31 Mayıs 2017 Çarşamba

Elon Musk Says He'll Leave Presidential Councils If Trump Quits Paris Climate Accord

AP Photo/Evan Vucci

Tesla and SpaceX chief executive Elon Musk will step down from several of Trump administration advisory councils if the president pulls the US out of the Paris climate agreement, he tweeted on Wednesday.

Musk sits on an economic advisory council as well as a manufacturing group. Tesla's stated mission is "to accelerate the world’s transition to sustainable energy." He previously said serving on two of Trump's advisory councils would "serve the greater good."

Musk wouldn't be the first tech leader to step down from Trump's advisory groups. Uber CEO Travis Kalanick resigned from Trump's economic advisory council in February after facing backlash from users and protests outside the ride-hail company's San Francisco headquarters.

BuzzFeed News reported in January that some Tesla customers had canceled their Model 3 orders over Musk's relationship with Trump.

Nate Erickson

Tesla did not immediately return a request for comment.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2qGtFzI
via IFTTT

30 Mayıs 2017 Salı

Trolls Are Targeting Indian Restaurants With A Create-Your-Own Fake News Site

Shrina Begum, the owner of Karri Twist, and the fake news story that's ruining her business.

Laura Gallant / BuzzFeed

Shrina Begum couldn’t understand why people were calling her Indian restaurant to accuse it of selling human meat. The calls started on May 11, and by the next day Begum says she and her staff had answered hundreds of them.

“Both of our phone lines went off and people starting screaming, ‘Why are you selling human meat?’” she told BuzzFeed News.

Business at Karri Twist, her restaurant in London, soon dropped by half. Begum had to reduce hours for some staff, and she feared the business might not survive the false rumor. “During one of the calls, [my employee] managed to calm a person down to find out where they’d seen this, and they were like, it’s been sent to them via Facebook. I just couldn’t believe it whatsoever.”

Begum eventually tracked down the origin of the false rumor: A website called Channel23news.com had published a story claiming that her restaurant, Karri Twist, was caught selling human meat and that its owner had been arrested. The completely fake report, replete with spelling mistakes and the wrong name of the owner, featured a picture of Karri Twist and said nine bodies had been found on the premises in the freezer.

The story looked like any other news report when shared on Facebook, and it quickly spread on the site, as well as on Twitter and WhatsApp. People who clicked on the link were brought to a page with the story, and beside it was text that read, “You've Been Pranked! Now Create A Story & Trick Your Friends!” Channel23News.com’s homepage is in fact a form that enables anyone to create a fake news story, add an image, and instantly share it on Facebook.

Channel23News.com

Thanks to a fake article someone had created on the site, an Indian restaurant that has been in business since 1957 was in danger of closing.

“I had planned to do some renovation work — which we had saved for — and now I’d had to cut some staff hours because on the weekend I basically had nobody in,” Begum said.

A search of Channel23News.com’s archives also found that Begum’s restaurant was one of at least six Indian restaurants targeted with fake stories claiming they served human meat. Five of the stories used almost the exact same text as the original hoax about Karri Twist.

Channel23news.com isn’t an isolated make-your-own-fake-news site. Using domain registration records, BuzzFeed News identified two separate networks that together own at least 30 nearly identical “prank” news sites and that published more than 3,000 fake articles in six languages over the past 12 months. They’re also generating significant engagement on Facebook: The sites collectively earned more than 13 million shares, reactions, and comments on the social network in the last 12 months.

Some of the sites’ biggest viral hits of the past year in English include fake stories about a Popeyes manager being arrested for “dipping chicken in cocaine-based flour to increase business” (over 429,000 Facebook engagements), Beyoncé giving birth to twin boys (141,000 engagements), the FBI announcing it found evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia (38,000 engagements), two great white sharks being found near St. Louis (201,000 engagements), and President Obama passing a law that requires grandparents to care for their grandchildren each weekend (515,000 engagements).

Begum is also by no means the first business owner or organization to scramble to deal with the aftermath of a fake story generated on one of these sites. The mayor of Annapolis, Maryland, was the subject of a fake story claiming he had made racist statements, and a park in Colorado was targeted with rumors that it was closing on June 1. “The post was shared thousands of times, so now officials are doing damage control to stop the rumor from spreading any further,” according to a local news report.

Police in Middlesbrough, UK, recently spent time looking into false rumors about a high school after teens there began creating and spreading hoaxes about each other and at least one teacher using one of the sites.

“I think people are using it to bully people,” one unnamed mother told a newspaper. She added, “My worry is people will not realise it is fake and something bad will happen to my son.”

Meanwhile, officials in Joplin, Missouri, also had to deal with a spate of false stories created about the area on Channel22News.com, a sister site of the one that hosted the hoax about Begum’s restaurant.

A Facebook spokesperson told BuzzFeed News it will continue to roll out programs and product updates to make it harder for spammers and fake-news creators to make money from its platform.

“A huge motivation for the spammers who trade in false news is their own profit — and we’ve recently launched new updates to disrupt their financial incentives and curb the spread of this type of material,” they said. “There’s more work to do, and people should know we remain absolutely committed to it.”

Recent fake stories published on Channel23News.com.

Channel23News.com

The owner of Channel23News.com and at least 18 other sites like it is listed in domain registration records as Korry Scherer. He’s a 25-year-old based in Milwaukee who told BuzzFeed News he prefers to go by the name Korry Tye. In a phone interview he said he’s spent the past five years figuring out ways to make money from the internet. He started by using MySpace pages to advertise products, then eventually shifted his focus to Facebook. At the beginning of this year, Tye decided to launch his first so-called prank news site.

“I just thought it could be something that might do well and would be fun and user-driven and take off on its own,” he said.

The first site's success led him to launch more. He now owns 19 prank news websites with domains such as Channel23News.com, Channel22News.com, and Channel45News.com. Since February they’ve published at least 724 fake news stories, generating a total of more than 2.5 million shares, reactions, and comments on Facebook.

Tye says for the most part “people make pranks about their schools or their coworkers.”

“There’s times that people abuse the platform, like all platforms get abused, and at that point people reach out to me and I have things removed right away,” he said. “It’s not meant for people to slander people’s names or bully people or do disrespectful things that could negatively affect someone’s life or ruin their day — that’s not cool.” (Tye did not respond to a subsequent email noting that the story about Begum’s restaurant was still online nearly three weeks after being published.)

He acknowledged that on Facebook the prank stories from his sites look like any other news article. But Tye said most people will click on the stories they’re inclined to believe.

“By the time they actually go check it out they’re gonna realize it’s all in fun,” he said. “Not everyone is as savvy as everyone else on the internet, but it’s pretty much there before your eyes.”

He says the vast majority of stories posted on his prank sites are created by users, though in the early days he sometimes posted fake news stories gathered from other sites to try to raise awareness for his. Hoaxes from elsewhere continue to be copied and uploaded to his sites. The fake story “Man accused of ejaculating in his boss’ coffee everyday for 4 years” was first published on World News Daily Report and appeared on Channel34News.com a few days later. (Tye also owns other sites that often publish viral hoaxes that originated elsewhere.)

“Initially I never really set out trying to mess with fake news,” he said. “This prank site for the most part is people making stories that affect them and their friends ... I definitely took advantage of online hoaxes and viral hoaxes over the years, I can’t deny that. It’s a way to make money.”

Popular fake stories from two of Nicolas Gouriou's sites.

Media Vibes

Though he’s quickly built up a large network of make-your-own-fake-news sites, Tye isn’t the originator of what he calls the “prank news” concept. That may be Nicolas Gouriou, a man based in Belgium who owns at least 11 prank news sites that publish in English, Spanish, French, German, Portuguese, and Italian. The oldest of his sites has been online since at least March of 2015. Gouriou did not respond to multiple emails from BuzzFeed News requesting an interview, or to a list of questions.

Both men’s sites feature similar forms for uploading a fake news story, as well as instructions that are almost word for word. One difference is that Gouriou’s sites feature a disclaimer: “Any bullying, racist, homophobic or pornographic jokes are prohibited. Do not hesitate to report any inappropriate content by contacting us via the Contact Form.”

In spite of the warning, Gouriou’s sites have been the subject of critical news stories in several countries where he offers language-specific versions. A website run by El Pais, one of the largest newspapers in Spain, published a story about the Spanish-language hoax site 12minutos.com. It noted that the site is a source of political hoaxes, and one fake story even caused a real journalist to ask a politician about it. France TV has examined Gouriou’s French-language fake news operation, and BuzzFeed Germany recently published a story to warn people about his German-language hoax site.

Gouriou’s operation generates significant engagement on Facebook. Using data from Buzzsumo, BuzzFeed News found more than 2,300 stories published on his 11 sites in the past 12 months alone. Together they generated more than 10.5 million shares, reactions, and comments on Facebook. Those same stories generated more than 22,000 shares on Twitter during the same time period.

These sites continue to see strong engagement on Facebook in spite of the social network’s efforts to crack down on what it calls “false news” and clickbait. Based on his experience with Facebook, Tye said he thinks his sites' success probably won’t last.

“Facebook does a lot of stuff to combat anything that’s doing well in the world, period,” he said. “As quick as it does good, Facebook damages the reach and affects the way it propagates.”

He said the reasons for this is partly the company’s crackdown on fake news, and partly because he believes Facebook diminishes the organic reach of content in order to push publishers to pay to promote their content.

“Facebook’s changed a lot and made it hard on a lot of people, but at the same time they created an opportunity and a space for people like me and others to make a ton of money, and it’s life-changing in some cases,” he said. “It might not be as sweet as it used to be, but it’s still great.”

Tye said he’d be happy to follow whatever rules Facebook has for his pages and sites, but he’s been unable to speak with anyone from the company about it. “I aim to, and would like to, establish more of a working relationship with Facebook,” Tye said. “I have a healthy budget to spend with them.”

A photo of the original Indian restaurant opened by Shrina Begum's father in 1957.

Laura Gallant / BuzzFeed

His complaint about not being able to reach Facebook was also echoed by Begum, the restaurant owner whose business suffered after a hoax on his sites.

“I was really angry because I had no way of getting in touch with Facebook — no way whatsoever to tell them that they need to do something to take this down or stop it from spreading,” she said.

She suggested the company create a hotline that people being affected by fake news or scams can call. “They make literally billions and billions of dollars globally, and the cost of this would be small.”

Today, a little more than two weeks since the story first went viral, Begum says her business is still suffering and she continues to receive angry phone calls accusing her of selling human meat.

“It’s been a very, very slow process of recovery, and at the moment my year-on-year sales are completely shot to pieces, it's really terrible,” she said. “People are still believing this story — it's still being propagated.

“For people, it's like one screenshot they’re passing on to each other,” she continued. “It’s a couple of clicks and they don’t think anything more of it, but the human cost is horrible. I'm not sleeping or eating because of this — I don’t know what I'm going to do.”



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2shUJpX
via IFTTT

Uber Fires Engineer Accused Of Stealing Self-Driving Car Secrets From Google

Anthony Levandowski

Afp / AFP / Getty Images

Uber has fired Anthony Levandowski, the engineer at the center of a self-driving lawsuit from Alphabet's autonomous vehicle unit Waymo, an Uber spoksperson confirmed.

Levandowski's termination, which is effective immediately, was earlier reported by The New York Times.

Levandowski's dismissal comes amid a bitter trade secrets lawsuit from Waymo, where he worked before departing to start his own self-driving truck company called Otto, which Uber acquired last year. Waymo alleges Levandowski downloaded thousands of files related to its self-driving program before departing, and that Uber is now benefitting from that information. Levandowski has pleaded the 5th Amendment and for months was not complying with the company's investigation into Waymo's claims. Uber has maintained in court documents and hearings that Waymo's information has not crossed into its systems.

Uber first demoted Levandowski on April 27, citing the need to remove him from leadership over work involving LiDAR – the technology at hand in the lawsuit – pending a trial. (LiDAR, which stands for light detection and ranging, is a laser system that helps self-driving cars see.) Uber then installed Eric Meyhofer as its self-driving program's leader. With Levandowski now out of the company, his direct reports will also fall under Meyhofer. US District Judge William Alsup told Uber that it had no excuse to "pull any punches" to force Levandowski to comply with a legal investigation into Waymo's claims that he stole its trade secrets on May 15.

The ride-hail company took the court's directive to heart. Earlier this month, legal filings showed that the ride-hail giant threatened to fire Levandowski if he did not cooperate with an investigation into allegations that he stole trade secrets from Alphabet's Waymo, his former employer. An Uber spokesperson said the company for months pressed Levandowski to comply with its internal investigation into the allegations, and set a deadline the engineer failed to meet.

Here's Uber's full termination letter to Levandowski:

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2sbcqIC
via IFTTT

26 Mayıs 2017 Cuma

The British Prime Minister Wants To Pressure Tech Companies To Fight Terrorism

Justin Tallis / AFP / Getty Images

Today at the G7 summit of world leaders in Sicily, British Prime Minister Theresa May called on those in attendance — including President Trump — to pressure social networks to crack down on terroristic and extremist content.

May's decision to call for a session on digital policing comes just days after a deadly suicide attack in Manchester on Monday evening that killed 22 people and wounded dozens more. An official close to May told the Evening Standard that the threat of harm from terrorists and extremists has moved from "the battlefield to the internet.” The official also noted that internet materials circulated by extremist organizations "has in the past been linked to acts of violence and the less of this material that is on the internet, that is clearly for the better."

May's call to action today during the Summit did not single out any tech companies specifically. Instead, she urged world leaders to put pressure on "communication service providers and social media companies to substantially increase their efforts to address terrorist content."

And this morning The Guardian reported that May "apparently had the backing of Trump" for the session.

When reached for comment on May's call to action, some of tech's biggest companies expressed their desire to partner with governments, while also highlighting the work they've been doing to try to combat extremism.

"We are committed to working in partnership with governments and NGOs to tackle these challenging and complex problems, and share the government’s commitment to ensuring terrorists do not have a voice online," Peter Barron, Google's VP Communications for Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, told BuzzFeed News in a statement.

The rest of the statement is below:

"We are already working with industry colleagues on plans for an international forum to help accelerate and strengthen our existing work in this area. We employ thousands of people and invest hundreds of millions of pounds to fight abuse on our platforms, and will continue investing and adapting to ensure we are part of the solution to addressing these challenges"

Monika Bickert, the Head of Global Policy Management at Facebook, touted the company's own technology and human reviewers in its fight to police digital extremism on its platform and urged that the problem "can only be tackled with strong partnerships."

Here's Facebook's full statement:

“We want to provide a service where people feel safe. That means we do not allow groups or people that engage in terrorist activity, or posts that express support for terrorism. Using a combination of technology and human review, we work aggressively to remove terrorist content from our platform as soon as we become aware of it — and if there is an emergency involving imminent harm to someone's safety, we notify law enforcement. Online extremism can only be tackled with strong partnerships. We have long collaborated with policymakers, civil society, and others in the tech industry, and we are committed to continuing this important work together.”

Others, like the Anti-Defamation League's CEO Jonathan Greenblatt, praised May's move:

And while May's session at the G7 has been universally lauded, the task of ridding the internet of terroristic and extremist content remains a herculean problem that Silicon Valley has struggled to solve for years. In March, Twitter — which has vigorously policed its platform for terroristic content — announced it purged 376,890 accounts promoting terrorism between July and the end of December 2016. Since August 2015, Twitter says it has removed 636,248 accounts for terrorism alone.

And just a few months ago, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, and YouTube partnered to create a shared industry database to police terroristic content. The database contains "hashes" or unique digital fingerprints for images and videos that are produced or simply just used by terrorist organizations, including ISIS. The goal of the partnership is to help all four companies identify and slow the spread of terrorist content across the internet.

Twitter, AT&T, and Comcast did not immediately respond to a request for comment.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2rHFYAa
via IFTTT

Another Setback For Uber In Self-Driving Car Lawsuit

Anthony Levandowski

Afp / AFP / Getty Images

A magistrate judge on Thursday ordered Uber to hand over to Waymo by the end of the day an unredacted version of the term sheet agreement for its 2016 acquisition of Otto, the self-driving truck start-up last summer.

Otto and its founder, former-Google engineer Anthony Levandowski, are at the center of an increasingly contentious legal battle between Uber and the Alphabet-owned Waymo, which alleges the ride-hail giant stole its self-driving trade secrets.

Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley's order forcing Uber to disclose the terms of its Otto purchase is a small victory for Waymo, which has argued that the document likely includes information material to its case. The company has also been pushing for Uber to disclose the due diligence report it conducted ahead of the Otto acquisition. Uber has so far refused to do so, claiming the document contains confidential information and is protected by attorney-client privilege.

The high-profile trade secrets lawsuit between the two tech giants is scheduled to go to trial on October 2. Uber has maintained throughout the case that Waymo's proprietary information never crossed into its systems and that it has built its own LiDAR technology – the laser system that helps self-driving cars see and navigate the world, which is at the center of the case.

Waymo is also arguing for the court to require Uber to provide its due diligence report on Otto's acquisition. Waymo’s lawyers have called Otto a ruse, and argued in court that the startup was created so Uber could acquire it and bring on Levandowski – and the information he allegedly took from Waymo. (Uber has since dropped the name Otto.) Given that Levandowski has invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination in the case, Waymo's lawyers argue that those documents could shed more light on the issue of what Uber might have known about his alleged actions when it was buying his company. Perhaps crucially, that report also includes an interview with Levandowski.

On Wednesday, US District Judge William Alsup — who is overseeing the case and recently referred it to federal prosecutors — slammed Levandowski for responding to Waymo's request for documentation with information he essentially called gibberish: "one thousand pages, over twenty thousand entries, and appeared to be two spreadsheets generated by automated data compilation with no intelligent review or analysis involved."

Reached for comment, Uber directed BuzzFeed News to an earlier statement on the matter saying its due diligence report on Otto "is protected by Attorney Client Privilege, which is the most sacred and important privilege in our entire legal system. The law simply does not support Waymo’s attempt to gut those privileges.”

Waymo has not yet provided comment.

Uber last week threatened to fire Levandowski if he did not cooperate with the investigation into Waymo's allegations, following a court order that directed the company to do everything in its power to compel his participation. Levandowski's lawyers have argued that the order violates his 5th Amendment rights. The court has ordered Uber to return any allegedly stolen documents to Waymo by May 31.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2rYsNby
via IFTTT

25 Mayıs 2017 Perşembe

Mark Zuckerberg Positions Himself As The Anti-Trump In Speech To Harvard

Paul Marotta / Getty Images

Mark Zuckerberg has said he’s not running for president. And maybe he’s not. But the 33-year-old Facebook CEO laid out a clear political platform in a commencement speech at Harvard Thursday.

Zuckerberg’s message was far from subtle: He positioned himself as the anti-Trump, preaching a form of compassionate globalism that could make a system of free trade and open immigration work for those it’s left behind — a stark contrast from President Trump’s inward-looking approach.

“This is the struggle of our time,” Zuckerberg told the crowd. “The forces of freedom, openness, and global community against the forces of authoritarianism, isolationism, and nationalism. Forces for the flow of knowledge, trade, and immigration against those who would slow them down. This is not a battle of nations, it's a battle of ideas.”

It was difficult, if not impossible, to hear these words without conjuring Trump’s proclamation from his inaugural address: “From this moment on, it’s going to be America First.” Zuckerberg's were the opposite.

Zuckerberg hasn’t shied away from expressing his dismay about the resurgence of nationalism across the globe — one that helped Trump get elected in the US, Brexit become reality in Britain, and Marie Le Pen force a runoff in France. "I hope that we have the courage to see that the path forward is to bring people together, not push them apart," he said in a keynote at Facebook’s F8 conference last year.

And he isn’t hiding his desire to put Facebook to work to help improve the global system, so more people will buy in. “The most important thing we at Facebook can do is develop the social infrastructure to give people the power to build a global community that works for all of us,” Zuckerberg said in a letter titled “Building Global Community” in February.

But Zuckerberg also appears to understand it will take more than one technology company to solve the widespread job loss and income inequality largely blamed on the global system. Making it work “for everyone,” as Zuckerberg put it, is no easy task.

Zuckerberg formed the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative with his wife Priscilla Chan, in part, to help. He will donate nearly all his money to the initiative, whose stated goals are “advancing human potential and promoting equal opportunity.” But he won’t stop there.

The Harvard speech appeared to be a moment for Zuckerberg, who created Facebook in a dorm room not far from the commencement ceremonies, to lay out a number of policy positions he believes will create better global systems. But implementing these policies requires government — Facebook or the Chan Zuckerberg initiative don’t have the power to accomplish it on their own.

Zuckerberg addressed economic inequality, for instance. “There is something wrong with our system when I can leave here and make billions of dollars in 10 years while millions of students can't afford to pay off their loans, let alone start a business,” he said. To help, he proposed exploring universal basic income, providing affordable childcare, and offering healthcare not tied to a single employer.

He discussed immigration, tearing up when speaking about an undocumented student interested in social justice. “It says something about our current situation that I can't even say his name because I don't want to put him at risk,” Zuckerberg said. “If a high school senior who doesn't know what the future holds can do his part to move the world forward, then we owe it to the world to do our part too.”

Zuckerberg also discussed technological automation, a major economic concern that candidates barely acknowledged during the 2016 election. “Our generation will have to deal with tens of millions of jobs replaced by automation like self-driving cars and trucks,” Zuckerberg said, calling for a “generation-defining public works” shortly afterward.

While the public works programs of the 1930s spent billions to build roads, schools, and airports, Zuckerberg said this generation should be invested in "manufacturing and installing social plans" to help stop climate change, to work to cure disease, and, controversially, to build a system that allows people to vote online. “Let's do big things, not only to create progress, but to create purpose,” Zuckerberg said.

Instead of his go-to grey T-shirt, Zuckerberg wore a suit. He delivered the speech in a more lively, animated, and emotive manner than how he’s spoken in the past. He called on members of the audience to stand up, discussing their personal stories with the crowd as examples of resilience and courage. If Zuckerberg ever runs for office, it will almost certainly look a lot like the man that spoke today. For now though, he’s simply asking for your Like.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2rES1y6
via IFTTT

Facebook's Closed Captioning Malfunctioned And Turned Zuckerberg's Speech Into A Jibberish Tone Poem

“CECEOKOK wasn’t the first thing I built” - Facebook CEO, Mark Zuckerberg.

Mark Zuckerberg built Facebook. And Facebook built a closed captioning system for its auto-play and livestream videos.

Mark Zuckerberg built Facebook. And Facebook built a closed captioning system for its auto-play and livestream videos.

But today, that closed captioning system apparently malfunctioned — just as Zuckerberg was giving his commencement speech at Harvard University.

But today, that closed captioning system apparently malfunctioned — just as Zuckerberg was giving his commencement speech at Harvard University.

And it ruled.

And it ruled.


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2r2gNaG
via IFTTT

Is Shazam's Game Show The Future Of Unscripted TV?

Jamie Foxx with contestants on the new show Beat Shazam.

Michael Becker / FOX

On a recent afternoon at CBS’s Studio 36 in LA, at the center of a glowing teal and purple set lit up like the inside of a Poké Ball, the actor, comedian, and musician Jamie Foxx was whipping an eager game show audience into a froth. Rebounding after a commercial break, he leaned into a shopworn catchphrase, and the crowd, on cue, shouted back with glee.

“The money’s going!”

“Up!”

“The money’s going!”

“Up!”

Onstage with Foxx — who was loose and charismatic in a red, white, and black biker jacket, closely cropped haircut, and sculpted beard — were Christina and Steve, romantic partners and contestants on the game show, called Beat Shazam, which premieres tonight on Fox. They’d reached the final round of the game, in which teams compete — first against each other, and then against the titular name-that-song app — to rapidly identify popular songs. Only one song stood between them and the grand prize of $1 million — one song, that is, and Shazam, which is represented in the game by an enormous, circular, smoke-spouting monitor that looms over the stage like an angry deity, or a less-homicidal upgrade of HAL 9000, the sentient computer from 2001: A Space Odyssey.

Christina, from Brooklyn, had tan skin and chest-length, wavy brown hair. Steve, from Nashville, was lanky with round cheeks and a goatee. As on any decent primetime game show, they faced a burdensome choice: take on Shazam and go for the $1 million, or walk away with what they’d earned up to that point in the game — a less transformative but still substantial $197,000. If they challenged Shazam and lost, their money would be halved.

In the audience, the air went thick and quiet with suspense. A sober look fell over Steve's face, as if the weight of the world sat on his shoulders.

"Are you going to beat Shazam, or are you going to walk away?" Foxx asked Christina. She paused, and then declared, cocking her neck from side to side on each syllable, "I'm going to Beat. Sha. Zam!" The room erupted.

"Beat! Sha! Zam! Beat! Sha! Zam! Beat! Sha! Zam!"

Its existence underscores growing interest in franchises with appeal across platforms.

Since it launched in 2002, Shazam’s willingness to march to its own beat has helped the company navigate more than a decade of transformation in both the music and mobile app businesses. Its 300 million users, who use the app over 20 million times per day to identify songs playing in public spaces — bars, coffee shops, on the radio — at the touch of a button, have grown accustomed to seeing its curlicue logo pop up in unlikely places, including in Super Bowl commercials, on cases of Coke, and, as of last year, inside Snapchat’s camera function.

But Beat Shazam — the first primetime TV show based on an app (a play-at-home version will launch concurrently) — is by far the company’s strangest and most high-profile experiment yet. With backing from Foxx, Don’t Forget the Lyrics creator Jeff Apploff, and reality TV kingpin Mark Burnett, its existence underscores both Shazam’s unique cultural footing and a growing interest among tech companies and the entertainment industry in franchises with appeal across platforms. Last fall, The CW premiered a Saturday morning cooking show based on the popular recipe app Dinner Spinner, and a game show based on Candy Crush, hosted by Mario Lopez, will debut on CBS this summer.

“If you’ve got an app that has 300 million users identifying songs, it tells you right off the bat that you’ve got an audience,” Apploff told BuzzFeed News.

Shazam CEO Rich Riley (left) with Chief Revenue Officer Greg Glenday at Shazam's NYC office.

Ricky Rhodes for BuzzFeed News

The first version of Shazam for iPhone — based on a pre-smartphone service where users could dial a number, hold up the mouthpiece of their phone, and receive a text message with information about whatever song was playing — was one of the mobile revolution’s original success stories. After it was released in 2008, the company became a verb, built a business by collecting affiliate fees from the sales it generated for iTunes (over 1 million downloads per day at its peak), and drew investment from blue chip venture capital firms like Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, which helped fund Amazon, Google, and Snapchat.

In 2012, at the height of the initial wave of interest in so-called second-screen experiences that linked mobile devices with television programming, Shazam began offering cast and episode information for TV shows — only to later roll back that functionality due to insufficient demand. Its push into advertising was more fruitful, and last year, Shazam turned its first profit, even as music sales continued to decline amid a broad shift toward streaming. The majority of the company’s income now comes from brand partners, who use Shazam’s in-house creative team and tech — including a new in-app camera that can recognize codes printed on packages and other surfaces — to make their promotional campaigns interactive.

The company continues to evolve. Shazam was an early mover on a trend that has now seized much of Silicon Valley, in which apps on your phone promise to make sense of the world around you. In roughly the past month, both Facebook and Google have announced “augmented reality” products that use your smartphone’s camera to recognize objects in your environment and overlay contextual information, like a restaurant’s Yelp ratings or the name of a flower species.

On a recent episode of the HBO comedy Silicon Valley, a startup providing such a service was described as “Shazam for food.” But the Shazam for food in the real world, or at least the Shazam for food brands, may well just be Shazam — the company unveiled its own AR capabilities at SXSW this year.

“We’ve never taken our eye off the ball in terms of the core of what we do, and that’s allowed us to extend our leadership and extend our brand and our capabilities,” said Rich Riley, CEO of Shazam since 2013 and an executive producer of Beat Shazam. “Fortunately for us, interest in music is always increasing, so I think we’ll continue to innovate and look for more big partnerships.”

Michael Becker / FOX

Whether Beat Shazam can match the popularity of its namesake remains to be seen. Apploff said he took the idea from a long-running parlor version of Name That Tune that guests play at his annual New Year’s Eve party. He first approached Riley with the concept over two years ago at the behest of Fox, which, at the time, was working closely with Shazam on the hit music industry drama Empire.

Knowing that viewers could dismiss the show as a corporate cash grab, or simply superfluous, the producers doubled down on entertainment value, luring Foxx — an Grammy and Academy Award winner — and promising A-list special guests and life-changing prize money. They ran through hundreds of iterations of the game before settling on the format, with three teams of two competing against each other until one is left standing to face Shazam. Test versions that featured more teams, or brought in the Shazam character earlier on, felt flat.

“We taped for nine hours one Sunday and threw everything against the wall,” Foxx, who said he last used Shazam to identify a “Bad and Boujee” remix at a nightclub in Budapest, told BuzzFeed News. “The good was really good, but the bad was really bad. I said, ‘Guys, I fucked up. We all fucked up.’ We were thinking, Is this the right thing to do?

The first hint that they’d found a winning formula came from trial contestants, who’d volunteered to help work through the kinks. “They started saying to us, ‘We’ll stay the whole day! We don’t wanna leave! Let’s play more!’” Apploff said.

Foxx, who figures heavily in ads promoting the show, said he’s already met at least one fan of the concept. On a recent drive in LA, he was startled by a man who pulled his car next to his and started screaming his name. “I thought this dude was trying to harm me or something,” Foxx said. “But the first thing he said was ‘I can beat Shazam!’”



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2qnzrG0
via IFTTT

Here's What 39,000 Teens Think About Fake News

They think they’re a lot better at spotting it than they actually are.

83% of US teens are familiar with the term "fake news".

We wanted to poll some actual high schoolers, and After School verifies they're actually in high school through their Facebook and other factors. It's kind of like Yik Yak, but without the bullying, and it often runs fun polls for its users. Teens from all 50 states answered these questions – just over 39,000 teens in total.

A study from Stanford last year showed that middle and high school students aren't very good at determining fake news – especially more nuanced things like noticing bias in a source, or understanding the difference between sponsored content and a regular article. (If you want to test your own ability to sniff out fake news, try one of our quizzes to see if you're actually as good as you think.)

After the 2016 election brought the scourge of fake news into the national conversation, some schools started teaching kids media literacy and how to spot false stories on social media.

The polling standards here are not exactly scientifically rigorous, considering this survey's results came from a bunch of kids on an app answering a poll. So take this with a grain of salt.

Teens said that if they see something they think is a fake news story on social media, most of them will just ignore it.

But 31% actually will go ahead and call it out to the person who posted it. Bold!


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2rYzxFw
via IFTTT

A Senator Just Introduced The First Ever National Gig Economy Bill

Mheim3011 / Getty Images

If you’ve ever taken a paid sick day, collected worker’s compensation, or contributed to an employer-backed retirement plan, you’ve taken advantage of benefits that are only accessible to traditional employees. But millions of working Americans who aren’t classified as employees — whether they work in the gig economy, or as temp workers, or some other precarious work situation — don’t have these benefits.

On Thursday, the first piece of federal legislation aimed at addressing on-demand workers’ lack of benefits will be introduced by Virginia democrat Senator Mark Warner. The bill would create a $20 million fund that organizations across the country could use to build and evaluate portable benefits programs for independent contractors.

The idea behind portable benefits is that contract-based workers should, along with the company or companies where they work, pay jointly into a fund that can be used to cover healthcare costs and lost pay in case of injury, or even fund retirements. They’re called portable benefits because rather than being tied to a single worker with a single job, the fund can travel with workers from gig to gig, platform to platform, part-time job to full-time work, and back again.

Senator Warner, who estimates that currently a third of the US workforce falls outside traditional employment and predicts that figure will increase to 50% by 2020, said his goal is to get people to break out of the “mindset that ... the only way you got benefits was if you're a full-time, permanent employee."

“[Portable benefits is] that emergency fund,” Warner told BuzzFeed News Wednesday. “It might be a fund to take care of a disability if you get hurt. It might work with some existing retirement programs. Part of it would be, depending on what happens with Obamacare, an ability to help deal with health care expenses. I think there will be a variety of models.”

Warner’s fund, if approved, would allocate $5 million in grants to organizations already conducting portable benefits experiments, and $15 million to encourage new programs, according to a draft of the bill reviewed Wednesday by BuzzFeed News. He said a wide range of organizations, from nonprofits to startups to labor unions, are encouraged to apply. The grants made available in 2018 will be awarded by Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta, and reviewed by the Government Accounting Office in 2020.

The notion of creating portable benefits funds for on-demand contractors has broad support, including from Princeton economist Alan Kreuger and former Labor Secretary Robert Reich.

“There's no question we have to move toward portable benefits,” Reich wrote via email to BuzzFeed News. “It's not just gig economy workers who need them, but the large and growing number of people working part-time on any number of jobs. One way to structure it would be for workers to pay into a joint fund that would spread risks and also gain them economies of scale. I also think companies that employ contract workers should be required to pay into the fund on the basis of how many workers they contract with.”

Supporters of portable benefits at the Aspen Institute’s Future of Work Initiative have argued that rather than sweeping change, the best way to figure out how to update the social safety net is through experimentation on the local level.

Senator Warner, who worked in the technology industry prior to his career in politics, has been talking about creating laws to reign in the gig economy for years now. In 2015, the senator talked about creating a new classification of worker, a legal status that would ideally have blended the protections that employees receive with the flexibility and independence that contractors enjoy.

For now, the idea of creating a new type of worker in the US economy is pretty much dead. But, with Warner’s help, the idea of creating a portable benefits fund has taken its place. “[Portable benefits] could evolve into a third worker classification,” Warner said. “I think it will more likely evolve into a much more flexible benefits system that would be complementary to a traditional benefits system.”

While Warner’s bill is the first federal legislation to directly address the on-demand economy, a couple of states have proposed portable benefits bills. In Washington state, legislators are considering a bill that would require on-demand companies to contribute 25% of the the money they make per transaction and put it toward a benefits fund. And in New York, a similar (though less generous) piece of legislation was recently tabled while Governor Andrew Cuomo assembles a task force to investigate the issue further.

Meanwhile, some on-demand companies have already started introducing experimental programs around benefits for their workers. Care.com, which matches caregivers with families, announced last fall that it would be offering workers $500 a year to cover expenses associated with health care and transportation. More recently, Uber raised its rates in eight states by five cents per mile and said those funds would be made available to drivers, who have the option of using the money to buy personal injury insurance.

But while funds for portable benefits would help fill a crucial gap in coverage, not everyone thinks it’s the best solution to the dilemmas that on-demand workers face. In the case of the proposed New York bill, the creation of a portable benefits fund would mean codifying in law gig economy workers’ status as independent contractors. If the law was passed, the workers would never be classified as employees.

Workers across the gig economy have sued companies including Uber, Lyft, Handy, Instacart and Postmates for misclassification, arguing that they should have been hired as employees and are owed back pay for minimum wage, overtime, and unpaid benefits. Some, including Harvard Law’s Maia Usui and former NRLB chair Wilma Liebman, see the whole concept of creating portable benefits funds as a potential way for the tech industry to sidestep their legal obligations to workers. It’s worth noting that on-demand cleaning startup Handy helped write the New York portable benefits bill, which was supported by lobbying firm Tech:NYC, an organization that counts Uber among its members.

Dan Teran is CEO of Managed by Q, an on-demand office management startup that’s notable for hiring its workforce on as employees, providing them with benefits, and even offering stock options. “The idea that we would create a framework to provide employer paid benefits to people who can't currently access them is a net positive. However, it shouldn't be a trap door into deregulating labor,” Teran told BuzzFeed News regarding the portable benefits debate. “As these new frameworks are being built, government agencies should continue to enforce existing worker protections."

Warner said he’s familiar with these criticisms, but said focusing on the benefits and protections that have been lost won’t help address the immediate problems people are facing in the 21st century economy.

“We can’t just wave a magic wand and say ‘Everyone is going to work the same job for 35 years again’. There were a lot of good things about the 20th century economy. Even if you didn’t have that much money, you had predictability,” he said. “We don’t have that now. This tries to meet the workforce where it’s at, and where it’s headed.”



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2rTZHKa
via IFTTT

24 Mayıs 2017 Çarşamba

The Trump Administration Wants To Hack Your Drone

Vincenzo Pinto / AFP / Getty Images

The Trump administration wants Congress to let it surveil, hijack, or strike down any drone in US airspace.

Trump's team has published a 10-page draft of legislation requesting authority for the federal government to develop countermeasures and take action against any drone over US soil deemed to pose a threat. The proposed bill focuses on commercial drones, such as small quadcopters like the DJI Mavic or Phantom that are easy to purchase online. The New York Times first reported the news.

What kind of threats do drones actually pose?

Drones pose a rising security risk as their technology advances, their range improves, and they're able to bear heavier payloads.

After ISIS used small quadcopter drones like ones you'd buy at Radioshack to surveil and drop explosives in Iraq and Syria, it stoked US officials' fears that the group will attempt to use drones to carry out terrorist attacks. And in 2015 when a drone evaded the White House's radar system and mistakenly crash landed on its lawn, the incident prompted a Secret Service investigation.

More and more people also have drones. Sales are expected to go well beyond $1 billion this year, up sharply from around $800 million last year. An estimated one million drones were sold in the 2015 holiday season alone.

So here are powers the government wants to have over drones:

  • Surveil them: "Detect, monitor, identify, or track, without prior consent, an unmanned aircraft system, unmanned aircraft, payload, or cargo, to evaluate whether it poses a threat to the safety or security of a covered event or location."
  • Hijack them: "Redirect, disable, disrupt control of, exercise control of, seize, or confiscate, without prior consent, an unmanned aircraft system."
  • Strike them down: "Use reasonable force to disable, disrupt, damage, or destroy an unmanned aircraft system, unmanned aircraft, or unmanned aircraft's payload or cargo that poses a threat to the safety of a covered facility."
  • Research them: "Conduct research, testing, training on, and evaluation of any equipment."

"Threats" in this case are defined as anything that could interfere with a wide range of government activities: disaster rescue or emergency services, prisoner detention, the safety of military or government personnel, transportation of nuclear materials, and other processes.

The document does say that the Federal Aviation Administration would still hold sway over the regulation of the general national airspace, so the Trump administration's power wouldn't be limitless if the new legislation passed as it is right now. But the regulation is likely to change as the administration consults the Department of Transportation, the FAA, and Congress.

The reason the Trump administration is having to ask Congress to give it this control over drones is because current privacy protection laws technically prevent the government from interfering with drones. As noted in the bill's draft, "some of the most promising technical countermeasures for detecting and mitigating [unmanned aircraft systems] may be construed to be illegal under certain laws that were passed when [drones] were unforeseen."

The Trump administration did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

What are the privacy concerns?

The administration is asking for a broad swath of powers that may trouble drone owners. According to the draft, any drone that the government disables is immediately considered US government property, and its communications as well as its hardware may be dissected to develop more defenses against drones. That kind of research would subject all the digital records of your drone to government investigation.

The act does, however, stipulate that the privacy implications of any new measures must be reviewed by the Secretary of Homeland Security, a position appointed by the president. A recent court decision struck down the regulation obligating consumers to register their recreational drones with the Federal Aviation Administration.

The draft says that the government would have to take action against drones while respecting "privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties," but it also says that US courts would have no power to hear lawsuits over the federal government's actions against drones, which means drone owners would have no recourse to recover their forfeited equipment. The information gathered under the legislation would also be exempt from information disclosure laws, according to the draft.

DJI, the world's largest drone manufacturer and seller, declined to comment, saying it was still evaluating the impact of the proposed legislation.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2qhGxNb
via IFTTT

A Human Resources Shakeup At Tesla Follows Discrimination Suits And Allegations Of Labor Violations

Tesla employees work in the Tesla factory in Fremont, Calif., Thursday, May 14, 2015. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu)

Jeff Chiu / AP

Arnnon Geshuri, the high-profile VP of human resources at Tesla who oversaw its 2011 hiring spree, is leaving the company, BuzzFeed News learned earlier this month and Tesla confirmed in a blog post Tuesday evening. His departure is the third in a string of HR exec exits from Tesla, which has recently been beset by allegations of unsafe working conditions, discrimination and harassment, and potentially illegal mishandling of a union drive at its California manufacturing plant.

Geshuri follows two other HR executives who have left Tesla this year. The first — Jennifer Kim, director of HR for engineering — left Tesla this spring. The second — Mark Lipscomb, who served as VP of HR under Geshuri — left the company earlier this year for Netflix.

“Arnnon helped transition Tesla from a small car company that many doubted would ever succeed, to an integrated sustainable energy company with more than 30,000 employees around the globe,” reads Tesla’s blog post on the matter. “As Tesla prepares for the next chapter in its growth, Arnnon will be taking a short break before moving on to a new endeavor.”

Geshuri will be replaced by Gaby Toledano, an industry veteran who comes to Tesla from Entertainment Arts (EA).

In recent months, a growing body of evidence suggesting that, for workers, Tesla’s state-of-the-art factory in Fremont, California hasn’t always been the safest or most comfortable place to work. In fact, from 2013 to 2016, Tesla’s incident rate in that facility that was higher than the industry average, the Guardian reported and the company acknowledged earlier this week.

Today, a group called Worksafe published a report that pokes holes in Tesla's argument that the company has successfully lowered its incident rate for the beginning of 2017 to a number that's below the industry average. Worksafe said its independent review of public health and safety data shows Tesla's injury rate has "changed significantly since the company’s recent claims of success in reducing injuries in the first quarter of 2017."

Allegations about working conditions at Tesla first arose on February 9, when factory employee Jose Moran kicked off a union drive with a blog post in which he points to long hours, repetitive stress injuries, and lower than competitive compensation as reasons why Tesla workers should unionize. Tesla recently staved off threats of a strike at its German factory over similar issues by offering workers there a pay raise.

The United Auto Workers — the union trying to organize Tesla’s Fremont, CA plant — filed charges against Tesla with the NLRB last month, alleging illegal coercion, surveillance and intimidation against workers who distributed information about the union effort. Geshuri is listed as the “employer representative” in those charges.

In addition to issues with the union, Tesla has faced broader allegations of discrimination. In March, a video surfaced in which Tesla employees repeatedly used the n-word and threatened violence against an African American colleague, a man named DeWitt Lambert who later sued the company. At the time, Tesla rebutted Lambert’s allegations, saying Lambert had accused his fellow employees, with whom he was friendly outside of work, out of retaliation when he mistakenly believed they had reported him to HR. But Tesla also acknowledged that an error in its investigation process caused the company to lose track of its initial HR investigation into the video.

“We don't feel that we met our standard in terms of how we handled the people involved in that situation,” said Tesla managing counsel Carmen Copher in an interview with NBC. “We also, pointedly, don't believe we met our standard in terms of how the investigation was handled.”

Geshuri’s departure was unrelated to this incident, according to Tesla.

Meanwhile, another Tesla employee, AJ Vandermeyden, is also suing Tesla for discrimination. Vandermeyden, who still works as an engineer for the company, alleges that she is paid less than her male peers, was passed over for deserved promotions because of her gender, and has endured “inappropriate language, whistling, and catcalls” on the factory floor. Vandermeyden’s suit, which was filed in 2016, is currently in private arbitration.

According to his LinkedIn, Geshuri had been with Tesla for over seven years; previously, he was senior director of staffing and human resources at Google, where he was involved in the high-tech antitrust litigation scandal.

Geshuri did not respond to request for comment from BuzzFeed News.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2rURdBX
via IFTTT

The Man Behind The Seth Rich Private Investigation Has A White House Connection

Facebook

Ed Butowsky, the Dallas wealth manager and Fox News contributor who facilitated a private investigation into the murder of Seth Rich, is friends with and serves on the board of an organization started by White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon.

"I consider him a friend and a very nice man," Butowsky told BuzzFeed News of Bannon.

According to his website, Butowsky "serves as a Board Member for Reclaim New York, a non-partisan, non-profit think tank dedicated to advancing a grassroots conversation about the future of New York." Per tax filings, Bannon is Reclaim's vice chairman. (The group's secretary and treasurer are Jennifer and Rebekah Mercer, the powerful daughters of right-wing moneyman and Trump champion Robert Mercer.)

In addition to Reclaim, Butowsky and Bannon know each other through Breitbart News, of which Bannon was executive chairman and to which Butowsky has contributed articles. In 2015, Bannon interviewed Butowsky for a Breitbart radio program.

Both Butowsky and a White House official deny speaking about Seth Rich.

Over the past week the Rich story has captivated conservative media, following a Fox News report that linked the murder of the 27-year-old Democratic National Committee Staff member with email hacks of the DNC that may have helped then-candidate Trump in his campaign against Hillary Clinton. Such a finding would contradict the view, widely held in the intelligence community, that Russian intelligence was behind the theft — a key point for those who believe there was an improper relationship between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.

Fox's report — a conspiracy theory with no corroborating evidence — was based on an interview with a private investigator, Rod Wheeler, who Butowsky introduced to the Rich family and offered to pay for. (Fox News yesterday retracted its story.) The Rich-as-leaker narrative's rise is the clearest example yet of the way an insurgent pro-Trump media has been able to push dubious stories beneficial to the administration into the limelight.

And the news that their benefactor has ties to a key figure in the administration — and the godfather of the pro-Trump media — has left the Rich family stunned.

“The family is in shock to learn that Ed Butowsky is both friends with and served on a board with Steve Bannon," Brad Bauman, a spokesman for the Rich family, told BuzzFeed News Wednesday. "We are very much trying not to rush to judgment in order to allow this story to develop.”

Bannon declined to comment for the story.

Butowsky has long said that he heard about the Rich case from a friend, though he can't remember whom, and that he was motivated to connect the Rich family with Wheeler because he was moved by their story.

In an interview Tuesday outside Del Frisco's Steakhouse in Manhattan, where he was feeding pigeons, Butowsky told BuzzFeed News that he had never discussed the Rich case with Bannon, and qualified their friendship as warm but not close.

"It's not like I have a Steve Bannon teddy bear," he said. "I've never eaten a meal with the guy."

A photograph on Butowsky's Facebook page shows him in the White House briefing room on March 22. Butowsky did not comment on the record why he was at the White House, but did clarify that he had not met with any White House officials.

Butowsky added that his association with Reclaim was distant and purely based on his wealth management expertise.

"Am I really on the board?" Butowsky asked when informed that his website claimed he was on the board. "I've never been to a board meeting."

Prior to his career as a wealth manager — his clients include a number of athletes and celebrities — Butowsky worked for nearly two decades at Morgan Stanley, where, according to his LinkedIn, he ran one of the highest earning teams at the firm.




from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2qc4wRP
via IFTTT

U.S. International Tourism Market Share Is Falling Under Trump, Foursquare Data Shows

Foursquare

The United States’ slice of the international tourism pie is declining, according to a new report from Foursquare that looks at data from millions of phones worldwide.

The US share of international tourism dropped 16% in March 2017 compared the previous year. And it declined an average of 11% year over year in months spanning October 2016 to March 2017, according to the report.

The drop coincides with the final month of the US election, the Trump transition, and the early months of the Trump presidency, which notably imposed a travel ban on people from several majority Muslim countries in January 2017 that was eventually halted in court but is currently under appeal. Declines in tourism market share from people originating in the Middle East were more pronounced than the rest of the world, down 25% this January, along with a smaller decrease in South America, Foursquare found.

The data accounts for the percentage of international tourism coming to the US and not the absolute number of tourists, but Foursquare CEO Jeff Glueck told BuzzFeed News that it’s unlikely tourist visits to the US increased while share declined. “I don’t think you’d see a 16% decline in international market share and absolute numbers being up, I don’t think that’s compatible,” he said. “The volume of tourism doesn’t change that fast.”

Foursquare’s data comes from approximately 13 million users who opted to share their locations with the company, much like the data collection methods it used to accurately predict iPhone sales in 2015 and a massive decline in Chipotle sales in 2016. Foursquare tracks where the people holding these devices go at all times, allowing it to identify types behavior — including leisure and business travel — based on where they go and how often they visit these places. The data is anonymized. “We understand where phones sleep, generally over time where ‘home’ is,” Glueck said. “We’re able to see not just that someone traveled from Switzerland to Miami, but things like, did they walk into a mall, a museum, a restaurant; did they stay at a hotel?”

Foursquare

Other research seems to support Foursquare’s conclusions about a slowdown in international tourism to the US. While the US Travel Association, for instance, reported a small increase in absolute international travel to the US in its Travel Trends Index in March, it warned that “the modest pace of international inbound travel growth represents a dramatic slowdown, and portends a potential decline in the months to come.” The report noted that an increasingly valuable dollar contributed to the slowdown, along with “negative perceptions of Trump administration rhetoric and policies related to travel restrictions, immigration, and international relations.”

There are other indications that international tourism to the US may be tailing off. Marriott International chief executive Arne Sorenson said in April that his company has experienced a decline in bookings from Mexico and the Middle East during the Trump presidency. And travel app Hopper said searches for flights to the US were down 17% the day the travel ban was announced, compared to the Obama presidency's final two weeks.

While Foursquare’s report showed a declining US share of international tourism, it did find an increase in business travel of approximately 3%.

The decline in international tourism share could have a broader impact on the the US economy, Foursquare contends, and with good reason. International travelers spent $247 billion in the US last year, according to the US National Travel and Tourism Office. “The entire retail sector fell about 3% last year, and that led to almost 100,000 workers losing their jobs,” Guleck said. “A 16% drop in America’s tourism market share is a punch in the gut to a restaurant and shopping world that’s already under pressure.”



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2qVdD8M
via IFTTT

23 Mayıs 2017 Salı

Two New Facebook Live Features Just Launched To Use With Friends

Add in a friend to do a split-screen live video with, and make private chats on public videos.

And today, the company is adding two new features to make live videos better for both filming and watching.

Now you can make a private chat with just friends on a public Live video.

Now you can make a private chat with just friends on a public Live video.

This means that on a popular live video, you can talk to just your friends without having all your comments swamped by hundreds of randos. Or, let's say that you're part of a niche community of veterinarians specializing in giraffe birth, and you want to be able to discuss the pregnancy of April the giraffe without all the riff-raff (this could happen, right?) This new feature would be perfect for that.

The next feature lets you do a joint live broadcast with a friend in a different location. It's basically like letting other people watch your Skype or Facetime with your BFF.

The next feature lets you do a joint live broadcast with a friend in a different location. It's basically like letting other people watch your Skype or Facetime with your BFF.

Facebook offered this feature to verified users last summer, but now everyone can do it. This solves a big problem with doing a live video yourself, which is like... doing it alone is kind of boring? And you might not have anything to say. Now, you can share the awkwardness of a live video and make it like your own mini talk show, even if your friend lives on the other side of the country.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2qLy9Im
via IFTTT

Instagram Is Introducing Algorithmically Curated Stories

Instagram

Instagram is at it again, reaching into Snapchat’s bag of features and pulling out yet another for use in its own product.

Today, the Facebook-owned app is introducing Location Stories and Hashtag Stories, its version of the algorithmically curated stories you can find via Snapchat’s search feature. These new features consist of images and videos gathered from public stories, and stitched together based on hashtag and location. They’ll be watchable as cohesive, curated videos in Instagram’s Explore tab and on location pages — much like Snapchat, which does this with keywords.

With Instagram’s stories, the algorithm is the editor; it scans all public images and videos posted using hashtags and locations, decides which images and videos to highlight for each specific hashtag and location, and picks the order they play in.

“There will be no human editing,” Blake Barnes, the director of product leading Instagram’s Explore tab told BuzzFeed News.

A look at Snapchat’s keyword-based Stories shows the divergent and sometimes discomfiting direction algorithmically curated stories can take. Searching the keyword “Syria” this weekend, for instance, revealed a number of users trivializing the brutal civil war in that country. One Snap played footage of Grand Theft Auto with a caption that read “Live footage of a USA soldier bombing Syria.” Another showed a man in a Trump jersey with the caption “YASSSS FU Syria.” Yet another showed a person in Ohio wearing a gas mask with the caption “Waking up in Syria like.”

Instagram will likely also be home to a mix of fun stories and complicated and potentially disturbing ones. The fun stories won’t be difficult to find. As an example, Barnes played a few, including a Hashtag Story for #ootd, or “outfit of the day,” — a compilation of people posting well, the outfit they wore that day. He also showed Location Stories from Tokyo and Paris — compelling peeks into cafes and city life. But when BuzzFeed News asked him to show Location Stories from Tehran and Kabul, Barnes demurred. “Maybe you can try it when you get it,” he said.

Instagram, which has more than 700 million monthly active users, is much larger than Snapchat, and simply by the nature of that scale, it’s likely its stories will contain violent, graphic, and upsetting images. This means that through Location and Hashtag Stories, Instagram will likely have to wrestle with the murders and gruesome violence that are now a major problem on Facebook proper. And with algorithms making the calls, there will be little safeguard against them. Asked about this, Barnes said users can report concerning content and the platform will review it. “Our focus will be to make sure the content that the content we show and pull together into these stories conforms to our policy guidelines,” he said.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2rwW1Rf
via IFTTT

There's Now A New Kind Of Snapchat Story

Snapchat just introduced a new feature, custom Snapchat Stories, which allows you to create stories with friends rather than by yourself.

Like with regular Stories, videos and photos in a custom story will display for 24 hours, and a custom Story will stay active until no one has contributed to it for 24 hours.

It's like a collaborative, ephemeral vacation slideshow, wedding album, or baby book.

To create a custom story, you click "Create Story" in the Stories screen on Snapchat, name the Story, designate who can add to it, and then add images or videos.

The designated contributors will then be able to add to it. Custom stories will appear the My Story section.

You can be a contributor to an unlimited number of custom stories at a time, but you can only have three that you've created running at any one time.

You can make it location-specific, so any friend within a certain radius — "about a block in circumference," according to Snap — can add to the story.

You can also set the geofence to allow friends of your Snapchat friends to contribute.


By default, custom stories are only visible to the contributors, but you can select which other friends can see them. If you select the geofence option and make your followers or friends of friends contributors, they can see it as well.


youtube.com




from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2qRZ2cl
via IFTTT

The New Surface Pro Is Just A Little Better Than Last Year's

Microsoft

Today, at a special event in Shanghai, Microsoft took the wraps off its new, fifth-generation laptop-tablet hybrid, called just “Surface Pro,” dropping the number in previous models (eg. Surface Pro 4) because, well, they can.

For those with last year’s Surface Pro, there isn’t that much to upgrade to. The new device looks nearly identical to the previous model (save for a few more rounded edges), but now has a better battery life, improved performance, and a new cellular LTE option that lets you browse the web without Wi-Fi. Additionally, the fifth-generation Surface Pen, a stylus for drawing and note-taking on the Surface Pro’s touchscreen that has typically shipped with the device, will now be sold separately (its price has not been announced yet).

The announcement is one of several major Surface brand releases in the past year. Microsoft’s new desktop PC Surface Studio aimed at iMac customers started shipping in early 2017, and the company also announced a Chromebook-competitor called Surface Laptop, which runs a version of Windows that only runs apps from the Windows Store, earlier this month. The Pro line is Microsoft’s most lightweight, affordable device under the touchscreen-friendly Surface brand, and the latest Pro is slightly more productive than its predecessor, but still not as powerful as the more expensive Surface Book or Surface Laptop.

The two most significant improvements are battery life and performance.

Microsoft

The new Surface Pro now has 13.5 hours of battery life, up from 9 hours in the previous version, while the aspect ratio (3:2), screen resolution (2736 × 1824 and 264 ppi), and screen size (12.3 inches diagonally) remain the same. The processors are also being upgraded to seventh generation Intel core processors. You can choose between the lightweight m3 processor, the faster i5 (both of which are now quieter because they are fanless), and the fastest tier, i7 (which has always been fanless but is even quieter in this model).

In addition to those internal upgrades, a 4G LTE version of the new Surface Pro, for web browsing over a cellular data connection without Wi-Fi, will be available later this year.

Drawing, note-taking, and typing have also been improved on the new Surface Pro.

Microsoft

Although it’s now sold separately, the Surface Pen is really one of the defining features of any Surface device. The new stylus has a stronger magnet that snaps to the side of the screen with more force.

It also has more lifelike drawing capabilities. Now, when you tilt it slightly, you can also adjust the thickness of the stroke, and when you tilt it even more, you can shade with it. It’s faster and more accurate than the previous pen. The pen has 4,096 levels of pressure sensitivity (up from 1,024 levels) and is twice as fast. The tablet’s kickstand also now goes down to 15 degrees for more comfortable pen interaction, mimicking Microsoft’s very high-end Surface Studio desktop PC.

The pen is also further integrated into Microsoft Word, Excel, and PowerPoint, which all support the new tilt and shading capabilities. You can customize a toolbar of favorite pen styles (pens, pencils, and highlighters) and colors that is synced across the three Office apps.

Another enhanced input experience in the new Surface is typing. There’s a new keyboard cover, called the Signature Type Cover, that has more bouncy keys, a full-size trackpad (like one you’d see on a dedicated laptop) and backlit keys. The whole device is also designed to be more sturdy on your lap.

The new Surface Pro starts at $799 (remember: without a pen), and every tier is incrementally more expensive.

Microsoft

You can configure the Pro with the processor and memory of your choice (4GB, 8GB, or 16 GB of RAM) or, in other words, how fast your laptop/tablet will be, as well as storage capacity (128GB, 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB).

What you need will depend on how you plan to use it. Generally, if you need a laptop just for Internet access and streaming music and movies, you can get by with the entry-level Core M. But if you need to work with apps like Office or Photoshop a lot – or even if you’re a web surfer who open lots of tabs at once – you’ll want (at the very least) the Core i5 with 8GB of RAM. Microsoft hasn’t updated pricing tier details yet, but we’ll update this post as soon as they do.

The laptop, which ships with Windows 10 Creators Update, and new keyboard cover (in four different colors: silver, burgundy, cobalt blue, and black) can be pre-ordered starting today, and will ship on June 15 in 26 countries, including the US, UK, Australia, China, Germany, France, and Japan. The Surface Pen, which comes in colors matching the keyboard covers) won’t be available for another couple of weeks, however, and the 4G LTE Surface Pro will come later this year.

Should I switch to a tablet laptop hybrid?

Tablet-laptop hybrids are great for their flexibility. Many Windows laptops now have touchscreens and, increasingly, Chromebooks do too. Their screens can be detached for note taking or drawing and then, when it’s business or study time, you can slap on a keyboard cover and run full Windows 10 desktop programs, like Photoshop. The problem is that historically hybrids have been underpowered and hard to use on your lap because of light, flimsy keyboards, compared to a dedicated laptop.

Many may find Apple’s similarly lightweight MacBook, which start at $1,299 for a core m3 processor and 8GB of memory, to be too expensive (though new upgrades are rumored to arrive next month). And affordable Chromebooks, which run Google’s apps (Chrome, Google Docs, etc.) very well and Android apps sort of well, may be be too limited for some people. A device like the Surface Pro is a good alternative.

The new Surface Pro addresses (but doesn’t fix) any of those issues, so if you weren’t a Surface Pro believer before, this might not be the device that convinces you to get one. But for those with older Surface Pros (like the Surface Pro 3), the improvements in the new tablet might be what you’re looking for.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2qcJoXL
via IFTTT

22 Mayıs 2017 Pazartesi

How One Pro-Trump Site Feeds Its Own Conspiracy Theories

The top story on pro-Trump media last week was a conspiracy about a murdered DNC staffer and his alleged connection to Wikileaks.

The top story on pro-Trump media last week was a conspiracy about a murdered DNC staffer and his alleged connection to Wikileaks.

A typical Gateway Pundit headline.

In July, a few days before the Wikileaks release of thousands of DNC emails, Rich, was killed in what police says was an attempted robbery. Far-right conspiracy theorists have claimed Rich was the leaker, and his killing was ordered by the Clintons in retaliation.

Since last Monday, the story has dominated far-right media — even as it's dismissed, debunked, and ignored by the mainstream, and despite a series of bombshells regarding the potential ties between Donald Trump and Russia. To better understand how the pro-Trump media keeps a conspiracy theory alive in the face of overwhelming evidence against it, it's instructive to look at one of its most popular blogs, The Gateway Pundit.

The Gateway Pundit is a pro-Trump site run out of St. Louis, Missouri by long-time blogger Jim Hoft. The site reaches a wide audience — Hoft claimed that during the 2016 campaign, it was pulling down over one million unique views a day. The site has a reporter who regularly attends White House press briefings. Outside of its readership, Gateway Pundit is maybe best known for reporting on and pushing sensationalized claims and rumors that get picked up on bigger sites like the Drudge Report. Some of its greatest hits: that Hillary Clinton was having seizures during the campaign, that Obama's birth certificate was a forgery, and that illegal voting cost Trump the popular vote.

Hoft and Gateway Pundit have been instrumental in championing the Seth Rich/Wikileaks conspiracy. On Hoft's Twitter feed alone, which has over 73,000 followers, Hoft has kept up a steady clip of Seth Rich tweets since a D.C. local Fox station broke the story.

Here's a sampling of Hoft's tweets from May 16th — the day after the Fox 5 Seth Rich story broke:

Hoft and Gateway Pundit are far from the only pro-Trump outlets to push the Rich story, but Gateway Pundit stands out as a prime example of how the pro-Trump media can not only champion a conspiracy but also continue to feed itself and whip up more outrage and intrigue. Here's how it works:

1) Repetition, Repetition, Repetition

In the last week, Gateway Pundit published 15 stories about the Rich murder and Wikileaks conspiracy — some of which are almost exact copies of each other.

For example, here are two Gateway Pundit stories from last Monday and Tuesday.

They have two different headlines:

"BREAKING: Seth Rich Family Detective Tells FOX 5 DC THERE IS EVIDENCE Seth was “Emailing” Wikileaks …UPDATED WITH REPORT"

And:

"IT WASN’T RUSSIA! FOX NEWS REPORTS SETH RICH LEAKED 44,000 DNC EMAILS TO WIKILEAKS – THEN HE WAS MURDERED"

But the body of the two posts are completely identical until the last few paragraphs:

The repetition serves two purposes. First, it makes it so that Hoft and Gateway Pundit can quickly churn out new posts without having to spend the time to re-write new copy. And second, it cements the narrative with its audience. There is maybe only a tweet's worth of new information in the two posts, but each post is framed as a huge new revelation, ensuring that the audience feels the story is constantly moving and developing, despite the fact that little has changed since the now-discredited Fox 5 report. The reader, trying to get to the new information, has to read to the bottom. And in doing so, re-absorbs the Rich narrative again and again.

2) Incendiary Headlines

Gateway Pundit uses headlines to increase the stakes of each story. Often, they describe how the reader is supposed to feel about the story (example: "ABSOLUTELY SICKENING!") or what they should take away from the piece (example: "IT WASN'T RUSSIA!").

They draw the reader in, and undoubtedly play well on social media, but, much like the constant repetition, they also add to the sense that the Rich conspiracy is rapidly moving forward and that the minor updates are actually shocking revelations. Basically: they add false gravity to a story that's largely stagnant.

3) A Closed-Loop Reporting Structure

Here's a story Gateway Pundit ran on Sunday:

Here's a story Gateway Pundit ran on Sunday:

There was no "bombshell": The post was a write-up of an appearance Gingrich made on Fox and Friends on Sunday morning. Though the headline suggests Gingrich put forth proof that the "DNC operative was behind Wikileaks DNC email release," Gingrich did no such thing. He merely acknowledged that the Rich story was "very strange" and repeated rumors pushed by Gateway Pundit.

As with the above examples, the body copy of the Gingrich story was nearly identical to the other Gateway Pundit stories about Rich. In this case, the only difference is the inclusion of the Gingrich video at the end, alongside a short transcription of his interview.

Though the transcript clearly shows there's no bombshell from Gingrich, the information is included so far down in the post that Gingrich's quote is almost beside the point. The incendiary headline, which reinforces the rumor Gateway Pundit has been pushing for a week, cements the narrative and Gingrich's name attaches extra credibility to the conspiracy theory.

To recap: First, Gateway Pundit promotes rumors. Then, a politician repeats those rumors. Finally, Gateway Pundit uses politician's sound bite as proof rumors are true.

4) Flimsy Evidence

Perhaps the best example of Gateway Pundit's manufactured controversy came on Sunday night, when the site reported "'Complete Panic' at Highest Levels of DNC."

The post hinges on an anonymous 4chan thread from an individual claiming to "work in D.C." The post claims that "the Seth Rich case has scared the shit out of certain high ranking current and former Democratic Party officials," and goes on to say the DNC "is near open panic." The post's headline doesn't take into account that the 4chan user in question is completely unverifiable or that 4chan is a notorious breeding ground for trolls and misinformation.

Later that evening, Sean Hannity tweeted about the Rich conspiracy using almost the exact same language as the 4chan post:

While it's hard to know how Hannity came upon the 4chan post, it's possible he stumbled upon this tweet (which Gateway Pundit notes was the first public tweet of the 4chan post):

In other words: Hannity, drawing on information likely gleaned from an anonymous 4chan post, claimed that "complete panic" had set in at the DNC. And Gateway Pundit — with no verification — reported this as fact.

In isolation, each one of these examples may seem extreme. But taken together, they present a formidable misinformation campaign that's highly effective at pushing and cementing a narrative among devoted readers. Gateway Pundit may not have started the Rich conspiracy, but thanks to its constant promotion, it's helping to keep it in the news.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2qPD2OY
via IFTTT