31 Mart 2016 Perşembe

Tesla Unveils The Model 3, Its First Mass-Market Electric Car

The Model 3 costs $35,000, has an all-glass roof and reaches 60 mph in six seconds. It ships in late 2017.

Tesla

Tesla founder and CEO Elon Musk debuted the $35,000 car amid much fanfare, describing the latest vehicle venture as something paid for by Tesla's luxury cars, the Models S and X.

Elon Musk in Paris on Dec. 2, 2015.

Eric Piermont / AFP / Getty Images

The Model 3 will go from 0 mph to 60 mph in less than six seconds, will have autopilot hardware, and will seat five people comfortably. It will also come with supercharging standard.

"It gives you freedom of travel," Musk said.

The Model 3, which comes in black, silver and red, also has an all-glass roof.


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1UwtUdh
via IFTTT

Top Conservative Writer Is A Group Effort, Sources Say

Sources claim interns produce much of Breitbart.com tech editor Milo Yiannopoulos’s work. Yiannopoulos says his practices are “completely standard.”

A leading voice of the new "alt-right," Breitbart.com tech editor Milo Yiannopoulos, does not write many of the articles that appear under his byline on the conservative news site, two sources who have worked directly with him told BuzzFeed News.

These sources — a former intern and someone who has worked with Yiannopoulos for years both in and outside of the Breitbart News Network — as well as a video taken from a private chat offer a glimpse behind the curtain of one of a new movement's leading provocateurs. The sources also suggest that much of the commentator's work is written by a bevy of mostly unpaid personal interns.

Yiannopoulos confirmed in an interview with BuzzFeed News that he has "about 44" interns — "a mix of paid and unpaid" — writing and conducting research for him. But he denied that other people write stories for him start to finish.

"Two people write Breitbart stuff for me," he told BuzzFeed News, but "ghostwriting is too great a word." He said that the majority of his interns are researchers and that some write speeches for him. "I have two books coming out this year," he said. "It's completely standard for someone with a career like mine to have researchers and assistants and ghostwriters."

Yet the sources who came forward to BuzzFeed News tell a different story. "Milo Yiannopoulos is not one person," said the Breitbart employee. "That person does not exist. It is a collective consciousness of various different people who come and go."

The former intern said Yiannopoulos delegated frequently. "I wrote articles for him," he told BuzzFeed News. "His articles on Breitbart. He writes some of them, but most no. He has other people writing his shit."

Yiannopoulos directs these personal interns — who are not associated with Breitbart — through a private group on the chat service Slack. BuzzFeed News obtained a minute-and-a-half-long video that appears to depict activity in the group, which is called PROJECT MILO.

In the clip, the user "milo" warns the group not to use racial epithets because of the way it would look if the group chat became public: "Can't believe I have to say this but no n-words in shitposting or anywhere else, thank you. Please THINK about how this could appear if leaked to the wrong person."

#shitposting is another channel in the PROJECT MILO Slack.

Immediately after the warning from "milo," a user named "marc" adds "that also includes anyone saying 'sieg heil' to me in shitposting, you know who you are."

According to the former worker, "marc" is Marc Geppert, who is listed as Yiannopoulos's executive assistant on his personal website. (Geppert did not immediately respond to a request for comment from BuzzFeed News.)

Yiannopoulos told BuzzFeed news that all uses of the n-word in PROJECT MILO were ironic. "A lot of these guys are young 4chan guys," he said, referring to his interns. "They use it in the sense that message boards use it ... It was the n-word with an -a, not with an -er — they were quoting hip-hop lyrics."

"I know they don't mean it in a racist way," he continued. "It wasn't like I had to police racism out of my Slack."

Elsewhere in the video clip, "milo" writes, "does anyone need anything else from Daddy tonight?"; instructs the group to tweet a link to a Breitbart story about Twitter censorship of conservatives from their accounts; and tells workers to tune in to an appearance on Fox News. He also asks several workers to write a speech about feminism: "include (1) feminism attention seeking for ugly people (2) wage gap (3) campus rape culture... a load of mean jokes."

Yiannopoulos insisted that this kind of delegation was normal for public figures, adding that "I take a much more hands-on approach than most people." Indeed, Yiannopoulos has tweeted about the headaches of having the amount of assistance he enjoys:


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1opz9NM
via IFTTT

Experts Question The FBI’s Thinking In Keeping iPhone Hack A Secret

Dado Ruvic / Reuters

Nearly four months after the FBI confiscated a locked iPhone used by the man behind the San Bernardino terrorist attack, investigators have found a way to access the data inside of it.

The Justice Department has refused repeatedly to share details of how it got in, so the method they used remains a mystery, along with the identity of the outside party who showed the FBI how to penetrate the device. But even as the Justice Department has decided to keep these things a secret, at least for now, the White House has recognized that disclosing such vulnerabilities can serve the public interest. Under the government’s own review process, the FBI may be obligated to share the details of the method with Apple.

Michael Daniel, a special assistant to the president and cybersecurity coordinator, laid out the benefits and drawbacks of disclosing vulnerabilities in a 2014 White House blog post. “Too little transparency and citizens can lose faith in their government and institutions,” he wrote, “while exposing too much can make it impossible to collect the intelligence we need to protect the nation.”

Daniel said the government “established a disciplined, rigorous, and high-level decision-making process for vulnerability disclosure.” Among the questions Daniel would ask an agency who wishes to keep a vulnerability secret:

“Does the vulnerability, if left unpatched, impose significant risk?”

“How badly do we need the intelligence we think we can get from exploiting the vulnerability?”

“How likely is it that someone else will discover the vulnerability?”

Daniel’s post gave the public a glimpse into the government’s internal review process for disclosure, a process that privacy experts say lacks transparency and public accountability.

Known as an equities review, the process was designed to balance the competing interests of government agencies after a new vulnerability has been discovered. In some cases, withholding a vulnerability allows the government to conduct counterintelligence or prevent criminal activity, Daniel wrote. But keeping exploits a secret can also leave the American public at risk, with consumer products and computer networks vulnerable to intruders or manipulation.

“This administration takes seriously its commitment to an open and interoperable, secure, and reliable Internet,” Daniel wrote, “and in the majority of cases, responsibly disclosing a newly discovered vulnerability is clearly in the national interest.”

In a call with reporters Monday, a law enforcement official declined to comment on the risk that the San Bernardino method may pose to other iPhone owners. He also declined to say if the vulnerability would be subject to the equities review process. But experts outside the government agree that it should, and that the iPhone security breach ought to trigger disclosure, so that the millions of American iPhone owners won’t be exposed to the same vulnerability.

“By keeping this a secret, the FBI is essentially gambling that no one else will independently discover it,” Christopher Soghoian, the principal technologist at the ACLU, told BuzzFeed news. “It’s unlikely that they will remain the only entity that knows about this flaw forever.”

Soghoian also expressed concern about the equities review process itself. The interagency review group, overseen by the president’s National Security Council, he said, is stacked with people who are inclined to keep vulnerabilities secret, in order to use exploits to conduct surveillance, hacking, counterintelligence, and law enforcement. “You have a bunch of foxes deciding how the hen house should be built,” he said.

“There’s not a lot we know about that equities process,” Alan Butler, the senior counsel of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, told BuzzFeed News. The 2014 White House blog post is one of the few public documents about the review process. Another, from January of this year, was made public by the government only after the Electronic Frontier Foundation pursued a public records lawsuit compelling its release.

EPIC’s Butler believes the government is obligated to disclose the San Bernardino iPhone method, especially considering the abundance of data that iPhones contain, in addition to personal information. “In many situations, these phones are used as keys and authenticators for other sensitive material, including critical infrastructure,” Butler said.

Riana Pfefferkorn, the cryptography fellow at Stanford’s Center for Internet and Society, told BuzzFeed News that responsible disclosures can enable companies like Apple to “to alert their users, come up with a fix, and push it out to their users through software updates.” But from the Justice Department’s perspective, a successful security patch can also represent the loss of a law enforcement tool. “The key thing is that Apple can't fix what they don't know about, so the DOJ wouldn't lose this method if they keep it secret,” Pfefferkorn said

But Pfefferkorn believes the tradeoff works in favor of disclosure. Keeping the method secret would mean leaving everyone’s devices less secure, she said, “so that law enforcement potentially can get access in some instances to some mobile devices used by the tiny percentage of the population who are criminals.”

The law enforcement official on the press call declined to say whether the Justice Department would share details of the secret method with Apple, or whether the method would be used on additional iPhones in different investigations.

In an active New York drug case, for instance, a federal judge rejected the government’s application for a court order that would force Apple to extract information from a confiscated iPhone; the Justice Department has appealed. Court documents from the New York case also revealed that 12 additional cases are pending throughout the U.S., all of which feature the government requesting that Apple pull information from encrypted devices.

Because little is known about the method outside the government, it’s difficult for outside experts to gauge the risk that it may pose to the public, Jay Kaplan, a former NSA analyst and CEO of Synack, a cybersecurity firm, told BuzzFeed News. “There might not be anything for Apple to fix,” he said.

“There's a lot between the conclusion that this particular phone could be accessed by a particular contractor and everyone's phone being vulnerable,” said Joseph DeMarco, a former federal prosecutor who also represented law enforcement groups in support of the Justice Department in the San Bernardino case. “I think there's a lot of assumptions and steps in between that.”

It’s also not clear whether a nondisclosure agreement between the FBI and the unidentified third party would trump the government's obligation to disclose the vulnerability.

Ordinarily, DeMarco told BuzzFeed News, the contract between the government and the third party would govern whether the method could be shared with other parties, including additional law enforcement agencies and Apple.

Following the Snowden revelations, the Obama administration convened a special review group to assess the government’s intelligence agencies. In addition to the review group recommending that the government “not in any way subvert, undermine, weaken, or make vulnerable generally available commercial encryption,” the group also advised the government to generally disclose vulnerabilities.

“In almost all instances, for widely used code, it is in the national interest to eliminate software vulnerabilities rather than to use them for US intelligence collection,” states the 2013 review group report. And that principle holds true in the 2014 White House blog post: “Disclosing vulnerabilities usually makes sense.”

Andrew Crocker, a staff attorney for the EFF, told BuzzFeed News that the requirements to trigger the review process — a newly discovered vulnerability that is not publically known — are clearly present in the San Bernardino case.

What’s unclear, he said, is whether the government will actually follow through with the process, or weigh the public interest case for disclosure fairly. “You can imagine all kinds of workarounds. And we’ve found that the government plays all kinds of word games related to the intelligence context,” he said.

“It’s just a policy adopted by the government; there’s not a lot of transparency or rules around this.”

In the same way that the Apple vs. FBI dispute has made concrete what was once a more abstract disagreement over encryption, Crocker believes this case has also drawn attention to how the government cloaks what ought to be in public view.

“Everyone who is innocent and is walking around with a phone is at the same risk as a target of surveillance or hacking or whatever the government might want to engage in.”



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1ZOt239
via IFTTT

Startup Workers Say No To Free Food, Hell Yeah To Intermittent Fasting

Illustration by BuzzFeed News / SuperStock / Alamy

Every Wednesday at 8 a.m., members of a group called WeFa.st gather at a casual order-at-the-counter kind of San Francisco cafe for what they call a biohacker breakfast. The restaurant varies, but the meal is always awash with the relief of finally being able to eat.

WeFa.st is an online community made up mostly of tech workers, all of whom share a fascination with intermittent fasting, which dictates a strict schedule for fasting and eating in exchange for a host of health benefits. These mostly young, mostly male, hype men for biohacking have built an ethos around the diet, which promises peak productivity and readiness for a future where technology is king and the smartest man wins. If tech is becoming a lifestyle brand, then intermittent fasting is its Master Cleanse, and these are its Gwyneths. Each regimen has its own name, like the Warrior Diet, wherein the faster abstains for 20 hours and eats one big meal at night, or the Monk Fast, which entails fasting continuously for 36 hours. For the X Games of caloric consumption, there is the Himalayan Fast, where you fast continuously for 60 hours. “This is difficult to sustain,” the website warns.

Fasters at a breakfast at Elmira Rosticceria on March 30.

Nitasha Tiku

The WeFa.st breakfast club’s members are on different regimens, but aim to end their fast in time for the group meal. Among intermittent fasters, the block of hours where you’re allowed to eat is called “a feeding window.” The term is better suited to farm animals or lab rats, but the vibe they’re going for is less mammal and more machine.

One of the biohackers at breakfast last week was Clinton Mielke, a data scientist working with MRI results from Alzheimer's patients at UCSF. Mielke also runs a startup called Infinome dedicated to increasing life expectancy. He predicts that the tech industry will shift away from software and toward personalized medicine, pointing to Google’s investments in life sciences startups like Calico and Verily, as well as its hiring of futurist Ray Kurzweil. According to Mielke, both he and the Google co-founders have had an epiphany: “The computer revolution was really exciting, but ultimately it’s the human source code that matters and that’s the human genome, the code that powers all of us.”

It’s a dizzying existential leap from skipping dinner to cheating death, but it also explains why some of the newer acolytes to a practice that dates back to ayurvedic medicine are approaching intermittent fasting with such zeal. Scientific research, mostly in mice, has shown that intermittent fasting can boost metabolism and fight diabetes and obesity; adherents are fond of mentioning studies about enhancing longevity.

It's also, according to Paul Benigeri, an engineer for the nootropics company Nootrobox, supposed to be a contrast to the status quo. “We're always splurging,” said Benigeri. “We eat a lot, we play a lot of games, we download a lot of apps.” Fasting offers a more austere alternative, he said. “You kind of feel like a monk.” (The Warrior Diet has been around for a couple years, but Benigeri said that he and his co-workers came up with “Himalayan” because it invoked a “super extreme” way of life.)

Indeed, perhaps there’s a reason that all three dietary archetypes seem to hark back to a time before standing desks, and why fasters tend to invoke evolutionary biology when explaining their choices. For years, a certain stratum of the tech industry has enjoyed unlimited access to venture-backed abundance. But if Salesforce managers are taking Benedictine vows and even Google is tidying its estate, we may be approaching an ascetic bent in the economic cycle.

Aside from the meetups, WeFa.st is basically just a group chat on Slack, the popular software for organizing teams and offices. Nootrobox, which sells mind-enhancing supplements, set it up after the company’s six-person, all-male staff challenged themselves to try it. WeFa.st isn’t the first online hangout for fasting obsessives, but it represents a new spin on the concept. You’re more likely to find hardcore disciples on bodybuilding sites like Leangains, but there, commenters are seeking “a shredded eight-pack,” explained Justin Schafer, a regular breakfast club member and former marketing analyst for Solar City, Elon Musk’s energy startup. The WeFa.st guys, said Schafer, are obsessed with “an optimally functioning human brain.”

Illustration by BuzzFeed News

Last week's breakfast was held at the Yerba Buena location of The Grove, a popular chain of homey cafes in San Francisco. The space earnestly adheres to the woodsy theme with actual floor-to-ceiling tree trunks amid the dining tables. At 8 a.m., the line to order already stretched from the counter to the door.

Because everyone is quasi-starving, biohacker etiquette permits digging in as soon as one’s food arrives. While some of us waited, Schafer passed around a box of Tulsi tea made with “holy basil” from India that supposedly makes the drinker impervious to stress, as well as a pop-top plastic bottle of L-theanine, a beginner-level nootropic that’s said to kill the jittery side effect of coffee.

I put the tea in my pocket and swallowed the pill with my coffee. If I had work to do after breakfast, Schafer assured me that I would now be good to go. All I had to do is put in some earbuds, go to Brain.fm (a site that uses artificial intelligence to recommend songs) and listen to some binaural beats, where different tones are played in each ear in order to enhance concentration. Geoff Woo, the Nootrobox CEO, nudged me. With a “belly full of food” I’d be ready for action, he said. (One big selling point for intermittent fasting is avoiding the food coma that plagues carb enthusiasts like myself.) Schafer, who was sitting across from me, made a tick-tock gesture with his index fingers to mimic the beats switching from ear to ear.

They grinned like they were going to induct me into a bungee-jumping club or hand me a micro-dose of LSD, not send me back to my office to sit on a chair and look at a screen. Once I returned to my desk, however, the combo did seem to do the trick. Schafer is a good salesman. A few days later I found myself in line at Whole Foods with two boxes of Tulsi tea and a strong suspicion that with a few tweaks, I might be able to master my own destiny.

During the three breakfasts I dropped in on, people were friendly and encouraging — intermittently cognizant of how they sound to the wider world, but also relishing in the subversiveness. (“I’m not a psychopath,” Schafer replied when I asked him if The Warrior Diet meant always saying no to after-work drinks or dinner with friends.) There’s a lot of talk about 23:1s or 16:8s, shorthand for the ratio of fasting hours to feeding hours. I watched a few try to out-reference each other with research papers like they were baseball stats. One biohacker, who identified himself only as Carl, told me that he’d “been reading shitloads of research” and described a week of plowing through 40 research papers on fasting — while simultaneously fasting. Carl said he got into discussions with academics about cell replication and cancer. “I not-so-gracefully shut them down,” he bragged. When I asked whether he was a programmer or a researcher, Carl didn’t specify, but he did volunteer that he was probably better read on the subject “than most people that are raised in academics.”

Illustration by BuzzFeed News

I decided to try a short fast after the first biohacker breakfast.

Practitioners recommend no more than 500 calories a day on fasting days. I didn’t intend to eat 94% of these allotted calories before 9 a.m., but it just sort of happened. I ate lentil soup (300 calories) and that made me want a slice of bread (140 calories) — and what kind of monster eats dry bread (70 calories of olive oil). By 3 p.m. on Tuesday I was scrolling through The Grove’s menu looking for the fattiest thing I could order. By 6 p.m. I was eating a soft-boiled egg (70 calories) to make it through the night. When I woke up the next morning, though, I felt excellent and ordered something (semi) healthy instead.

It supposedly gets easier. Benigeri told me that while abstaining, he and Gavin Banks, Nootrobox’s business development guy, have fantasized about In-N-Out and sent each other pictures of steak. But he also told me that talking about being hungry in the Slack group is rare because it implies weakness. The gnashing of teeth, he said, tends to happen one on one.

Banks was on the Himalayan Fast, so he wasn’t eating the morning of my second breakfast. Intermittent fasting, he said, helps him work better and faster. “I feel crispier and sharper throughout the day.” Crispier? “Crispier,” he said with a nod, making a gesture as if nerve endings were firing.

According to him, that’s the “motivating factor” that distinguishes fasting from diets. “The goal is to live forever, right?” Benigeri said to Banks, rapping his knuckle on the wooden table.

But it’s also apparently about the challenge. At the breakfast, the group joked about selling fasting kits containing air and water. Banks, who started fasting to lose his love handles, suggested “a mirror to look at yourself and not quit.”

“It’s another little mental victory over being lazy,” said Banks. (Not to mention one over temptation from the tech company cafeteria: “I'd get bored, have a snack,” Benigeri said. “I'd get angry, have a snack.”)

“Physical performance isn't necessarily representative of your salary,” Banks continued. Rather, salaries are “measured by how much you are output-ing at work.” (The number of nouns that these biohackers verb-ized during the course of one meal was arresting.) Fasting improves mental clarity so that he can do more work and generate more revenue. So instead of competing on a physical plane, “I am competing with the rest of the world.”

Schafer, who is 28 years old, said he quit his job recently to help out the family business and start up something of his own. In the meantime he’s driving a Lyft. I spoke to him just after he had dropped off a passenger. “People treat you differently when you’re in the service sector. It’s a little bit like a second-class citizen — and that’s totally fine. My identity is not tied to my current means of generating income. It’s more of a social experiment.”

I asked him if he’s concerned that the world will soon be divided into two categories: Uber drivers and Uber passengers. He said a dividing line was forming, but it would be between “the people who can wield technology and those who are the servants of technology. People who can master technology will be creating the systems,” like Uber, “and the others will be on the receiving end of it, I guess,” he said, referring to Uber’s plans to turn turn to driverless cars.

In Schafer’s mind, his lifestyle choices and the arc of technological development are aligned: “There are only going to be more distractions, more stimulations, and more opportunities to not focus on what matters.” So it will be increasingly important “to know how to focus and know how to prioritize in order to adapt to the present and the future.” He sounded like the mirror-image of a doomsday prepper: The apocalypse as told from the perspective of someone who expects to thrive in this harsh new reality.

Illustration by BuzzFeed News

There were two to five women at the three breakfasts I went to, better than the low bar set by your average tech conference, considering the size of the group. At the first meal, I met Mielke’s girlfriend, Jun Axup, who is also a startup founder and Ph.D. researcher. She’s been fasting for the past 12 years, but in a more organic manner. Axup doesn’t care for breakfast foods, so she fasts from 7 p.m. or 8 p.m. until noon the next day. It wasn’t until Mielke introduced her to intermittent fasting that she realized there was a name for it.

She described the gender imbalance in intermittent fasting as unfortunate, but expected — the same skewed ratio she’s had to face at work and school. (The research on how intermittent fasting effects women is not definitive. Some female fasters claim that it causes anxiety and irregular periods. A female founder at the breakfast club reported bloodshot eyes.) But Axup pointed out that it doesn’t reflect a lack of interest. “The fasting thing might be more male-dominated right now,” she said, but just look at all the YouTube videos about anti-ageing face creams or other makeup tutorials. “This whole search for a fountain of youth? Women have been doing this for a long time, too.”

Danielle Morrill is the CEO of Mattermark, a startup that collects and crunches data on private companies, which just raised more than $7 million in funding. Morrill began fasting inadvertently a couple months ago when she started getting up 5 a.m. and found the prospect of a sunrise meal unappealing. An investor in Bulletproof Coffee clued her in to the surrounding fervor. (Bulletproof’s founder, Dave Asprey, is partly responsible for the intermittent fasting fad.) Morrill hesitates to tweet or talk much about her diet, to avoid scrutiny and unnecessary competition. “I just want to figure out what is the ideal way to live day-to-day and I don’t think anyone really teaches you that.”

Illustration by BuzzFeed News

George Burke, another WeFa.st member, used to run a bitcoin startup and now organizes the San Francisco Peak Performance Meetup. Nearly 600 people are signed up for the meetups online, which is roughly 200 more members than WeFa.st. About 50 to 75 people have been showing up at events.

Burke had a unique perspective. He said he approached intermittent fasting not because he was a Type A guy who was always on his grind, but because he felt self-conscious about not being that guy. “I never really felt all that productive. My whole life I always felt like I was one step behind everyone else, so I was always looking for an edge.” Burke said that’s why he organizes the meetup, to share whatever he’s learned, but also to surround himself with experts. (It’s not too shabby for his personal brand in the fitness-tech space either.) “There are a lot of people who are underperformers and underachievers who simply accept their place in life, and I don’t,” he told BuzzFeed News. And now? A wrist full of self-tracking devices later? “People perceive me as being equal, so I’ll take it,” he said.

Schafer also traced his faith in fasting back to a sense of insecurity. In high school, he followed the whey protein and weightlifting wisdom popular in the '90s. It didn’t work. He would fall asleep during AP calculus every day because it came after lunch, and he lost the sense of himself as a curious, hyper-literate kid. That doesn’t seem to be an issue now. During the course of our 45-minute conversation, he mentioned Seth Godin, The Paleovedic Diet, Dave Asprey, Derek Sivers (who pioneered the decision tree: “Hell yeah!” or “No”), and Nassim Taleb’s Antifragile — a veritable office lounge shelf of counterintuitive thinking.

Burke’s approach to productivity makes him an ideal hypebeast for biohacking. His daily routine sounds like a word cloud for the quantified self. For example, Burke has also dabbled in micro-dosing LSD, another trendy productivity hack that posits that micrograms of hallucinogens can be office appropriate. During his bitcoin days, he said he wasn’t scared to lead a meeting while microdosing because “they are mostly libertarians and many of them enjoy their vices. I’ve never been to wilder parties, outside of the bitcoin space."

As with all health fads, there’s still a lot of conflicting advice about fasting and micro-dosing, but that uncertainty doesn’t faze Burke. “I’ll experiment with almost anybody’s advice. That’s kind of what biohackers do,” he explained.

Burke’s quest to reach the apex of performance has some hardware components as well. He wears an Apple Watch to measure his heart rate and an Atlas wristband to measure reps at the gym. He also uses a Pavlok, a device that zaps users with a bit of electricity, as a means of curing bad habits.

So far, he’s found it useful for both fasting and quitting vaping. He recommended a new Chrome plugin that punishes you for opening too many windows. “Set it at 10 or more browser tabs, it’s going to zap you.” Burke said the sensation was kind of like touching a doorknob charged with static electricity. “It’s uncomfortable but it’s not painful. They even make sex toys with little type of zap, so you’re not going to die,” he assured me.

Burke had to miss the biohacker breakfast, but when he broke his fast later that day it was with food from Two Forks, a meal delivery service. His options that day included grass-fed beef with roasted plantains and green beans and shallot salad, as well as free-range chicken with roasted eggplant and kale salad. Even though it’s made for Paleo, Burke still has to tweak it to his standards. “I have to modify [the deliveries] because there are still starches in these meals that I’m not going to eat.”



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/23527Ck
via IFTTT

30 Mart 2016 Çarşamba

This Smart Bracelet Buzzes When Your Phone Needs You

And it’s actually cute.

The beauty of wearable tech is being able to stay off your phone until it *really* needs you, thanks to notification-induced vibrations.

The beauty of wearable tech is being able to stay off your phone until it *really* needs you, thanks to notification-induced vibrations.

End screen addiction NOW.

nbc.com

Today, Ringly is offering more choice when it comes to wrist-bound gadgets with a new smart bracelet called Aries.

Today, Ringly is offering more choice when it comes to wrist-bound gadgets with a new smart bracelet called Aries.

Ringly

Aries works just like Ringly's phone-enabled smart rings (which I reviewed earlier this year).

Aries works just like Ringly's phone-enabled smart rings (which I reviewed earlier this year).

Nicole Nguyen / BuzzFeed / Via buzzfeed.com


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/22XNCjy
via IFTTT

Microsoft’s HoloLens Begins Shipping To Developers Today

At Microsoft’s Build conference, we got a look at what the augmented-reality headset is going to be used for.

Today, Microsoft begins shipping the HoloLens to developers.

View Video ›

The augmented-reality headset was announced early last year, but this is the first time people outside Microsoft-controlled demos will get their hands on it.

Right now, it's only available to developers and enterprise users — essentially, only people who work for an organization executing a very specific mission, like a hospital or NASA, or are engineers building new tools and experiences for HoloLens and are in need of a headset to do it.

Even though the HoloLens is a ways away from making it onto the heads of average consumers, Microsoft is beginning to show off exactly what it's going to be used for when it does.

Facebook: video.php

Case Western Reserve University will be using it for medical education and research.

View Video ›

Facebook: video.php

NASA is using it to take a closer look at Mars and to stay connected with astronauts on the International Space Station.

View Video ›

Facebook: video.php

And, in one of the few looks at what normal consumers can expect, this is what Skype will look like on HoloLens.

View Video ›

Facebook: video.php


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/232mNL5
via IFTTT

Twitter Pulls Down "Moment" Following Questionable Editorial Decision

Twitter pulled down a Moment yesterday after acknowledging that it has misstepped in its decision to post it in the first place.

The Moment curated a Trump supporter's Twitter rant against @Estblishmnt, an account belonging to a woman's magazine, not the actual Republican establishment. Though funny, the Moment both highlighted abuse on Twitter — and sparked even more of it, this time directed toward the Trump supporter. After being called out on these two fronts, Twitter took the Moment down.

When Twitter introduced Moments last October, it effectively entered the editorial business. And though the company doesn't write the tweets placed within Moments, it still writes the headlines, and decides which stories are Moment-worthy. These editorial decisions are difficult, the type even the most seasoned news organizations struggle with, and the very act of making them turned Twitter from an agnostic platform into one with a point of view. The shift was bound to get Twitter into trouble at some point, and yesterday it did.

In recent weeks, Moments' editorial tone has been noticeably bold, so the episode isn't entirely surprising.

Twitter declined to comment beyond Twitter Moments lead Andrew Fitzgerald's apology in a tweet.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1VTHfvM
via IFTTT

Apple Hits Milestone On Conflict Minerals Efforts


Jared Harrell / BuzzFeed News

Apple has announced a milestone in its five-year-long effort to ensure that the minerals used in its products are sourced responsibly and "do not finance armed
conflict." These "conflict minerals" are so called because the proceeds from their mining have at times been used to fund armed groups associated with murder, rape, and other human rights violations in the Democratic Republic of Congo and neighboring countries where they are mined.

As of today, all of the smelters and refiners that supply the tech company with conflict minerals are enrolled in a third-party auditing program, a process Apple COO Jeff Williams calls "a journey." The announcement comes at a time when the Silicon Valley behemoth is increasingly angling to be seen as an international do-gooder.

Apple currently works with 242 suppliers in the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining nations, where violent conflict plays a role in how those substances are extracted and sold. Conflict minerals such as gold, tin, tungsten, and tantalum are used to make circuit boards, as well as the parts of iPhones that allow them to vibrate or hold a charge. When Apple published its conflict mineral report last year, 199 of 225 smelters and refiners were enrolled in the audit program.

"Unfortunately," Williams told BuzzFeed News, "we had to kick out 35 along the way that we were unable to convince to do things in the way we think are appropriate." In some instances, he said, Apple resorted to "publicizing smelters in order to shame the ones we couldn't convince otherwise to join the program."

Apple

After President Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Act — which included anti–conflict mineral regulations — in 2010, companies like Apple have been under pressure to ensure that the products they sell don't come from suppliers that are contributing to or exacerbating violent conflict or human rights violations.

It can be difficult, however, to track the origin points of many of these substances, as they tend to change hands many times after extraction. The easiest path forward, Apple says, would be to work with a small number of approved smelters and refiners.

"You can do that, and you can declare yourself conflict free," Williams explained, "but that would have very little impact on the ground." Instead, Williams said, Apple made the decision to instead maximize its potential impact on baseline practices in the region by working with as many suppliers as possible.

Apple’s primary conflict mineral auditor is the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative (CFSI), whose stated goal is to make sure that the smelters and refiners tech companies source from aren't using minerals that come from mines controlled by armed forces. To accomplish this, auditors including the CFSI use methods like the "bag and tag" system, in which minerals that are certified conflict free are given a barcode so that they can be tracked from mine to export.

But even these procedures are corruptible, which is why Apple isn't labeling itself "conflict free" just yet.

"By current definitions and standards, we could declare ourselves conflict free," Williams said. "We've chosen not to do that, because we think the third-party audit programs, while a good first step, [can be improved]. There are too many holes in the system, too many chances for robberies along the way. We aren't ready to declare ourselves done."

Human rights groups agree that third-party auditing, while helpful, is just a start when it comes to transparency in the supply chain. Seema Joshi is head of business and human rights for Amnesty International, which published a none-too-rosy analysis of companies, including Apple, last year. She says she hopes to see more concrete evidence of what these businesses are doing to eliminate harmful practices.

"Companies are still not providing enough information as to what their due diligence practices are," Joshi, who had not yet seen Apple's report today, told BuzzFeed News. "We're not yet seeing the transparency that we hope to be seeing."

Now that Apple's goal of 100% enrollment in the third-party auditing program has been met, the company plans to further strengthen its system. It is investigating reports of incidents in which "individuals associated or potentially associated with armed groups, in particular the police in the DRC and the DRC national army, were alleged to be involved in incidents linked to smelters in Apple’s supply chain." Apple says it has reviewed over 700 such reports from on-the-ground organizations so far, three of which they are continuing to investigate.

"This is not about marketing 'conflict free.' It's not about guilt-free purchases for consumers," Williams said. "It's about reducing armed conflict."



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1WY6HP6
via IFTTT

Meet The Breakout Star Of Microsoft Build Conference

Bryan Roper, a true iconoclast.

A star was born.

A star was born.

Tech conferences are usually dull, Banana Republic-dominated affairs. This guy came onstage and immediately stole the show.


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1RL4stL
via IFTTT

29 Mart 2016 Salı

Former Uber Worker Claims Company Investigator Illegally Entered Her Home

Uber CEO Travis Kalanick

Steve Jennings / Getty Images

A former Uber worker claims that an investigator acting on the company's behalf entered her apartment without permission and acted in an intimidating manner in an attempt to discover the source of a BuzzFeed News story. The former employee sent the company a cease and desist letter in response. Uber previously confirmed to BuzzFeed News that it is investigating the source of the leak.

Morgan Richardson, a former Uber worker in Portland, Oregon, alleges that Uber's Legal and Security and Law Enforcement Director, Craig Clark, contacted her on March 4th, in response to a BuzzFeed News article about leaked internal data regarding rape and sexual assault. According to Richardson's attorney, Clark "asked her a series of questions" and "began to accuse her of taking certain screenshots and giving them to the media."

The article in question was not published until March 6th, however Uber was notified of the leaked screenshots by BuzzFeed News on March 3rd.

After publication, Richardson's attorney alleges that Clark contacted her again demanding she hand over "any information she had collected and disclosed and that she identify anyone to whom she had disclosed such information."

According to the cease and desist letter, on March 25th, around 7:30 in the morning "a male individual showed up at Richardson's apartment and began banging on the door." After five minutes of continued knocking, Richardson "saw him opening her mailbox and looking inside it." The letter alleges the unidentified man "place[ed] his ear against her door apparently to hear her inside."

When Richardson opened the door the male "identified himself as an Uber investigator from California" but did not provide any identification.

The letter further states:

During this conversation, the investigator asked if he could come into her apartment and she refused. Despite this refusal, he walked into her apartment while she was getting a pen. This clearly constituted trespass and frightened Ms. Richardson since she had just refused him entrance. The Uber investigator, sent from California to intimidate Ms. Richardson, put his briefcase on the sofa and took out a legal pad for Ms. Richardson to write on. She wrote that she did not want to talk to him and then he said, "You know what this is about don't you?" She replied that she thought she did. At one point, he asked ominously, "Do I scare you?" Then he said to her, "THIS IS NOT GOING TO GO AWAY YOU KNOW."

When reached for comment, Richardson's attorney, Martin C. Dolan would only confirm the validity of the letter, noting the document is his only contact thus far with Uber.

An Uber spokesperson told BuzzFeed News that the investigation is ongoing, noting that "we have an obligation to look into situations like this where sensitive confidential and personal information has been shared."

“As we said in our blog post a couple of weeks ago: ‘you asked yesterday if Uber had contacted customer service representatives who had recently queried the terms “rape” and “sexual assault” in our database. The answer is yes. We are unsurprisingly concerned that sensitive, personal and confidential data has been shared with people outside Uber. We believe that any company in a similar situation would do exactly the same.’”

"The investigator knocked once and the conversation lasted about two minutes," the spokesperson said.




from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1MRwfaV
via IFTTT

Sony Wants You To Pay $30 Per Movie To Stream In 4K

Sony

When Sony's new 4K video streaming service Ultra debuts next month, it may cause a bit of sticker shock, even among the AV crowd.

Sony said Tuesday that it plans to charge Ultra customer $30 per movie to stream in 4K. That's at least double the price of going out to see a first-run film in the theater.

Films available on ULTRA will include new video releases like Concussion, The Night Before, and The Walk, and library titles such as Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon and Ghostbusters, priced at $30 in 4K with HDR.

Ultra will debut on April 4 on Android-compatible Sony 4K TVs. Initially, it will offer a catalog of about 40 to 50 films. Sony plans to offer TV shows as well, but the company hasn't yet disclosed programs or per-episode-pricing.

Customers who purchase eligible Sony 4K Ultra HD televisions with Ultra this summer will receive four complimentary movies when they sign up for the service, and users of Sony's UltraViolet cloud service will be able to access the films at a discounted price.

While 4K streaming is still in its infancy, Sony will have rivals in the space. Netflix began offering 4K streaming last year. The difference between the two services will be stark, beginning with price point: Netflix only charges $11.99 per month to upgrade from its standard $7.99 service.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1pILRYM
via IFTTT

Lyft Launches A Cheap New Commute Option In The San Francisco Bay Area

Lyft

On Tuesday, San Francisco Lyft riders and drivers will see a new option next to Line, Lyft, and Plus: Carpool.

For the passenger, it looks a lot like a normal Lyft ride, except that it's on a schedule — you request a ride the night before work, rather than as you're heading out the door, making Carpool Lyft's first foray beyond on-demand. And if you have a car, you can sign up and tell Lyft where your daily commute starts and ends, and when you have to be at work. Lyft then matches you with someone whose commute is similar, takes care of directions, and even sends a notification when it's time to get going.

Tellingly, Lyft is pitching Carpool as an alternative not to other services on its platform, but to Casual Carpool, the quasi-formal Bay Area practice in which strangers gather at designated points throughout the East Bay to be picked up by drivers headed into San Francisco. The drivers save bridge toll and time by using the carpool lane, and the riders save public transportation fare, pitching in a dollar or two to cover gas and the discounted toll.

Lyft's Carpool will be almost as cheap. According to Lyft, Fares will be capped at $10, no matter the distance.

That means less money for drivers — but Lyft is thinking of Carpool not as a primary or secondary job, but as "a thing that offsets the daily cost of driving," according to Emily Castor, Lyft's director of transportation policy. "Drivers could earn up to $400 or $500 a year," she told BuzzFeed News.

That distinction also means that unlike typical Lyft drivers, Carpool drivers will not go through a background check (though they will be subject to two-way reviews). "Carpool Drivers are a different classification of drivers and as such have different criteria," a Lyft spokesperson told BuzzFeed News. "It takes about five minutes to sign up and there is a short approval period that follows. You'd need to provide a photo of your driver's license, details about your car and commute route."

At launch, the service will be limited to the San Francisco Bay Area. It's a region well-suited to the service: According to John Goodwin of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission/Bay Area Toll Authority, which has partnered with Lyft to launch Carpool, only about 10% of commuters in the area carpool.

But after Lyft tackles the techies sitting in traffic from San Francisco to Silicon Valley, it intends to expand Carpool even further. "This is definitely something that we want to take nationwide," Lyft Product Manager Lev Popov told BuzzFeed News.




from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/22YrqG2
via IFTTT

Instagram Extends Video Length Limit To 60 Seconds


The term "social media" once meant text and static images: the 140-character tweet, the Facebook status update, the Instagram photo. Video, which in the early days of social was difficult to watch on a desktop, let alone a mobile device, was still largely the domain of television.

By golly has a lot changed.

Today, Instagram is ushering in the latest development in video's march to become social media's dominant content format. The Facebook-owned product is extending the time limit of user-posted videos from 15 to 60 seconds. The move is sure to increase the amount of video consumption on its platform, which has already shot up 40% over the past six months, per a spokesperson.

Up until now, 60-second videos were only available to advertisers. But starting today, the longer videos will begin rolling out to the general public.

That said, the move may lead to a decline in quality of content posted to the platform. Unlike photos, quality video is still difficult to produce. It's quite hard to shoot, edit, and put together a story in a coherent way. So most users will likely give the longer videos a good ol' college try and end up producing boring stuff like this:

youtube.com

On the bright side, social media users don't seem to want polished content anymore. They like authenticity, something that feels real, not drummed up in a corporate studio. And with this in mind, the longer Instagram videos should open up room for people to express themselves. Even if "themselves" are kinda boring.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1RIhc4r
via IFTTT

Snapchat Adds A Boatload Of New Messaging Features

Snapchat is releasing a significant overhaul to its "chat" tab today, introducing audio calls, better video calling, stickers, batch image uploads, and more.

The update comes at a moment of intense messaging competition in the U.S., as chat apps are moving beyond simple text and photo formats to offer much broader functionality. Over the past year, while Snapchat sat largely stagnant, Facebook, its biggest competitor, introduced ride-hailing, GIFs, a basketball game, and more to its Messenger app. Now Snapchat is throwing its counterpunch.

Here's a quick rundown of some of this new stuff:

Video Chat

Video chat isn't new to Snapchat, but the updates to it may be the most impressive element of this new round of changes. The new video chat is intuitive — unlike the previous version, which felt like a hidden feature — and fun. Unlike almost all video-calling features, this one starts with both faces displayed in small circles within the app. Answer the call and you go fullscreen; swipe down on the screen and you go back to the circle.

After you start a call, the person on the other end is presented with three options: Ignore, Join, or Watch. Tapping "Watch" turns the call into a one-to-one live stream of sorts, and the person on the other end can comment by sending messages through the compose field.

Snapchat

Video Notes

Snapchat

Snapchat is also introducing a way to send short, goofy selfie videos over chat. If you hold the camcorder button down, you can send a video note of up to 10 seconds using the selfie camera. The note loops like a GIF, but contains sounds. It shows up in the chat window in a small circle and seems like it would be useful when you want to send a quick reaction to a friend.

Audio Calls

Snapchat

People still make audio calls? Snapchat thinks so. The company is introducing audio calls that can be placed by tapping the phone icon. The audio call also doesn't take up the full screen, and it starts on speakerphone, so you can talk while you continue to play around within the app. Snapchat's audio calling seems more useful not as a default phone but for those occasional text conversations that end up requiring a call to get across more complex or nuanced ideas.

Audio Notes

Snapchat


Snapchat's audio note is essentially the same thing as its video note, except with audio instead of video.

Stickers

Snapchat

Snapchat is a bit late to the game on this, but it's introducing a slew of stickers as well. If you haven't used stickers, they're the ultimate way to tell someone you're done with a conversation without using words.

The Bottom Line

The time we spend on our phones is increasingly concentrated in a handful of apps. Eighty-four percent of the time a given smartphone user spends in non-native apps goes to just five apps, according to Forrester Research. This means there’s a death match taking place between companies to reach and stay within that top five for as many people as possible. Messaging is one route in: The leading messaging app will always command our time, because it's where we’ll return again and again to communicate with our friends and family. And once you get those repeat visits, you can expand to do things like ride-hailing (see: Facebook) or media distribution (see: Snapchat).

Whoever wins the messaging battle will be a conduit for all sorts of businesses that are being shut out of the “top five” and still need to reach their audiences and customers. It’s a critical battle, and Snapchat's product release today, over a year in the making, looks to be a big part of the company’s bid to remain a dominant mobile app for years to come.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1REvwOu
via IFTTT

Soundcloud Launches A Paid Subscription Service Of Its Own

Soundcloud

In its most recent annual report on music sales, the Recording Industry Association of America noted that streaming music revenues have now surpassed those of physical music sales in the U.S. The labels sold $7 billion worth of music last year, and streaming music services like Spotify, Pandora, Apple Music, and YouTube accounted for about $2.4 billion of it. Now Soundcloud would like a taste of that money as well.

On Tuesday, Soundcloud announced Soundcloud Go, a new subscription streaming service it's launching with the blessing of the music industry. According to co-founder Eric Wahlforss, the company’s CTO, the service was a long time coming.

“The decision to [go subscription] was made several years ago,” Wahlforss told BuzzFeed News. "It just took quite a while to get all the pieces together. These were difficult negotiations."

Soundcloud Go, which launches today in the U.S., arrives at market with the features we've come to expect of streaming music services: a broad catalog featuring major label artists, an ad-free listening experience, the ability to listen to music "offline," and that familiar $9.99/month subscription fee. On Soundcloud Go, subscription-only content will be offered alongside the services's vast and variegated standard fare. Pay the fee and you'll be given full access to it. Don't and you'll encounter a 30-second preview and an opportunity to purchase a subscription.

Soundcloud

For Soundcloud, which began as a sort of freewheeling YouTube for audio, this is a significant change. The service has long been home to a smorgasbord of sound — covers, DJ mixes, remixes, and the occasional recording of someone’s dog barking. That, along with the ease with which Soundcloud music can be shared, has made the service wildly popular. Now, with record label deals in place, those mixes and remixes can be created and shared without pissing off the owners of the original tracks. Presumably that will mean fewer takedown notices.

And that's a good thing for Soundcloud and the people who use it. “This is the biggest positive move the company has made for DJs,” said Wahlforss. “There wasn’t a good way to do this without full industry support. The deals allow for the creative ecosystem all of these things — mixes, remixes, covers — that should be on the platform."

Of course the deals allow for something else as well: a revenue stream, and crucially a fast-growing one. And for Wahlforss, that's just one more way to grow Soundcloud as a platform and extend its reach.

“We started as a utility solving a very simple problem,” said Wahforss. "I think in many ways what we’re doing is executing that vision. We don’t see this as a complete shift or total change in strategy. I want to reach more and more listeners. I want more control."



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1V0yWO1
via IFTTT

28 Mart 2016 Pazartesi

People Are So Annoyed By Their Friends Asking Them To Turn On Instagram Notifications

*Un-like.*

So if you haven't heard, the social media world is in a straight-up ~tizzy~ because Instagram is changing its algorithm.

Instagram: @orihara_trash

The social media app announced on March 15 that it is planning to change its algorithm to highlight posts that it thinks users want to see more than others, rather than show pictures in chronological order.

The social media app announced on March 15 that it is planning to change its algorithm to highlight posts that it thinks users want to see more than others, rather than show pictures in chronological order.

Instagram

"The order of photos and videos in your feed will be based on the likelihood you'll be interested in the content, your relationship with the person posting and the timeliness of the post," Instagram said in a blog post. "As we begin, we're focusing on optimizing the order — all the posts will still be there, just in a different order."

Even though Instagram said the change will happen sometime in the next "couple months," for some reason this weekend Insta users were gripped with PANIC that the change was imminent.

Instagram: @meganbot3k


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1qbqu2U
via IFTTT

I Wore Wireless Earbuds In The Shower And I’m Still Alive

Just a dash of the future.

Jenny Chang / BuzzFeed

I really dislike wired earphones.

I really dislike wired earphones.

Getting the cords caught on a door handle or pulled out of my ears because the cable was caught short are some of the more infuriating experiences of my life.

Even my current daily driver, the Bluetooth-enabled Jaybird Bluebuds X, aren't truly "wireless" headphones — there's still a cord that connects the left and right ears. Wireless earbuds are an up-and-coming category, and the Bragi Dash appears to be the frontrunner in what will soon be a very competitive category.

The Dash is a set of wireless Bluetooth earbuds that have standard headset traits, like streaming music from your phone and answering calls, but with even more packed into its small form factor.

The earbuds can track your heart rate, log your workouts, use motion gestures (like nodding your head to accept calls), and allow you to hear sound from your immediate surroundings without having to pull the earbuds out. And to top it all off, they are waterproof enough that you can shower and even swim with them.

Jeff Barron / BuzzFeed


View Entire List ›



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1XYPzsv
via IFTTT

Lunches At Facebook Included Maggots, Former Executive Says

Elliott Minor / AP

Facebook's origin story has been told and retold so many times, in so many formats, that you might think all the juicy details about the social network's early days would have come to light by now.

Not so, apparently, according to a Vanity Fair interview with Chamath Palihapitiya, a venture capitalist and former Facebook executive. While dispensing advice that startups should not waste money on extravagant food, Palihapitiya casually dropped this explosive revelation:

"I can tell you what it was like at early Facebook: the food was terrible; we’d ship in lunch and probably two to three times a week the lunch had maggots in it. But we were there because we believed, and it didn’t matter."

Uhhhhh!

This raises a number of questions. First of all, how did the maggots get into the lunches? Did they come from a Palo Alto restaurant? If so, why did Facebook employees continue to order food from there?

Was the food simply so delicious that it was worth the risk of there being maggots?

The maggots appeared two to three times a week, Palihapitiya says. That is a lot of maggots, by any standard.

So was Palihapitiya perhaps joking? Exaggerating?

BuzzFeed News reached out to a partner at his firm, Social Capital, just to check. "I don't have any additional context," the partner, Ashley Mayer, said in an email, adding that Palihapitiya was traveling and mostly offline.

What does Facebook have to say about these maggot-filled lunches? BuzzFeed News sent a note to Elliot Schrage, Facebook's vice president of communications and public policy, to try to get to the bottom of this mystery.

His emailed response: "lol."

Via giphy.com




from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1Si9FtC
via IFTTT

FBI Accessed San Bernardino Shooter's iPhone Without Apple, Drops Lawsuit

SAN FRANCISCO — The Justice Department (DOJ) announced Monday that it had successfully accessed data on the iPhone used by one of the San Bernardino shooters and that it was dropping its lawsuit against Apple to help unlock the phone.

According to a court filing by the DOJ Monday, investigators are no longer seeking Apple's help to penetrate the device used by one of the shooters behind the San Bernardino terrorist attack. In a call with reporters Monday, a law enforcement official said the government had successfully accessed the data, with the assistance of an outside party. The method they used, they said, worked on an iPhone 5c running iOS 9.

The official said that law enforcement was currently reviewing the information stored on the phone. They declined to reveal the name of the outside party which successfully unlocked the phone for the FBI, despite widespread speculation over who was involved and what methods they used.

Apple declined to comment on the DOJ's announcement, and said they do not know which outside party stepped in to help the FBI. The announcement ended a month long standoff between the DOJ and one of the world's most powerful tech companies.

The FBI said that it can not comment on whether it would seek Apple's help on future cases. More than a dozen cases are currently winding their way through the courts which could see law enforcement officials request assistance in unlocking phones, and with Apple promising to double-down on efforts to make its phone impossible to breach, cryptographers say the inevitable privacy vs. security battle will only continue to make headlines.

In a statement Melanie Newman, DOJ Spokesperson, said:

As the government noted in its filing today, the FBI has now successfully retrieved the data stored on the San Bernardino terrorist’s iPhone and therefore no longer requires the assistance from Apple required by this Court Order. The FBI is currently reviewing the information on the phone, consistent with standard investigatory procedures.

“It remains a priority for the government to ensure that law enforcement can obtain crucial digital information to protect national security and public safety, either with cooperation from relevant parties, or through the court system when cooperation fails. We will continue to pursue all available options for this mission, including seeking the cooperation of manufacturers and relying upon the creativity of both the public and private sectors.

United States Attorney Eileen M. Decker said:

The government has asked a United States Magistrate Judge in Riverside, California to vacate her order compelling Apple to assist the FBI in unlocking the iPhone that was used by one of the terrorists who murdered 14 innocent Americans in San Bernardino on December 2nd of last year. Our decision to conclude the litigation was based solely on the fact that, with the recent assistance of a third party, we are now able to unlock that iPhone without compromising any information on the phone.

We sought an order compelling Apple to help unlock the phone to fulfill a solemn commitment to the victims of the San Bernardino shooting – that we will not rest until we have fully pursued every investigative lead related to the vicious attack. Although this step in the investigation is now complete, we will continue to explore every lead, and seek any appropriate legal process, to ensure our investigation collects all of the evidence related to this terrorist attack. The San Bernardino victims deserve nothing less.

The full court filing is below.

The full court filing is below.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1Urchf4
via IFTTT

Rejoice! Tumblr Replies Are Back

Replies are back, baby!

Replies are back, baby!

Tumblr

Last year, Tumblr changed one of the features that made Tumblr, well, Tumblr: the threaded reply/reblog chains. Often these became very..... good. The threaded format became its own structure for jokes.

The old threaded very looked like this:

The old threaded very looked like this:

hipster-trichster.tumblr.com

The Tumblr community HATED IT when replies were changed. They missed the old replies. You could still reblog, just not reply.

Starting today, replies are coming back (it'll rollout to users in the new few days, so if you don't have it right now don't freak out). You'll also be able to reply to yourself, not just others, which is a completely new feature. So if you're the one who thinks up that great pun on your own post, GO FOR IT. And you can reply to your own blogs, if you're that self-obsessed.

The new reply features has some enhanced features for privacy and harassment prevention:

  • Everyone can reply
  • Only people you follow and people who have been following you for a week (no new friends or lurkers) can reply
  • Only people you already follow can reply (safest mode)

A new redesign of Notes also lets you see how people replied more easily. There's a simplified Notes view where you can see only replies and reblogs with commentary, and the plain likes and reblogs get compressed at the top.





from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1ogRnB5
via IFTTT

Lumosity's Stumble Reveals How We Think About Thinking

The ads were pervasive, popping up on CNN, Fox News, NPR, and Google searches. And they were persuasive: Playing Lumosity games would do your brain good.

“Can you remember the name of that song you just heard?” one announcer asked Pandora listeners. “Most people find that memory declines with age. But your memory doesn’t have to. Control and improve your memory with Lumosity.com, the personal trainer for your brain.”

A TV spot offered similar reassurances. “I take care of my body,” a woman said. “But it’s harder to take care of my brain. Lumosity.com is based on neuroscience. And it just seems like games, but it’s serious brain training.”

But these claims sounded a little too rosy to the Federal Trade Commission, which cited these and other ads in alleging that Lumos Labs, the maker of Lumosity, preyed on people’s fears with non-scientifically validated claims. Earlier this year, the company settled the charges by paying $2 million into a fund for refunds, though it’s by no means going away or giving up — it has a new CEO at the helm and a plan to create new games and bring on more customers.

It was a stumble for a company that had, up until that point, been a bright light in the booming online brain-training game industry. It was a cautionary tale for a cottage industry that’s risen sharply despite debatable scientific evidence that the products actually work. And it was an example of a startup whose buzz and private valuations rose sharply despite such questionable evidence. While Lumos Labs, Theranos, and Zenefits all have different business models and answer to different regulatory agencies, their newly public struggles have helped spur regulators, investors, and customers to more closely scrutinize the claims of startups, health-related and otherwise.

After graduating from Princeton University in 2001, Michael Scanlon moved to Palo Alto to study neuroscience at Stanford University; his research centered around how environmental conditions and certain behaviors affect the brain. Then he left school after a few years to start Lumos Labs with Kunal Sarkar, a fellow Princeton alumnus who had been working at a private equity firm. Another co-founder was David Drescher, who oversaw the company’s products and technology.

It was an auspicious time to be getting into the brain-training business. Scanlon likely didn’t know it at the time, but his business was at the nexus of several macro-level trends: Baby boomers in the United States are living longer than their predecessors, aging-related cognitive disorders have become a pressing public health issue, the knowledge economy continues to grow, and virtually all dementia-related therapies have flamed out in clinical trials.

Today, Lumosity has more than 70 million users from 182 countries. One hundred forty employees work in its San Francisco office, which is decked out with education-themed touches: a library shelved with staff-donated books, chess sets, rooms named after Lumosity games. Forbes named it one of “America’s Most Promising Companies” in 2013. It’s raised nearly $68 million in venture capital.

And as it grew, a constellation of get-smart-quick games, apps, and websites mushroomed up around it. SharpBrains, an independent market research firm that tracks the digital brain-training industry, names the year of Lumos Labs’ founding — 2005 — as when that market began to explode. According to SharpBrains’ estimates, it was worth $210 million then and upwards of $1 billion in 2012; it will exceed $6 billion in 2020. That’s due to high interest in several online brain-training games from companies like Posit Science, the maker of BrainHQ, founded in 2002; Peak, founded in 2012; and Elevate, which launched its app in 2014.

In the electronic gaming era, one of Lumosity’s immediate predecessors was Brain Age: Train Your Brain in Minutes a Day!, a game for Nintendo DS. Released in 2005, it featured sudoku puzzles, math questions, and reaction-time tests and sparked a sequel plus reformulations on other platforms. And it was inspired, Nintendo said, by the work of Japanese neuroscientist Ryuta Kawashima, who appeared in the game. But the company shied away from making scientific claims, stressing that it was a “fun, rewarding form of entertainment.”

Indeed, while many neuroscientists acknowledge that some early research shows promise for certain kinds of brain training, they say that overall there is thin evidence that they improve customers’ cognitive abilities in other areas of life. What research does seem to show is that physical exercise offers modest protection against cognitive decline (although this is not a closed question, either).

But it’s easier to flock to brain-training games on phones and computers than to hit the gym.

Internet companies opened access to training that felt like tools previously only available at a neuropsychologist’s office. Now “you don’t have to spend thousands of dollars getting assessments, doing programs,” said Alvaro Fernandez, CEO of SharpBrains. “You could do it for $20, $30, maybe $100. It’s not as good, not as targeted, but it’s better than nothing. The demand was there.”


A sample screenshot from a Lumosity game.

Lumosity / Via lumosity.com

Lumos Labs’ new CEO, Steve Berkowitz, is not a scientist. He has been the president of IDG Books, the publisher of the Dummies series; an executive at Microsoft; the CEO of Ask.com, which was sold for $1.85 billion; and the CEO of Move Inc., the operator of realtor.com, which was acquired for $950 million. He describes the thread that ties together his career as “dealing with consumers and how they engage with technology.”

So when a recruiter approached him about the gig last year, Berkowitz, who’d already been casually playing Lumosity for a few months, went to read its App Store reviews. There were more than 90,000, most of them positive. “When I looked at it,” he told BuzzFeed News in his office, “I was more focused on this idea that if you have something consumers engage in and enjoy, then that’s a strong foundation by which you can build a business.”

By the time Berkowitz joined in November, Lumos Labs was already a 10-year-old business. Its more than 50 games are animated and colorful: Players race through deserts, do quick math calculations before raindrops hit the earth, and remember shapes and colors as they change from one screen to the next. The games, which grow progressively harder as players improve, test memory, flexibility, attention, and problem-solving. Some are free, but with a premium subscription that starts at $12 a month or $60 a year, players can access the vast majority and have their progress tracked.

At Lumosity’s core is “this idea that people are wanting to find ways to engage in things they potentially feel will keep their minds engaged,” Berkowitz said. “It’s something that the company has done a really good job of, of taking those basic scientific concepts and turning them into engaging entertainment. I mean, in today’s world, we’re all fighting for that ‘entertainment’ time. I think that people are looking for ways to just engage their minds.”

But entertainment is not necessarily efficacy. This is the debate over brain-training: whether skills gained through such games translate to the real-life ability to remember names or where you put your keys, a concept scientists call “far transfer.”

"In today’s world, we’re all fighting for that ‘entertainment’ time. I think that people are looking for ways to just engage their minds."

In October 2014, more than 70 psychologists and neuroscientists signed a statement circulated by the Stanford Center on Longevity. “We object to the claim that brain games offer consumers a scientifically grounded avenue to reduce or reverse cognitive decline when there is no compelling scientific evidence to date that they do,” it read, without naming companies, while acknowledging that more research was needed. Another group of 127 doctors and scientists shot back, arguing that the statement downplayed “a large and growing body” of research that “certain brain exercises have been shown to drive cognitive improvements.”

Several published studies — some by independent researchers, others with Lumos Labs scientists — have tested the cognitive benefits of playing Lumosity and Lumosity-like games, with mixed results. One study that the company likes to tout, published in September in PLOS One and conducted mostly by company employees, involved two groups of people totaling 4,715. Over 10 weeks, an experimental group went through 49 Lumosity exercises and the control group filled out crossword puzzles during daily 15-minute sessions at least five days a week.

After follow-up tests, researchers concluded that, compared to the control group, the Lumosity players showed greater improvements in processing, short-term memory, working memory, problem-solving, and flexible thinking. “These results indicate that a varied training program composed of a number of tasks targeted to different cognitive functions can show transfer to a wide range of untrained measures of cognitive performance,” the researchers wrote.

Lumos Labs acknowledges on its website that the findings are not proof that the skills transfer to tasks in everyday life. Alan Castel, a psychology professor at UCLA who has written about brain games, questioned the results by expressing skepticism about the use of crosswords as a valid control: “There’s no concrete scientific evidence doing a crossword puzzle will improve memory.” Instead, he said, crossword players draw on knowledge they have already built.

Glenn Morrison, Lumos Labs’ director of clinical trials, disagreed, saying that if people believe crosswords help — even if the puzzles actually don’t — that could in fact make them a good placebo.

Castel’s bigger concern is that people are spending time on brain-training games instead of activities that are more likely to improve cognition and general everyday functions. “It’s hard to exercise, it’s hard to eat well, it’s hard to get a good night’s sleep,” he said. “It may seem obvious, and perhaps even too obvious, that people are looking for what’s the latest and greatest thing.”

Lumosity isn’t the only cognitive-training game developer to face regulatory scrutiny. Last year, the FTC accused Carrot Neurotechnology of making unfounded claims about its vision improvement app (the company settled for $150,000). Under another settlement, a Texas company had to stop making claims that the children’s computer game Jungle Rangers had “scientifically proven memory and attention brain training exercises, designed to improve focus, concentration and memory.”

At the same time, Fernandez of SharpBrains noted that not all brain-training games are guilty of exaggerated, ill-supported claims. “We have to be careful not to throw out the baby with the bathwater,” he said. “Some people think everything works and some people think nothing works, and the reality, the truth, is something in the middle.”

At Lumos Labs, Berkowitz said that, while the company did not admit wrongdoing as part of the settlement, the FTC in his view exaggerated the pervasiveness of the problematic ads. “I don’t think it was any significant part of what the marketing has been in the past, and it’s definitely not part of the marketing we’ve done in the last 12 to 18 to 24 months,” he said.

Lumos Labs indeed seems eager to leave the settlement behind. Of its three co-founders, Sarkar has since become board chairman and Scanlon serves in an “unofficial advisory capacity,” according to the company. This year, Berkowitz said, the team wants to branch out into applied skills like language arts and math and improve the social aspect of the games by making it easy for relatives to share their progress. And for the first time, Lumos Labs may design games to improve wellness factors like mindfulness and sleep.

Why those subjects? It all comes back to popular demand. “Those are the things our customers are interested in,” Berkowitz said.

But, as Castel the psychologist cautions, what we think we want is not always what is best. “Not just Lumosity, but anything we think might be helping us — we want to be sure it’s helping us, because it can come at a cost,” he said.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1XY01jW
via IFTTT

27 Mart 2016 Pazar

Searching For Google CEO Sundar Pichai, The Most Powerful Tech Giant You've Never Heard Of

The Consumer Electronics Show, universally known as CES, is a riot of technology. Held annually in the bleak Nevada desert town of Las Vegas, it is a great blinking din, jammed with screens, speakers, automobiles, whirling drones, blooping robots, e-cigs and e-cigs and ever more e-cigs, plus some 170,000 people bumping around inside a disease-ridden convention center. Among those many attendees is Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google.

Pichai is 43, tall and slender, and tends to dress casually, if nicely — think Banana Republic dad. Today he’s wearing a v-neck sweater over a collared shirt and jeans. He sports rectangular-framed glasses and a trim, graying beard. For the most part, he looks like any other conventiongoer. Which for him is clearly a thrill. As he pauses for a moment to gape at a motion simulator ride where 20 or so people are strapped into lurching theater chairs with VR headsets clamped across their faces, he leans in close to make sure he can be heard over the fury of carnival noises bouncing around the hall.

“The nice thing about CES,” he says impishly, grinning and eyes aglow, “is that there are so many people, you can be anonymous.”

It’s true. And he’s definitely enjoying the chance to cruise the show in incognito mode. Pichai has long been respected in product circles as a visionary. But he is now among an elite group of tech executives — along with the likes of Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, Apple’s Tim Cook, and Amazon’s Jeff Bezos; the new American industrialists whose global reach make U.S. Steel and Standard Oil look like Piggly Wiggly by comparison. And yet, unlike those boldface names, and despite a widely reported $200 million stock windfall, he remains largely unknown.

Were Cook or Zuck to stride across a CES show floor, they would be mobbed. Pichai is not at that point yet. So all morning, he’s been running around with his name badge flipped over backward, having fun, anonymously checking out gadgets. He bounces from smart locks, to smart lights, to a smart shower, to smart shoe insoles. It almost backfires when a Samsung representative demonstrating a smart refrigerator reaches out and flips his badge back over, asking, “What are you, press?” But his name doesn’t mean anything to her, and Pichai just casts an amused sideways glance and dives in with questions. “So, what can I ask the fridge?” he wants to know. Various versions of this same scene play out again and again.

Sundar Pichai at the 2016 CES conference in Las Vegas.

Mat Honan / BuzzFeed News

Yet while he’s purposefully keeping a low profile today, that’s clearly not possible long-term. Pichai was promoted to Google’s top job in August, following a massive restructuring that created a new holding company, Alphabet. This let the company peel off its more fantastical ventures — things like Calico that’s “curing” death, or its Wing self-flying-drone delivery service — as Alphabet subsidiaries, while keeping all of its main internet businesses under Google. With $74.5 billion in annual revenue last year, Google is by far the largest (and only profitable) business under Alphabet. Indeed, Google has seven different products that more than a billion people use: Search, Gmail, YouTube, Android, Chrome, Maps, and its app and media vending machine, the Google Play Store.

But with that world-beating growth has come controversy. It was intimately linked to the Edward Snowden revelations about an NSA program called Prism, which caused people the world over to wonder how much Google was cooperating with the NSA. (The company has always maintained that the NSA was not given direct access to its systems.) Protesters in San Francisco made Google buses synonymous with income inequality, and regularly took to blocking them in the streets. Google tussled with European governments over citizens’ rights to remove unfavorable listings from search results (the so-called right to be forgotten), and over antitrust claims that it lists its own products ahead of its competitors. At one particularly low point, during its Google IO developers conference in 2014, a protester stood in the aisles during the keynote presentation shouting, “You work for a totalitarian company that makes machines that kill people.”

Things used to be so different! When Google was young it was A Very Different Kind of Tech Company, espousing idealistic principles in the earnest manner of the ’90s web. In the now-famous letter from its 2004 IPO, the company's founders wrote that one of its principles was “Don’t be evil.” It was just there to help you get shit done. Search for your stuff and get out.

Google’s mission is to organize the world’s information. And the company has been very good at this — it’s why its search is unparalleled, Gmail is the best tool for organizing and sorting your email, and Google Photos can take all your thousands of pictures, tell you who is in them, and where they were taken, and that this is a picture of a parrot, while that is a picture of a duck.

But to do all that it has to suck up an enormous amount of information — and increasingly that information isn’t coming from Web pages, but from you. You are, at this very moment, bustling with data (location, age, primary mode of transportation, gender, browsing history, heart rate, race, IP address, browser, operating system, cervical mucus, cholesterol level) that can be used to better understand you. And Google is collecting ever more of it in an effort to give you better and better answers; to take your raw data and turn it into useful information. What’s more, as the company pushes ever more into machine learning, human beings are ceding control of what its products decide. Why did its AI, AlphaGo, choose the moves that beat the best human player in the world in a Go tournament earlier this month? The honest answer is no one really knows. Which is to say, Google may not be evil, but it’s undeniably a little creepy.

Meanwhile, all of these things Google is doing for those of us in the industrialized world today, it wants to do for the whole world tomorrow. Google is sprinting to attract its “next billion” users. For the most part, these are people in the developing world; people who will go online, for the very first time, using one of Google’s Android-powered handsets. Which puts Google in the position of being seen as both a corporate NSA and modern East India Company.

It’s that vague, impending creepiness, plus increasing global ambition, that explains why Pichai seems like the ideal person to be running Google now. The company’s previous CEOs, Eric Schmidt and Larry Page, never seemed particularly empathetic or, you know, likely to have a measurable body temperature. (Schmidt once famously said, “If you have something that you don’t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn’t be doing it in the first place,” while Page waxed rhapsodic about theoretical lawless “special zones” where the company could be “free to experiment.”) While the gossip on Schmidt tended to center around things like, as New York Magazine put it, his “lavish sex palace,” what you hear Googlers whispering about Pichai is how he promised to put his kids to bed himself every night in 2015.

Pichai clearly understands there are all sorts of things we don't want anyone to know. "We need to design systems so that we give people a very easy way to say, ‘I need to be off the grid, I need this to be private,’” he says over a smashed avocado at the Wynn, moments after being buttonholed by Barry Diller in a nearby hallway. Can Sundar Pichai transform Google's image? Can he make you actually like Google again?

As Clay Bavor, who runs Google’s virtual reality efforts, says of Pichai’s approach to technology, “You want a deeply thoughtful, caring human person, thinking about those issues and leading the company making those things happen. I’m really glad that he, of all people, is Google’s CEO. That’s what I tell my friends.”

So… Sundar Pichai: It could be worse?

Vivek Singh for BuzzFeed News

In November, the winter monsoon blew into the coast of southeast India, just as it always has. But this time its effects were very different. A particularly bad storm system dumped more than 40 inches of rain on Chennai that month, with more than 10 coming in a single 24-hour period, flooding the city. Illegal building and the destruction of neighboring wetlands had left Chennai poorly prepared, and it remained inundated for weeks. More than 300 people lost their lives, and damages were estimated at $3 billion. Sundar Pichai’s family was among those affected.

“My grandmother took the brunt of it,” he says from the backseat of a van, snaking through the thick Delhi traffic on a warm December day. His grandmother had been staying with his aunt, and when the rains came they moved to the second floor of a building where they were stranded for four days with no water, power, or cell service. A cousin collected rainwater for them to drink. And for four days, the CEO of the company that has amassed more information on more people than any other on the planet had no idea what was happening to his family. Weeks after the floods, he is visiting India for the first time in more than a year.

“It’s always emotional to me to come back to India,” says Pichai, who is on his way to a stadium where he will address a few thousand cheering students. “It’s truly humbling to see the reception.”

The CEO of this American colossus grew up in a two-room house in Chennai, where he and his brother slept on the living room floor. “My parents sacrificed a lot and education was always a priority,” he says. “I felt fortunate about the opportunities I had, so I never felt it was modest because they were determined to give me access to education, whatever it took.”

(Pichai will later say that he worries his father is still disappointed that he didn’t go further in school. “I think if you talked to my dad, he’s probably still regretting that I didn't complete my Ph.D. He had to leave college after his undergrad. He wanted to learn more, but because of financial reasons he couldn't do it. I think he always wanted me to continue on.”)

By the standard of living in India, Pichai was fortunate. His father was an engineer, and he had access to education. The family had enough money for a scooter, which all four of them — himself, and his father, mother, and brother — would sometimes ride at once. Sure, you could catch him hanging off the sides of buses in Chennai as they rolled down the street, but it was to avoid the oppressive heat, not the fare.

Yet there were plenty of people — and he saw them all the time — far less fortunate. “Outside my home there was this guy we called the night watchman,” he explains. “He would sleep outside our home every night. I never thought of him as homeless, but he never had a home, and never had a family. He doesn’t know where he was born, or how he was born.”

Today, Pichai travels with a security detail in multiple vehicles, and an entourage of assistants and lieutenants. When one, an American, notes the cacophony of horns, weaving tuk-tuks, curbside food stands, and vendors who walk out into the roadway to sell enormous, man-sized balloons, Pichai scoffs. “Delhi’s nothing; Delhi’s so organized.”

“I remember when I was young trying to come home at night, and these dogs wouldn’t let me come home. So I wound up climbing on the top of the houses, and going from rooftop to rooftop, and they would follow me all the way, barking.”

As the caravan creeps through a swarm of slow-moving, smoke-spewing vehicles through Delhi’s crumbling history and rapidly modernizing future, it passes a large, unmissable billboard, advertising the Nexus 6P, Google’s flagship phone. You see these ads all over Delhi, and outside of it, too. They greet you at the airport. There are no similar signs for the iPhone. And indeed, there are very few iPhones in India at all, where Apple has less than a 2% market share.

There are, on the other hand, a lot of goddamn Android phones. Android commands a whopping 64% of the Indian market. And in 2016, for the first time, Google expects to sell more Android phones in India than in the United States. Smartphones have largely saturated the United States, where almost 70% of the adult population, and a full 86% of people in their twenties, has one. But India is still on the way up. Only 26% of India’s population owns a smartphone, and they make up nearly all of the country’s internet users. That number looks poised to change rapidly, fueled not by high-end devices like the fancy Nexus 6P that’s advertised everywhere, but by an explosion of inexpensive phones from no-name manufacturers and a blooming infrastructure that’s allowing people to connect those phones to the Internet. One of Pichai’s challenges will be to make sure Android keeps that market share as India blooms.

“Personal computers never really took off in India,” explains Pichai. “Two things changed: affordable smartphones powered by Android, and connectivity. It’s one of those ignition moments when the combination of the two is lighting up a country.”

Android was, very literally, made for this moment. Its entire point is to be customized, reconfigured, and personalized for a world full of people across a range of sizes, shapes, configurations, and price points. Sure, signs for the $550 Nexus abound, but you can also score a cheap Android phone in Delhi, like a Lava Atom X, for less than $40 — and that’s without a contract. It will, Pichai thinks, change the status quo not just in India, but the entire world.

“Hundreds of years ago very few people had access to information. And they were essentially in the corridors of power,” he says, sitting up in excitement, and leaning forward from the backseat of the van. “Even a simple thing like the printing press made books accessible to many more people. I’ve always been fascinated by this thing, that every jump in technology involves leveling the playing field."

Yet those inexpensive phones are nothing without affordable connections. India’s cities have slow, overloaded connections, and its rural areas often have no connection at all. But that’s changing, largely through the efforts of companies like Google and Facebook.

Facebook’s main push in India was via a program called Free Basics, which offered a set of services like the weather, Wikipedia, and, well, Facebook that people could access without counting against their data plans. But in January, India’s government banned so-called differential pricing plans, killing Free Basics and dealing it a huge setback.

Google is going a different direction. It’s trying to do two main things: reduce the amount of data its devices use, and break out its checkbook to help provide free bandwidth for people to use whatever services they want. “The model people want here is similar to what we have in the United States,” Pichai says. “We should do more to get more data and make it more affordable. That’s a better way to approach the problem.”

To that end, in January, Google rolled out a program that will provide free Wi-Fi at railway stations. It started in Mumbai, and will be in 100 stations by the end of the year, reaching 10 million people. Eventually, it will arrive at some 400 stations in all.

The other big piece is making it easy for people to use their phones on slow networks, or when there is no network at all. That means doing things like caching Maps so you can still navigate even without an internet connection. Or the emphasis in its forthcoming version of Android, N, on using less data to accomplish the same tasks.

Google is also pushing hard into Indic languages. Although Hindi is the most widely spoken language in India, with more than 400 million native speakers, that’s a small slice of the nation’s 1.3 billion–strong population. Google says it expects the next 300–400 million Internet users in India to come online speaking native languages. And so Google has rolled out support for 11 of them.



from BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1Rz8ske
via IFTTT