31 Mart 2017 Cuma

You Can Now Search Snap Stories For Stuff Like Basketball Games And Puppies

You can now search for Snap Stories by place and topic.

The options are endless: "Puppies," "Atlanta Falcons," your favorite bar, "spring break," "election day," etc. The feature launches today in Miami and will roll out later in other cities, though Snap declined to specify exactly when and where.

youtube.com

In a blog post released Friday, Snap said that its curation team had become "overwhelmed" by the number of Stories people had produced and submitted to the collective, localized Our Story feature, so the company decided to allow users to search for them on their own.

We’ve built a new way to understand what’s happening in Snaps that are submitted to Our Story, and to create new Stories using advanced machine learning. The results have been amazing: you can search over one million unique Stories on Snapchat!

According to a Snap spokesperson, the Stories you can search for cast a much wider net for Stories than the professionally curated Our Stories, Publisher Stories, and Shows that you’ll still see in “Discover” and “Featured” sections throughout the app. Snaps shown in Our Stories typically focus on big events, like The Grammys, Super Bowl, or a presidential debate.

In 2016, Snap acquired the search engine Vurb for $114.5 million. The company said it developed its new Search feature in-house. Snap said the new feature works by algorithmically identifying what’s happening in submitted Stories based on things like caption text, time, and visual elements.

Snap made its Initial Public Offering one month ago at a valuation of $34 billion. It's stock price has since fallen.

The change comes as Facebook is creating a Stories-esque feature in all of its flagship apps: Messenger, Whatsapp, Instagram, and, most recently, Facebook.




from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2ojpJaS
via IFTTT

This American Shero Buttchugged Mountain Dew

Susan B. Anthony. Rosa Parks. Hillary Clinton. And now add to that list of feminist icons, @lilbabybytch. On the second to last day of Women’s History Month, this fearless woman leaned in and broke a whole new barrier: the first woman to buttchug Mountain Dew.

WARNING: PIC IS OF SOMEONE BUTTCHUGGING MOUNTAIN DEW. WE WARNED YOU.

WARNING: PIC IS OF SOMEONE BUTTCHUGGING MOUNTAIN DEW. WE WARNED YOU.

Twitter: @lilbabybytch

A second angle:

A second angle:

Here's the link to the tweet, which we can't embed here because we can't blur it.

Twitter: @lilbabybytch

NOTE: BUZZFEED DOES NOT ACTUALLY ENDORSE BUTTCHUGGING ANYTHING. DO NOT DO THIS. SERIOUSLY. WE MEAN IT.

This isn’t the first time @lilbabybytch has shattered the glass ceiling of doing dirtbag stuff. In 2015, she made headlines here at BuzzFeed for buttchugging cough syrup with the help of her friend @freakmommy. It may surprise you that both women do not drink or do drugs, nor do any of the partygoers at the Mountain Dew event.

Here's @lilbabybytch in 2015 buttchugging cough syrup (NSFW):

Here's @lilbabybytch in 2015 buttchugging cough syrup (NSFW):

Twitter: @freakmommy

I caught up with this American shero to ask her a few questions about her groundbreaking journey to fully do the Dew.

BuzzFeed: What inspired you to undertake this experiment?

@lilbabybytch: Well the same as with the alcohol-free cough syrup, I just wanted to see if it would work at all. Coffee enemas are pretty common, so I wanted to try some uncharted caffeine suppository territory.

So what happened when you did it? Did it work? Did it all just poop/splash out?

So a can of Mountain Dew only has about 55mg of caffeine in it, and I did not get anywhere near 12 oz. in there. I didn't notice any obvious effects, but I couldn't sleep. I lay awake grinding my teeth for about four hours! I shotgunned a Mountain Dew after the buttchug though, so honestly there's too many variables to speak on it definitively.

Here’s a video of it in action. WARNING: VERY NSFW

So it stayed inside you?

I didn't poop for four hours. I thought I would have the runs (it felt like I would), but it was pretty mellow and ended quickly. Here's a picture of my friend Carolyn next to the part that leaked out of my butt in the couple minutes afterward:

Note the wet spot on the couch ^^^^^

@lilbabybytch

Any weird poops after?

No! It didn't get my digestion going off in any weird way. I wish it had.

Was it classic Mountain Dew, or one of the flavors, like Code Red?

Classic. My favorite flavor is Voltage.

Any advice for the fans out there?

If you wanna get a lot of liquid in your ass, do it like an enema. Handstands are not conducive to receiving large volumes of soda. But most of all, you don't need to do drugs to have fun.


LINK: Meet The Girl Who Buttchugged Cough Syrup




from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2nFxy8d
via IFTTT

Policy Experts Slam ISP Privacy Vows After Congressional Vote

GeekWire

AT&T and Comcast are pushing back against concerns that the repeal of Obama-era internet privacy rules might harm their customers and lead to invasive business practices that rely on harvesting your personal data.

On Friday, AT&T and Comcast both released lengthy statements touting their commitment to privacy and reassuring customers that little has changed since Congress moved to gut regulations that would make it easier for them to sell information about their online habits to third parties. But representatives from the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Public Knowledge, and the Center for Digital Democracy told BuzzFeed News that the consequences of the repeal may differ sharply from the comforting messages delivered by the telecom giants.

"There is a lot to say about the nonsense they've produced here," said Ernesto Falcon, legislative counsel at EFF. "There is little reason to believe they will not start using personal data they've been legally barred from using and selling to bidders without our consent now. The law will soon be tilted in their favor to do it."

At the beginning of Comcast's statement the company claims it will never sell the individual browsing histories of their customers. Comcast goes on to say that it will not share customers "sensitive" information without their permission. But "sensitive" has a very specific meaning when it comes to privacy rules.

According to the Federal Trade Commission's guidelines — which Comcast has pledged to abide by — browsing history is not always considered "sensitive" information, though privacy experts say it can contain revealing information about our financial, political, religious, sexual, medical, and social lives.

"Comcast saying that it doesn't sell individual browsing history is not the same thing as Comcast being prohibited from doing so."

One crucial distinction between "sensitive" and "non-sensitive" information has to do with consent. With non-sensitive data, internet providers don't need to get your explicit permission to collect and share it. In contrast, sensitive data requires that you opt-in, that you first give affirmative consent before ISPs can share it.

Perhaps one of the most important things the Obama-era privacy rules did was classify browsing history as sensitive data, giving Americans stronger protections online. The rules were passed by the Federal Communications Commission in October, and parts of the regulations were slated to kick in later this year. But the major carriers — including Comcast and AT&T — prefer the older FTC guidelines, in which customers' online habits can be surveilled, sorted, and sold more easily.

In his statement Friday, Gerard Lewis, Comcast's deputy general counsel and chief privacy office said: "We do not sell our broadband customers’ individual web browsing history. We did not do it before the FCC’s rules were adopted, and we have no plans to do so." (Disclosure: Comcast Corp.'s NBCUniversal is an investor in BuzzFeed.)

But Dallas Harris, a policy fellow with Public Knowledge said she isn't convinced that a mere pledge by a corporation can replace robust privacy protections. "Comcast saying that it doesn't sell individual browsing history is not the same thing as Comcast being prohibited from doing so," she said. "Without these rules, when and if they decide to start selling individual web browsing history, they can now bury it on page twenty of their privacy website and give you the option to opt-out 20 clicks away from where you log-in. That is unacceptable."

Jeff Chester, the executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy acknowledged that Comcast doesn't directly share the browsing histories of individual customers, but he still characterized the company's statement as "misleading." "It’s used for direct targeting by the ISP and is supplemented by brand and other digital media data," he said.

In AT&T's statement, Bob Quinn, the company's senior executive vice president pointed to the "web browsers, search engines, and social media platforms" that, he said, are actually the entities who collect and use the most consumer information online. Quinn argued that having stricter privacy rules for ISPs, "confuses" customers rather than protects them.

But Chester and other privacy advocates say that ISPs have significant visibility into our online lives, sometimes more so than Web companies like Facebook or Google. "[ISPs] have a lion’s share of geo-location and other specialized data," he said. "They should have safeguards instead of pointing to others."

Howard echoed that sentiment, noting that asking ISPs to implement stronger privacy rules seems a modest demand. "We are just asking internet providers to get your permission before they collect sensitive information about you," she said.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2ojkzf8
via IFTTT

The Music Industry Kind Of Likes Streaming Now, But It's Still Nervous

51% of the music industry's revenue comes from streaming, according to a report published Thursday by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA).

Paid streaming services like Spotify and Apple Music accounted for just 9% of the industry's revenue in 2011, grew to 34% in 2015, and jumped to 51% in 2016 with 22.6 million people paying for them.

According to an accompanying blog post, "2016: A Year of Progress For Music," 78% of all US music is distributed through digital channels. Digital distribution overtook physical music sales — mostly made up of CDs — globally in 2015.

RIAA

These are truly strange times. The music industry used to hate streaming. Now it's in love with it.

Giphy

The precursors to online music streaming were free services like Kazaa and Napster that let you download pirated music. Limewire viruses, anyone? Spotify, too, though, tbh.

Streaming is here to stay. But it's still unclear if the music business will ever make as much money as it did during the heyday of CDs.

Overall industry revenue rose by 11.4% in 2016, which was the biggest increase in over a decade.

But it's still just a fraction of what it used to be.

But it's still just a fraction of what it used to be.

RIAA

Spotify, the world's biggest streaming music service, is and always has been unprofitable. Maybe that'll change in 2017? The RIAA cautioned people that the industry's recovery from it steep losses in the mid-aughts "is fragile and fraught with risk." Sales of CDs and song downloads are declining fast, especially as Apple more heavily favors its streaming service over iTunes. Digital music is hard.

Pandora, one of the first services to offer streaming radio and formerly the music industry's archenemy, just released an on-demand streaming service that faces stiff competition from Spotify and Apple Music. Investors are pressuring Pandora to sell itself, just as the company started to be on better terms with the recording industry.

Some things don't change, though. The music industry is still mad at YouTube for how little it pays artists:

The RIAA wrote, "a platform like YouTube wrongly exploits legal loopholes to pay creators at rates well below the true value of music." The RIAA launched Value The Music today in conjunction with other industry groups to lobby for policy change that would monetarily favor artists and record labels.

RIAA



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2ojkpUM
via IFTTT

How To Keep Your Browsing History Actually Private

Last week, the House repealed Internet privacy rules requiring broadband companies to ask for your consent before sharing or selling your information, like browsing history, location data, app usage data, and content communications. If Donald Trump signs the legislation into law, all of your unencrypted online activity – essentially everything you do on websites without a padlock in the URL bar – is up for grabs by advertisers.

Without these privacy protections, your porn viewing, shopping, and search habits could be made public. There is, however, one very easy way to maintain your privacy: using a virtual private network, or a VPN, which is like an Invisibility Cloak for your browsing history.

Twitter: @AbbottColton

Who does the repeal affect?

You, and everyone else reading this article in the US, are subject to having their browsing history sold to the highest bidder. That is, unless you subscribe to Sonic or Monkeybrains, two California-based providers that have pledged to not sell browsing history.

What can my Internet company actually do under the repeal?

As my colleague Hamza Shaban pointed out, your Internet service provider can not only sell your browsing history, but compile web profiles, inject targeted ads, and deploy hidden tracking cookies on your phone.

Some companies (including Charter, Cogent, DirecPC) have also been known to hijack searches through a service called Paxfire, and send you to brands that paid for more traffic.

What the heck is a VPN?

A VPN, or virtual private network, is a service that will privatize everything you do on the Internet through encryption. In other words, it will hide your IP address (which reveals your physical location) and the pages you’re visiting. A VPN is like a secret tunnel that turns all of the data running through Internet cables into gibberish, so your Internet service provider (AT&T, Comcast, Charter, etc.) can’t see what you’re up to and, therefore, can’t sell that information to marketers.

It’s safer, too. Most VPNs have servers that scan data in real-time for websites with hidden malicious software.

This “VPN thing” sounds really complicated. How hard is it to set up?

Not hard at all!! Using a VPN usually means downloading software or a mobile app, and logging onto a website, signing in, clicking connect, and then… that’s it. For some services, you’ll be automatically logged into the VPN every time you use your home Internet. You may, however, need to select a VPN server location before you can connect to the Internet. You can use a VPN anywhere you are: on your phone, on home Wi-Fi, on plane Wi-Fi, etc.

cwtv.com / Via giphy.com

How do I choose what VPN service to use?

Picking the right VPN is actually a little complicated, but hopefully this guide will make it less so.

Security expert Francis Dinha, CEO of Private Tunnel, offered a few of his best tips:

– “Stay away from free services, because you’ll go back to the same problem. Some VPNs are going to collect your information to push advertisements to monetize,” said Dinha. Hola VPN was caught violating user privacy in 2015. Just remember: There’s no such thing as a free lunch!

– Dinha also advised staying away from providers that use weak protocols. If you’re not sure what makes a protocol strong, VPN University has a great chart comparing different methods. It shows that OpenVPN is the strongest protocol, followed by L2TP (Layer 2 Tunnel Protocol), and the Windows PC-only SSTP (Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol), which all use 256-bit level encryption. On the product site you’re looking at, look for those bolded words and you should be safe.

– Avoid PPTP (point-to-point tunneling protocol) at all costs. Vulnerabilities in the protocol were exposed in 2012, when Moxie Marlinspike (the founder of Open Whisper Systems, which is what the encryption for WhatsApp, Signal, and other apps, is based on) created software called CloudCracker that could crack any PPTP connection.

– When looking for tools to protect your privacy, the Electronic Frontier Foundation’s Noah Swartz said to look for a product using an open-source technology (like OpenVPN), that would allow other engineers to verify that its code retain strong encryption and best practices.

– Also, make sure the provider doesn’t log any user activity (some VPNs keep extensive logs of users’ IP addresses) and has a strong commitment to privacy.

That detailed VPN comparison chart is the most comprehensive way to look at every aspect of most major providers, including logging, privacy policy, pricing, and connection speeds. On this chart, green means “generally good,” yellow means “something of concern,” and red means “something of major concern.” There’s even a version for the color blind!

So, what apps meet those requirements?

A 2015 study compared 14 popular VPN service providers and found that the only services that did not suffer from “IPv6 traffic leakage,” which is when your VPN fails to hide your unique IP address, were TorGuard, Private Internet Access, VyprVPN, and Mullvad. Astrill was not secure against IPv6 leaks, but was safe against DNS hacking, which is when a third party (like a hacker or an Internet service provider) redirects queries to a different site.

For those more technically proficient, you can try running your own DIY VPN, using Streisand or OpenVPN Install on GitHub.

What are the downsides I should know about?

First and foremost, it’s important that you select a provider with a strong privacy policy that you can trust, because VPNs have the ability to see all of your traffic, log your activity, and modify that traffic (see the How do I choose a VPN? section). Even when using a VPN, it’s important to use sites that have HTTPS turned on (any website with a lock icon in the URL bar) and apps with end-to-end encryption, like WhatsApp or iMessage (between iPhones only).

If you really want to stay anonymous, you should use Tor, which scrambles your activity through a network of servers so it’s virtually undetectable. It will, however, affect browsing speeds.

If you’re concerned about government surveillance, you should know that a VPN doesn’t completely anonymize you, especially if you’re using an account tied to your real name.

Using a VPN can also mean random connection hiccups. Usually the ol’ turn-it-off-then-turn-it-on-again method does the trick.

When using a VPN, your Internet connection is routed through a server that may be in a different state or country, which means the content you look at may reflect that VPN location.

VPN’s don’t protect you from phishing (those sketchy emails that look like password reset forms), so make sure you’re protecting your privacy in other ways, too (like using two-factor verification).

Looking to learn more about protecting your privacy? Read this guide.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2okFRJt
via IFTTT

People In Their Thirties Can't Stop Hoarding CDs

I swear, I used to be cool. There was a time I cared a lot about music, which is the thing you care about when you’re cool. And now I’m old and not cool and don’t really care anymore and I mostly just listen to the radio or the Spotify top 50 while I’m at the gym. And even though I don’t care, I still have a box of my old CDs under my bed that I haven’t touched in years.

This box represents my musical taste from high school and college, approximately 1996–2004. It’s horrible. I’m deeply embarrassed by this box. At the time, I thought I had very cool taste in music, but a lot of that era has not aged well, and some of the buzzy bands of the early aughts have faded into obscurity (Longwave, anyone?). I’ll be blunt: There’s a lot of mid-'90s ska revival.

I think of this box kind of like the painting in The Picture of Dorian Gray. As time passed and I aged, the Get Up Kids CDs got more and more gnarled and horrifying.

I’ve read Marie Kondo’s The Life-Changing Magic of Tidying Up, and I believe in the doctrine. I’ve purged my closet, my books, and my knickknacks, but I just can’t get rid of that box of CDs under my bed. I haven’t played any of them in years, and have no intention to.

My terrible box of CDs. Note at least FOUR Less Than Jake albums.

BuzzFeed News

The heyday of CDs wasn’t that long. The first year they outsold cassettes was 1993, and the transition to digital was cemented in 2005 when the affordable iPod shuffle came out. So the cohort of people whose prime music consumption years — high school and college — happened during the reign of CDs are now in their thirties and forties. They’ve dragged this box around for several apartment moves, but maybe now they’re having kids and need the space. (Our CDs may not be long for this world anyway; recent evidence shows that "CD rot" means that discs are degrading at around 25 years in some cases.)

Mike Pace, age 38, has hundreds of CDs stored in his parents’ basement. “I've been trying to figure out the best way to sell them but have NO IDEA,” he told me. “My mom's been asking me for years to get rid of them and part of me is willing, but only if I can find them a good home.”

My coworker at BuzzFeed, Sami Promisloff, is also a fully grown adult abusing her parents’ basement as a storage space. The remnants of her middle and high school jam band phase numbers an estimated 300–400 CDs in binders, and then more stacked on spindles.

“I was on the leading edge of tape trading turning into CD trading, which then turned into LimeWire and Kazaa for any good gigs I didn't yet own, plus Archive.org rips,” she told me. “I have an entire book with live Phish CDs only, and another one that's gotta be 50% Dave Matthews Band followed by other H.O.R.D.E. tour alumni (ranked in order of importance, and the order is very profound/purposeful).”

Because live gig tapes are huge in the jam band community, Promisloff’s collection is almost exclusively burned CDs, which means there’s no chance of her selling it to a used CD store.

Not that she’d get much for them anyway. The market for used CDs is, well, not great. Academy Records, a used CD and vinyl shop in Manhattan, has plenty of customers, even on a rainy Monday afternoon. Ari Finkel, their 23-year-old used CD buyer, also plays in an experimental band. He’s an anachronism — a fresh-faced relic from another time when snooty record store clerks were a recognizable breed (Finkel hasn’t seen Empire Records, but admits that High Fidelity is completely accurate). He doesn’t even really own that many CDs, and admits, “most people my age want nothing to do with this.” The typical CD seller he sees is over 30, and it’s not unusual to see them unsuccessfully try to dump their whole collection. “Generally if someone brings them all in and they’re an able-bodied young person, we’ll tell them to bring them to Housing Works [a charity thrift store] a block away.”

Donation is your other option — charity resale shops like Goodwill or Housing Works will always take them. A clerk at a Paramus, NJ Goodwill told me that plenty of people still buy their used CDs, which sell for $1.99 each. Another Goodwill in Maryland explained that if they end up with more CD donations than they sell (which happens fairly often), they move the excess around to other stores or other parts of their organization. So a CD donation is always appreciated.

Academy will almost always buy classical and classic rock: A Beatles or Rolling Stones CD will sell, so they’ll buy it for $1). They’ll also take stuff that’s obscure or out of print. They may take your Belle & Sebastian album if they don’t have any on hand at the moment, but don’t expect more than 50 cents for it. Finkel swears that his personal taste doesn’t come into play when he buys for the store; he only goes by cold capitalism. He knows for certain that the following will not sell:

  • One hit wonders from the ‘00s or ‘10s (sorry, The Ting Tings)

  • Any U2 from the ‘00s (‘80s/’90s are ok)

  • Those “chillout” electronica compilations that sound like Svedka ads. Finkel notes that somehow everyone whose entire collection is otherwise exclusively rock seems to have one of these terrible mix CDs

Academy also receives a fair amount of full CD collections coming from estates after someone died. When CDs first came out, a lot of baby boomers re-bought their whole vinyl collections onto the hot new technology — tons of Steely Dan and Fleetwood Mac. Now, Academy is getting calls from widows or children who are getting rid of the whole collection. For big collections and for older people, they’ll do house calls.

Ryan Martin, a late-thirtysomething who ran a indie label called Dais for experimental music, sold off his collection through a housecall. The famous record store Princeton Record Exchange in Princeton, NJ came to his Brooklyn apartment and gave him $7,000 for his full collection of more than 10,000 CDs. Of course, this was 10 years ago. “Even the appraiser who wrote me the check was like, ‘ha, good thing you are doing this now; in 2-3 years these will be worthless,’’ Martin said. He was fairly unsentimental about letting his collection go. “Seven grand was an unthinkable amount of money for me back then, so it was more like jubilation. I think I went out to a fancy dinner when the check cleared.”

Chris Capese works via word of mouth, and will come to your house, appraise your collection, buy it, and haul it off. He only works with real-deal collections, not your one box of Smash Mouth CDs.

Both he and Finkel pointed out that how many copies of a title were printed affects the market in a way you might not have considered. We tend to think of albums in digital terms now, where tangible supply is never an issue. Not so with CDs. “The more popular an artist is, the less valuable it will be,” Finkel said. “Music from the ‘90s and ‘00s was this golden era of CDs where everything was being manufactured in such huge quantities. Things like R.E.M. or Oasis, there are just so many copies in existence.”

A magic five-disc changer.

Leo-setä / Creative Commons 2.0 / Via flic.kr

Without sounding too “kids these days!”, I think that kids these days will never understand the way that owning physical copies of music feels so different than streaming or mp3s. Musical taste will always be important for young people, and almost certainly more access to music means kids will love even more of it. But the intense feelings you get when you go to a store and buy a CD and bring it home and remember the track order and the liner notes – that’s different. And that’s why us old people are so attached to them. It’s hard to say goodbye to those memories not only of enjoying your teenage music, but also of being a young person who had the time to sit and read the lyrics in the liner notes along while listening to the album in entirety. Our CD collections aren’t just nostalgia, they’re part of our identities.

Elizabeth Olson, 38, kept her old CDs in a paid storage space for years while moving cross country for work and living in a small apartment. Now settled with a house and a baby in the New Jersey suburbs, she has room in the basement for her boxes. “Part of me hopes that one day my son will bring home a dusty CD player from the thrift store and be super excited to listen to It’s A Shame About Ray,” she said.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2oHGmtg
via IFTTT

You Can Play Ms. Pac-Man In Google Maps

April Fool’s came a day early.

Google Maps just released a Ms. Pac-Man game for April Fool's Day.

Google Maps just released a Ms. Pac-Man game for April Fool's Day.

To play, make sure your app is updated, then open it and hit the Ms. Pac-Man button on the side.

To play, make sure your app is updated, then open it and hit the Ms. Pac-Man button on the side.

Then, just run away from the ghost thingees while chomping up little balls. You know, play Ms. Pac-Man —but in Google Maps. Enjoy.

Then, just run away from the ghost thingees while chomping up little balls. You know, play Ms. Pac-Man —but in Google Maps. Enjoy.

media.giphy.com


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2oHFzZo
via IFTTT

SpaceX Just Made History By Relaunching A Rocket Into Space For The First Time

SpaceX made history (again) by successfully relaunching and landing a recycled rocket, a key step toward making spaceflight a lot cheaper.

If at first you do succeed, try, try again. That's what SpaceX did with its Falcon 9 rocket relaunch on Thursday night, marking an industry first for shooting a recycled rocket back into space.

If at first you do succeed, try, try again. That's what SpaceX did with its Falcon 9 rocket relaunch on Thursday night, marking an industry first for shooting a recycled rocket back into space.

Nasa / Getty Images

Elon Musk's California-based company launched and landed the refurbished Falcon 9 rocket in less than a year, a milestone for the aerospace industry and a crucial step in the tech CEO's mission to significantly cut the cost of spaceflight.

Elon Musk's California-based company launched and landed the refurbished Falcon 9 rocket in less than a year, a milestone for the aerospace industry and a crucial step in the tech CEO's mission to significantly cut the cost of spaceflight.

Bruce Weaver / AFP / Getty Images


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2oDXbW6
via IFTTT

Apple Just Opened A Centre In India To Help Indian Developers Make Better Apps

Apple

Apple officially opened an App Accelerator — essentially an incubator for developers creating apps for the iPhone, iPad, Mac, Apple TV, and the Apple Watch — in the Indian city of Bengaluru on Friday. The objective is simple: getting developers in a country where 97% of smartphones run Android to dip their toes in the Apple waters.

Indian developers can sign up for free at the Accelerator where experts known as Apple Technology Evangelists will brief about 500 developers each week on developing for Apple’s platforms. According to a press release, Apple will also work with developers on a one-on-one basis to offer detailed app analysis and feedback to enhance their apps on Apple’s various platforms. Apple CEO Tim Cook had first announced the Accelerator during his visit to India in May 2016.

Phil Schiller, Apple’s Vice President of Worldwide Marketing who is in India for the launch, told Indian technology news blog Gadgets360 that Apple wants to “accelerate the quality and innovation of the apps that are being created [in India]” and to “bring some of our unique Apple expertise close to developers who are making their great software.”

It’s easy to see why that might be crucial for Apple. Thanks to Android’s dominance in emerging markets like India, developers in these countries often develop their apps for Android first, and, in some cases, Android only. More importantly, engaging with local developers would allow Apple to understand the needs of the Indian market and help tailor future versions of its operating systems to its needs, said analysts who spoke to BuzzFeed News.

“India is home to more than a million software developers, so Apple naturally wants to get as many of them as possible hooked to the Apple ecosystem,” Neil Shah, Research Director of Devices and Ecosystems at market analysis agency Counterpoint, told BuzzFeed News. “Not losing this vast talent pool to other players like Google and Facebook is essential for them.”

Shah also points out setting up a centre like this also allows the company to win brownie points with the Indian government, with which it has been grappling for months to be allowed to set up Apple Stores in India. The country’s stringent laws require certain kinds of foreign companies to source components locally before they can set up a retail presence within India, something that Apple has been resisting. “Setting up an App Accelerator in the country would help Apple show its commitment to contributing to the Indian economy by generating software jobs,” said Shah.

Apple is collaboration partners at launch are Practo, a $600 million health-tech startup based in Bengaluru, and game developer Reliance Games. But some iOS developers in India told BuzzFeed News that they wish Apple had reached out to smaller developers in the country rather than wealthy startups with dedicated Apple development teams.

“I think companies with small teams — between 5 and 40 people — are the ones that would really benefit from Apple’s Accelerator,” said Shashwat Pradhan, founder of Emberify, which makes an iOS life-logging app called Instant. “Having hands-on guidance from Apple would be great for indie developers like us who can’t really afford to go to WWDC (Apple’s annual conference for developers) in California every year.”



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2nmteJ2
via IFTTT

30 Mart 2017 Perşembe

After Internet Privacy Vote, Some ISPs Pledge Not To Sell Browsing Histories

FCC Chairman Ajit Pai

Nicholas Kamm / AFP / Getty Images

This week, Congress voted to gut internet privacy regulations. The new legislation — which only needs President Trump’s signature to become law — would make it easier for internet providers like Comcast and Verizon to sell your browsing history and other information about your online habits to third parties. But just as giant carriers are seeing new avenues for data collection and ad revenue opening up, two California-based internet providers have pledged not to sell their customers’ browsing history, or any other data.

Sonic, a carrier with around 100,000 subscribers that offers service to most of California, and Monkeybrains, a San Francisco-based provider with around 9,000 subscribers, both promise to never sell your internet browsing history, subscriber information, or usage data.

“We're not in the business of selling data and we've never done so. We provide internet as a service and that’s it,” Alex Menendez, co-founder of Monkeybrains.net, told BuzzFeed News. “We have consistently had pro-consumer policies with regards to our privacy practices,” Dane Jasper, the CEO of Sonic, told BuzzFeed News. “We have a long history of differentiating ourselves that way.”

The Electronic Frontier Foundation consistently gives Sonic the highest marks on its annual scorecard “Who Has Your Back,” which evaluates the privacy and transparency practices of internet and technology companies. Monkeybrains counts the EFF as a client of its own. Both companies were among more than a dozen small-scale ISP and networking companies who publicly opposed the repeal of the internet privacy rules. But most Americans don’t have access to these services and have to rely on big ISPs for internet access.

Back in January, several major internet providers, including Comcast, Verizon, AT&T, Charter, and T-Mobile, voluntarily pledged to abide by a set of “ISP Privacy Principles” which rely on guidelines shaped by the Federal Trade Commission. However, there’s a crucial difference between these FTC guidelines and the more robust Obama-era rules that Congress just voted to overturn. The rules established that your browsing history is considered “sensitive” information, meaning that broadband providers first need to get permission before they can share it with third party companies like advertisers.

The ISPs, in their privacy principles, made no such commitment. They favor the older FTC guidelines, where customers’ browsing history may be collected and shared by default, without your affirmative consent.

Now that a Republican-controlled Congress has voted to ensure that these stronger rules won’t take effect, consumer advocates and former regulators have argued that key protections have been erased. Internet providers now have more freedom to make money off of your online activity.

"There is no reason to compete on privacy — that's the problem."

Under its privacy policy, AT&T, for example, states that it may collect: “IP addresses, URLs, data transmission rates and delays. We also learn about the pages you visit, the time you spend, the links or advertisements you see and follow, the search terms you enter, how often you open an application, how long you spend using the app and other similar information.”

“We or our advertising partners may use anonymous information gathered through cookies and similar technologies, as well as other anonymous and aggregate information that either of us may have to help us tailor the ads you see on non-AT&T sites,” the privacy policy states. “For example, if you see an ad from us on a non-AT&T sports-related website, you may later receive an ad for sporting equipment delivered by us on a different website. This is called Online Behavioral Advertising, which is a type of Relevant Advertising.”

When asked how they planned to use customers’ web histories if the rules were removed, AT&T, Verizon, and Sprint directed BuzzFeed News to their privacy policies. Comcast, Charter, and T-Mobile did not respond to queries about their use of browsing history. (Disclosure: Comcast Corp.'s NBCUniversal is an investor in BuzzFeed.)

Telecom industry representatives and Republican lawmakers say they oppose the privacy rules because they unfairly target ISPs, while favoring web companies like Google and Facebook. Because the rules don’t apply to these companies, they can use their customers’ data to rake in ad dollars.

USTelecom told BuzzFeed News that the repeal opens up advertising opportunities for internet providers, which may be helpful to consumers. NCTA — The Internet & Television Association told BuzzFeed News that the repeal will allow internet providers to better compete in the advertising marketplace.

But privacy advocates and Democratic lawmakers have argued that internet subscribers need special protections for two main reasons. The first is that ISPs can monitor everything a person does online, so long as the traffic is unencrypted, which is something web services like Google and Facebook cannot do. Second, most Americans live in areas with only a single internet provider. That means they can’t switch to more privacy-friendly ISPs like Sonic or Monkeybrains; instead, they’re forced to accept the privacy practices of a single carrier if they want internet access.

“We don't believe that telephone companies should listen to our telephone calls,” Sonic’s Jasper said, using an analogy to describe how customers view their internet providers. “Carriers are in a different position, and that position is a trusted position in the minds of consumers.”

On platforms like YouTube and Gmail, for example, Jasper said there is a commonly understood relationship, where businesses provide a free service in exchange for advertising that’s shaped around tracking your behavior. This “implicit compact,” he argued, doesn’t exist between customers and their internet service providers.

Jeff Chester, the executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy, told BuzzFeed News that he hopes consumer pressure might influence how internet providers modify their data collection, but absent strong regulations, he believes the economic incentives are too strong for the big ISPs to ignore. "There is no reason to compete on privacy — that's the problem,” he said.

“You could make the argument that it’s good business — and it is — but there are no regulations requiring any real privacy protections at all. If everybody is just buying and selling your data, then being the one that says 'No, I'll do better' does impact the bottom line."



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2oEusAs
via IFTTT

Twitter Tweaked How Replies Work And People Have All The Feelings

Twitter revamped its reply feature today: @usernames won't show up in replies to tweets anymore.

Twitter revamped its reply feature today: @usernames won't show up in replies to tweets anymore.

It used to be that a bunch of @ usernames would show up in your Twitter replies, which could occupy a significant chunk of the 140 character limit for tweets. Now, the @ names won't appear in the reply itself. The names of the people in the conversation will appear above the tweet, and you can control who's part of the conversation by tapping on that list of names.

And people are ~stressed~

giphy

People pointed out that it's tough to remove yourself from replies with the new feature:

giphy

And just generally...loathe the change

But some people love it, I guess?

The overwhelming majority of reactions have been negative, though.

Twitter rolled back a similar feature in December in response to widespread outrage.

The company has recently shipped a number of updates; many of them are intended to curb abuse. In June 2016, it announced that GIFs, videos, photos, and other media wouldn't count toward the 140-character limit.

It's worth noting that pretty much any time Twitter rolls out a change, people get mad. Twitter did not respond to request for comment.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2nkIWo0
via IFTTT

29 Mart 2017 Çarşamba

Lyft Is Launching A Commuter Shuttle Service

Lyft, your "woke" ride-hailing option, has started testing a shuttle service in San Francisco and Chicago.

Available only during commute hours (6:30 to 10 a.m. and 4 to 8 p.m. on weekdays), Lyft says its shuttles will cost a fixed price that won't be subject to surge pricing during high-demand commuting hours. Lyft says the cost of a Shuttle ride will vary depending on the length of the trip; a screenshot the company shared with BuzzFeed News suggests a benchmark price for a Shuttle ride is $3.50.

Lyft says Shuttle is an extension of its Line service, a cheap and popular carpool feature that is competitive with Uber Pool. "Lyft Line is the future of rideshare, and we often test new features that we believe will have positive impact on our passengers' transportation options," the company statement reads.

A Lyft spokesperson said drivers will earn the same amount driving Shuttle as they do driving Lyft Line.

To book a shuttle ride, passengers type in their destination, get matched with a Lyft shuttle route, and walk to the pick up spot. Commuters trying to make the morning meeting can expect Shuttle to estimate how long it will take to walk to the pickup spot, how long the drive will be, and how long it will take to walk from the drop off point to the final destination.

Here's how the system will work, based on an email Lyft sent to customers.

Here's how the system will work, based on an email Lyft sent to customers.

Lyft Line is a door-to-door ride hail service with extra stops to pick up and drop off fellow carpoolers along the way, but Shuttle has fixed routes, and passengers will need to walk to central points on both ends of the trip.

Based on the email, it looks the shuttle routes in San Francisco will primarily serve passengers who live and work in the city's posher neighborhoods (like the Marina and Russian Hill) and the South of Market neighborhood where lots of tech companies have their offices. Lyft says Shuttle will only appear as an option when you launch the app if you're near one of these routes.

If the idea of multiple people sharing a ride from a mutually convenient origin point to mutually convenient destinations along a fixed route sounds a lot like a bus to you, you're right. Ride-hailing services have been working with public transit authorities in various cities, and they've had aspirations to replace or at least augment mass transit for a while now.

The use of private shuttle buses instead of public transit options is a historically contentious issue in San Francisco, where busloads of tech employees use private, company-funded shuttles to get to and from work in Silicon Valley everyday. But there's also opportunity, and therefore competition, in the commuter transit space; last fall, Ford acquired Chariot, a San Francisco-based shuttle company that is also meant to supplement public transportation.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2o8x7WI
via IFTTT

Here Are The 15 Most Batshit Things People Have Lost In Ubers

Uber released a series of ~fascinating~ lists today about what people lose in Ubers and when they lose it.

Giphy

The top five most commonly lost items are what you'd expect.

William Andrew / Getty Images

  1. Phone
  2. Ring
  3. Keys
  4. Wallet
  5. Glasses

Getting back your phone seems tricky, given that Uber is an app. But it's possible.

There are certain cities where people are more prone to losing their stuff:

Giphy

  1. Los Angeles
  2. New York City
  3. San Francisco

Tbh, though, these just seem like the cities where people take the most Ubers.

In 2016, a lot of people left something behind in their Uber on Halloween weekend:

Giphy

More people were absent-minded on October 30 and December 11 than any other days of the year. Saturday and Sunday are the days when people lose the most stuff — again, these are the days when it seems people take Uber most frequently. Uber did say that it sees an increase in lost plane tickets on Saturdays and lost wedding dresses on Sundays.

The real treasure, though, is the company's roundup of the "most unique" items abandoned in Ubers:

🤔 We have some questions.

Vera Storman / Getty Images

  1. Lobster (was it still alive when you got it back?)
  2. Potted plant (same question as the lobster)
  3. "Valuable Nordic walking poles" (how much $$ we talkin'?)
  4. Lottery ticket (same question)
  5. "Sweet potato care package" ("who's my little sweet potato?" —your mom, probably)
  6. Rubber mallet (who are you, the Joker?)
  7. Laser (What kind? For tag, for science, or for annoying people in a movie theater?)
  8. Hot Cheetos (honestly girl they're like $1 plz chill?)
  9. Smoke machine (it's lit?)
  10. Bullet proof vest (...um, what were going to use that for?)
  11. "Meat packet" (...what?)
  12. "Expensive slipper" (hope Cinderella wasn't mad?)
  13. Diary (did the driver read it?)
  14. Arm sling (you took it off and forgot your arm was broken?)
  15. "Money bag" (you used an Uber as a getaway car for a bank robbery?)

Uber wouldn't tell us what happened when people asked for the items back.

Just FYI, here's how you can get your lobster back if you leave it in an Uber, ya klutz:

youtube.com




from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2oi3KOW
via IFTTT

Tesla's Valuation Could Overtake Ford Any Day Now

Susana Bates / AFP / Getty Images

Tesla, the loss-making electric car company that sold about 84,000 vehicles last year, is now worth about as much as Ford, which sold 6.7 million cars in 2016 and turned a $4.6 billion profit.

Valuations for the two companies converged in recent months, as Ford slid and Tesla surged. By Wednesday afternoon, Tesla was worth $45.2 billion and Ford's was valued at $46.6 billion, according to Bloomberg data. Tesla could overtake Ford any day now, and become America's second most valuable car company. GM, the current number one, is worth about $54 billion.

How wildly optimistic are investors about electric cars? Based on its current market price, Tesla is worth about $600,000 per vehicle sold in 2016, while Ford is worth about $7,000, according to calculations by Barclays analyst Brian Johnson.

Here's the market valuation of Ford, in light blue, and Tesla, in black, over the last 12 months, up to the close of trading Tuesday

The stock market, of course, is supposed to reflect how investors rate the future of a company, not its past. On that front, Tesla, founded in 2003, has plenty of reasons for optimism. The company is right at the front of the two biggest trends in the industry: electric engines and self-driving cars.

And its revenues are heading up, fast: in 2016 it brought in $7 billion, up 73% on the year prior and up almost 1600% compared to four years ago. Ford's revenue barely moved in 2016 and is up about 14% since 2012.

Analysts expect Tesla's revenues to keep surging as it releases more affordable models — their best guess is the company could sell $19 billion worth of cars in 2018, according to data collected by S&P Global Market Intelligence. Ford, on the other hand, is expected by analysts to see its revenues fall slightly in the same period.

A man driving a 1911 Model T Ford in Scotland.

Jeff J Mitchell / Getty Images

Ford, like other major carmakers, is making sizable investments in self-driving technology and electric vehicles, but none have captured the imagination like Tesla. Imagination or not, Ford is in good shape to benefit from lower gas prices, as buyers move away from sedans and towards Ford's more profitable SUVs and trucks.

But it's easy to see why investors have a crush on Tesla. If the future of of transport involves a network of self-driving electric cars, powered by batteries that charge with solar power, Tesla has set itself up to benefit from it. The company is rushing to build a giant battery factory, and now owns a major solar power business as well.

Tesla stock has risen 22% in the last year, and 714% in the last five years. Ford shares, on the other hand, have fallen by 11% and 5% in the last 1 and 5 years respectively.

Tesla also earned the endorsement of another massive technology company on Tuesday, when Tencent, the Chinese internet conglomerate that runs the social network WeChat, bought 5% of the company. Tencent is a "new adherent" of the "Tesla cult," Johnson wrote.

Some still have their doubts. Hedge fund manager Jim Chanos has long questioned Tesla's business prospects, and those of its recently acquired solar energy business, Solar City, saying that the loss-making car company would constantly have to take new money from shareholders to fund its losses.

Johnson said in February that the jump in Tesla stock (the shares fell after the election and started rising again in December) had "less to do...with anything around the near-term financials, and more to do with the nearly superhero status of Elon Musk."



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2nMsHnO
via IFTTT

Here's Everything You Need To Know About The New Samsung Galaxy S8

Samsung’s new flagship phone is thinner and more high-resolution than ever. And it comes with a new personal assistant named Bixby.

If you're one of the 69.5 million people in the US that already own a Samsung phone, you might be wondering: Is the Galaxy S8 worth the upgrade?

Samsung's latest flagship device, unveiled today in New York City, is the company's first smartphone launch in the post-Note7 explosion era.

I got a preview of the phone before today's announcement, and, during that briefing, Samsung representatives reiterated their commitment to safety and the new eight-point safety protocol being implemented for the device. The Galaxy S8, which ships in April, will test its efficacy.

Samsung's latest flagship phone is larger (but slimmer) than previous models and has a brilliant display with even more pixels packed in. It's an elegant device with curved edges all around, but the most note-worthy Galaxy S8 news is on the inside. "Bixby" is what Samsung calls an "intelligent user interface agent" and allows users to perform tasks with their voice. It's an interesting update, considering Google's voice-enabled AI, Google Assistant, already ships with phones running Android, the Galaxy S8's operating system.

Stayed tuned for a full review, but until then, here's a look at the Galaxy S8 and S8+.

Nicole Nguyen / BuzzFeed News

There are two sizes: the Galaxy S8 and the Galaxy S8+.

There are two sizes: the Galaxy S8 and the Galaxy S8+.

The smaller Galaxy S8 has 5.8-inch display, while the Galaxy S8+ has a 6.2-inch display. That's much larger than last year's Galaxy S7 and S7 edge devices, which were 5.1 and 5.5 inches respectively. However, the devices' edges are curved on all four sides, which makes them seem smaller than it actually is.

Nicole Nguyen / BuzzFeed

Nicole Nguyen / BuzzFeed News

It's even slimmer than the S7 – but by just 1.5 millimeters.

It's even slimmer than the S7 – but by just 1.5 millimeters.

Nicole Nguyen / BuzzFeed News


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2oh4N1j
via IFTTT

28 Mart 2017 Salı

Congress Votes To Gut Internet Privacy Rules

The House voted Tuesday to repeal landmark internet privacy rules that required broadband companies to first get consent before sharing their customers' sensitive information, including browsing history and location data, with advertisers and other third party companies. The vote comes a week after the Senate approved the repeal. Now President Trump's signature is the final step needed to abolish the privacy protections.

Passed by the Federal Communications Commission in October, the rules also forced broadband providers to tell customers about the data they collect, why they collect it, and to identify the kinds of third party companies that might be given access to that information. Parts of the internet privacy rules were scheduled to take effect later this year. Others, including a provision that required broadband companies to protect consumer information from hackers and data breaches, had already kicked in. FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai, however, moved to block the data security rules earlier this month.

Republican lawmakers and the telecom industry have staunchly opposed the regulations. They have argued that the rules unfairly target internet providers, like Comcast and AT&T, and offer an advantage to other web companies that regularly harvest and sell customer information. Since businesses like Facebook and Google are not bound by the FCC rules, critics say the privacy regulations singled out broadband companies.

"These rules varied from the industry principles developed last year and established a double-standard by creating different sets of regulation for internet service providers on the one hand and the rest of the internet ecosystem on the other," US Telecom CEO Jonathan Spalter said in a statement last week.

But a coalition of consumer and privacy groups have argued that internet providers occupy a powerful position in people's internet use. Groups including the ACLU, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Free Press say that the rules are a crucial protection in the digital age.

"We are one step closer to a world where ISPs can snoop on our traffic, sell our private information to the highest bidder, and pre-install spyware on our mobile phones," Jeremy Gillula, a senior staff technologist for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, told BuzzFeed News.

Unlike social media companies, and other kinds of advertisers and web trackers, broadband providers can monitor all unencrypted internet traffic. Democratic lawmakers have also pointed out that many Americans only have a single internet provider serving their community, leaving them no choice but to accept whatever data collection practices are in place if they want internet service.

3 Invasive Things Your ISP Could Do If the Privacy Rules Are Repealed

1. Selling Your Browsing History

"The consequences of repeal are simple: ISPs like Comcast, AT&T, and Charter will be free to sell your personal information to the highest bidder without your permission — and no one will be able to protect you," wrote Gigi Sohn, counselor to former FCC chairman Tom Wheeler, in an op-ed at the Verge Monday.

While Americans can use free browser tools to block many types of web tracking, monitoring by internet providers is much harder to prevent. "Your ISP is in a privileged position, where they can see everything," said Gillula, who has written about the "creepy" data collection that ISPs can conduct if the regulations are gutted.

"Any attempt to block the ISP from monitoring you, they have the power to override," Ernesto Falcon legislative counsel at EFF, told BuzzFeed News.

2. Compiling Internet Profiles And Injecting Targeted Ads

"There are major medical, financial, and legal websites — like the US Courts, for example — that are largely unencrypted. ISPs will be able to build detailed profiles of their customers — knowing when they're at vulnerable points in their lives — and sell that information to practically whomever they wish," Gaurav Laroia, policy counsel at Free Press, told BuzzFeed News. If someone is visiting a medical website, for instance, third parties can infer what illnesses they may suffer from, revealing sensitive health information.

"It's well-established that these internet companies are looking hungrily at companies like Facebook and Google; they want in on that advertising action," Jay Stanley, a senior policy analyst with the ACLU, told BuzzFeed News. "This is an effort by them to preserve the ability to monetize people's information. And without these rules, they are going to plow forward."

3. Deploying Hidden Tracking Cookies On Our Phones

Following a 15-month investigation, the FCC settled with Verizon Wireless last year over the company's use of so called "supercookies" — tracking code that could not be deleted, which Verizon used to monitor customers' online activity without their permission.

"It didn’t matter if you were browsing in Incognito or Private Browsing mode, using a tracker-blocker, or had enabled Do-Not-Track: Verizon ignored all this and inserted a unique identifier into all your unencrypted outbound traffic anyway," the EFF's Gillula wrote. The browsing history, according to the FCC, was collected for several years without consent; Verizon and other third party companies used it for targeted advertising.

For privacy advocates, pervasive data collection of your internet activity can be enormously invasive. "The websites you visit can indicate information about your financial life, you sexual life, your medical life, what disease you have, what diseases you might be worried you have," said Stanley.

"We don't even know what other derivative uses exist, because no one has ever had this type of information on consumers," Falcon said, referring to new types of data collection and novel forms of the sale of personal data. "That's what's most frightening."



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2neWdi0
via IFTTT

Pro-Trump Media Has A New Obsession: The White House Briefing Room

Lee Stranahan / Via youtube.com

Following Trump administration Press Secretary Sean Spicer's pledge to establish a White House press corps with voices “outside of Washington”, a number of unabashedly Trump-friendly news outlets have made the pilgrimage to the west wing briefing room — the symbolic heart of the establishment. Their goal: to bring their anti-elite, pro-Trump, and occasionally trollish brand of coverage to the White House.

For some of these self-described “real news” outlets and personalities, landing a seat in the White House briefing room is vindication of their often sensational and semi-factual 2016 presidential campaign stories which some believe undermined the candidacy of Hillary Clinton and helped propel Trump to the Oval Office. For others, it’s a chance to ask questions the mainstream media won’t touch. And for many, there’s a singular benefit worth the trip to Washington alone: the exposure that comes from seeing and being seen on the highest rated show on daytime TV.

“The briefing room has become a piece of pop culture for this generation and the people who followed the election every day on TV and are now glued to the day-to-day,” one newer White House correspondent told BuzzFeed News. For the reporter, being in the room brings with it the intoxicating proposition of asking a question that could set news cycle for the day — or the week. “And so it's definitely an opportunity for far-right, crazy blogosphere types to make a name for themselves. It’s that way for anyone new but definitely true for the far-right guys. Everyone’s watching.”

"It's definitely an opportunity for far-right, crazy blogosphere types to make a name for themselves."

For Jim Hoft and Lucian Wintrich of the far-right blog Gateway Pundit, a short time in the briefing room has generated enormous returns. Hoft, Gateway Pundit’s founder, announced Wintrich’s White House correspondent position at ‘The Deploraball’ the night before Trump was sworn in as president. Since then, the 28- year old Wintrich has been the focus of dozens of articles (one by this writer), the star of a documentary film, and last week, the subject of a lengthy New Yorker profile. Earlier this month, he was the alleged victim of an altercation inside the briefing room involving Fox Radio’s John Decker, who, according to Wintrich and a few observers, openly chastised Gateway Pundit as a racist, xenophobic outlet. The incident — the details of which are disputed by both parties — was partially witnessed and tweeted by the well-followed members of the White House press corps, written up in a variety of publications, and outrage-shared across the pro-Trump internet, casting Wintrich among the far-right as the heroically aggrieved party, just trying to do his job.

But Wintrich has yet to ask a question of Spicer. Instead, he’s opted to “feel out the room” and “learn the protocols” before jumping in. “If you see pictures of me on Twitter in the briefing room. I’m literally squeezed in the corner taking notes,” he told BuzzFeed News.

The daily briefing spectacle has caught the eye of non-Washington types like New Right blogger and Twitter personality, Mike Cernovich, who lives in California. “It's so good for your brand to be in the room now because it still seems like this prestigious place,” he told BuzzFeed News. “That's why the press corps is losing it — White House access is a major status thing and now it feels like everyone's able to do it.”.

While Spicer’s briefings may appear more open to the media’s fringes, the truth is, the briefing has never been overly exclusive. Day passes for a trip to the press room require little more effort than submitting some personal information to the White House (caveat: full-time “hard passes” are much harder to obtain). Cernovich said he has tentative plans to try and drop by a briefing sometime in April. Last week on Twitter he asked his followers, “should I get a White House pass?” (again, it doesn’t quite work that way, but the sentiment suggests he wants to show up). Responses ranged from “Light eradicates darkness. DO IT!” to “I think we should revoke CNN's and give it to you.”

The conspiracy and pro-Trump news site Infowars has deftly injected itself into the Beltway news cycle multiple times without even stepping into the briefing room. In February, Infowars’ founder Alex Jones posted a video falsely claiming he’d secured White House press credentials from the Trump administration. Jones subsequently walked back that claim, explaining he’d simply taken initial steps to secure credentials. Then, in late January, Jones hired former World Net Daily writer and fellow conspiracy theorist, Jerome Corsi to head up an Infowars Washington bureau. In early February, Corsi tweeted that the White House had told him it “didn’t think there would be any problem in Infowars and Alex Jones and me getting press credentials.”

Two weeks ago, Lauren Southern, a controversial far-right Canadian media personality, made her way to DC to attend a White House briefing, where she tweeted a selfie with the caption, “Independent media takeover.” The tweet ricocheted around the internet; for pro-Trumpers it was another win for the unsung voices of “new media.” Southern — known for her previous denunciations of both rape culture and popular feminism— showing up in the briefing room registered to some as alarming breach. A few hours after posting the selfie, Media Matters ran a story with the headline, “Meet Lauren Southern, The Latest “Alt-Right” Media Troll To Gain Access To The White House Press Briefing.” The story called Southern “just the latest of the fringe, sycophantic “alt-right” media personalities that the White House is letting into its press briefings.”

Southern said she decided to show up in the room after Wintrich’s confrontation. “I heard there was hostility towards new media in the briefing room and wanted to see the experience for myself,” she told BuzzFeed News, adding that she intends to return “in order to ask questions the MSM won't touch.”

The new prestige of the White House briefing room reverses decades of decline. For years the role of White House correspondent had gradually shifted from being central in journalism to one that many reporters dreaded as being captive to unresponsive, low level aides while big stories broke across the internet and elsewhere. As such, tensions over briefing room access have flared in the early weeks of Trump’s presidency. A number of reporters for mainstream outlets have voiced public concerns on Twitter over Spicer and President Trump’s penchant for calling on conservative media outlets during press conferences.

This month, after a reporter for the Heritage Foundation’s Daily Signal served as the press pool reporter for a Vice Presidential event, the Washington Post’s Paul Farhi questioned partisanship’s role in the White House press corps in an article headlined, “What’s a legitimate news outlet? A new face in the White House press pool raises questions.” And in a recent New Yorker article, White House correspondents and camera crew from legacy news outlets were quoted sniping at the new publications that have popped up in the briefing room. In one instance a radio correspondent was overheard bemoaning that, “at best, they don’t know what they’re doing...at worst, you wonder whether someone is actually feeding them softball questions.”

The prickly reception given to White House briefing room newcomers isn’t exactly unprecedented. At his first press conference in 2009, President Obama’s decision to call on The Huffington Post’s Sam Stein prompted a mini news cycle of its own. In 2009, Time Magazine described Obama’s decision as such: “the whole White House media shop, has crossed a Rubicon of sorts, acknowledging the equivalent legitimacy of an unapologetically unobjective media outlet, which lives nowhere but the Internet and which didn't even exist four years ago”

At the time, New York Times White House reporter, Peter Baker called the decision to add partisan-leaning blogs to the press corps “troubling,” arguing that “We’re blurring the line between news and punditry even further and opening ourselves to legitimate questions among readers about where the White House press corps gets its information.” It’s a position Baker still appears to hold today; this month he told the told The Daily Signal that the issue has only grown murkier. “It becomes harder to draw lines now and say this organization is acceptable and this one is not,” he wrote.

Multiple self-professed members of pro-Trump outlets told BuzzFeed News their welcome to the room by more established outlets was less than friendly — “there’s a palpable tension there,” Wintrich told BuzzFeed News. While two other White House correspondents said allegations of a freeze-out were “overblown.” The discrepancy likely results from the spectrum of conservative outlets and reporters in the Trump press room. While some, like Wintrich and Gateway Pundit delight in trolling, plenty of reporters from right-leaning new media outlets try to play it straight and push the administration on claims like wiretapping and Russian interference in the election. “Plenty of those guys come from conservative outlets but still show up everyday ready to do the hard work like everyone else,” one White House correspondent said.

"They're playing right into our fucking hands — it's ridiculous."

Regardless, the perceived tension and occasional hand-wringing from mainstream media is having the — perhaps unintended — consequence of elevating the profiles of the new faces in the room. The trolls, in essence, have been fed.

“They're playing right into our fucking hands — it's ridiculous,” Wintrich said describing the reaction to the briefing room altercation a few weeks ago. “So many members of conservative media after this happened reached out all supportive and told me how unfair the situation was. That's street cred for me.” For Southern, the reaction from places like Media Matters is what will keep her coming back to the press room. “I literally just stood there and this was their reaction? I look forward to seeing the collective meltdown when I actually get a question in,” she said.

“I think members of the media are doing a disservice to themselves by putting so much attention on people who don't report each day from the White House and use the briefing to bring attention to themselves,” one White House reporter said. “The Gateway Pundit situation was an ordeal and all but at the end of the day I don't know I’ve ever read anything by [Wintrich]. So why not just ignore it?” In Southern’s case, Cernovich agrees. “They're so triggered by the presence of people like Wintrich that they made him into an overnight sensation. He got the mainstream media to troll themselves.”



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2nfZz5j
via IFTTT

A Pharma Company Is Sponsoring An iPhone App To Fight The Opioid Crisis It Helped Start

Darren Mccollester / Getty Images

The pain medication OxyContin has been widely blamed for setting off the opioid epidemic, one in which more than 15,000 people in the United States fatally overdosed on prescription painkillers in 2015 alone.

Now, the drug’s maker, Purdue Pharma, is starting a study that asks chronic pain patients to log their symptoms on iPhones and Apple Watches, so their doctors can keep tabs on them and, ideally, decrease or eliminate their medications.

Purdue plans to partner with Geisinger Health System in Pennsylvania, a state that has been hard-hit by opioid abuse, to recruit hundreds of patients this summer for a yearlong study. Purdue began experimenting with ResearchKit, Apple’s software framework for clinical trial apps, in 2015. This is Purdue’s first official foray into remote health-monitoring technology.

Researchers at Purdue and Geisinger hope that wearables and smartphones will help doctors better understand patients’ real-time experiences, prescribe them painkillers only as needed, and cut health care costs. While some public health experts say the study potentially has merit, they acknowledge that Purdue’s involvement can, at the very least, look awkward.

“I’m just very suspicious that they’re interested in developing a tool that will help people get off of their medicines,” said Andrew Kolodny, co-director of the Opioid Policy Research Collaborative at Brandeis University. “When I hear about this, I wonder if it’s all an effort by Purdue to get good [public relations].”

Robert Jamison, an anesthesia and psychiatry professor at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, said abuse of OxyContin “triggered some of the problems we’re facing today.” He added of Purdue, “I’m sure they’re looking for some positive press out of this, [so they can] say, ‘We’re trying to make things better.’”

“I know that sounds like, ‘What a crazy thing for a company that produces opioids to do,’” Tracy Mayne, Purdue’s executive director of medical affairs strategic research, told BuzzFeed News. “But it comes from that level of commitment to addressing the problem in the US.”

Family members hold pictures of loved ones killed by the opioid epidemic during a news conference on Capitol Hill.

Alex Wong / Getty Images

Since 1996, OxyContin has generated billions for Purdue. The private, family-owned pharmaceutical company aggressively marketed the drug and long held an outsized market share: Its patent on the original formula didn’t expire until 2013. In 2007, top executives pleaded guilty to federal prosecutors’ charges that it had misbranded OxyContin as less addictive than it actually was and misled regulators, doctors, and patients about its risks. Purdue was fined $635 million. Other lawsuits have since been filed.

Purdue knew for decades that OxyContin’s painkilling effect often tapered off hours before the advertised 12-hour mark — a problem that led many patients to become addicted, the Los Angeles Times reported last year. With OxyContin prescriptions falling in the US, the company’s owners are now using some of the same old marketing tactics, from patient discounts to seminars training doctors to prescribe opioids, to push the painkiller in Latin America, Asia, the Middle East, Africa, and other regions, according to the Times.

But Purdue executives say their new ResearchKit study is one of several efforts the company has made to stem opioid abuse. They co-sponsored a prescription-monitoring program in Virginia, so prescribers can see and make decisions based on patients’ medication history, and granted $1 million to the National Association Boards of Pharmacy to promote prescription-monitoring nationwide. They’re working on non-opioid pain treatments and distributed the CDC’s new opioid-prescribing guidelines to medical professionals. They’ve also sponsored studies on why patients hang on to unused opioids, and the characteristics of Medicaid members who use opioids. These preliminary studies are being presented this week at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy’s annual meeting.

At the meeting, Purdue will also present early research about a multi-faceted treatment program for chronic pain patients at Geisinger, which involves a three-day educational seminar, a year of follow-up, and coordination and goal-setting with primary care doctors.

For the new ResearchKit study, the health system plans to digitize this program by handing out Apple Watches and iPhones to more than 200 patients. Eligible patients will have chronic pain conditions like back pain, advanced osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis, and will already routinely take painkillers, Mayne said. (Geisinger did not make a doctor available to comment on the study.)

The devices will passively record metrics like physical activity, heart rate, sleep quality, and GPS data (not a patient’s exact location, Mayne said, but a measure of how far they’re moving outside their home). Patients will also self-report information like how much pain they’ve felt that day or at a given moment, how depressed they feel, and how much medication they’re taking.

All this information will be integrated into the patient’s electronic medical record and shared with their doctor at Geisinger. Both sides will be encouraged to constantly communicate with each other about what is and isn’t working, via text, email, phone, and the app itself.

One data-based recommendation a doctor could make, according to Mayne: A patient who was averaging 1,000 steps a day, and is now doing 5,000, should aim for 10,000 steps six months down the road. Another doctor might observe that a patient’s pain is lessening as their medication doses decrease, something that they may not necessarily know when a patient is going about their life outside the clinic.

“The goal is to be able to reduce reliance on pain medications, and for some patients, that would absolutely include complete discontinuation,” Mayne said. “I don’t expect that to be a large group... but certainly a goal is if someone can actually discontinue medication.”

Oxycodone pain pills.

John Moore / Getty Images

Jamison says the study “sounds like a real good plan.” He and his colleagues have conducted a similar, forthcoming study in which pain patients communicated with their doctors through an app — for both iOS and Android — and tracked their activity through a wearable device, in this case a Fitbit.

That study involved 100 or so people and lasted about three months, while Purdue and Geisinger intend to run theirs for a year in a bigger group of patients. In addition to the 200-person Apple Watch group, researchers will study 200 people who have gone through Geisinger’s specialized pain treatment program in person; 400 enrollees who are in Geisinger’s pain clinics but not its specialized treatment program; and a control group of 600 to 800 pain patients.

Sustaining patient enthusiasm over a year will be the main hurdle, Jamison says. Based on his experience, he said, “People will use it for a while, and then they’ll drop off unless they have some sort of sense that ‘this information is very, very valuable and is going to make a difference in my care.’”

He added of Purdue: “I gotta believe they’re sincere.”

Still, Kolodny doubts the experiment will give doctors more useful data than they already have, or actually help curb addiction.

“Getting patients off of opioids is very difficult,” he said. “Just because a prescriber recognizes a patient should come off, doesn’t mean the patient’s going to be capable of it.”

LINK: Almost Half Of Patients Prescribed Opioids For A Month Get Hooked For A Year

LINK: A Recent Spike In Cocaine Overdose Deaths Has Been Linked To The Opioid Epidemic

LINK: iPhone Apps Could Be A Revolution In Health — If People Use Them




from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2odtNXh
via IFTTT

Uber's Leadership Is 78% Male, According To Its New Diversity Report

Justin Sullivan / Getty Images

Uber's leadership is 78% male and 22% female, according to a new diversity report released by the company today.

The report — Uber's first-ever — comes about a month after Uber launched an internal investigation into sexism allegations, after a female former engineer posted a viral account alleging systemic sexism and sexual harassment at the company.

According to the report, tech leadership — those with director-level positions or higher — is 88.7% male and 11.3% female.

Overall, Uber is 63.9% male and 36.1% female, as of March 2017.

Uber

For comparison, Twitter's latest diversity report said the company was 37% female as of December 2016.

But in tech roles, the gap widens to 84.6% male and 15.4% female.

Uber

In non-tech roles, staff is 44.4% female and 55.6% male.

The report also covered race. Uber's U.S. workforce is 49.8% white, 30.9% Asian, 8.8% black, 5.6% Hispanic, 4.3% mixed race and 0.6% "other."

Uber

Bloomberg reported last week that Uber’s own recruiters were denied access to its diversity data, stymying their efforts to hire more women and people of color.

US leadership overall is 76.7% white, 20.2% Asian, 2.3% black and 0.8% Hispanic. Uber said it has no black or Hispanic people in tech leadership roles.

Tech leadership in the US is 75% white and 25% Asian.

In January, civil rights leader Jesse Jackson wrote a letter to Uber asking the company to release diversity data on the heels of its hiring of Bernard Coleman III as head of diversity and inclusion.

Liane Hornsey, Uber's chief human resources officer, said in a conference call with reporters last week that the company plans to hold new training sessions called "Why Diversity Matters," "How to be an Ally," and "Building Inclusive Teams."

"This report is a first step in showing that diversity and inclusion is a priority at Uber," Uber CEO Travis Kalanick said in a statement provided by a spokesperson.

In Uber's first companywide meeting on Feb. 21 after sexism allegations became public, Kalanick apologized for leading the company up to that point and promised staff Uber would "do better." Two days later, women of Uber urged Kalanick to begin “listening to your own people,” and start "admitting to ourselves as a company that we have a systemic problem," according to leaked audio obtained by BuzzFeed. On Friday, The Information reported that Kalanick and a team of five Uber employees visited an escort bar during a work trip to Seoul in mid-2014, leading to an HR complaint from a female employee who felt uncomfortable.




from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2o33qGp
via IFTTT

Do You Rinse Your Lemons?

It has recently come to my attention that some people do a completely absurd thing: They rinse lemons before using them. Not just if they’re going to put a slice in a drink, but even if they’re just going to use little juice for say, a salad dressing.

A quick poll of friends and coworkers revealed that people are bitterly divided on this issue. Those who rinse think it’s disgusting that people wouldn’t rinse, and the non-rinsers think it’s a big waste of time.

Well, when life hands me a debate about lemons, I make some phone calls and fix myself a tall glass of sweet, refreshing journalism lemonade.

First, I spoke to Jaydee Hanson, senior policy analyst for the Center for Food Safety, an organization that advocates a variety of agricultural issues, like trying to keep genetically modified apples out of supermarkets and encouraging popcorn producers to use bee-friendly pesticides.

“Yes, lemons definitely should be washed,” Hanson told me. His reasoning was that the rind is chock-full of pesticides that could transfer to the lemon while cutting, or transfer onto your hands while you touch the rind. “In addition to having pesticides on them, they also have antibiotics on them,” Hanson continued. “Most people don’t realize this. The EPA granted emergency use of antibiotics on citrus crops to prevent citrus greening.” Citrus greening is a bacterial disease passed along by bugs that has been plaguing U.S. citrus crops in the last few years.

Hanson admits that the amount of pesticides on a lemon aren’t exactly deadly. “Are you going to die from it? Not unless you’re allergic to the antibiotics.”

Hmm. I know plenty of people who are allergic to antibiotics, and I’ve never heard of anyone ever having a reaction from eating fruit. If this sounds perhaps a little alarmist, you’re not the only one thinking that.

Lemons at the grocery store, touched by who knows how many germy hands.

Katie Notopoulos / BuzzFeed News

Jim Adaskaveg is a professor of plant pathology at University of California, Riverside, who specifically studies post-harvest fruit problems and sanitizing fruit. His career is basically dedicated to whether or not you should rinse a lemon.

To understand if you should rinse a lemon, you first have to understand what rinsing would actually accomplish. Are you really washing off those pesticides and antibiotics? Nope! “Most lemons in a supermarket are processed and treated and ready to be consumed,” Adaskaveg explained. Fruit is washed at a processing plant between the field and the supermarket. After it’s washed, they’re treated with a wax and a safe fungicide to keep them from getting moldy.

And the wax means that any trace amount of pesticide residue is not really getting washed off anyway – at least not be a few seconds of rinsing.

However, Askaveg still is in favor of rinsing. The reason? Germs from whoever touched them at the grocery store: the manager who set up the display, or a customer who test-squeezed a few. Or even you when you touched them before washing your hands. “The pesticides aren’t really dangerous, even though people think they are,” he said. “The risk of any poisoning is astronomically low compared to germs from handling.”

So there you go. Whether you believe the food safety guy or the fruit packing professor about the dangers of potential pesticide residue, they still agree that a rinse is worth it. Most of all, this is terrible news for me, since it means my husband was right. Goddammit.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2nf3pLM
via IFTTT

This Chatbot Can Help Immigrants Who Work In Tech

In the film "For Here Or To Go," Indian-born computer programmer Vivek Pandit's offer to join a startup is rescinded when the company discovers it would have to sponsor Pandit's H-1B visa transfer.

Via trailers.apple.com

Visabot — a Facebook Messenger chatbot that guides immigrants through the visa application process — just added a capability that will make Silicon Valley very happy. Starting today, Visabot can help people navigate the labyrinthine process of transferring their H1-B work visa to a new employer.

Often, tech workers who are in the US on H-1B — or “skilled worker” visas — work for corporations like Google, Microsoft or Intel, which have giant legal teams that help with visas. But say a visa holder at one of those companies gets a job offer from a hip new startup — they can’t take the gig unless that startup is willing to sponsor their visa transfer, an expensive and complicated process. This state of affairs — which happens to be the plot of For Here Or To Go, a recently released film about Indian tech workers in Silicon Valley — leaves a lot of foreign-born computer programmers feeling trapped.

“When startups are hiring, they need [the job filled], like, tomorrow,” Visabot CEO Artem Goldman told BuzzFeed News. “The startup usually doesn’t care about all these visa issues. They don’t want to spend time and money on that — they can’t.”

For now, Visabot isn’t doing regular H-1B applications, only H-1B transfers, and the pros at Visabot’s partner law firms still check its work. But Goldman says regular H-1B applications will be available soon, though not by this year’s April 3 deadline.

Visabot — which already offers tourist visa extensions, artist visas, and help with DACA — works kind of like TurboTax: the algorithm walks applicants through the application process with a series of questions. First, you select which type of visa fits your needs, and then provide Visabot with information about you — where you live, went to school, where you work, etc.


Visabot then asks you to upload the necessary documents, and even sends notifications when deadlines creep up. “It’s going to be kind of like a lawyer, but better, because it’s a machine, so there’s no mistakes,” said Goldman. While some think it’s too risky, about half of the lawyers Goldman talks to say their jobs could be made a easier by artificial intelligence.

“We still can’t say that we will replace an immigration lawyer in the next five years, because there are so many complicated types of visas,” Goldman said. “But what we can do is save lots of their time. By doing this, they’re going to have more clients, and the clients are going to have lower prices.”

One early Visabot client, a twenty-year-old Romanian singer named Afina Madoian, confirmed that getting an O-1 artists visa through the bot was easier than it would have been to find a lawyer in Romania.

“A lot of companies take money and don’t do anything,” Madoian said. What she liked about Visabot is that she got a price upfront. She started gathering documents in September and, after a lawyer reviewed and submitted her application, got her approval in February; the whole process cost her $4,000. Madoian said while she would recommend using Visabot, she might not have been willing to entrust her US visa — something she’s wanted since childhood — to a robot if she hadn’t originally been put in touch with Goldman through a friend.

Since Visabot launched late last year, it’s processed more than 50,000 applications for various types of visas. Goldman acknowledged that the nationwide panic over immigration law induced by some of President Trump’s policies has been good for business. Whenever the president tweets about immigration, Goldman says Visabot sees a bump in traffic. “We joke to investors that Donald Trump is our head of PR,” said Goldman. But that attention isn’t always good.

“We have a lot of people from like Africa and Arab countries saying, ‘Guys, I need to have a Green Card please, how much is it going to cost?’ I’m feeling bad when I can’t help, but I can’t,” Goldman said. “It’s not about us improving or changing the immigration system. What we do is making the process of immigration — this bureaucratic, difficult and unclear process — as easy as it is with bots.”



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2nw99U9
via IFTTT