2 Şubat 2017 Perşembe

Elon Musk Will Stay On Trump's Advisory Groups For "The Greater Good"

Elon Musk will remain on two of President Trump's advisory councils because "engaging on critical issues will on balance serve the greater good," he tweeted Thursday, hours after Uber's chief executive Travis Kalanick quit a White House advisory group.

"Advisory councils simply provide advice and attending does not mean that I agree with actions by the Administration," Musk said Thursday on Twitter, one day ahead of the first meeting of an economic advisory group he sits on.

Musk had fielded some criticism over his decision to sit on an economic advisory group and another manufacturing-focused council under Trump's administration. At least a handful of customers canceled their Model 3 orders over Musk's relationship with Trump, BuzzFeed News reported.

The tweet reaffirms Musk's belief that he can "serve the greater good" by sitting on the council. Still, today would have been an easier day for Musk to ditch the advisory groups: Uber CEO Travis Kalanick dropped out of the economic advisory group a few hours earlier after backlash from customers and Uber employees. Kalanick said in a memo to staff announcing his departure from the group that he did not intend for the decision to join the group to serve as an endorsement of Trump or his agenda, but it had been "misinterpreted" as such.

Musk rebutted the idea that joining the group was an endorsement in his tweet, and said he would object to Trump's controversial immigration ban in the meeting.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2kymY3a
via IFTTT

Snapchat Wants Its Workers To Call Each Other Out For Food In Their Teeth

Snapchat CEO Evan Spiegel

Michael Kovac / Getty Images

Letting a coworker know they have food stuck in their teeth might be "a little awkward," but that kind of candor is an important facet of the creative culture at Snapchat, the social app's parent company revealed on Thursday.

The company, Snap, offered this detail as part of a legal prospectus it filed in anticipation of its IPO. The document, geared toward prospective investors, contained financial information and warnings about possible risks, as well as a series of diagrams showing how to navigate Snapchat's sometimes-baffling interface. But some of the most intriguing disclosures pertained to the culture of the famously secretive company.

Like many tech startups, Snap sees itself as more than just a place where workers punch a clock and collect a paycheck. Instead, the company says, working at Snap means adhering to a particular code of values and beliefs.

"Our team is kind, smart, and creative," the IPO prospectus reads. "When we say 'kind,' we mean the type of kindness that compels you to let someone know that they have something stuck in their teeth even though it’s a little awkward."

"We care deeply about kindness because we want to create a space that helps to give our team the courage to create," the company continued. "We think our team feels comfortable creating new things because they are surrounded by the kindness of their peers and know they have our support."

But working at Snap doesn't just mean being vigilant about your colleagues' oral hygiene. Given the sprawling nature of the company's network of offices, the prospectus says, some employees may not even get the chance to interact at all.

While Snap's main offices are in the Venice neighborhood of Los Angeles, workers are spread across "many office buildings that are dispersed throughout the city," according to the company. Among the potential side effects? Sadness, isolation, and quitting.

"This diffuse structure may prevent us from fostering positive employee morale and encouraging social interaction among our employees and different business units," the company says.

"Moreover, because our office buildings are dispersed throughout the area, we may be unable to adequately oversee employees and business functions," the company continues. "If we cannot compensate for these and other issues caused by this geographically dispersed office structure, we may lose employees, which could seriously harm our business."

Outlining risks like this is standard practice for a company preparing to go public. Another risk, the company revealed, stems from its own success.

"We have many current employees whose equity ownership in our company gives them a substantial amount of personal wealth," Snap says in the prospectus, noting that many employees could grow even wealthier after the IPO.

"As a result, it may be difficult for us to continue to retain and motivate these employees, and this wealth could affect their decision about whether they continue to work for us," the company says.

Still, Snap makes an effort to keep employees happy and loyal. It says it has a "Snap-a-Wish" financial support program, which in the past has provided last-minute plane tickets for an employee during a family emergency, and a rental car to an employee whose car was stolen.

In addition, Snap holds a biweekly "Council" program that lets employees "express themselves and listen to others."

"We believe that this type of sharing teaches and reminds our team to listen and learn from those around them," the company says.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2k1JvCe
via IFTTT

10 Big Numbers From Snapchat's IPO Filing

Scott Eisen / Getty Images

Snapchat will soon be traded on the New York Stock Exchange, with its parent company Snap Inc. publishing the paperwork for its initial public offering on Thursday. The company is seeking to raise $3 billion by selling shares to investors. .

The IPO filing revealed all sorts of new information about Snap, giving the public detailed information about the financial health of the company for the first time, among other juicy details. Here are the 10 most essential details from the filing.

1. Snapchat’s daily user growth is flattening

As BuzzFeed News reported Wednesday, Instagram recently overtook Snapchat in the critical time-spent-per-user category. Snap’s filing contains even more concerning details for investors: daily active user growth is flattening, meaning the company may have hit a growth ceiling. “The growth in Daily Active Users was relatively flat in the latter part of the quarter ended September 30, 2016,” the filing said.

The flattening user growth Snap describes coincides with the rise of Instagram Stories, a near-direct clone of Snapchat’s Stories product.

2. Snap lost $514.6 million in 2016

Startups are often comfortable losing money in the pursuit of growth, and Snap is no different. The company generated $404.5 million in revenue in 2016, and reported $924.9 million in expenses. While its 2016 revenue was almost seven times greater than in 2015, Snap warned prospective shareholders that it “may never achieve or maintain profitability.”

3. Spectacles were not a big money maker

Spectacles “has not generated significant revenue for us,” Snap said in the filing. When Spectacles came out, some wondered whether the video-capturing sunglasses were a major new product for Snap or a brilliant marketing device. It seems like it might be the latter.

4. We still don’t know the valuation Snap is seeking

All the details Snap provided will help investors learn more about the company, but the key detail, the amount Snap believes it’s worth, is missing at this point — which isn’t surprising. Snap is expected to release this information in a revised prospectus in the coming weeks. If Snap aims too high, it could end up in a situation similar to Twitter, which has spent its post-IPO existence trying to live up its IPO valuation.

5. Evan Spiegel will own about a quarter of Snap.

The Snap CEO currently has a 22.4% stake, the prospectus shows. After the IPO, he’ll get a special bonus — a “CEO award” — of an additional 3% of the shares.

6. New shareholders will have no say in running the company

Snap’s founders, Spiegel and Robert Murphy, currently control a combined 88.6% of the company’s voting stock, according to the prospectus. The company is selling only one class of stock in its IPO, and these shares will have “no vote on matters submitted to our stockholders.”

“Mr. Spiegel and Mr. Murphy, and potentially either one of them alone, have the ability to control the outcome of all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval,” the IPO document says. This set-up is similar to ones used at Google and Facebook that let the company’s founders control it with little-to-no input from other investors.

7. Snapchat will spend $2 billion on Google services in the next five years

The company has committed to $2 billion of spending on Google's cloud computing services in the next five years, and is very dependent on Google. Snap warned potential investors it has "built our software and computer systems to use computing, storage capabilities, bandwidth, and other services provided by Google, some of which do not have an alternative in the market."

8. Spiegel borrowed $15 million from Snap last year.

The Snap CEO borrowed the $15 million in February 2016, on top of $5 million he had previously borrowed from the company, according to the prospectus. He repaid the loans before the end of the year.

9. Snap paid $890,339 to protect Spiegel last year.

The bill for the CEO’s personal security was bigger than his $503,205 salary, but not as big as his $1 million bonus.

10. Snap has been very friendly to Evan Spiegel’s dad’s law firm.

Snap has paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for legal services from the Los Angeles corporate law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson, where Evan Spiegel’s dad John Spiegel is a partner. While the elder Spiegel hasn’t done any legal work for the company, it has paid almost $650,000 for legal work in the past three years.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2jCWE8G
via IFTTT

Uber CEO Travis Kalanick Is Leaving Trump's Advisory Council

Uber CEO Travis Kalanick

Money Sharma / AFP / Getty Images

Uber CEO Travis Kalanick has dropped out of President Trump’s economic advisory council after backlash from customers that spurred a viral #DeleteUber social media revolt and internal dissent. Uber confirmed to BuzzFeed News that Kalanick has left the group.

News of Kalanick's decision was first reported by The New York Times.

Kalanick's decision to resign from the advisory group before its first meeting this Friday comes after a protest outside the company's San Francisco headquarters the day of Trump's inauguration, and after Uber was forced to automate its account-deletion process following a viral #DeleteUber campaign. At an all-hands meeting with employees on Tuesday in San Francisco, Kalanick said sitting on the council would offer a better chance for Uber to affect change, sources present at the meeting told BuzzFeed News.

The #DeleteUber social media revolt began Saturday night, about a day after Trump's controversial executive order restricting immigration – hours after Uber had already announced it would pay drivers affected the order for three months if they could not work. Since then, many thousands of customers have deleted their accounts. Kalanick, who previously had not spoken to Trump, told employees in a memo that "Earlier today I spoke briefly with the President about the immigration executive order and its issues for our community." Kalanick had previously described his choice to attend the first meeting of the White House advisory group as a means to express dissent against measures like the immigration ban as a voice on the inside.

Protests were scheduled to take place at Uber offices throughout the country — including San Francisco, New York and New Orleans — on Thursday; organizers in Palo Alto said those demonstrations will continue, despite Kalanick’s decision to step down as an advisor to Trump.

Here's the full email Kalanick sent employees announcing his departure from the advisory group:

Dear Team,

Earlier today I spoke briefly with the President about the immigration executive order and its issues for our community. I also let him know that I would not be able to participate on his economic council. Joining the group was not meant to be an endorsement of the President or his agenda but unfortunately it has been misinterpreted to be exactly that.

I spent a lot of time thinking about this and mapping it to our values. There are a couple that are particularly relevant:

Inside Out - The implicit assumption that Uber (or I) was somehow endorsing the Administration’s agenda has created a perception-reality gap between who people think we are, and who we actually are.

Just Change - We must believe that the actions we take ultimately move the ball forward. There are many ways we will continue to advocate for just change on immigration but staying on the council was going to get in the way of that. The executive order is hurting many people in communities all across America. Families are being separated, people are stranded overseas and there’s a growing fear the U.S. is no longer a place that welcomes immigrants.

Immigration and openness to refugees is an important part of our country’s success and quite honestly to Uber’s. I am incredibly proud to work directly with people like Thuan and Emil, both of whom were refugees who came here to build a better life for themselves. I know it has been a tough week for many of you and your families, as well as many thousands of drivers whose stories are heartfelt and heart-wrenching.

Please know, your questions and stories on Tuesday, along with what I heard from drivers, have kept me resilient and reminded me of one of our most essential cultural values, Be Yourself. We will fight for the rights of immigrants in our communities so that each of us can be who we are with optimism and hope for the future.

Travis

This story is developing. Check back for updates.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2jIG9Dz
via IFTTT

Indian IT Minister Says Apple Plans To Make iPhones In Bengaluru

Priyank Kharge, Minister IT & BT || Tourism : Govt of Karnataka / Via Twitter: @PriyankKharge

Apple's plans to pursue iPhone manufacturing operations in India seem to be moving along well. In a statement issued to Bengaluru's local press late on Thursday, the IT minister of the Indian state of Karnataka, Priyank Kharge, said he welcomed "Apple Inc.’s proposal to commence initial manufacturing operations in the state."

He followed the statement with a tweet: "Glad to announce initial manufacturing operations of the world's most valued company: Apple, in Karnataka. Another validation for Karnataka."

Kharge offered no other details on the proposal.

Apple has been in talks with the Indian government about manufacturing locally for months, and had asked India for major incentives, including a 15-year exemption on customs duty among other things.

Twitter: @chandrarsrikant

Apple declined comment on the minister's statement, but instead pointed BuzzFeed News to a statement it issued a few weeks ago: "We've been working hard to develop our operations in India and are proud to deliver the best products and services in the world to our customers here. We appreciate the constructive and open dialogue we’ve had with government about further expanding our local operations.”



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2kuIaYm
via IFTTT

Microsoft Urges Trump To Exempt Students And Workers From The Travel Ban

David Ramos / Getty Images

Microsoft is urging the Trump administration to create an exemption in its controversial travel ban to allow foreign-born students, workers, and people with family emergencies to leave and enter the United States.

In an executive order signed last week, President Donald Trump indefinitely suspended Syrian refugees from entering the US and has blocked people from Iraq, Iran, Sudan, Somalia, Libya, and Yemen from entering the country for 90 days.

In a letter to the head of Homeland Security and the Secretary of State, Microsoft President Brad Smith said the immigration order has impacted people with "pressing needs," noting situations in which parents and children have been separated, individuals stranded, and travel for family medical emergencies blocked. Microsoft has 76 employees and 41 dependents who are impacted by the immigration order. But Smith added, "These situations almost certainly are not unique to our employees and their families."

In the letter, Microsoft proposed an exemption to the travel ban. Individuals with valid travel documents, and who have committed no crimes, would be permitted to enter the US. And employees with work travel or family members with medical emergencies would be allowed to leave and enter the US, within a two-week window of time. Under Microsoft's proposal, travel to one of the seven Muslim majority countries for family-related emergencies would require approval on a case-by-case basis.

"We believe such an exception under the existing framework of the Executive Order
would help address compelling personal needs without compromising the Executive
Order’s security-related objectives," wrote Smith.

To bolster Microsoft's case, Smith notes that the president's executive order explicitly grants Homeland Security and the State Department discretion to grant such exemptions.

"We therefore believe that the process we are proposing here is not only consistent with the Executive Order, but was contemplated by it."

Based in Washington state, Microsoft has also lent its support to a lawsuit there challenging the president's immigration order. Washington-based businesses Amazon and Expedia filed sworn statements in support of the suit, which was led by Attorney General Bob Ferguson. Earlier this week, a spokesperson for the company told BuzzFeed News, "Microsoft has been supportive and has provided information to the Attorney General and is willing to provide further testimony if necessary.”



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2kYvKFD
via IFTTT

How Many Startups Does It Take To Change A Lightbulb?

Two years ago, as it prepared to build a new office on Manhattan’s West Side, the ad firm R/GA surveyed its 1,000-odd employees to ask what improvements they wanted made to their workplace. Number one was sit-stand desks. Easy enough. Number two was natural light: Some of R/GA’s New York employees had very little exposure to the sun.

That was trickier. Though 5 West Street, a hulking brutalist ziggurat nicknamed the “Tyrell Building” for its unfortunate resemblance to the headquarters of the evil corporation in Blade Runner, was about to undergo an architectural facelift that would transform its facade from an opaque beige scowl into a clear glass grin, there was nothing to be done about the building’s floor plates, which were larger than football fields. The office was simply too big for everyone to sit near a window.

“It was a gutted, filthy, old warehouse,” said Julia Goldberg, R/GA’s senior vice president of global office services. “The lighting was terrible.”

Goldberg had to figure out how to brighten up the place. She considered a commercial lighting system built by Philips, but it had no back end — no software to control the whole thing. For a 220,000-square-foot office, that was pretty important, if for no other reason than the time it would take to wander around turning on and off all the lights. Then, last June, Goldberg discovered Ketra, an LED lighting startup from Austin that promised some pretty big things.

The first was what Ketra calls “natural light”: white light sources that imperceptibly change their color and intensity throughout the day to mimic the lighting conditions outside. The second was an extreme degree of control. Ketra lights could be wirelessly grouped into zones of any number of lights that could all be separately adjusted via custom software on a wall panel, computer, or phone. The third was precision. Each Ketra bulb contained a patented sensor that measured its own color 360 times a minute to make sure the light being produced was the light being requested. Ketra was selling precisely measured, nature-approximating light, accessible throughout the massive office at the press of a button.

They sold the idea of light, not lighting.

It was exactly what Goldberg — who was under a mandate to design an office that embodied R/GA’s recent rebrand as “an agency for the connected age” — wanted to hear. And it helped that the two Ketra employees who showed up to pitch her didn’t simply treat lighting as a utility or a mundane problem to be solved. Nav Sooch, the CEO, was a design-focused, Stanford-trained engineer who had already hit it big with a semiconductor company; Michael Heinemeier, the sales director, had previously worked on a light installation with the artist James Turrell, a MacArthur "genius." These were creative technologists preaching high-quality light as a convenient, aesthetically pleasing, and healthy lifestyle choice. They sold the idea of light, not lighting. Goldberg was in.

Throughout the relatively short history of electric light, most improvements have been aimed at making light bulbs last longer or use less energy. Ketra is selling something different than dull efficiency: light as an object of beauty, light as a perk. For millennia, we made do with candles, torches, oil lamps, and the dim flickering of all manner of flames. Sure, the chandeliers at Versailles were nice, but the flames themselves were no different than what you’d light in the most modest hovel. Now technology has advanced to the point where illumination itself is a luxury good. What Ketra is selling is the idea that it can make your life better by giving you more control over how it is lit, in really minute detail — that electric light has contributed to making us unhealthier, and that electric light will make us healthy again.

R/GA's office, complete with Ketra lighting, after the renovation.

Courtesy of R/GA

Eighteen months and more than a million dollars of Ketra products later, the R/GA headquarters is a sight to behold, as cavernous as a hangar and as white and austere as a nun’s wimple. The space has accessorized terrifically with the humans inside it. On a recent afternoon, top-knotted men ordered lattes from an on-site Brooklyn Roasting Company. Women in black beanies, black sweaters, and black Nikes glided under dozens of massive projection screens displaying the agency’s work. And lining the ceilings, 2,000 white fixtures held 8,837 white Ketra lamps, casting cool, crisp white light worthy of an Apple ad on all the industry below.

5 West Street is the biggest project the seven-year-old Ketra has ever finished, but it won’t be for long. It’s currently working on a new 300,000-square-foot headquarters for Stripe, the $5 billion payments startup. And Stripe marks the latest in a run of successes for Ketra, which has seemingly come out of nowhere in the past two years to light the spaces of some of the world’s biggest startups, trendiest businesses, and most august cultural institutions: Apple, Facebook (where it lights the Facebook Live studio in New York), Google, Vice, Eataly, the upscale salad chain Sweetgreen, the Art Institute of Chicago. (And, oh! BuzzFeed.) Meanwhile, R/GA, which runs its own consulting business, has started recommending the lights to its corporate clients. Recent converts include what Julia Goldberg would only refer to as “a well-known apparel company” (R/GA famously counts Nike as a client), as well as a “large hotelier” and Sheikh Mohammed of Dubai.

Ketra has positioned itself to illuminate our affluent, healthy, wired, and well-cultured future in part by being as chameleonic as its LEDs, which, in addition to emulating the sun, can turn millions of colors. To architectural lighting designers, the finicky aficionados of the lighting world, they comprise a creative tool kit par excellence. To facilities bosses with blank slates and enormous budgets, like Julia Goldberg, they are highly customizable, networkable, energy-saving conveniences. And to a crop of health-focused businesses — and tech companies eager to tout how lavishly they take care of their employees — they are wellness orbs, radiating futuristic vim.

But who really needs them? Being all things to all people doesn’t come cheap. A single Ketra bulb costs about $100. (That’s a lot for an LED: The Sweethome’s recommended bulb sells at $20 for four.) It’s even more considering the context of a gadget world that produces inexpensive and reasonably good knockoffs faster than ever, not to mention an LED industry with a built-in existential crisis — the bulbs last so long that selling their replacements isn’t necessarily good business. Nav Sooch is fond of saying that his company has invented a new category of product. And there’s no question Ketra has built a bleeding-edge light source and a sophisticated way to control it. But before you can sell millions of dollars of high-tech lighting to some of the world’s biggest companies, you have to convince them that there is a very big problem with their light.

The kitchen at Vice's headquarters in Brooklyn.

Courtesy of Ketra

It is the sad fate of artificial lighting to be a historical invention that most people only notice when it isn’t working. Ever since the advent and spread of modern incandescent lighting in the first half of the 20th century — a wonder enabling untold advances in every field of contemporary human endeavor — people basically think of their lightbulbs only when they burn out, or when it’s too dim to read, or too bright to take off their clothes.

“Everyone thinks light just happens,” said Sean O’Connor, a Los Angeles architectural lighting designer. “People just expect there to be light everywhere they go.”

“Everyone thinks light just happens,” said Sean O’Connor, a Los Angeles architectural lighting designer. “People just expect there to be light everywhere they go.”

If public awareness of lighting has nudged up a smidge over the past 10 years, it’s because of 2007 federal regulations requiring more efficient bulbs. So consumers made the change from traditional incandescents, which had been the standard for more than a century — and it was a pain. At first we switched to more efficient incandescents and compact fluorescent lamps, the ones that look like little curled pigtails. But CFLs can be hard to dim, contain mercury, and give off harsh, antiseptic light. People hated them. And now they’re dying: Earlier this year, GE announced that it would stop manufacturing and selling CFLs in the US.

That left LEDs, which produce white light either by mixing red, green, and blue or by slathering a yellow phosphor over a blue LED. Once prohibitively expensive and of highly varying quality, LEDs in recent years have plunged in cost and generally give off light that’s not all that far off, quality-wise, from daylight or incandescent light. They’re the present and the future of lighting, a $15 billion industry in 2014 that is on pace to exceed $21 billion by 2019.

But the LED industry faces its own day of reckoning. As J.B. MacKinnon has written, LEDs last so long that they undermine the traditional “planned obsolescence” business model of incandescents. How can companies maintain their profit margins when people only need to buy their $5 products every 15 years? Three of the huge players in the industry — GE, Philips, and Osram — have responded by spinning off part or all of their lighting businesses in the face of likely declining revenue. If people only care about light when their bulbs burn out, and if their bulbs almost never burn out, won’t people just stop thinking about light?

Maybe, unless companies like Ketra can define new ways that our lights aren’t working.

The inner workings of a Ketra lightbulb.

Julia Robinson for BuzzFeed News

One afternoon in 2009 — long before affordable and high-quality LEDs could be bought at Home Depot — David Knapp accompanied his wife to a lighting store in Austin. The couple were building a new house, and he was more or less tagging along in case she picked out something he really hated. As Knapp wandered to the back of the showroom, he saw some lights that he thought looked odd and familiar, like light-emitting diodes.

Knapp knew LEDs. He had sold his first company, which pioneered the use of LED fiber optics to network multimedia devices in cars, in 2005. Now in his late forties and with time on his hands, he was intrigued.

“Yeah, they suck,” the salesperson told him. “We don’t recommend them.”

The clerk went on to explain that LEDs were bad at rendering colors and were marred by a whole range of issues related to color control (they were too bright and harsh), dimming (they didn’t, or did erratically), and aging (they changed color over time).

“I’d like to buy one of every one of those that you have,” Knapp responded.

That night, Knapp went home with a bundle of LED lights, where he “tore them apart, and started investigating why they were not the ideal solution. How do you address that? That’s what we spent the next six to eight years doing.” Knapp recruited Horace Ho, with whom he had built his first company, and together they invested more than $5 million of their own money into solving the problem.

Their solution was, basically, a self-conscious LED — one that never stops analyzing the light that it produces. At the heart of Ketra’s tech is an LED chip capable of temperature-optical feedback, which senses heat and color output in real time and adjusts itself according to that data. Knapp’s early prototypes were on 12-inch printed circuit boards as big as laptops, but the results were encouraging enough to attract investors, including Nav Sooch, who had known Knapp and Ho since their days as young engineers. Sooch had made millions in the ’90s and early 2000s founding Silicon Labs, an Austin-based semiconductor company.

Nav Sooch, CEO of Ketra, at the company's showroom in New York City on Jan. 3, 2017.

Bryan Derballa for BuzzFeed News

In 2012, Sooch traveled with Knapp to Korea and China to meet with major lighting manufacturers to try to sell them the Ketra chip. “They asked us questions about how they would turn that into a system,” Sooch said. It was, he thought, as if Elon Musk had taken the Tesla battery to Honda and they'd asked him how to make a car out of it. Philosophically, the big lighting companies didn’t get it, and practically, they weren’t set up to make processors; why waste time waiting?

“If we’re going to sell a chip to these big lighting folks, what do we make, a dollar or two per chip?” Knapp said. “We came back and were like, 'These guys don’t know what they’re doing, and we have to build the whole thing.'”

Workers review panels of lights as they are tested at the Ketra manufacturing facility in Austin.

Julia Robinson for BuzzFeed News

As Ketra expanded (it now employees 85 people) and began to design actual light sources, it solicited the interest of professional light obsessives, people who draw up elaborate specifications to ensure spaces are lit just so. In early 2013, Tom Hamilton, Ketra’s head of marketing, showed an early mockup — a big white translucent globe with the Ketra chip inside — to Sean O’Connor, the architectural lighting designer who does high-end retail, hospitality (think the St. Regis Aspen and the Beverly Hills Hotel), and residential projects. The advent of LEDs, inconsistent and unreliable, had made his job much more complicated and stressful.

“When we do an LED project, before we can write the specifications, we have to see samples from everybody to see if it does what it says it does. Historically, it doesn’t,” O’Connor said. “Everything is fiction until you try it.” It was as if an architect couldn’t be sure that a steel beam was the length they had ordered until they saw it in person.

Ketra, even with its goofy globe, promised what O’Connor regarded as “the holy grail” for LED architectural lighting: flexibility and standards. That is, an LED that dimmed like an incandescent, could shift between different kinds of white light while maintaining a high rendering quality, and did it every time, right out of the box. No other LED product on the market that did dynamic white — such as the popular Philips Hue, which O’Connor dismissed as “a consumer toy” — had the special chip inside ensuring consistent color temperature.

Michelle Rial / BuzzFeed News

“It's very easy to use an LED just to sense 'is there light there or no?' but to sense the color and the intensity to get that level of information — I don’t know of anybody else who could do it,” said Maury Wright, the editor-in-chief of LEDs Magazine. “Hue says, 'What’s the difference if it’s a little more or a little less red?' For professional products, you want light matching exactly in terms of spectral energy.”

Winning over skeptics got Ketra in the door with an entire universe of places that depend on rigorously exact light: upscale restaurants, stores, and galleries. In early 2015, another architectural lighting designer suggested Ketra to David Thurm, the Art Institute of Chicago’s chief operating officer. Thurm had been trying to find LEDs to light his masterworks for years, but every time he gathered the curators together to run a test, they left unsatisfied.

“We would get funny results,” Thurm said. “We easily went through 10 LED manufacturers.” And even if the light rendered a painting well, it might be untunable and change the color of the wall. Thurm said he had heard of other major art museums repainting their walls to deal with the problem.

The Art Institute has the world’s largest collection of Monet’s paintings of haystacks, the impressionist’s famous studies of light and time. Thurm set up a viewing of the paintings lit by Ketra, with the museum’s director, curators, and conservation staff. They were astonished.

“We could tune it to a place where the paintings looked beautiful,” Thurm said. “We’re very fussy about this stuff. And everything we were getting from incandescent, we were now getting from LED.”

Ketra's showroom in New York City.

Courtesy of Ketra



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2l10MvB
via IFTTT