up 28% from the first quarter last year and higher than the $28 billion predicted by analysts polled by Bloomberg.

And not only is the company making big profits — this time around, investors are happy with it for doing so, with Amazon stock rising over 12% in after-hours trading. When the online retailer reported a record profit in its previous quarter, its stock crashed.

The stock may be rallying thanks to aggressive projections for sales growth that Amazon released alongside results on Thursday. It expects revenues between $28 billion and $30.5 billion, while analysts expected second quarter revenues at just over $28 billion.

Amazon/BuzzFeed

Amazon Web Services, its cloud computing business, is still growing like crazy. It had revenues of $2.6 billion, up 64% from a year ago, and above the $2.5 billion that analysts forecasted. The division's operating income of $604 million was over triple the $195 million it earned a year ago. Amazon's total operating income, which is a slightly different measure from net income or profits, was $1.1 billion.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/26ylWVa
via IFTTT

In His First "Founder's Letter," Sundar Pichai Charts Google's Future

Vivek Singh for BuzzFeed News

In his inaugural "founder's letter" — Google's version of a State of the Union — newly minted CEO Sundar Pichai laid out his vision of the company's future, stressing that change is on the way, and Google wants to be all-in on the artificial intelligence revolution when it arrives.

"The next big step will be for the very concept of the “device” to fade away," Pichai writes. "Over time, the computer itself — whatever its form factor — will be an intelligent assistant helping you through your day. We will move from mobile first to an AI first world. [Artificial intelligence] can help us in everything from accomplishing our daily tasks and travels, to eventually tackling even bigger challenges like climate change and cancer diagnosis."

Pichai's letter also serves as a brief highlight reel of Google's past year; Pichai references Google's AlphaGo artificial intelligence beating a world champion at the strategy game, Google Photos (which relies heavily on Google's AI strengths) reaching 100 million users in less than a year, and having over 1.4 billion active Android devices in the market.

This is Pichai's first time penning Google's annual "founder's letter." For every year since its formation, that's been handled by the company's co-founders, Larry Page and Sergey Brin. However, when Google restructured last year into Alphabet and Google, they handed over the Google reins and role of CEO to Sundar Pichai.

"Since the majority of our big bets are in Google, I wanted to give him most of the bully-pulpit here to reflect on Google’s accomplishments and share his vision," writes Page in a brief foreword to Pichai's letter. He goes on to write that he, Brin, and Pichai will likely all make these announcements moving forward.

In addition to mapping where Google is going, and what it's accomplished lately, Pichai also included the high-minded, inspirational rhetoric expected from tech CEOs in 2016. "For us, technology is not about the devices or the products we build. Those aren’t the end-goals. Technology is a democratizing force, empowering people through information," writes Pichai. "Google is an information company. It was when it was founded, and it is today. And it’s what people do with that information that amazes and inspires me every day."

You can read the full founder's letter here.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1NDPtX5
via IFTTT

This Startup Wants To Beat Whole Foods At Online Delivery

Thrive Market

It’s been a rough few months for tech-enabled delivery startups. Just ask Instacart, which recently cut pay for contract drivers in several cities and raised its prices. Or DoorDash, which last month raised money at a reportedly lowered valuation. Or SpoonRocket, which shut down its meal delivery service in March. Or any of the many venture-backed startups — Blue Apron, Gobble, Hello Fresh, Munchery, Plated, Good Eggs — that are facing an increasingly crowded market for grocery, pre-cooked-meal, and meal-kit delivery.

Thrive Market, an organic food and beauty product startup in Los Angeles, thinks it’s found a way in by doing key things differently compared to some of its competitors.

First off, it doesn’t touch fresh food. It also doesn’t rely on independent contractors to bring goods to your door within hours, the way Postmates, Instacart, DoorDash, and GrubHub fully or partly do.

Thrive describes itself as a mix of Whole Foods and Costco, a business that taps into the customer demand for organic food and lifestyle products that has also propelled startups like Jessica Alba’s the Honest Company — products that are normally associated with higher prices.

A $60 annual membership (that’s the Costco element) gives you access to Thrive’s online marketplace of 4,000 non-perishable food items, baking ingredients, bath and beauty products, nutritional supplements, and home supplies, which are marketed as gluten-free, paleo-friendly, organic, and so on, just like at Whole Foods. But executives say Thrive’s products cost around 25% to 50% less because the company buys them in bulk at discounted prices, and doesn’t need to foot the bills for brick-and-mortar retail stores.

“Only the top 3–5% of consumers can afford that premium,” Thrive Co-CEO Nicholas Green said of Whole Foods. “We’re focused on the 90% to 95% of American families. They’re not thinking about getting fresh food delivered — they’re thinking about shopping on a budget for the healthiest products they can.”

CEOs Gunnar Lovelace and Nicholas Green

Thrive Market

If Thrive’s leaders are to be believed, the company has been doing well since it was founded in 2013 and launched its service in November 2014 — and its self-reported figures stand out against the layoffs and other gloomy developments recently making rounds in the delivery world. Thrive’s revenue last year reached $50 million; monthly sales now exceed $10 million and are reportedly growing at a “double-digit” rate. There are more than 200,000 paying members, 30,000 of whom joined in March and 28,000 in February, the company told BuzzFeed News. There were also 432,000 new registered users in March. (People who register for free can browse the site and get a discount off their first purchase.)

The company says it has raised $58 million from investors that include Demi Moore and John Legend. Thrive isn’t profitable, however, and is at the moment more focused on bringing on as many new customers as possible. It makes shipping free for orders over $50 — the CEOs say the cost is absorbed into the cost of membership — and rolled out iOS and Android apps this spring.

Still, the CEOs say, Thrive works because it has annual subscriptions, which help the company predict how much revenue will be coming in, and with a greater degree of reliability than occasional or one-time purchases. And because Thrive’s inventory — grains, pasta, nuts, cookies, almond butter, soap, vitamins — can be stored for weeks without going bad, the company can waste less and make better predictions about what it will need. Perishability is a complex logistical problem that has challenged organic food supplier Good Eggs, which last year closed its hubs outside San Francisco and laid off nearly 140 employees.

So Thrive doesn’t need to rush to get products out before they spoil — and its products aren’t things that people typically need immediately, either, but rather every few weeks or months. Last fall, it introduced its own, private-label organic tomato sauce and coconut oil.

“A lot of people want to buy their avocados and bananas in person and see if the items are ripe or fresh,” Green said. “The nice thing about non-perishable (items) is they’re stable, you don’t need to touch them to make a decision. The only reason they’re sold in a grocery store is it’s a vestige of a time before grocery stores.”

Thrive Market

All this stuff is stored in a 40,000-square-foot warehouse in Los Angeles, and a newer 375,000-square-foot, ex-General Electric plant in Batesville, Indiana. A total of about 400 workers — W-2 employees with benefits — receive inventory, fill orders, and ship them off via UPS, which delivers within a few days. Co-CEO Gunnar Lovelace and Green say that for the kind of work their employees do, using independent contractors didn’t make sense.

Before Thrive, Lovelace started and sold two software companies. He grew up with a single mother who “struggled to make healthy choices,” he said, and remarried a man who ran a food co-op out of an organic farm in Ojai, California. Learning about that system would later drive him to get into the organic-goods business and try to make it affordable: For every paying member who signs up, Thrive gives away a membership to a low-income family, and in January, it started allowing shoppers to donate store credit to other Thrive shoppers in need. (Customers have chipped in $156,000 so far.) Green, who’d sold an education startup he’d started in college, had initially wanted to invest in Thrive, but decided to join Lovelace as a co-founder.

Thrive’s success so far is due to the fact that it’s tapped into a market beyond wealthy coastal cities — “people that Whole Foods just isn’t even close to and won’t be, at least not for the foreseeable future,” as Greycroft Partners co-founder and partner Dana Settle, an investor in Thrive, put it to BuzzFeed News. A spokesperson for Whole Foods did not return a request for comment.

Greycroft also invests in on-demand meal startup Munchery and meal-kit subscription service Plated. But Settle doesn’t necessarily see them as competing with each other.

“The market for food is just enormous,” she said. “There’s opportunity and room for multiple players that do different things and appeal to different consumers, and sometimes the same consumers for different reasons.”

Thrive Market




from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1WVe382
via IFTTT

Apple’s Newest App Tool Helps You Keep Tabs On Your Health

Dolgachov / Getty Images

Over the last two years, Apple has sought to turn the iPhone and the Apple Watch into health-tracking devices through which people track and record some of their most important — and intimate — data. Early Thursday, Apple officially launched CareKit, a new app-building tool meant to help people more easily connect with health care providers even more frequently.

Announced at Apple’s iPhone event last month, CareKit is an open-source framework, a sort of scaffolding for app functions that let patients track and measure their symptoms, check off to-do lists assigned by their doctors, and send their health data to clinicians. Developers can use the tool to create apps from scratch or add new features to existing apps.

A few companies were given a CareKit head-start with Apple’s blessing and are incorporating elements of the tool into app updates released today. The programs intend to help people manage diabetes (One Drop), track the effects of antidepressant medications (Start), and monitor pregnancies and newborn health and development (Glow Nurture and Baby). The University of Rochester also has one dedicated to Parkinson's disease, and still others are in the works by institutions like Texas Medical Center, Cleveland Clinic, and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.

Glow, a startup that makes women’s health apps, used CareKit to enable Nurture and Baby users to easily email PDF updates about their prenatal health and babies’ growth to gynecologists and pediatricians. “CareKit can help accelerate the ability to harness information and put it in the hands of consumers and ultimately relay that back to their health care providers,” Jennifer Tye, Glow’s vice president of marketing and partnerships, told BuzzFeed News.

One Drop

Apple

And Start lets people record their physical and mental reactions to antidepressants, determine whether they working over time, and email progress reports to doctors. With the new CareKit functions, they can also do things like check off that they’ve taken their daily dose and receive report submission reminders. Start was launched last year by Iodine, a startup that’s been called the “Yelp of medicine” for its searchable library of crowd-reported drug side effects.

Although CareKit’s PDF reports don’t seamlessly sync with hospitals’ electronic health records, they do handle the important task of presenting crucial information in an easy-to-read-way, said Iodine CEO Thomas Goetz. “It solves this problem we’ve been wrestling with … as we’ve been working with clinical partners: ‘How do we get our data into your system?’” he told BuzzFeed News. “CareKit makes that process very intuitive for the user.”

Apple isn’t the only tech company with an expanding presence in the increasingly digital world of health and wellness. This month, developers funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation released ResearchStack, an Android app framework that allows people to remotely participate in clinical studies. It is the Android equivalent of ResearchKit, the iOS app framework released in March 2015.

Google said last fall that there are 1.4 billion active Android devices worldwide. But Apple also has more than 1 billion active devices to brag about, and unlike Google, it controls the manufacturing of all its products.

So any extra reason for people to open their iPhones is a win in Apple’s war for customer loyalty — and CareKit is yet another reason for patients to keep coming back to iOS. During an earnings call Tuesday, CEO Tim Cook mentioned that the company is “very excited about the ways iPhone and Apple Watch are helping people lead healthier lives.” “We believe there's great promise here for the future,” he added, “and we are very interested in where this can take us.”

Apple Chief Operating Officer Jeff Williams announcing CareKit.

Justin Sullivan / Getty Images



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/24lCFJo
via IFTTT

27 Nisan 2016 Çarşamba

Mark Zuckerberg Addresses Sharing Decline Reports As Facebook Crushes Earnings

Facebook

In recent weeks, reports have emerged declaring that ‘original sharing’ on Facebook is down significantly. This sharing — the type where you post your own photos, videos or text instead of simply hitting the ‘share’ button — is critical to the vibrancy of Facebook. Less original sharing equals more mass-appeal content for Facebook’s feeds, meaning we see more news reports and made-for-social memes taking the place of the heartfelt life updates and goofy photos that make Facebook fun.

It is no wonder then that Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg received a question about sharing during Wednesday’s earnings call. His answer, while filled with positive news, did not dispute the reports that original sharing is down, a sign we’re likely to keep hearing about this issue for some time to come.

“Overall sharing is up across Facebook and people are spending more time on Facebook and the whole family of apps,” Zuckerberg said. “That is not just the case for the aggregate of the growing community, but it's actually also the case on a per-person basis as well, in terms of people sharing more and spending more time individually.”

Zuckerberg didn’t specify the type of sharing that went up, leaving the door open for the increase in overall sharing to be fueled by more simple clicks of the ‘share’ button.

That said, Facebook isn’t giving up on original sharing, or even acknowledging its decline. Zuckerberg simply spoke of other Facebook products where the sharing may have migrated to.

“Facebook gives you the ability to share with all of your friends and publicly if you want, and groups, but we are also investing in things like Messenger and WhatsApp,” Zuckerberg said. “A lot of people want to share increasingly messages privately one-on-one or with very small groups.”

The original sharing problem seems to be a small one for Facebook at the moment. The company delivered an impressive earnings report for the first quarter of 2016, bringing in revenue of $5.38 billion on the quarter, beating estimates of $5.25. And its 77 cents profit per share beat estimates of 62 cents.

Zuckerberg, for one, was pleased with the results, telling analysts: “We started 2016 off well.”



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1TxRvr4
via IFTTT

Facebook Quietly Live-Streamed Its First Professional Sports Broadcast Over The Weekend


As Alex Morgan prepared to take the field Saturday for her team's National Women's Soccer League season opener, the Orlando Pride forward posted an update to her Facebook page: "Orlando Pride season opener! First half action live."

Accompanying the text was a broadcast of the game, beamed through Facebook with an assist from the platform's Live API — complete with professionally shot video, cuts and graphics. It was everything you'd expect to see on TV, except this time it was on Facebook.

The broadcast was Facebook's first live stream of a professional sports event. It reached an audience of 273,249 unique viewers in the first half, according to Facebook. A second separate live video of the game's second half reached 348,944 unique viewers, also according to Facebook. The game reached an estimated 554,000 unique viewers in all, according to Cycle the media company that orchestrated the stream.

In comparison, a National Hockey League playoff game between the Nashville Predators and The Anaheim Ducks pulled in 413,000 average viewers Saturday, according to Nielsen. Nielsen's average viewer number is calculated differently from Facebook’s unique viewers though, so the comparison isn’t completely analogous.

Cycle CEO Jason Stein told BuzzFeed News he expects more live sports broadcasts on Facebook to follow the Orlando Pride's lead. "If you can broadcast sports live on Facebook and reach a significant audience that's bigger than most sporting events on TV, you can expect more people to migrate to this distribution tool," Stein said. "Most sporting events are buried within a thousand different channels on cable. With Facebook Live, you're able to open up an app and see live sports on your phone, delivered right to you."

Cycle, which works with Morgan to develop social content, arranged to stream the game live on her Facebook page via an agreement with the National Women's Soccer League and the Orlando Pride. The league, which doesn't have a TV partner, also broadcasted the game to YouTube. But the game reached far less viewers there: a bit over 76,000, according to YouTube.

Facebook is running an experiment where it’s paying athletes, celebrities and media companies to stream live. Morgan is part of that experiment, according to Cycle, which would not disclose the financials behind the Orlando Pride season opener deal.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/26vs4xk
via IFTTT

FBI Will Not Reveal The San Bernardino iPhone Hack

Carlos Barria / Reuters

The FBI will not share the secret technique it purchased for at least $1.4 million to crack the San Bernardino iPhone, a top law enforcement official said in a statement Wednesday.

The agency’s decision leaves Apple and the public with little knowledge of the vulnerability FBI exploited to penetrate the device, an iPhone 5c used by the man behind the San Bernardino terrorist attack last year. More recently, the iPhone has been at the center of a controversial legal battle between the Justice Department and Apple over government access to encrypted communications.

Days before a scheduled courtroom showdown last month, an unidentified outside party showed the FBI how to access the device. The method, purchased by the agency, proved successful, prompting the Justice Department to abandon its case against Apple. The identity of the outside party and the details of the method used to crack the device became subjects of intense curiosity, as the Justice Department refused repeatedly to offer specifics.

Privacy experts, however, pointed to the government’s internal policy on disclosing cyber vulnerabilities. Known as an equities review, the policy was designed to balance the interests of law enforcement and intelligence agencies in keeping hacks secret, against the public interest case for disclosing them — the patching of security vulnerabilities and the shielding of consumers from malicious intruders and manipulation.

Even as legal and tech experts such as Christopher Soghoian of the ACLU, Andrew Crocker of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Alan Butler of the Electronic Privacy Information Center argue that the equities review process lacks accountability and transparency, the government's stated policy favors disclosure. But the FBI says it knows so little about the technical details of the San Bernardino method, it can’t submit the vulnerability to the equities review.

“The F.B.I. purchased the method from an outside party so that we could unlock the San Bernardino device,” said Amy Hess, the FBI’s executive assistant director for science and technology.

“We did not, however, purchase the rights to technical details about how the method functions, or the nature and extent of any vulnerability upon which the method may rely in order to operate. As a result, currently we do not have enough technical information about any vulnerability that would permit any meaningful review” she said.

Apple declined to comment.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/24kvX6s
via IFTTT

Reports: Body Found At Apple Headquarters

Authorities are reportedly investigating after a body was found in a conference room at Apple’s headquarters in Cupertino.

A body was found Wednesday at the Apple headquarters in California, several media outlets reported.

A body was found Wednesday at the Apple headquarters in California, several media outlets reported.

Apple headquarters in Cupertino.

Marcio Jose Sanchez / AP

It is unclear if the deceased person is an Apple employee.

Pictures from the scene showed county sheriff vehicles parked at the Cupertino campus.

Apple and the Santa Clara County Sheriff's Office did not immediately respond to BuzzFeed News' request for comment.

This is a developing story. Check back later for updates and follow BuzzFeed News on Twitter.


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1rA4TSO
via IFTTT

26 Nisan 2016 Salı

As Social Shifts To Video, Content Creators Win Power And Dollars

In December, a pack of widely followed Vine stars made their way to Twitter’s San Francisco headquarters for an unprecedented meeting. These stars, who helped propel Vine to popularity by creating a unique brand of entertainment to fit its short, looping format, wanted to finally get paid for their work. Other social networks had plans in the works to pay content creators, and these Viners wanted in too. It was a bit of a watershed moment: After years of the platform acting as supreme ruler, the leverage was beginning to shift.

In the meeting, the stars sent a message to Twitter: Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat all want our videos too; cut us a check if you want to keep us. "We made Vine a cultural phenomena," one of the Vine stars in attendance told BuzzFeed News. "We would like finally make a living off of the platform."

The meeting displayed something new that major social companies are now starting to reckon with: Very few people, relatively speaking, are capable of regularly creating compelling videos that others want to watch. And as social platforms look to saturate their feeds with video — live or otherwise — rather than just pictures and text, they're essentially competing for the same limited set of good videos. So those who create the ​quality​ stuff can demand payment.

In recent weeks, those payments have begun flowing. Twitter and Facebook both started handing out multimillion-dollar wads of cash to bring quality video content to their platforms. Twitter announced earlier this month that it would spend millions to stream 10 NFL games during the 2016 NFL season. And Facebook is offering six-figure checks to celebrities who agree to use its live-streaming product. Periscope’s CEO, in an interview, wouldn’t rule out paying content creators down the road either. When those Vine stars marched into Twitter’s Market Street headquarters in San Francisco demanding financial compensation for their work, it wasn’t an outlier. It was the new normal.

“In video we are seeing just how hard it is to make great content people watch on a recurring basis,” Josh Elman, a partner at venture capital firm Greylock Partners who has invested in the live-streaming app Meerkat, told BuzzFeed News. “Given that, the platforms are starting to compete for those hundreds or thousands of creators who can do that, rather than hoping just anyone can become a star.”

The Vine stars’ demand in their meeting with Twitter was similar to the demands TV content companies make during negotiations. Viacom, for example, last week threatened to remove its content (including Comedy Central and MTV) from Dish Network if the satellite provider didn't fork up more cash for the rights to air it. If Dish didn't pay, Viacom’s “blackout” would make Dish’s competitors more attractive to the market. Dish agreed to fee increases, and Viacom remains on the network.

Multichannel video programming distributors — Comcast, Verizon, Dish Network, DirecTV, and more — transmit programming into people’s living rooms. But they pay content producers and programmers to fill the airwaves so they don’t have 1,000 channels of public access town hall meetings. Sound familiar? Just substitute Twitter for Dish and Vine stars for Viacom. The social platforms don’t want to fill their feeds with hours of boring video either.

In the digital world, social platforms are the content conduits to the masses, and the power relationship between them and content creators is similar. Ultimately, people care about good content, not who distributes it.

(Of course, the two are not perfectly analogous: People pay to watch cable, but they don’t pay to use social platforms. And cable has effectively no user-generated content, making it completely reliant on professional creators.)

Still, as the social companies shift to video, they’re going to win and lose users based on the quality of the video they’re showing. So they’re willing to place bets on quality video content that can draw users in even if they’re not guaranteed to directly make money off these deals. Take, for example, Twitter’s recent agreement with the NFL to stream a package of games, which may cost Twitter more than it makes back in advertising.

“An engagement game, that’s what Twitter is doing with the NFL,” Peter Stabler, senior analyst at Wells Fargo Securities, told BuzzFeed News. “They’re hoping to bring back hundreds of thousands of lapsed Twitter users.”

Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, and Snapchat all want the same engaging, high-quality videos that do well on their platforms. “They’re competing for attention, they’re competing for engagement,” Stabler said.

To get that engagement, it’s looking more likely that these companies will be relying on video from a limited group of gifted social talent creators (see: DJ Khaled), or professional media companies. For Facebook, the reality may be arriving sooner than anticipated. Original sharing on the platform is down significantly, according to a report in The Information, meaning people are simply hitting the “share” button instead of posting original text, photos, and videos. Less content creation across the board makes professional content operations even more valuable to the social giant.

Facebook is already paying media companies and celebrities to post video via its Live product. The company is offering around $250,000 for 20 posts per month over a three-month period, according to one source with knowledge of the arrangement. (BuzzFeed is among the group of Facebook Live paid media partners.)

Kayvon Beykpour, CEO of the Twitter-owned live-streaming app Periscope, did not rule out the possibility of paying content creators in a recent interview with BuzzFeed News. "Maybe it’s something that we experiment as Periscope specifically later on,” he said, while adding: “It’s really important for us to make sure we’re building a product that people want to use without being monetarily incentivized."

“I think you’re seeing a renaissance for content creators,” Athan Stephanopoulos, president of digital media company NowThis, told BuzzFeed News. “Facebook’s done a good job of connecting the lines to consumers and so has Snapchat, Twitter, Instagram, and Vine. Now you’ve got to fill those pipes with quality content.”

At Facebook’s F8 developer conference this year, CEO Mark Zuckerberg said that in a decade, “video will look like as big of a shift in the way we all share and communicate as mobile has been.” And though Zuckerberg is setting up a product to spark more video creation from regular folks (Live), he's likewise ensuring it will be more attractive to professionals by paying them and expanding the cameras from phone cameras to professional-grade equipment.

This power shift may not mean media companies will find an answer to their digital revenue struggles, but it’s still a moment where those posting quality content are beginning to get paid by social platforms, rather than ads, for their editorial work. And that’s a big deal.

“These platforms know that without strong, independent, unique voices that they have nothing,” Nicholas Megalis, one widely followed Vine creator, told BuzzFeed News. “The people are the most important part of any scheme. We can move mountains.”



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1pDeXbZ
via IFTTT

Google, Ford, Uber Launch Self-Driving Car Super Lobby

Stephen Lam / Reuters

Google, Uber, and Lyft are joining forces to accelerate the adoption of self driving cars, forming a coalition with carmakers Ford and Volvo to lobby U.S. policy makers and influence the public debate on the future of autonomous transportation.

The tech companies, ride-hailing services, and car manufacturers announced Tuesday that the group will focus on not only on influencing regulators, but persuading other businesses and city managers of the financial and public safety benefits of autonomous cars.

Dubbed the Self-Driving Coalition for Safer Streets, the group will be led by David Strickland, a former chief of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

"Self-driving vehicle technology will make America's roadways safer and less congested," Strickland said in a statement to BuzzFeed News. "The best path for this innovation is to have one clear set of federal standards, and the Coalition will work with policymakers to find the right solutions that will facilitate the deployment of self-driving vehicles."

For tech and car companies eager to dominate the fledgling industry, a patchwork of state laws poses an immediate roadblock. Last month, representatives of Google and Lyft told lawmakers that the crisscrossing demands of state regulations present unworkable obligations for transportation companies. Working towards a unified policy on autonomous vehicles that extends across state-lines will likely be a primary goal for the group.

For critics and regulators, sorting out novel safety guidelines, which have yet to be defined, remains a top priority. $4 billion has been dedicated by the federal government to test and research driverless car initiatives, as part of President Obama’s proposed 2017 budget.

As part of its public relations campaign, the coalition will also seize on projections made by the Department of Transportation, which suggest driverless cars may significantly improve public safety, reducing the number and severity of car accidents. As the group notes, citing Transportation Department research, human error causes an estimated 94% of road accidents.

On Wednesday, the NHTSA, Strickland’s former agency, will hold its second public forum on self-driving cars at Stanford University.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1pD2GnU
via IFTTT

Apple iPhone Sales Fall And Revenue Declines For First Time Since 2003

Apple CEO Tim Cook

Justin Sullivan / Getty Images


Apple is an iPhone company — and there's no better proof than its financial results. The company had its first year-over-year revenue decline for a quarter since 2003, largely thanks to slumping iPhone sales. The company sold 51.2 million iPhones in the first three months of the year, compared to 61.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 a 16% drop in units sold. Analysts polled by Bloomberg expected Apple to sell 50.7 million iPhones.

Apple's decline still produced revenues and profits that would be the envy of literally any other company, largely thanks to its success in getting people to buy a huge number of expensive phones all over the world.

Apple's profits in the second quarter were $10.5 billion with $50.6 billion in revenues, a 22.5% and 13% decline respectively. Analysts had expected $52 billion in revenues. The decline in revenue — which the company had projected three months ago — is Apple's first since 2003, almost four years before Steve Jobs first unveiled the iPhone .

BuzzFeed/Apple / Via apple.com


Apple's stock price has declined slightly so far this year, while the NASDAQ Composite, which is heavy with technology companies, is down 2.4%. In after-hours trading, Apple stock is down more than 5%.

Apple chief executive officer Tim Cook pointed to "ongoing macroeconomic headwinds" and "difficult year-over-year comparisons" on a call with analysts to explain the company's "pause" in revenue growth. Cook said that had currency values remained stable over the year, revenue would have declined 4 percentage points less.

"The smartphone market is expected to see single-digit growth this year, as most of the developed markets are now near saturation," Deutsche Bank analyst Sherri Scribner said in a note last week.

UBS analysts called the upgrade cycle to the 6s and 6s Plus "mediocre in terms of installed base upgrades." The release of the 6 and 6 Plus, on the other hand, helped drive Apple to one of the most financially successful quarters in the history of public companies at the end of 2015.

"The market...is currently not growing," Cook said, but that that growth doldrums in the US and the rest of the world "shall pass." Cook also pointed particularly to revenue growth in emerging markets, like India, where revenue grew 56%. In Greater China, which includes China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong, however, revenue fell 26% to $12.5 billion.

"We remain very optimistic about the China market over the long-term," Apple's chief financial Luca Maestri said on the call. Maestri also pointed to the dollar strengthening as well as supply constraints in China as helping drag down results. A year ago, annual revenue growth was 81%.

Lanterns hang outside an Apple store in a mall in Beijing on February 23, 2016.

Greg Baker / AFP / Getty Images


While some analysts expressed skepticism about whether Apple can grow substantially in the developed world, Cook pointed to the base of iPhones growing 80% in the past two years, meaning a larger base for upgrades to more expensive phones.

"I think there is still really, really good business in the developed market, so I wouldn't want to write those off," Cook said. He also pointed to high levels of Android users switching to iPhones, including "more switches in the first half of this year than any other six-month period ever.

But in the near term, Apple is predicting a sales slowdown. The company said it expected between $41 and $43 billion in revenue in the next quarter, which would be mean another revenue drop on an annual basis. In the third quarter of last year, Apple's had $49.6 billion in revenue.

Apple sold 10.3 million iPads, while analysts expected 9.4 million, although that's still a 19% decline in sales from a year ago.

Justin Sullivan / Getty Images


This year's earnings report also marked the one year anniversary of the Apple Watch, which was released just over one year ago. While the company doesn't break out Apple Watch revenue specifically, the company's "other products” revenue, which includes the Watch, grew 30% from a year ago to $2.1 billion. Apple sold around 12 to 13 million watches in the last year, according to analyst estimates, which would be just over twice as many iPhones sold in its first year.

The company has also started to emphasize the revenue it earns from services sold to users of its products, like the App Store, iTunes, ApplePay, and iCloud storage. Investors like companies with large, recurring services revenues because they are thought to more consistent than sales of devices, which can be highly volatile.

Apple has over 1 billion active device users, which "are a source of recurring revenue that is growing independent of the unit shipments we report every three month," Cook said.

Apple had $6 billion in revenues from its services business, up 20% from a year ago. While this could sustain an entire public company for a whole year — Salesforce had $5.4 billion in revenue in all of 2015 — it’s still a small portion of Apple’s overall business, just under 12% of its revenue in the last three months.

Despite Apple's management talking more about its software and services businesses, analysts and investors tend to view Apple more simply as a hardware business, and more specifically, an iPhone business.

Steven Milunovich, an analyst at UBS, said on the call that the role of Apple's services business is "more creating an ecosystem that supports the high margins that supports the high margins on hardware as opposed to independently driving earnings."

“We are very happy with the continued strong growth in revenue from Services, thanks to the incredible strength of the Apple ecosystem and our growing base of over one billion active devices,” Apple chief executive officer Tim Cook said in a statement.





from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/240TFrC
via IFTTT

Twitter Hits 310 Million Users, But Revenue Falls Short

Jonathan Alcorn / AFP / Getty Images

Twitter eked out a small gain in user numbers in its most recent quarter, but its revenue fell short of Wall Street’s expectations​, the company reported on Tuesday.

Twitter's quarterly results showed 310 million people were using the service in the first three months of 2016, a metric known as monthly active users. That was 1.6% higher than the 305 million monthly active users in the fourth quarter of 2015. And it exceeded the expectations of Wall Street analysts, who had expected 308 million monthly active users, according to an average of estimates compiled by Bloomberg.

That user numbers grew at all is a modestly positive sign for the social media company, which has been struggling to expand its relevance with product updates under Jack Dorsey, the co-founder who took over as CEO last year. Twitter reported in February that its count of monthly active users declined in the fourth quarter from 307 million in the prior quarter, a sign that led some to speculate the company's growth was stalling.

But the slight growth in users didn't seem to mean much to investors, who sent Twitter shares down more than 10% in trading after the market closed. Twitter stock ended regular trading at $17.75 a share on Tuesday.

Investors were eyeing the company's revenue, which came in below Wall Street's expectations. Twitter reported $595 million in revenue in the first quarter, an increase of 36% from the quarter a year earlier, but short of analysts' forecast of $607.5 million, according to Bloomberg.

The company's profit, on an adjusted basis, came in at 15 cents a share. Analysts on average had expected 10 cents a share, according to Bloomberg.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1XVyTTg
via IFTTT

How Did You Listen To 'Lemonade?'

We know you’ve heard it. But did you actually shell out for a Tidal account?

By now, everyone's heard Beyoncé's new album, Lemonade.

It's basically destroying the internet as we speak.

Instagram: @beyonce

In typical Bey fashion, though, the rollout was unique.

In typical Bey fashion, though, the rollout was unique.

The only way to stream the album is by subscribing to Tidal, or buying it on iTunes or Amazon. This is, evidently, a boon for Tidal, which is owned by Beyoncé's husband, Jay Z, and which is now the #2 most downloaded app in the iTunes store.

Via beyonce.tidal.com



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1NxBHFr
via IFTTT

This New Messaging App Talkshow Makes Your Texts Public (Sort Of)

It’s more like a public Slack room.

Talkshow is a new messaging app where all the conversations are public. The company says Talkshow "is texting in public," but it really feels much more like a public-facing Slack room — an ongoing conversation between multiple people, that anyone can see.

No. Here's the difference: While all the chats on Talkshow are publicly viewable, only people you invite can join the conversation. On Twitter, not only do all conversations take place in public, but anyone who hits the reply button can join in.

Simply put, randos can't "actually" their way into your conversation on Talkshow like they can on Twitter. While someone can request an invitation, it's up to the host of a conversation whether or not to let them in.

But it's funny you should mention Twitter because Talkshow is from Michael Sippey, who used to run product there, and it is clearly informed by Twitter.

Another substantial difference is that messages are organized into distinct sets, which makes them easy to follow.

Conversations in Talkshow take place within "shows." You can think of these as chat rooms, more or less.

Shows tend to work really well when they take place around a certain event that everyone is experiencing at the same time — for example, the NBA playoffs. That's especially true when the people in the conversation are knowledgable and funny. It can be a little like watching MST3K, but on your phone, and in text format.


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1rfNLBu
via IFTTT

Inside “Emojigeddon”: The Fight Over The Future Of The Unicode Consortium

CBS

There’s trouble afoot inside the Emoji Council of Elders, or, at the very least, signs of a low-simmering schism that’s being referred to by some of its participants — perhaps with less humor than one might expect — as “Emojigeddon.”

Emails seen by BuzzFeed News reveal an emerging tension at the Unicode Consortium — the 24-year-old organization that was established to develop standards for translating alphabets into code that can be read across all computers and operating systems.

“And yes, obviously a burrito emoji will be more in use than medieval punctuation."

The series of frustrated messages show a deepening rift between those who adhere to the organization’s original mission to code old and obscure and minority languages and those who are investing time and resources toward Unicode’s newer and most popular character sets: emojis, a quirky periodic table of ideograms and smiley faces that cover everything from bemused laughter to swirling, smiling piles of poop. The correspondence offers a peek behind the scenes of the peculiar and little-known organization that’s unexpectedly been tasked with building what some see as the first digital universal language.

In a series of acerbic emails on a chain celebrating Unicode and emojis' mention on The Late Show With Stephen Colbert last March, legendary Unicode contributor and typographer Michael Everson railed against the consortium, suggesting that the organization’s focus on emojis is hurting the work of scholars like himself.

“It’s delightful that everyone is so happy about Mr Colbert, but I can tell you that many people are thinking that the UTC has lost the plot,” he scolded. “Emoji, emoji, emoji. It’s all about emoji.”

Other emails on the chain express similar frustrations. “I've only really seen one or two emails that actually sparked any meaningful discussion on Unicode while the rest have either been barrages of announcements...or end up being 'Oh look, people talk about emoji!', 'Should Father Christmas's beard be the same color as his hair?'" one younger member associated with the consortium wrote.

Unicode Consortium

Everson, who has spent decades encoding characters for Unicode — a 2003 New York Times profile cited him as “probably the world's leading expert in the computer encoding of scripts” — says that his frustrations stem from the consortium’s failure to provide “actionable feedback” on a medieval punctuation proposal that he placed in front of the committee in 2007.

“I’m editing some documents in medieval Cornish, and I personally need some of these characters. Their absence is impeding my work,” Everson told BuzzFeed News via Skype from his home in Ireland.

Though Everson managed to get two characters of medieval punctuation accepted at the last UTC meeting, he was dismayed that those accepted, including “the triple dagger” (which looks like three small swords stacked on top of each other), weren’t “particularly important to medievalists or really medieval at all.” Meanwhile, the consortium has accepted 79 new emoji proposals as candidates for its next emoji release (many of which are expected to be inducted in June), including: “drooling face,” “selfie,” “wilted flower,” “croissant,” “stuffed flatbread,” “shallow pan of food,” and “modern pentathlon.”

A few of the medieval punctuation marks from Everson's proposal.

Unicode / Via unicode.org

In one of his emails to the consortium, Everson takes issue mainly with the lack of feedback on his medieval punctuation proposal: “When ballot comments are reviewed, and something is rejected, a reason is given. Is that the case for PUNCTUS ELEVATUS MARK or PUNCTUS FLEXUS MARK? No. Nobody said a word about those,” he wrote.

Everson, who has been closely associated with Unicode since 1993, sees a correlation between the committee’s silence on proposals like medieval punctuation and the ever-increasing demands placed upon it by emojis' ubiquity. “I’m no enemy of Unicode — some of these people are friends of mine, but I’m quite frustrated,” he said. “I’d like to see more balance and focus.”

“What does it take to get your attention, folks? An April Fool's proposal for EMOJI PUNCTUS EXCLAMATIVUS MARK?”

As emojis' popularity has exploded, so has their press coverage, which Unicode has embraced. In recent years the consortium has weathered and begun to resolve the backlash over a lack of diversity inside emojis' character set and now presides over an influx of proposals for new emojis from both invested private citizens and companies like Durex condoms. Last December it publicized an Adopt A Character campaign to let people sponsor emojis (and other Unicode characters) and in January, Unicode President Mark Davis informally named the "Face With One Eyebrow Raised" emoji after Stephen Colbert, which led to the Late Show mentions and subsequent press. While it might all seem like good fun, Unicode traditionalists like Everson see it as a series of distracting stunts.

“What does it take to get your attention, folks?” Everson wrote in a March email to the consortium. “An April Fool's proposal for EMOJI PUNCTUS EXCLAMATIVUS MARK?” He then attached his 23-page medieval punctuation proposal for good measure.

In subsequent emails, Everson appears to have rallied some supporters. The younger member of the internal chain seems equally exasperated with Unicode’s embrace of emojis. “I was angered that an organization that essentially dedicates itself to the standardization of encoding the world's languages has been dumbed down to the organization that 'makes emoji,'" he wrote.

A number of strong leadership voices inside the consortium strongly disagree. On the email chain, John Hudson — another prominent typographer — shot down the idea that the consortium is letting emojis get in the way of its legacy business, suggesting that Unicode has always struggled to balance the old-school work of historical and minority scripts (dead languages) and newer, evolving language.

“They are problems that have been around for longer than emoji, and would persist even if emoji encoding in Unicode had not happened...even before Emojigeddon,” Hudson wrote.

The new emoji candidates next to a few of Everson's proposed medieval punctuation characters.

In an interview with BuzzFeed News, Hudson explained that the reason emoji proposals are causing some consternation inside the Unicode consortium is simply because reviewing them is often easier (and perhaps more fun) than debating the peculiarities of, say, PUNCTUS ELEVATUS MARK. “These historic language proposals are complicated — there’s lots we don’t know and the process takes a long time, while things like the bacon emoji are moving briskly through committee,” he said. “I can certainly see how that's frustrating for the script workers who are being asked to constantly revise proposals.”

But as Everson sees it, the glacial pace of the consortium is wasting crucial time that could be used to further language studies. In a recent email plea to the consortium over medieval punctuation like PUNCTUS FLEXUS MARK , he decried Unicode’s slow process while also taking a shot at the newly proposed (and likely soon to be accepted) dumpling emoji.

“We need these things encoded so we can USE them and we need them a lot more than we need a DUMPLING or even the Phaistos Disc [the latter is a reference to a 4,000 year old clay disc that was found in Crete that no scholars can decipher],” Everson wrote.

While Davis, Unicode’s president, told BuzzFeed News that “the vast majority of what Unicode does is not emoji,” the attention and excitement has led the non-emoji crowd to feel that the work to which they’ve dedicated their time and expertise is inferior.

“The worst part is that even within this mailing list, discussions/comments/observations on emoji seem to be 1st class citizens where discussions about new language encoding end up second class,” the same young Unicode member wrote in an email defending Everson.

Emojis' popularity isn’t lost on Everson. “I like the fun of all of this emoji stuff well enough, and if I wasn't having a road block on some of the real encoding work maybe I'd have time to participate in the emoji subcommittee,” he told BuzzFeed News, noting that he’d personally encoded emojis in the past. “And yes, obviously a burrito emoji will be more in use than medieval punctuation, but, on the other hand, the universal character set is for the translation and representation of texts — not for cartoons.”

Ultimately, Unicode’s Emojigeddon boils down to a few essential questions: Are emojis a language? And if not, what exactly are they? Why are their regulation and evolution overseen by a bunch of language nerds and engineers? Typographers, linguists, and text-encoding experts including Unicode’s president generally agree that the character set does not rise to the standards of an emerging language.

“People have strategies for stringing them together, of course, and deriving greater meaning — everyone knows eggplant is an erection and people sext with the vegetables, but that does not make it a substitute for language,” Everson said.

But for others, emojis' ubiquity makes the character set a meaningful mode of expression that transcends traditional linguistic barriers — vegetable sexting included — and is quite the opposite of a dumbed-down “cartoon.” Language or not, they argue, when millions of people zealously adopt a new, authentic way to communicate, it becomes important whether Everson, Unicode, or any linguist, typographer, or academic agrees.

Part of the reason for Everson’s passion and frustration is the sense that ongoing encoding work is, in the internet age, akin to a human right. To demonstrate, he explains a tribal alphabet used in India that, until recently, had never been encoded.

“Now those people who use this alphabet have the right and ability — if they have a computer and electricity — to write their names in their language. There’s something powerful about that. I don’t know how many people are using the alphabet, but it is there now and their rights have been met,” he said. “And there are more like that. We're not finished.”

But Davis thinks emojis' popularity can ultimately help save the more obscure work — especially Unicode’s Adopt A Character program. “We're devoting the funds raised from the program to help flesh out support for digitally disadvantaged languages. And it’s proved to be successful largely because of emoji.”

Davis assured he was doing his part. “I adopted the comma with my wife,” he said before quickly correcting himself. “The Oxford comma, of course.”



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1T2El2g
via IFTTT

This Autonomous Camera Drone Can Follow Your Face

This tiny drone is small, safe, smart — and a little scary.

This is the (not particularly creatively titled) "Hover Camera."

This is the (not particularly creatively titled) "Hover Camera."

It's the first product from Zero Zero Robotics, a Chinese company founded by two Stanford grads that hopes to bring autonomous devices into our homes.

Jeff Barron / BuzzFeed

Hover Camera is a tiny, self-flying drone with an on-board 4K camera.

Hover Camera is a tiny, self-flying drone with an on-board 4K camera.

Weighing just 240 grams, the device is just small enough to avoid the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration's drone registration requirements.

Jeff Barron / BuzzFeed

It's also portable. You can fold it, making it even smaller still.

It's also portable. You can fold it, making it even smaller still.

The whole thing is encased in a carbon fiber frame that makes it look a little like an airborne cafeteria tray when it's flying. But this enclosure also makes the Hover Camera's propellers nearly impossible to touch. While we weren't able to test it extensively, it did appear to be safer (and sturdier) than the average quadcopter.

Jeff Barron / BuzzFeed

While airborne, the Hover Camera can be piloted via smartphone app ...

While airborne, the Hover Camera can be piloted via smartphone app ...

Jeff Barron / BuzzFeed


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1rwPz9t
via IFTTT

25 Nisan 2016 Pazartesi

Here's How A Silicon Valley Programmer Got A $250K Salary

Coding chops, referrals, and competing offers. Poker skills probably helped, too.

This is Haseeb Qureshi.

This is Haseeb Qureshi.

He's a former poker pro who last year enrolled in a programming bootcamp — a mainstay for aspiring techies hoping to break into a big-name Silicon Valley company like Google, Uber, or Airbnb. In Qureshi's case, the 12-week program landed him a job as the director of product at the bootcamp he attended, App Academy.

Earlier this month, with just a year's worth of programming experience, Qureshi received a $250,000 job offer from Airbnb. That Qureshi was able to land such a gig isn't particularly interesting; "Tech Engineer Gets Huge Salary" is a story that could be written daily in the Bay Area. But the tale of how he came to receive the job offer, from beginning to end, is fascinating.

It's a glimpse into how dizzying salaries are attained, something not often discussed publicly, let alone openly in Silicon Valley. And Qureshi has interesting plans for his salary. He's an effective altruist who has pledged to donate a substantial portion of his lifetime income to high-impact charities.

Via Facebook: haseebq.bookface

Qureshi said you need referrals to even get your foot in the door at Silicon Valley tech companies.

Qureshi said you need referrals to even get your foot in the door at Silicon Valley tech companies.

Bootcamps like App Academy might teach you the coding skills you need to work at the big name tech companies, but their names don't count for much in Silicon Valley's highly competitive job market.

"I applied to the all the big hiring websites," Qureshi wrote. "Hired rejected me from their platform. I got no bites anywhere on AngelList or LinkedIn — not even cold e-mails from recruiters. Nothing from WhiteTruffle or SmartHires. Not a breath of interest anywhere."

Ultimately, over 50% of the companies Qureshi applied to rejected him outright. It wasn't until he began using TripleByte, a technical recruiting/screening platform for engineers, that his job search gained momentum.

Essentially, TripleByte serves as a middleman. It tested and screened Qureshi for a variety of qualifications and then pitched him as available talent to companies like Stripe, Twitch, and Airbnb. Because TripleByte was founded by a former partner of startup accelerator Y Combinator, it is particularly successful at placing candidates at YC companies.

App Academy

Seriously: You need someone who knows you to give you a referral if you want a call back.

Seriously: You need someone who knows you to give you a referral if you want a call back.

Every single one of the jobs Qureshi was eventually offered came through referrals — none were from applying to a job blind. Many of the offers came from people Qureshi already knew at the companies he was applying to (most tech companies hand out bonuses for employees who refer someone that's ultimately hired).

Via giphy.com

Tech companies compete for people — hard.

Tech companies compete for people — hard.

According to Qureshi, an offer in hand begat others — particularly if it was from a BIG Silicon Valley tech company.

"Just the whiff of the Google name got recruiters into a frenzy," Qureshi wrote. "Companies that wouldn’t even look at me now bent over backwards to expedite me through their funnels."

After receiving an offer from Google, Qureshi sparked interest at some of the hottest companies in the Valley; Uber, Twitch, and Airbnb all suddenly became much more interested in talking to him. What's unclear is just how these companies kept abreast of Qureshi's job search, and just how he became a seemingly hot commodity.

Via giphy.com


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1YQVmAX
via IFTTT

22 Nisan 2016 Cuma

HBO's Silicon Valley Can't Keep Up With Reality

John P. Fleenor / HBO


Last night, an investment bank and a venture capital firm co-hosted a premiere screening of a farcical premium cable show about tech companies. It sounds like the setup to a joke, but like on the show itself, it's not clear who gets the last laugh.

A few minutes before the crowd of industry insiders gathered at a San Francisco movie theater for a sneak peek at the first episode of Silicon Valley’s third season, news broke that Uber had settled two class-action lawsuits that could have cost the company its $50 billion business model. Meanwhile, across the country in New York City, Uber investor Shervin Pishevar was on a red carpet, posing next to Tom Hanks to celebrate Pishevar’s first turn as a movie producer. As the seat of capital and culture-shaping continues to inch north from Hollywood to Silicon Valley, it’s hard to stay on top of an industry constantly beta-testing the limits of its power.

Another reminder that tech truth can be stranger than fiction: a scene in the middle of the episode onscreen, when a promising startup reveals that its top secret tech project is (ba dum bump) just a Snapchat-like filter for adding 3D mustaches with names like The Sam Elliott and The Hitler. Earlier this week in the real world, Snapchat, which is valued at $16 billion, got in trouble for the boneheaded and utterly preventable decision to release a blackface filter of Bob Marley to celebrate 4/20.

None of these real-time footnotes made a difference to the audience in San Francisco, who cracked up — just as I did — with each new riff and pratfall. Where the show's first season focused on the trials of turning an idea into a company and the second on the trials of getting funded and off the ground, Season 3's major theme is regaining and retaining control.

In the first few episodes, Richard Hendricks, the brainy doofus at the helm of Pied Piper, the data compression startup that serves as Silicon Valley’s inanimate protagonist, meets his new nemesis: “Action” Jack Barker, the gray-haired CEO brought in to replace him. Unlike previous foes, Barker has a wider spectrum of emotions, all of which he employs to charm and defang Pied Piper’s employees. The biggest laugh of the night went to T.J. Miller's character, the proud wastrel Erlich Bachman, who runs over what he thinks is a deer, only to realize that his victim was in fact an experiment from Stanford Robotics, played by Boston Dynamics' lovable kickable robot.

From the get-go, Silicon Valley has emphasized its commitment to this type of detail. The people involved with the show have repeatedly cast their challenge as a choice between broad strokes and pixel-to-pixel verisimilitude, and they choose door number two. Mike Judge and co. seem very happy with their decision, and the chummy vibe at last night’s screening was a testament to the benefits: For tech personalities, getting tapped to fact-check or offer fodder for the show is almost as much of a bragging right as scoring one of the show’s many cameos.

But mutual admiration has also put Silicon Valley in a slippery position. It’s a biting satire suspiciously beloved by the people it’s supposed to be skewering. And it's a hyperrealistic, exhaustively vetted show that still manages to have some massive blind spots: a gender problem almost as stark as the one in the industry it parodies, a puerile sense of humor, and a bizarre devotion to the myth of the boy genius loner, to name but a few.

After the screening, there was a short question-and-answer session with some of the cast members, creator Mike Judge, and ex-Twitter CEO Dick Costolo, who worked as a consultant on the show after he was nudged out of Twitter. (It’s a plausible career move considering he used to do improv comedy at Second City, although Costolo made a wisecrack about how the mighty have fallen.) Onstage, Costolo was asked to name a couple instances where he had to steer the show’s direction back to reality. Costolo said it was the other way around. “Most of the time it was me saying, ‘No, you can go way past that. They do far worse things than this!’” he explained. “You can go much, much farther.”

You can, but it may hurt your faves. Later in the Q&A when Judge was asked about the most memorable feedback he’s gotten, he pointed to a series of glowing tweets from venture capitalist Marc Andreessen after the pilot. “That was really cool for us, I think,” Judge said. “Somebody who is that much a part of Silicon Valley liking the show and just the details he mentioned were — that felt good.” Judge wouldn’t be the first man to fall under the @pmarca thrall.

And besides, Silicon Valley is satirizing a subculture that can already sound like a joke. Zach Woods plays Jared Dunn, Pied Piper's maternal caretaker. Woods said the show has a similar dynamic to Veep, HBO’s political gaffe-fest that will also premiere its new season on Sunday. “I think a lot of these shows that parody worlds are often out-parodied by reality,” he said during a press junket earlier that day hosted at the office of a PR firm.

Woods was sitting on a couch next to Martin Starr, who plays Bertram Gilfoyle, a wickedly deadpan developer and Satanist. Both actors pointed to one scene in the upcoming season that they found particularly hard to swallow — until they saw it unfold on the news — in which Pied Piper makes a promotional video. The show’s creators were trying to parody a bizarre Facebook ad from 2012 called “Chairs are like Facebook.” Starr and Woods thought audiences wouldn’t buy it, until they saw Uber’s delusional take on “Bits and Atoms.”

The screening was held at the New Mission Theater, the San Francisco outpost of an indie cinema chain known for serving patrons food and drink while they watch. On the marquee outside, the words “New Mission” are spelled out in neon green lights visible up and down the street.

For the rapidly gentrifying Mission District, the “new” part is painfully obvious. The theater sits right next to Vida, a condo development loathed by some locals for its gaudy design and gaudier prices. On one edge of the block is El Techo de Lolinda, a luxe Latin American food restaurant perpetually mobbed by those seeking its premium margaritas and rooftop vantage point. On the other edge of the block, next to Vida, is a burned-out building with a Popeyes Chicken on the ground floor and the remnants of more than a dozen rent-controlled apartments above. (The police did not suspect it, but neighbors continue to blame arson for the four-alarm fire last year.) Across the street from the theater is Doc's Clock, a dive bar and treasured San Francisco institution where the bouncer has been known to wear a “Die Techie Scum” shirt. In February, the property owner said she would not be renewing the bar’s lease.

The night of the premiere, the block was dotted in fliers blaming displacement on the influx of tech money. One said “TRICKLE DOWN DEVASTATION” and featured Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Uber CEO Travis Kalanick, and Airbnb CEO Brian Chesky's bloody, logo-adorned heads on pikes.

Nitasha Tiku / BuzzFeed News

The show has yet to venture into San Francisco’s affordable housing crisis, or San Francisco at all. There is a nod to the housing market in the second episode of the upcoming season, but the butt of the joke ends up being a hippie who was priced out, not the evicters. Which is fine: This is a half-hour sitcom, not a morality play. If you’re hoping for Sunday night TV to make the world a better place, you’ll be waiting a long time. San Francisco's housing crisis is real, but it’s not particularly funny.

The bigger bummer of a missed opportunity is the show’s treatment of gender. Viewers who gave up on Season 1’s disappointingly sexist casting probably didn’t stick around to see how Season 2 responded directly to that criticism in the form of Carla Walton, a stellar engineer with no fucks to give who alternately intimidates and gaslights her male co-workers at Pied Piper. But as with the short-lived Donald Glover arc on Girls, interest seems to have waned. After actor Christopher Welch’s death, the show hired Suzanne Cryer to play Laurie Bream, the managing partner who replaced Welch’s take on Peter Thiel, and perhaps that was enough for them. (Although Bream’s character can come off like Thiel with a vagina, basically, apparently Marissa Mayer was “one of” the inspirations for the part.)

More alarming than the casting is the boys club vibe that the show can’t seem to shake. In first three episodes, there is one shockingly graphic and entirely superfluous scene that seems like the kind of sophomoric prank that got pushed through the censors because you wanted to impress your friends. Like cast member T.J. Miller, the show can be a bit of a loose cannon. Since this season seems more tightly focused on what’s happening inside Pied Piper, it might mean less punching up and more flailing around.

After the Q&A was over, the crowd exited the theater to sample sliders, deviled eggs with trout, bowls of fries, and fried green tomato pizza, leaning on doors and banisters and garbage cans to balance their plates and drinks. The party spilled into Bear vs. Bull, the red-light-bathed bar on the New Mission Theater’s ground floor. PR reps made a permeable barrier around the talent, while men in dress slacks giddily waited their turn and hopefully remembered to turn off their smartphone flash.

A venture capitalist who was milling away from the selfie line said he preferred escapist television like Games of Thrones to Silicon Valley, but he had seen the third season premiere twice. The level of razzing on the show made sense to him. “It’s the kind of biting we are with each other,” he said, comparing it to watching episodes of L.A. Law as a kid without knowing anything about being a lawyer. The show never promised “meta social commentary,” he said. “There’s not going to be a ‘very special episode’ of Silicon Valley about the 1099 economy.”









from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1SpxJeT
via IFTTT

Facebook Now Lets People Turn Off Live Notifications

Facebook is finally introducing an option to turn off all those live video notifications. The control is currently rolling out, a Facebook spokesperson confirmed. It was spotted by Teresa Hammerl who posted a screenshot on Twitter.

The rollout appears to still be in its early stages (a number of BuzzFeed reporters polled still don't have access) but Hammerl said she spotted it in the notifications section of her Facebook settings. So you can check there to see if you have it too.

"We are starting to roll out a new setting that lets people turn off all Live notifications, through their Notifications settings, that will be available to all people soon,” the Facebook spokesperson said.

Facebook is in the midst of a big push to get people to watch and post live video to its platform (BuzzFeed is among a group of Facebook Live paid media partners), so this control is likely to hurt the distribution of those videos a bit. Still, the notifications annoyed some of its users so much that the social giant felt compelled to give them a way to turn them off.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1To4ETB
via IFTTT

Teamsters To Organize Uber Drivers In California

Drivers protest outside Uber headquarters following rate cuts earlier this year.

Caroline O'Donovan / BuzzFeed News

On Thursday, Uber agreed to support a drivers' association as part of a $100 million settlement of two class action lawsuits brought against it. On Friday, the Teamsters and coalition of labor groups called Silicon Valley Rising said they would take the the ride-hailing company up on that offer.

The organization is to be known as the Uber Drivers' Association in California. In a press release, the Teamsters Joint Council 7 promised to throw its "institutional resources and power" behind driver efforts to organize for better hours and safety requirements, benefits, and legal assistance.

The misclassification lawsuit settlement, reached Thursday — but not yet approved, spans a class of about 385,000 drivers in California and Massachusetts. It's not yet clear how many drivers in either state are interested in joining a union.

According to prior statements by Uber, over half of drivers drive less than ten hours a week, making it unlikely that driving for Uber is their primary form of employment.

The settlement, which guaranteed some changes in Uber's policy, failed to achieve its primary goal of reclassifying drivers as employees. As contractors, Uber drivers don't legally have the ability to join a union, per the National Labor Relations Board. But, ride-hail drivers won the right to collectively bargain in Seattle in December, and similar legislation is gaining traction in California's state capital. (Neither the policy changes nor laws regarding organizing pertain to Uber drivers outside the United States.)

"As a transportation union, the Teamsters have a long history of dealing with drivers who are classified as independent contractors," said Rome Aloise, Vice-President of the Teamsters and President of Joint Council 7, in a statement. "Whether it's a voice at work, better benefits, or advocacy, this association will raise standards for Uber drivers."

Elsewhere, other unions have made attempts unionizing Uber drivers. In New York, competition between the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and the International Association of Machinists over which will represent LaGuardia airport-based drivers (and collect their dues) actually resulted in a formal dispute at The National Labor Relations Board. In New Orleans, The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees has been working to organize drivers, while in Florida, the Service Employees International Union has been active on the issue.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1VHRTqP
via IFTTT

Spotify Will Tell You Which Game Of Thrones Character You Are

Jon Snow loves indie rock, Dany is into “shimmer pop,” and Tormund Giantsbane is a metal head.

Game Of Thrones picks up again this weekend, and the question on everyone's mind is:

Game Of Thrones picks up again this weekend, and the question on everyone's mind is:

HBO

What character am I??

What character am I??

Not really. People want to know whether Jon Snow is dead or not.

HBO

But, if you're interested in finding out which GoT character shares your musical tastes, Spotify has you covered.

But, if you're interested in finding out which GoT character shares your musical tastes, Spotify has you covered.

The music streaming service launched a tool today at http://ift.tt/1WK41Xt that analyzes your listening habits to determine your Game Of Thrones Character.

John Paczkowski / BuzzFeed

I got Daenerys Targaryen.

I got Daenerys Targaryen.

I feel very good about this because Dany is the Unburnt, Mother of Dragons, and the Breaker of Chains. I feel less good about it because, according to Spotify, Dany listens to a lot of "shimmer pop."

My editor, who listens to a lot of metal, got Tormund Giantsbane, who is metal. VERY metal.

Brendan Klinkenberg / BuzzFeed


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1NFYwSd
via IFTTT